Enucleation after Stereotactic Radiosurgery in Patients with Uveal Melanoma.

INTRODUCTION: In the past enucleation was the treatment of choice for all the patients with uveal melanoma. Nowadays, we prefer glope-sparing treatment modalities, except for large tumors, tumors with extrascleral extension and painful blind eyes. Most of the patients perform radiotherapy or local resection techniques. In Slovak Republic, the only one possibility is a stereotactic radiotherapy on a linear accelerator LINAC. Nevertheless, enucleation after radiotherapy is necessary for some patients. The causes are postradiation complications, mainly neovascular glaucoma, tumor recurrence, tumor progression or patient´s decision. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The retrospective non-randomised study of 168 eyes of the patients with choroidal or ciliary body melanoma, who performed one-day session stereotactic radiosurgery at the linear accelerator LINAC during period 2007-2016. The data about postradiation complications were analysed based on the medical records of the patients and the data about enucleated eyes based on the histopathological findings. RESULTS: The occurence of enucleation after radiotherapy in our cohort was 17 % (28 patients), with median time period after radiotherapy 21,5 months. The most common cause was neovascular glaucoma (82 %), then tumor progression (14 %) and patient´s decision (4 %). The most common histopathological finding was spindle-cell melanoma. DISCUSSION: Others authors describe similar enucleation rate and causes. The histopathological findings indentified more viable melanoma cells in eyes enucleated for tumor progression in comparison with enucleation for other causes. Enucleation may be more difficult and the occurence of postoperative complications can be higher in the eyes after radiotherapy rather than primary enucleation. CONCLUSION: The management of the patients with uveal melanoma is difficult, and requires the cooperation of ophthalmologist, oncologist, radiation physicist and pathologist. Even if we make effort to preserve the eye, enucleation after radiotherapy is necessary in some patients.

RADIATION MACULOPATHY AFTER ONE-DAY SESSION STEREOTACTIC RADIOSURGERY IN PATIENTS WITH CILIARY BODY AND CHOROIDAL MELANOMA.

INTRODUCTION: Nowadays radiotherapy is the standard treatment care for patients with uveal melanoma. In Slovakia the only one option is a one-day session stereotactic radiosurgery at linear accelerator LINAC. Irradiation of surrounding tissues of the eye and orbit causes radiation complications. One of the most serious and vision-threatening is the radiation retinopathy, which divides into maculopathy and peripheric retinopathy. The clinical signs include microanerysms, teleangiectases, hard exsudates, cotton wool spots and macular edema, neovascularisation, and vitreous hemorrhage. Radiation macular edema can be classified by optical coherence tomography into cystoid or noncystoid edema. On fluorescein angiography macular edema is divided into non-ischemic and ischemic, while the latter means usually irreversible loss of the visual acuity. This paper is focused on risk factors of radiation retinopathy although it strongly influences functional result of radiotherapy and preservation of the visual acuity. PURPOSE: By means of bivariate and multivariate analysis to determine the association of radiation dose and other variables with the development of radiation maculopathy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The retrospective analysis of 168 patients with ciliary body or choroidal melanoma who performed one-day session stereotactic radiosurgery on a linear accelerator LINAC in a period 2007-2016. RESULTS: The prevalence of the radiation maculopathy was 29% with the median time from the irradiation to maculopathy 16 months. Median radiation dose on the macula was 37 Gy. Variables statistically significantly associated with the maculopathy were: radiation dose (p = 0.0016), postequatorial location of the tumor (p = 0.0271) and better visual acuity before treatment (p = 0.0007). The tumor touch of the macula was strongly associated with the visual acuity in the bivariate analysis (p = 0.0006), thus it could be omitted from the final model. DISCUSSION: The radiation dose on a macula is the key determinant for radiation-induced maculopathy, according to other authors and our study approvingly. Other variables were related to proximity of the tumor to the macula, so the radiation dose on the macula was higher indirectly. Better visual acuity before treatment as a risk factor for maculopathy can be a consequence of: a) earlier diagnostics of tumor with proximity to the posterior pole, b) lower enucleation rate; frequency of the enucleation was 1.6 higher in patients without maculopathy. Naturally, on enucleated eyes maculopathy was not diagnosed. Five patients underwent intravitreal application of the bevacizumab as a treatment of the radiation maculopathy, without improvement of the visual acuity. CONCLUSION: Radiation complications can be vision and eye threatening. Radiation maculopathy is a consequence of higher radiation dose on the macula. The treatment modalities of radiation maculopathy are rather ineffective.

The treatment results in patients with lmphoma disease in the orbit.

INTRODUCTION: Lymphoma is a malignant disease that can affect several structures of the orbit and eye adnexa. In the area of orbit the non-Hodgkins lymphoma (NHL) is typical, which may be indolent or aggressive. Indolent subtypes include MALT (mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue), follicular lymphoma (FL), lymphoplasmocytic lymphoma (LPL). Conversely, subtypes such as diffuse large cell lymphoma (DLBCL), mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) and Burkitt lymphoma (BL) are aggressive. The disease can be presented as primary or secondary malignancy of the orbit. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A group of 35 patients from the Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University in Bratislava in the period from January 1 2009 to December 31 2016 with diagnosed non-Hodgkins lymphoma located in the area of the orbit. For all patients, the generally valid diagnostic criteria for the NHL in the eye area were met. We processed the first signs of disease, the proportion of women and men with NHL, the percentage of NHL types in the orbit area. Statistically, we evaluated the age at which NHL occurred in patients and evaluated the incidence of the disease over the reference period. We have statistically processed the forms of the applied therapy, their adverse effects, the recurrence of the disease, the presence of other malignancies in the lymphoma patient. RESULTS: Of the total number of NHL patients in orbit region 13 (37%) were male and 22 (63%) female. The overall mean age at which lymphoma was diagnosed was 60 years. Median for the total age of patients was 61. In women, a slightly higher average age and median was found. On the other hand, lower values of both parameters were present in men. The modus of both sexes was the same, 70 years. We have seen various first symptoms in our group. We found that the most common symptom is red eye, and the rarest is the deterioration of the central visual acuity. The longest lasting symptom was swelling of eyelids (on average, up to 10 years) and the shortest described eye itching. Overall, the average duration of symptoms was 28 months, with a median of 13 months. In our group of patients were 3 % of LPL, 6 % of Burkitts lymphoma, 6 % of FL, 8 % of MCL, 17 % of DLBCL, and 60 % of malignant lymphoma. MALT lymphoma occurred in 62 % in orbital and 38 % in conjunctival localization. In 2 patients with MALT lymphoma of the conjunctiva to start with systemic therapy wasn't neccessary. In 21 patients with MALT lymphoma excisional biopsy or orbitotomy was the first step to diagnose lymphoma disease in 3 cases; in 18 patients the infiltration of the orbit or conjunctiva occured 1 to 3 years after primary diagnose of systemic lymphoma disease. In general, NHL localization was 29 % in conjunctiva and 71 % in the orbital area. In 9 % of the orbital lymphoma, we observed lymphoma ingrowth to the conjunctiva. Systemic therapy was initiated in patients in II. stage and higher stage of the disease according to the Ann Arbor system. Totally 63 % of the group were treated by systemic therapy. Recurrence occurred in 5 patients, representing 14 % of the observed, but only in one patient with MALT lymphoma. Preoperative and postoperative (excisional biopsy, orbitotomy) central visual acuity (CVA) stayed unchanged, postoperative swelling did not affect CVA, and CVA didn't change even during long-term follow-up. CONCLUSION: Careful differential diagnosis determines the therapy of the disease, since the primary symptoms are usually nonspecific for ocular lymphoma. Significant factors for therapy include tumor grading and clinical staging by AJCC 2009 (American Joint Committee on Cancer, Chicago, Illinois). Correct evaluation of the symptoms is an important step to indicate excisional biopsy or orbitotomy: After histopathological results we can start adequate therapy in the cooperation with oncohematologist. Key words: conjunctival tumors, orbit, lymfoma, orbitotomy.

Uveal melanoma survival rates after single dose stereotactic radiosurgery.

This paper presents the long-term results of single dose stereotactic radiosurgery for intraocular uveal malignant melanoma, and summarizes the results of the retrospective study in 170 Slovak patients. A group of uveal melanoma patients (149 choroidal melanoma, 21 ciliary body melanoma) from 20 to 92 years of age with 59 year median were treated in 2001-2016. There were 81males (47.7%) and 89 females 89 (52.3%). The median overall follow-up time was three years. The median tumor volume at baseline was 0.5 cm³ (ranging from 0.2 to 1.6 cm³). The therapeutic dose was 35.0 Gy by 99% of dose volume histogram. The survival after single dose stereotactic radiosurgery was 96% in one year, 93% in two years, 84% in five years, 80% in seven years and 52% in eleven years. Secondary enucleation was necessary for 22 patients because of secondary glaucoma complication. The enucleation free interval ranged from one to six years. The survival rates in five year intervals and necessity of secondary enucleation due to complications after single dose stereotactic radiosurgery is comparable to other techniques.