Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 10 de 10
Filter
1.
J Arthroplasty ; 2024 Aug 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39208966

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is an impactful procedure with goals that include pain reduction and improved function, with low levels of prosthesis awareness. The purpose of this study was to determine if patients reported prosthetic noise and noise-related symptoms diminished over the course of time after TKA. METHODS: This study was a single institutional, retrospective study of patients who underwent primary unilateral TKA from 2018 to 2021. The TKAs were performed by four high-volume, fellowship-trained arthroplasty surgeons. Patients had similar baseline characteristics. Patients completed a survey consisting of four Likert scale questions related to prosthetic noise generation, the Forgotten Joint Score (FJS), and the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score-Joint Replacement (KOOS-JR). Data were compared between patients who had undergone TKA one to two years earlier (N = 305) and those who had TKA three to four years prior to evaluation (N = 177). RESULTS: After more time with TKA, patients had significantly lower reports of hearing noise (31.1 versus 43.6%; P = 0.009) and feeling prosthetic noise-related symptoms (28.2 versus 40.3%; P = 0.010). Furthermore, after more time from TKA, patients had significantly higher satisfaction regarding noise-generation (65.5 versus 50.2%; P = 0.012), postoperative KOOS-JR scores (80.9 versus 75.9; P = 0.005), and FJSs (65.4 versus 53.8; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: As more time passes after TKA, patients observe less prosthetic noise generation and have lower levels of prosthesis awareness and greater satisfaction than those who had surgery more recently. It is unclear whether these differences represent real improvement or acclimation to noise over time.

2.
Arthroplast Today ; 23: 101216, 2023 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37753221

ABSTRACT

Background: Noise has been reported to occur with relatively high frequency after conventional total knee arthroplasty (C-TKA), and this may impact the incidence of patient satisfaction and function. The purpose of this study was to compare the rate of patient-reported prosthetic noise generation after robotically-assisted TKA (RA-TKA) and C-TKA. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted of unilateral primary RA-TKAs and C-TKAs performed between 2018 and 2021. Patients completed a survey consisting of 4 Likert scale questions related to prosthetic noise generation and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Score Joint Replacement and Forgotten Joint Score were assessed prospectively preoperatively and at a minimum of 1-year of clinical follow-up. Statistical analysis was done utilizing T-tests and chi-square tests, with statistical significance defined as a P-value < .05. Results: One hundred sixty-two RA-TKAs and 320 C-TKAs with similar baseline characteristics and functions were included. There were no significant differences in hearing or feeling grinding, popping, clicking, or clunking (40.7% vs 38.1%; P = .647) between groups. Most RA-TKAs and C-TKAs were not dissatisfied regarding noise generation (70.4% vs 73.1%; P = .596). In both cohorts, patients who reported noise generation had lower average Forgotten Joint Scores (45.5 vs 66.1; P < .001) and lower postoperative Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Score Joint Replacement scores (72.0 vs 81.4; P < .001) than those who did not experience noise generation. Conclusions: While RA-TKA may facilitate soft tissue balancing, there were no differences in prosthetic noise generation between RA-TKA and C-TKA. However, those who experience implant-generated noise have lower functional outcome scores.

3.
J Arthroplasty ; 37(10): 2106-2113.e1, 2022 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35533820

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has caused a substantial number of patients to have their elective arthroplasty surgeries rescheduled. While it is established that patients with COVID-19 who are undergoing surgery have a significantly higher risk of experiencing postoperative complications and mortality, it is not well-known at what time after testing positive the risk of postoperative complications or mortality returns to normal. METHODS: PubMed (MEDLINE), Excerpta Medica dataBASE, and professional society websites were systematically reviewed on March 7, 2022 to identify studies and guidelines on the optimal timeframe to reschedule patients for elective surgery after preoperatively testing positive for COVID-19. Outcomes included postoperative complications such as mortality, pneumonia, acute respiratory distress syndrome, septic shock, and pulmonary embolism. RESULTS: A total of 14 studies and professional society guidelines met the inclusion criteria for this systematic review. Patients with asymptomatic COVID-19 should be rescheduled 4-8 weeks after testing positive (as long as they do not develop symptoms in the interim), patients with mild/moderate COVID-19 should be rescheduled 6-8 weeks after testing positive (with complete resolution of symptoms), and patients with severe/critical COVID-19 should be rescheduled at a minimum of 12 weeks after hospital discharge (with complete resolution of symptoms). CONCLUSIONS: Given the negative association between preoperative COVID-19 and postoperative complications, patients should have elective arthroplasty surgery rescheduled at differing timeframes based on their symptoms. In addition, a multidisciplinary and patient-centered approach to rescheduling patients is recommended. Further study is needed to examine the impact of novel COVID-19 variants and vaccination on timeframes for rescheduling surgery.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Arthroplasty , COVID-19/epidemiology , Elective Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Humans , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , SARS-CoV-2
4.
J Am Acad Orthop Surg ; 30(2): 84-90, 2022 Jan 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34520419

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The efficacy of virtual reality (VR) as a teaching augment for arthroplasty has not been well examined for unfamiliar multistep procedures such as unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). This study sought to determine whether VR improves surgical competence over traditional procedural preparation when performing a UKA. METHODS: Twenty-two orthopaedic surgery trainees were randomized to two surgical preparation cohorts: (1) "Guide" group (control) with access to manufacture's technique guide and surgical video and (2) "VR" group with access to an immersive commercially available VR learning module. Surgical performance of UKA on a SawBone model was assessed through time and the Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills (OSATS) validated rating system. RESULTS: Participants were equally distributed among all training levels and previous exposure to UKA. No difference in mean surgical times was observed between Guide and VR groups (Guide = 42.4 minutes versus VR = 43.0 minutes; P = 0.9) or mean total OSATS (Guide = 15.7 versus VR = 14.2; P = 0.59). Most trainees felt VR would be a useful tool for resident education (77%) and would use VR for case preparation if available (86.4%). CONCLUSION: In a randomized controlled trial of trainees at a single, large academic center performing a complex, multistep, unfamiliar procedure (UKA), VR training demonstrated equivalent surgical competence compared with the use of traditional technique guides, as measured by surgical time and OSATS scores. Most of the trainees found the VR technology beneficial. This study suggests that VR technology may be considered as an adjunct to traditional surgical preparation/training methods.


Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee , Internship and Residency , Simulation Training , Virtual Reality , Clinical Competence , Humans
5.
Shoulder Elbow ; 13(4): 371-379, 2021 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34394734

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Anatomic parameters, such as the critical shoulder angle and acromion index, have emerged as methods to quantify scapular anatomy and may contribute to rotator cuff pathology. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the published literature on influences of scapular morphology on the development of re-tears and patient-reported outcomes following rotator cuff repair. METHODS: A systematic review of the Embase and PubMed databases was performed to identify published studies on the potential influence of scapular bony morphology and re-tear rates and patient-reported outcomes after rotator cuff repair. Studies were reviewed by two authors. RESULTS: A total of 615 unique titles and 49 potentially relevant abstracts were reviewed, with eight published manuscripts identified for inclusion. Two of three papers reported no relationship between these acromion index and rotator cuff re-tear rate, while one paper found an increased re-tear rate. All three studies on critical shoulder angle found a significant association between critical shoulder angle and cuff re-tear rate. There was no clear relationship between any bony morphologic measurement and patient-reported outcomes after rotator cuff repair. CONCLUSIONS: Rotator cuff re-tear rate appears to be significantly associated with the critical shoulder angle and glenoid inclination, while not clearly associated with acromial morphologic measurements.

6.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg ; 28(10): 1936-1941, 2019 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31371160

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND HYPOTHESIS: IDEAL (Iterative Decomposition of Echoes of Asymmetrical Length) imaging is a magnetic resonance imaging sequence that precisely measures rotator cuff muscle fatty infiltration. The influence of lower levels of fatty infiltration on outcomes after rotator cuff repair remains unclear. We hypothesized that increased preoperative fat fractions would be associated with inferior clinical outcomes after rotator cuff repair. METHODS: We retrospectively identified patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with preoperative IDEAL imaging. Patients completed the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Upper Extremity computer adaptive survey at a minimum of 2 years after repair. Muscle segmentation was performed on 4 consecutive slices. Correlations between intramuscular fat fractions and PROMIS scores were determined. Patients were grouped by PROMIS scores of 50 or greater and scores lower than 50 for comparison of fat fractions. Multivariate linear regression was performed to model PROMIS scores as a function of demographic characteristics, tear size, and fat fractions. Significance was defined as P < .05. RESULTS: Eighty patients were included (mean follow-up, 42.5 ± 10.7 months). Postoperative PROMIS scores were significantly inversely correlated with the infraspinatus (ρ = -0.25, P = .02) and subscapularis (ρ = -0.29, P = .009) fat fractions. The infraspinatus (7.2% ± 4.9% vs. 5.2% ± 3.0%, P = .046) and subscapularis (10.4% ± 5.1% vs. 8.2% ± 5.0%, P = .001) fat fractions were significantly higher for patients with low PROMIS scores vs. those with PROMIS scores of 50 or greater. In multivariate modeling, the infraspinatus fat fraction (ß = -0.68, P = .029) was the only significant independent predictor of postoperative PROMIS score. CONCLUSION: Intramuscular fat as determined by quantitative magnetic resonance imaging is an important factor in postoperative outcomes even in patients with lower levels of preoperative fatty infiltration.


Subject(s)
Adipose Tissue/diagnostic imaging , Adiposity , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Rotator Cuff Injuries/diagnostic imaging , Rotator Cuff Injuries/surgery , Rotator Cuff/diagnostic imaging , Aged , Arthroscopy , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Reported Outcome Measures , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
7.
J Arthroplasty ; 34(10): 2248-2252, 2019 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31445866

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Wearable sensors can track patient activity after surgery. The optimal data sampling frequency to identify an association between patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and sensor data is unknown. Most commercial grade sensors report 24-hour average data. We hypothesize that increasing the frequency of data collection may improve the correlation with PROM data. METHODS: Twenty-two total joint arthroplasty (TJA) patients were prospectively recruited and provided wearable sensors. Second-by-second (Raw) and 24-hour average data (24Hr) were collected on 7 gait metrics on the 1st, 7th, 14th, 21st, and 42nd days postoperatively. The average for each metric as well as the slope of a linear regression for 24Hr data (24HrLR) was calculated. The R2 associations were calculated using machine learning algorithms against individual PROM results at 6 weeks. The resulting R2 values were defined having a mild, moderate, or strong fit (R2 ≥ 0.2, ≥0.3, and ≥0.6, respectively) with PROM results. The difference in frequency of fit was analyzed with the McNemar's test. RESULTS: The frequency of at least a mild fit (R2 ≥ 0.2) for any data point at any time frame relative to either of the PROMs measured was higher for Raw data (42%) than 24Hr data (32%; P = .041). There was no difference in frequency of fit for 24hrLR data (32%) and 24Hr data values (32%; P > .05). Longer data collection improved frequency of fit. CONCLUSION: In this prospective trial, increasing sampling frequency above the standard 24Hr average provided by consumer grade activity sensors improves the ability of machine learning algorithms to predict 6-week PROMs in our total joint arthroplasty cohort.


Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/standards , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/standards , Gait , Patient Reported Outcome Measures , Range of Motion, Articular , Wearable Electronic Devices , Aged , Algorithms , Female , Humans , Machine Learning , Male , Middle Aged , Postoperative Period , Prospective Studies , Research Design
8.
J Arthroplasty ; 34(10): 2242-2247, 2019 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31439405

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Tracking patient-generated health data (PGHD) following total joint arthroplasty (TJA) may enable data-driven early intervention to improve clinical results. We aim to demonstrate the feasibility of combining machine learning (ML) with PGHD in TJA to predict patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). METHODS: Twenty-two TJA patients were recruited for this pilot study. Three activity trackers collected 35 features from 4 weeks before to 6 weeks following surgery. PROMs were collected at both endpoints (Hip and Knee Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, and Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey Physical Component Score). We used ML to identify features with the highest correlation with PROMs. The algorithm trained on a subset of patients and used 3 feature sets (A, B, and C) to group the rest into one of the 3 PROM clusters. RESULTS: Fifteen patients completed the study and collected 3 million data points. Three sets of features with the highest R2 values relative to PROMs were selected (A, B and C). Data collected through the 11th day had the highest predictive value. The ML algorithm grouped patients into 3 clusters predictive of 6-week PROM results, yielding total sum of squares values ranging from 3.86 (A) to 1.86 (C). CONCLUSION: This small but critical proof-of-concept study demonstrates that ML can be used in combination with PGHD to predict 6-week PROM data as early as 11 days following TJA surgery. Further study is needed to confirm these findings and their clinical value.


Subject(s)
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/methods , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/methods , Machine Learning , Monitoring, Ambulatory/instrumentation , Wearable Electronic Devices , Aged , Algorithms , Female , Humans , Knee Joint/surgery , Male , Middle Aged , Monitoring, Ambulatory/methods , Osteoarthritis, Hip/rehabilitation , Osteoarthritis, Hip/surgery , Osteoarthritis, Knee/rehabilitation , Osteoarthritis, Knee/surgery , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Patient Reported Outcome Measures , Pilot Projects , Postoperative Period , Prospective Studies , Range of Motion, Articular , Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted
9.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg ; 28(12): 2457-2466, 2019 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31353303

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Scapular anatomy, as measured by the acromial index (AI), critical shoulder angle (CSA), lateral acromial angle (LAA), and glenoid inclination (GI), has emerged as a possible contributor to the development of degenerative shoulder conditions such as rotator cuff tears and glenohumeral osteoarthritis. The purpose of this study was to investigate the published literature on influences of scapular morphology on the development of degenerative shoulder conditions. METHODS: A systematic review of the Embase and PubMed databases was performed to identify published studies on the potential influence of scapular bony morphology on the development of degenerative rotator cuff tears and glenohumeral osteoarthritis. The studies were reviewed by 2 authors. The findings were summarized for various anatomic parameters. A meta-analysis was completed for parameters reported in more than 5 related publications. RESULTS: A total of 660 unique titles and 55 potentially relevant abstracts were reviewed with 30 published articles identified for inclusion. The AI, CSA, LAA, and GI were the most commonly reported bony measurements. Increased CSA and AI correlated with rotator cuff tears, whereas lower CSA appeared to be related to the presence of glenohumeral osteoarthritis. Decreased LAA correlated with degenerative rotator cuff tears. Five articles reported on the GI with mixed results on shoulder pathology. DISCUSSION: Degenerative rotator cuff tears appear to be significantly associated with the AI, CSA, and LAA. There does not appear to be a significant relationship between the included shoulder parameters and the development of osteoarthritis.


Subject(s)
Osteoarthritis/epidemiology , Rotator Cuff Injuries/epidemiology , Scapula/anatomy & histology , Shoulder Joint/anatomy & histology , Acromion/anatomy & histology , Glenoid Cavity/anatomy & histology , Humans
10.
J Am Acad Orthop Surg ; 27(22): e977-e985, 2019 Nov 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31181031

ABSTRACT

Osseointegration is a surgical approach that permitted the direct attachment of an external prosthesis to the skeleton in some select patients with amputation, who had failed to tolerate conventional sockets, thereby obviating related issues such as discomfort, skin breakdown, and poor fit. In this specific population, osseointegration offers the potential for enhanced biomechanical advantage and rehabilitative potential. Multiple percutaneous implant systems exist for clinical use internationally, each attempting to create a stable bone-implant interface while avoiding complications such as infection and loosening. Prospective clinical trials are now underway in the United States. This article will review the history and biology of osseointegration, indications and contraindications for use of currently available implant systems, and reported outcomes. Future directions of orthopaedic osseointegration technology, including electronic systems capable of biomimetic bidirectional volitional motor control of, and sensory/proprioceptive feedback from, external prosthetic devices, will also be discussed.


Subject(s)
Amputation, Surgical , Bone-Implant Interface , Osseointegration , Prosthesis Design , Prosthesis Implantation , Artificial Limbs , Extremities/surgery , Humans , Patient Reported Outcome Measures
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL