Telemedicine follow-up is safe and efficacious for synthetic midurethral slings: a randomized, multi-institutional control trial.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: The objective was to assess whether telemedicine-based follow-up is equivalent to office-based follow-up in the early postoperative period after routine synthetic midurethral sling placement. METHODS: This is a prospective, international, multi-institutional, randomized controlled trial. Patients undergoing synthetic midurethral sling placement were randomized to 3-week postoperative telemedicine versus office-based follow-up. The primary outcome was the rate of unplanned events. Secondary outcomes included patient satisfaction, crossover from telemedicine to office-based follow-up, and compliance with 3- to 5-month office follow-up. RESULTS: We included 238 patients (telemedicine: 121 vs office: 117). No differences in demographics or medical comorbidities were noted between the study groups (p = 0.09-1.0). No differences were noted in unplanned events: hospital admission, emergency department visit, or unplanned office visit or call (14% vs 12.9%, p = 0.85) or complications (9.9% vs 8.6%, p = 0.82). Both groups were equally "very satisfied" with their surgical outcomes (71.1% vs 69%, p = 0.2). Telemedicine patients were more compliant with 3- to 5-month office follow-up (90.1% vs 79.3%, p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: After synthetic midurethral sling placement, telemedicine follow-up is a safe patient communication option in the early postoperative period. Telemedicine patients reported no difference in satisfaction compared with office-based follow-up but had greater compliance with 3- to 5-month follow-up.

Safety of Intradetrusor OnabotulinumtoxinA (BTX-A) Injection in the Asymptomatic Patient With a Positive Urine Dip.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate differences in adverse events (AE) in asymptomatic patients with a positive urine dip (UD) at time of intradetrusor onabotulinumtoxinA (BTX-A) injection vsthose with a defined negative UD. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All intradetrusor BTX-A injections were retrospectively reviewed at a single institution between 2016 and 2018. Exclusion criteria included an indwelling catheter, recent positive urine culture, recent antibiotic course, or absence of UD on the day of injection. A positive UD was defined using 7 different definitions with varying combinations of any level of positive blood, leukocyte esterase, or nitrite. Negative UDs were defined those excluded from the positive UD group. We compared multiple positive UD-defined groups to their respective negative UD cohorts with regards to outcomes and demographics. RESULTS: A total of 212 patients underwent 335 cycles of BTX-A injections over a 2-year period. The average age was 65 years (range: 21-90). The majority received 100 units (73%) of BTX-A for a non-neurogenic diagnosis (73%). The overall rate of AEs, urinary tract infection, and urinary retention was 14.6%, 9%, and 3%, respectively. In all groups, the most common AE was urinary tract infection followed by urinary retention. There were no major Clavien-Dindo-defined complications. There was no statistically significant difference in the total or categorical AE rates between positive and negative UD groups using all 7 definitions of a positive UD (P = .05-1.0). CONCLUSION: These data do not support the practice of obtaining a preprocedure UD in asymptomatic patients undergoing intradetrusor BTX-A injection for any indication; test results are unable to predict outcomes or AEs.

Management of the Exposed or Perforated Midurethral Sling.

The synthetic midurethral sling has become the gold standard for treatment of stress urinary incontinence since its introduction more than 20 years ago. With its utilization, the incidence of mesh-related complications has also increased. Mesh exposure and perforation are 2 common mesh complication scenarios that pelvic floor surgeons should be prepared to treat. This article highlights preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative factors to minimize the chance of vaginal wall mesh exposure or perforation of mesh into the lower urinary tract. It also summarizes common presenting symptoms, suggested evaluation and a range of treatment options.

What Is the Role of Additional Pharmacotherapy and Neuromodulation in Patients with Marginal Benefit from Botulinum Toxin Injection?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Third-line therapies for patients with overactive bladder (OAB) can improve symptoms for those who have failed conservative therapies. Options include percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS), cystoscopic injection of onabotulinumtoxinA (BTX-A), and sacral neuromodulation (SNM). This paper aims to review the current literature on the treatment of patients with idiopathic OAB who have undergone BTX-A injections and have not responded or have undesirable side effects from the therapy. RECENT FINDINGS: There are no randomized control trials examining the role of concurrent medical therapy and BTX-A; rather, there are observational studies in the neurogenic population. Furthermore, there are two observational studies on the role of SNM in BTX-A refractory idiopathic OAB patients demonstrating its safety and efficacy. There are many options available to the patient who fails BTX-A. Further research in this specific patient population is necessary to determine why patients have suboptimal responses and to delineate the next step in treatment.

An evaluation of the pharmacotherapy for interstitial cystitis.

INTRODUCTION: Interstitial cystitis (IC) and bladder pain syndrome (BPS) are chronic conditions that can be debilitating for patients. There is no consensus as to their etiology, and there are many proposed treatment algorithms. Oftentimes multimodal therapy, such as combining behavioral modification and physical therapy alongside pharmacotherapies, will be utilized. With the various treatment options available to patients and providers, there is an ever-growing need to implement evidence-based therapies. AREAS COVERED: The authors explore the different pharmacotherapies as commonly recommended in the American Urological Association (AUA) and European Association of Urology (EAU) multitiered guidelines for IC/BPS treatment as well as other investigational therapies. Pharmacotherapies targeting bladder, pelvic, and/or systemic factors in the overall treatment of IC/BPS are discussed with a particular focus on evidence-based guideline therapies. This article also looks at emerging therapies of interest. EXPERT OPINION: IC/BPS is a syndrome that requires a multimodal approach, including clinical phenotyping and directed therapy based on the patient's symptoms. The AUA and EAU provide guidelines for practitioners to follow, but adequate treatment requires the therapy to be targeted toward the patient's phenotypic domain.