Assessing the safety and tolerability of rhinologic surgery under local anesthetic: an 8-year retrospective analysis.

PURPOSE: Office-based rhinologic procedures (OBRP) have become widely available in North America due to technological advances and appropriate patient selection. Nevertheless, the literature exploring the safety of these procedures remains limited. The objective of this study was to further evaluate the safety, tolerability and efficacy of these procedures with a more robust sample size to allow for capture of rare events. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of all patients who underwent OBRP from May 2015 to March 2023. Information regarding patient demographics, the indication for surgery, wait time, tolerability, intra- and postoperative complications, need for revisions, and type of revision (if applicable) was recorded. RESULTS: 1208 patients underwent OBRP during the study period. No patients were excluded. These included turbinoplasties (35%), endoscopic sinus surgeries (ESS) (26%), septoplasties (15%), nasal fracture reductions (7%), and a variety of other procedures. For ESS procedures, the anterior ethmoids and the maxillary sinuses were the most common sinuses treated. 1.1% of procedures were aborted prior to completion. The post-operative complication rate was 3.2%, with 2 major complications (significant bleeding and sepsis) encountered. The mean follow-up overall was 11 months and for ESS it was 15.8 months. CONCLUSION: Office-based rhinologic procedures are well tolerated and safe for the appropriate patient and associated with shorter wait-times as well as avoidance of general anesthesia. The complication rates are similar to or lower than previously reported rates for rhinologic surgeries done in the operating room. The low rates of revision surgery also demonstrate the efficacy of these procedures.

Knowledge and attitudes surrounding breastfeeding in pediatric otolaryngology: A survey study.

OBJECTIVE: This survey study seeks to understand the knowledge and attitudes of pediatric otolaryngologists around breastfeeding to potentially inform future educational efforts. METHODS: This cross-sectional survey recruited 59 pediatric otolaryngologists from an international WhatsApp group comprising 213 members over a four-week period. Demographics, knowledge, attitudes, and experiences with breastfeeding were investigated using Likert scales. Descriptive statistics and correlational analyses were conducted. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: The majority of participants were women (59%) and had children (86%). Most participants and/or their partners breastfed for 4-12 months (67%). Previous breastfeeding education was limited in both medical school (20%) and residency (15%). Most agreed that otolaryngologists should be knowledgeable about breastfeeding (83%), however men respondents felt significantly less comfortable counselling (p < 0.003), addressing difficulties (p < 0.044), and suggesting means to change milk supply (p < 0.007). Knowledge gaps were identified with assessing aspiration risk and airway anomalies. Breastfeeding experience did not significantly influence attitudes and comfort around breastfeeding, or the knowledge of participants. CONCLUSION: While attitudes towards breastfeeding amongst pediatric otolaryngologists are very positive, degrees of comfort and knowledge are more limited, especially amongst men otolaryngologists. Future research should consider exploring the efficacy of educational efforts in Otolaryngology for improving the support offered to breastfeeding dyads.

Attitudes and Perceptions of Canadian Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgeons and Residents on Environmental Sustainability.

Objective: Healthcare systems, specifically operating rooms, significantly contribute to greenhouse gas emissions. Addressing operating room environmental sustainability requires understanding current practices, opinions, and barriers. This is the first study assessing the attitudes and perceptions of otolaryngologists on environmental sustainability. Study Design: Cross-sectional virtual survey. Setting: Email survey to active members of the Canadian Society of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery. Methods: A 23-question survey was developed in REDCap. The questions focused on four themes: (1) demographics, (2) attitudes and beliefs, (3) institutional practices, and (4) education. A combination of multiple choice, Likert-scale, and open-ended questions were employed. Results: Response rate was 11% (n = 80/699). Most respondents strongly believed in climate change (86%). Only 20% strongly agree that operating rooms contribute to the climate crisis. Most agree environmental sustainability is very important at home (62%) and in their community (64%), only 46% said it was very important in the operating room. Barriers to environmental sustainability were incentives (68%), hospital supports (60%), information/knowledge (59%), cost (58%), and time (50%). Of those involved in residency programs, 89% (n = 49/55) reported there was no education on environmental sustainability or they were unsure if there was. Conclusion: Canadian otolaryngologists strongly believe in climate change, but there is more ambivalence regarding operating rooms as a significant contributor. There is a need for further education and a systemic reduction of barriers to facilitate eco-action in otolaryngology operating rooms.

The Experiences of Motherhood in Female Surgeons: A Scoping Review.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to systematically synthesize the existing literature on the experiences of motherhood in female surgeons both during surgical training and as staff physicians, to identify knowledge gaps, and to provide recommendations for institutional changes to better support pregnant female surgeons. BACKGROUND: There are disproportionately fewer medical students pursuing surgical specialties, as surgery is often seen as incompatible with childbearing and pregnancy. However, no review has summarized the published literature on the collective experiences of female surgeons in navigating motherhood. METHODS: Four databases were searched and 1106 abstracts were identified. Forty-two studies were included and a thematic analysis was performed. RESULTS: Four themes were identified: path toward motherhood (n=18), realities of motherhood (n=25), medical culture and its impact on career and family life (n=24), and institutional reproductive wellness policies (n=21). Female surgeons are more likely to delay motherhood until after training and have high rates of assisted reproductive technology use. Pregnancy during surgical training is associated with negative perception from peers, pregnancy complications, and scheduling challenges. Maternity leave policies and breastfeeding and childcare facilities are variable and often inadequate. Many female surgeons would agree that greater institutional support would help support women in both their roles as mothers and as surgeons. CONCLUSIONS: Both female residents and staff surgeons experience significant and unique barriers before, during, and after motherhood that impact their personal and professional lives. Understanding the unique challenges that mothers face when pursuing surgical specialties is critical to achieving gender equity.

"It's a Big Part of Being Good Surgeons": Surgical Trainees' Perceptions of Error Recovery in the Operating Room.

BACKGROUND: The burden of surgical error is high - errors threaten patient safety, lead to increased economic costs to society, and contribute to physician and resident burnout. To date, the majority of work has focused on strategies for reducing the incidence of surgical error, however, total error eradication remains unrealistic. Errors are, to some extent, unavoidable. Adequate preparation for practice should include optimal ways to manage and recover from errors; yet, these skills are rarely taught or assessed. OBJECTIVES: This study aims to explore residents' perceptions and experiences of surgical error recovery. More specifically, we documented participant definitions of error recovery, and explored factors that were perceived to influence error recovery experiences and training in the operating room. METHOD: Guided by a qualitative descriptive approach, we conducted semi-structured interviews with residents and fellows in surgical specialties in Canada and the United States. Purposive and snowball sampling were used to recruit residents and fellows in postgraduate year 1 to 5. Interviews were transcribed, analyzed and inductively coded. RESULTS: A total of 15 residents and fellows participated. When exploring the importance of error recovery for the trainees, competency and safety emerged as main themes, with error recovery being considered an indicator of overall surgical competency. Data concerning factors perceived to influence error recovery training were grouped under 4 major themes: (1) supervision (supervisor-related factors such as attending behaviors and reactions to errors), (2) self (factors such as self-assessed competency), (3) surgical context (factors related to the specific surgery or patient), and (4) situation safeness. Situational safeness was identified as a transversal theme describing factors to be considered when balancing between patient safety and the learning benefits of error recovery training. CONCLUSION: Error recovery was considered to be an important skill for safe surgical practice and was considered an important educational target for learners during surgical training. Trainees' opportunities to learn to recover from technical errors in the OR are perceived to be influenced by several factors, leading to variable experiences and inconsistent opportunities to practice error recovery skills. Focusing on factors related to "supervision," "self," "surgery," and "situational safeness" may be an initial framework on which to build initial educational interventions to support the development of error recovery skills to better support safe surgical practice.

Surgical Errors Happen, but Are Learners Trained to Recover from Them? A Survey of North American Surgical Residents and Fellows.

BACKGROUND: Surgical training necessitates graded supervision and supported independence in order to reach competence. In developing surgical skills, trainees can, and will, make mistakes. A key skill required for independent practice is the ability to recover from an error or unexpected complication. Error recovery includes recognizing and managing a technical error in order to ensure patient safety and may be underrepresented in current educational approaches. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to explore residents' experiences and perceptions of error recovery training in surgical procedures. METHOD: An online survey was sent to surgical program directors in the United States and Canada using the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education and the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada distribution lists. Participating programs distributed the survey to their residents and fellows. The survey was composed of Likert-scale items, yes/no questions as well as open-ended questions focused on perceptions, experiences, and factors that influence to error recovery training in the operating room. RESULTS: A total of 206 surveys were completed. Overall, 99% (n = 203) agreed or strongly agreed that error recovery is an important competency for future practice. This was reflected in free-text response: "Errors can be minimized but they are inevitable, so certainly believe a surgical curriculum that addresses error recovery is of paramount importance." While 83% (n = 170) feel confident recovering from minor errors, only 34% (n = 68) feel confident that they could recover from major errors that are likely to have serious consequences on patient safety. Overall, residents do not consider that they have adequate training in error recovery, with only 37% (n = 72) felt they were adequately trained to recover from major errors. It was also mentioned "The quality of learning regarding error recovery depends entirely on the attending." CONCLUSIONS: Opportunities to learn to recover from technical errors in the operating room are valued by surgical trainees, but they perceive their training to be both inadequate and variable. This contributes to a lack of confidence in error recovery skills throughout their surgical training. There is a need to explore how best to integrate error recovery into more formal surgical curricula in order to better support learners and, ultimately, contribute to increased surgical safety.

Short- and long-term management of cases of venom-induced anaphylaxis is suboptimal.

BACKGROUND: Venom-induced anaphylaxis (VIA) accounts for severe reactions. However, little is known about the short- and long-term management of VIA patients. OBJECTIVE: To assess the short- and long-term management of VIA. METHODS: Using a national anaphylaxis registry (C-CARE), we identified VIA cases presenting to emergency departments in Montreal and to emergency medical services (EMSs) in western Quebec over a 4-year period. Data were collected on clinical characteristics, triggers, and management. Consenting patients were contacted annually regarding long-term management. Univariate and multivariate logistic regressions were used to identify factors associated with epinephrine use, allergist assessment, and administration of immunotherapy. RESULTS: Between June 2013 and May 2017, 115 VIA cases were identified. Epinephrine was administered to 63.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 53.9%-72.1%) of all VIA cases by a health care professional. Treatment of reactions without epinephrine was more likely in reactions occurring at home and in nonsevere cases (no hypotension, hypoxia, or loss of consciousness). Among 48 patients who responded to a follow-up questionnaire, 95.8% (95% CI, 84.6%-99.3%) were prescribed epinephrine auto-injector, 68.8% (95% CI, 53.6%-80.9%) saw an allergist who confirmed the allergy in 63.6% of cases, and 81.0% of those with positive testing were administered immunotherapy. Among cases with follow-up, seeing an allergist was less likely in patients with known ischemic heart disease. CONCLUSION: Almost 30% of patients with suspected VIA did not see an allergist, only two thirds of those seeing an allergist had allergy confirmation, and almost one fifth of those with confirmed allergy did not receive immunotherapy. Educational programs are needed to bridge this knowledge-to-action gap.