Plasma proteome profiling reveals dynamic of cholesterol marker after dual blocker therapy.

Dual blocker therapy (DBT) has the enhanced antitumor benefits than the monotherapy. Yet, few effective biomarkers are developed to monitor the therapy response. Herein, we investigate the DBT longitudinal plasma proteome profiling including 113 longitudinal samples from 22 patients who received anti-PD1 and anti-CTLA4 DBT therapy. The results show the immune response and cholesterol metabolism are upregulated after the first DBT cycle. Notably, the cholesterol metabolism is activated in the disease non-progressive group (DNP) during the therapy. Correspondingly, the clinical indicator prealbumin (PA), free triiodothyronine (FT3) and triiodothyronine (T3) show significantly positive association with the cholesterol metabolism. Furthermore, by integrating proteome and radiology approach, we observe the high-density lipoprotein partial remodeling are activated in DNP group and identify a candidate biomarker APOC3 that can reflect DBT response. Above, we establish a machine learning model to predict the DBT response and the model performance is validated by an independent cohort with balanced accuracy is 0.96. Thus, the plasma proteome profiling strategy evaluates the alteration of cholesterol metabolism and identifies a panel of biomarkers in DBT.

A phase Ib study evaluating the safety and efficacy of IBI310 plus sintilimab in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer who have progressed after anti-PD-1/L1 therapy.

BACKGROUND: The development of immune checkpoint inhibitors has made a significant breakthrough in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, there remains a huge unmet clinical need for patients with acquired resistance after initial treatment response. METHODS: This study evaluated the combination of IBI310 (an anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 [CTLA-4] antibody) and sintilimab (an anti-programmed death 1 [PD-1]) antibody) in NSCLC patients who have previously been treated with anti-PD-1/ligand (L)1 and acquired resistance. The patients were randomly assigned to receive either a lower dose of IBI310 (1 mg/kg Q3W, cohort A) or a higher dose of IBI310 (3 mg/kg Q3W, cohort B) in combination with sintilimab (200 mg Q3W). The primary endpoints of the study were objective response rate (ORR) assessed by RECISTv1.1 and safety, while secondary endpoints included disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: As of November 2, 2023, the study had enrolled 30 patients, with 15 patients in each cohort. The ORR was 13.3% (2/15, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.7-40.5) in cohort B. DCR were 46.7% (95% CI, 21.3-73.4) and 66.7% (95% CI, 38.4-88.2) in cohorts A and B, respectively. In cohorts A and B of this trial, the median follow-up times were 4.2 and 5.6 months, respectively. Median PFS was 1.45 (95% CI, 1.35-2.73) versus 2.73 (95% CI, 1.41-4.90) months for cohort A versus B; the median OS was 7.03 (95% CI, 3.09-not calculable [NC]) months in cohort A and 8.90 (95% CI, 5.13-NC) months in cohort B. Of the 30 patients, 86.7% in both cohorts experienced treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) with Grade ≥3 TRAEs occurring in 40% and 53.3% of patients in cohorts A and B, respectively. CONCLUSION: IBI310 3 mg/kg Q3W plus sintilimab was effective in a small number of previously treated anti-PD-1/L1-resistant NSCLC patients.

A global phase 3 study of serplulimab plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment for advanced squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (ASTRUM-004).

Combining immunotherapy with chemotherapy can provide improved survival in advanced squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients without targetable gene alterations. 537 previously untreated patients with stage IIIB/IIIC or IV squamous NSCLC without targetable gene alterations were enrolled and randomized (2:1) to receive serplulimab 4.5 mg/kg or placebo, both in combination with nab-paclitaxel and carboplatin, intravenously in 3-week cycles. The primary endpoint of progression-free survival (PFS) was met at the first interim analysis. At the second interim analysis, PFS benefit was maintained in serplulimab-chemotherapy group (hazard ratio [HR] 0.53, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.42-0.67). At the final analysis, serplulimab-chemotherapy significantly improved median OS compared to placebo-chemotherapy (HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.58-0.93; p = 0.010). Grade ≥3 serplulimab or placebo-related adverse events occurred in 126 (35.2%) and 58 (32.4%) patients, respectively. Our results demonstrate that adding serplulimab to chemotherapy significantly improves survival in advanced squamous NSCLC patients, with manageable safety.

Regorafenib monotherapy or combined with an immune-checkpoint inhibitor as later-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: a multicenter, real-world retrospective study in China.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of regorafenib monotherapy or in combination with immune-checkpoint inhibitor while treating Chinese patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): a real-world study. METHODS: The data of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who received regorafenib-containing regimen as the third or later line treatment at ten Chinese hospitals from Aug 2017 to Jun 2020 were retrospectively analyzed, including dosing details, survival data as well as adverse events. Survival analysis was further performed for patients administrated with regorafenib monotherapy and combined with an immune-checkpoint inhibitor based on Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression methods. The primary endpoint was overall survival. RESULTS: A total of 537 patients were included with a median age of 61, among whom 376 received regorafenib monotherapy and 245 received regorafenib combined with immune-checkpoint inhibitors. The clinicopathological characteristics of the two groups at baseline were mainly balanced. No significant difference in progression-free survival (PFS) was observed in patients receiving regorafenib monotherapy or combination therapy (3.8 vs. 5.5 months, p = 0.170). In contrast, patients receiving combination therapy had a more prolonged overall survival (OS) than those receiving regorafenib monotherapy (13.5 vs. 10.0 months, p = 0.001). The treatment regimen and regorafenib dosage were significant prognostic factors in the multivariate analysis. Significant benefits in PFS and OS were achieved in KRAS mutant and anti-angiogenesis treatment-naïve subgroups receiving combination therapy compared to monotherapy. No apparent increase was recorded in treatment-related adverse events in patients receiving combination therapy. CONCLUSION: Regorafenib plus an immune-checkpoint inhibitor has already been a widely adopted strategy in the later-line treatment for mCRC in the real world. The combination therapy yielded a significantly prolonged overall survival than regorafenib alone, with a manageable safety profile in Chinese patients, and warrants further investigation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04835324. Registered 6th April 2021.

Toripalimab plus nab-paclitaxel in metastatic or recurrent triple-negative breast cancer: a randomized phase 3 trial.

The combination of immune-checkpoint blockade with chemotherapy for the first-line treatment of advanced triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) has generated mixed results. TORCHLIGHT is a randomized, double-blinded phase 3 trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of first-line toripalimab and nab-paclitaxel (nab-P) (n = 353; experimental arm) versus placebo and nab-P (n = 178; control arm) for the treatment of women with metastatic or recurrent TNBC. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) assessed by a blinded independent central review in the PD-L1-positive and intention-to-treat populations. The secondary end points included overall survival and safety. Overall, 200 and 100 patients, in the toripalimab and placebo arm respectively had PD-L1-positive TNBC. At the prespecified interim analysis, a statistically significant improvement in PFS assessed by a blinded independent central review was demonstrated in the experimental arm in the PD-L1-positive population (median PFS 8.4 versus 5.6 months; hazard ratio (HR) = 0.65, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.470-0.906, P = 0.0102). The median overall survival was 32.8 versus 19.5 months (HR = 0.62, 95% CI 0.414-0.914, P = 0.0148). Similar incidences of treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) (99.2% versus 98.9%), grade ≥3 treatment-emergent AEs (56.4% versus 54.3%) and fatal AEs (0.6% versus 3.4%) occurred in the experimental and control arms. The addition of toripalimab to nab-P provided a significant improvement in PFS for PD-L1-positive patients with metastatic or recurrent TNBC with an acceptable safety profile. ClinicalTrial.gov identifier NCT03777579 .

First-in-human phase I/Ib study of QL1706 (PSB205), a bifunctional PD1/CTLA4 dual blocker, in patients with advanced solid tumors.

BACKGROUND: QL1706 (PSB205) is a single bifunctional MabPair (a novel technical platform) product consisting of two engineered monoclonal antibodies (anti-PD-1 IgG4 and anti-CTLA-4 IgG1), with a shorter elimination half-life (t1/2) for CTLA-4. We report results from a phase I/Ib study of QL1706 in patients with advanced solid tumors who failed standard therapies. METHODS: In the phase I study, QL1706 was administered intravenously once every 3 weeks at one of five doses ranging from 0.3 to 10 mg/kg, and the maximum tolerated dose, recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D), safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), and pharmacodynamics (PD) of QL1706 were investigated. In the phase Ib study, QL1706 was administered at the RP2D intravenously every 3 weeks, and the preliminary efficacies in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), cervical cancer (CC), and other solid tumors were evaluated. RESULTS: Between March 2020 and July 2021, 518 patients with advanced solid tumors were enrolled (phase I, n = 99; phase Ib, n = 419). For all patients, the three most common treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were rash (19.7%), hypothyroidism (13.5%), and pruritus (13.3%). The TRAEs and immune-related adverse events (irAEs) of grade ≥ 3 occurred in 16.0% and 8.1% of patients, respectively. In phase I, 2 of 6 patients in the 10mg/kg group experienced dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) (grade 3 thrombocytopenia and grade 4 immune-mediated nephritis), so the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was reached at 10 mg/kg. The RP2D was determined to be 5 mg/kg based on comprehensive analysis of tolerability, PK/PD, and efficacy. For all patients who received QL1706 at the RP2D, the objective response rate (ORR) and median duration of response were 16.9% (79/468) and 11.7 months (8.3-not reached [NR]), respectively; and the ORRs were 14.0% (17/121) in NSCLC, 24.5% (27/110) in NPC, 27.3% (15/55) in CC, 7.4% (2/27) in colorectal cancer, 23.1% (6/26) in small cell lung cancer. For immunotherapy-naive patients, QL1706 exhibited promising antitumor activities, especially in NSCLC, NPC, and CC, with ORRs of 24.2%, 38.7%, and 28.3%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: QL1706 was well tolerated and demonstrated promising antitumor activity in solid tumors, especially in NSCLC, NPC, and CC patients. It is currently being evaluated in randomized phase II (NCT05576272, NCT05179317) and phase III (NCT05446883, NCT05487391) trials. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04296994 and NCT05171790.

Befotertinib (D-0316) versus icotinib as first-line therapy for patients with EGFR-mutated locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised phase 3 study.

BACKGROUND: Befotertinib (D-0316) is a novel, selective oral third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine-kinase inhibitor. This phase 3 trial compared the efficacy and safety of befotertinib with icotinib as a first-line treatment for patients with EGFR mutation-positive locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: This study was a multicentre, open-label, randomised, controlled phase 3 study at 39 hospitals in China. Eligible patients were 18 years of age or older, had histologically confirmed locally advanced or metastatic stage IIIB, IIIC, or IV unresectable NSCLC, and had confirmed exon 19 deletions or exon 21 Leu858Arg mutation. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) via an interactive web response system to receive either oral befotertinib (75-100 mg once daily) or oral icotinib (125 mg three times per day) in 21-day cycles until disease progression or withdrawal criteria were met. Randomisation was stratified by type of EGFR mutation, CNS metastasis status, and gender, and participants, investigators, and data analysts were not masked to treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was independent review committee (IRC)-assessed progression-free survival in the full analysis set, which comprised all randomly assigned patients. All patients who received at least one dose of the study drug were included in safety analyses. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04206072, and the overall survival follow-up is still in progress. FINDINGS: Between Dec 24, 2019, and Dec 18, 2020, 568 patients were screened, of whom 362 were randomly assigned to the befotertinib (n=182) or icotinib (n=180) group; all 362 patients were included in the full analysis set. Median follow-up was 20·7 months (IQR 10·2-23·5) in the befotertinib group and 19·4 months (10·3-23·5) in the icotinib group. Median IRC-assessed progression-free survival was 22·1 months (95% CI 17·9-not estimable) in the befotertinib group and 13·8 months (12·4-15·2) in the icotinib group (hazard ratio 0·49 [95% CI 0·36-0·68], p<0·0001). Grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events occurred in 55 (30%) of 182 patients in the befotertinib group and in 14 (8%) of 180 patients in the icotinib group. Treatment-related serious adverse events were reported in 37 (20%) patients in the befotertinib group and in five (3%) patients in the icotinib group. Two (1%) patients in the befotertinib group and one (1%) patient in the icotinib group died due to treatment-related adverse events. INTERPRETATION: Befotertinib demonstrated superior efficacy compared with icotinib in first-line treatment for patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC. Although serious adverse events were more common in the befotertinib than the icotinib arm, the safety profile of befotertinib was manageable overall. FUNDING: Betta Pharmaceuticals (China). TRANSLATION: For the Chinese translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Gumarontinib in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer harbouring MET exon 14 skipping mutations: a multicentre, single-arm, open-label, phase 1b/2 trial.

Background: Approximately 3-4% of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have MET exon 14 (METex14) skipping mutations. We report primary results from the phase 2 stage of a phase 1b/2 study of gumarontinib, a selective, potent, oral MET inhibitor, in patients with METex14 skipping mutation-positive (METex14-positive) NSCLC. Methods: The single-arm, multicentre, open-label, phase 2 stage of the GLORY study was conducted at 42 centres across China and Japan. Adults with locally advanced or metastatic METex14-positive NSCLC received oral gumarontinib 300 mg once daily in continuous 21-day cycles until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent. Eligible patients had failed one or two prior lines of therapy (not including a MET inhibitor), were ineligible for/refused chemotherapy, and had no genetic alterations targetable with standard therapies. The primary endpoint was objective response rate in patients with a valid baseline tumour assessment, by blinded independent review. The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04270591). Findings: Between Aug 2, 2019 and Apr 28, 2021, 84 patients were enrolled and received gumarontinib (median follow-up 13.5 months [IQR 8.7-17.1]), at data cut-off (Apr 28, 2022) five patients whose METex14 status could not be confirmed by a central laboratory were excluded from the efficacy analysis. The objective response rate was 66% (95% CI 54-76) overall (n = 79), 71% (95% CI 55-83) in treatment-naïve patients (n = 44), and 60% (95% CI 42-76) in previously-treated patients (n = 35). The most common treatment-related adverse events (any grade) were oedema (67/84 patients, 80%) and hypoalbuminuria (32/84, 38%). Grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 45 (54%) patients. Treatment-related adverse events leading to permanent discontinuation occurred in 8% (7/84) of patients. Interpretation: Gumarontinib monotherapy had durable antitumour activity with manageable toxicity in patients with locally advanced or metastatic METex14-positive NSCLC when used in first line or later. Funding: Haihe Biopharma Co., Ltd. Supported in part by grants from the National Science and Technology Major Project of China for "Clinical Research of Gumarontinib, a highly selective MET inhibitor" (2018ZX09711002-011-003); the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82030045 to S.L. and 82172633 to YF.Y); Shanghai Municipal Science & Technology Commission Research Project (19411950500 to S.L.); Shanghai Shenkang Action Plan (16CR3005A to S.L.) and Shanghai Chest Hospital Project of Collaborative Innovation (YJXT20190105 to S.L.).

Safety and effectiveness of apatinib in elderly patients with metastatic gastric cancer: a sub-analysis from the large-scale, prospective observational study of apatinib for gastric cancer treatment in a real-world clinical setting (AHEAD-G202).

Background: Apatinib was shown to improve the survival of Chinese patients with refractory metastatic gastric cancer (mGC). As an orally administered drug, it has been widely used in elderly patients because the dosing schedule can be adjusted flexibly. However, data on the efficacy and safety of apatinib in elderly patients is scarce. The aim of this study was to evaluate the toxicity and effectiveness of apatinib for elderly patients with mGC in a real-world setting. Methods: Data from the sub-population of patients who were ≥65 years enrolled in the AHEAD-G202 trial were analyzed. Patients with mGC were prospectively registered and initially received ≤850 mg oral apatinib daily combined or not combined with chemotherapy, at the investigator's discretion. The primary endpoint was safety. The secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Results: A total of 117 patients were included. There were 51 (43.59%) patients in the low-dose (250 mg) group, 60 (51.28%) patients in the mid-dose (425 to 500 mg) group, and 6 (5.13%) patients in the high-dose (850 mg) group according to the initial daily doses. Hypertension (6.84%) was the only grade 3-4 adverse event (AE) with a prevalence of more than 5% and across the low-dose (11.76%), mid-dose (3.33%) and high-dose group (0%). The median OS and PFS were 7.13 months (95% CI: 5.04 to 9.22 months) and 4.27 months (95% CI: 3.24 to 5.29 months), respectively. The OS and PFS were similar among the 65-74 and ≥75 years groups (χ2=1.406, P=0.306; χ2=0.378, P=0.066, respectively). The OS and PFS were also comparable among the 3 dose groups. Conclusions: Elderly patients with mGC can tolerate and benefit from apatinib therapy. A lower initial daily dosing strategy may be a suitable choice for elderly patients in clinical practice.

Central Nervous System Efficacy of Furmonertinib (AST2818) Versus Gefitinib as First-Line Treatment for EGFR-Mutated NSCLC: Results From the FURLONG Study.

INTRODUCTION: Furmonertinib (AST2818) is a pan-EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor with central nervous system (CNS) antitumor activity. We report the CNS efficacy of furmonertinib compared with gefitinib in untreated EGFR-sensitizing mutation-positive NSCLC from the FURLONG study. METHODS: FURLONG was a randomized, double-blind, phase 3 study conducted in 55 hospitals in the People's Republic of China. Patients 1:1 randomly received furmonertinib 80 mg once daily or gefitinib 250 mg once daily treatment. At screening, all the patients underwent brain imaging examination. Patients with asymptomatic steady CNS metastases at baseline constituted this preplanned CNS subgroup analysis. RESULTS: A total of 358 patients were enrolled in the FURLONG study. In the 133 (37%) patients who had measurable or nonmeasurable CNS lesions, CNS progression-free survival was 20.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 15.2-25.3) in the furmonertinib group and 9.8 months (95% CI: 7.2-18.0) in the gefitinib group (hazard ratio = 0.40 [95% CI: 0.23-0.71], p = 0.0011). In the 60 patients (17%) who had measurable CNS lesions, CNS objective response rate was 91% (95% CI: 72-99) with furmonertinib and 65% (95% CI: 48-80) with gefitinib (OR = 6.82 [95% CI: 1.23-37.67], p = 0.0277). The least-square mean of CNS depth of response was 62% (95% CI: 51-72) in the furmonertinib group and 39% (95% CI: 30-47) in the gefitinib group, the mean difference was 23% (95% CI: 10-37, p = 0.0011). CONCLUSIONS: Furmonertinib first-line treatment was found to have superior efficacy in CNS progression-free survival, CNS objective response rate, and CNS depth of response compared with gefitinib in patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC with CNS metastases.

Efficacy and safety of camrelizumab plus apatinib in previously treated patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer harboring EGFR or ALK genetic aberration.

Background: Camrelizumab plus apatinib shows encouraging antitumor activity and acceptable toxicity in chemotherapy-pretreated patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, clinical benefits from this combination regimen in NSCLC patients with EGFR mutations or ALK rearrangements (EGFR+/ALK+) have not been reported. We assessed the efficacy and safety of this combined regimen in pretreated patients with advanced NSCLC and defined EGFR/ALK status (EGFR+/ALK+) in a phase 1b/2 trial. Methods: Previously treated patients with advanced EGFR+/ALK+ NSCLC were enrolled and given camrelizumab 200 mg intravenously every 2 weeks plus apatinib at the recommended dose of 250 mg orally once daily. Patients harboring sensitive EGFR mutations or ALK fusion genes had received at least one EGFR/ALK TKI and a platinum-based chemotherapy regimen before the enrollment. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). Results: All 43 enrolled patients comprised the efficacy and safety analysis population. The confirmed ORR was 18.6% (95% CI: 8.4-33.4%) and the clinical benefit response rate was 27.9% (95% CI: 15.3-43.7%). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 2.8 months (95% CI: 1.9-5.5 months) and median overall survival was not reached (95% CI: 7.3 months-not reached), with a median follow-up period of 15.7 months (range, 0.5-24.4 months). The most common grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were hypertension (16.3%), proteinuria (11.6%) and palmar-plantar erythrodysaesthesia syndrome (9.3%). No unexpected adverse events were recorded. Conclusions: Camrelizumab plus apatinib showed moderate antitumor activity and acceptable safety profile in previously treated patients with advanced NSCLC and EGFR or ALK genetic aberrations, which warranted further validation. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03083041. Registered March 17, 2017.

Two case reports of non-small cell lung cancer patients harboring acquired EGFR T790M-cis-C797S benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitor combined with platinum-based doublet chemotherapy.

Background: Acquired resistance is inevitable in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs). The emergence of EGFR exon 20 C797S is one of the major resistance mechanisms to osimertinib as a third-generation EGFR-TKI. To date, there is no standard of care for NSCLC patients after acquiring EGFR C797S. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized the treatment of various types of cancers in the last decade. Whether NSCLC patients with acquired EGFR C797S could benefit from ICIs remains elusive. Case Description: Herein, we reported two cases of EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients who acquired a tertiary EGFR mutation C797S benefited from ICIs. A 28-year-old woman presented with anepithymia and nausea. Chest computed tomography (CT) revealed a mass in the right lung. She was diagnosed with stage IV lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) with EGFR exon 19 deletion (19del) based on imaging and next-generation sequencing (NGS) findings. She received icotinib followed by osimertinib, then acquired EGFR T790M-cis-C797S. She had low tumor mutation burden (TMB) and achieved partial response (PR) to a programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) inhibitor sintilimab combined with platinum-based doublet chemotherapy as late-line treatment lasting more than 5 months. A 66-year-old man complained with chest tightness, hemoptysis, and back pain. CT scans revealed a mass in the right lung and metastases to the bilateral lungs, liver, adrenal gland, mediastinal lymph nodes, and bone. He was also diagnosed with EGFR 19del-positive LUAD and treated with icotinib followed by osimertinib. He also acquired EGFR T790M-cis-C797S. The patient had low TMB also and benefited from a PD-1 inhibitor camrelizumab combined with platinum-based doublet chemotherapy as late-line treatment with a progression-free survival (PFS) of 8 months. Two cases had no treatment-related adverse events leading to discontinuation of PD-1 inhibitors. Conclusions: Our study provides the first clinical evidence that ICIs combined with platinum-based doublet chemotherapy may be effective treatment options for overcoming resistance mediated by EGFR T790M-cis-C797S. Clinical trials are needed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of PD-1 inhibitors in the treatment of NSCLC patients harboring EGFR T790M-cis-C797S.

Furmonertinib (AST2818) versus gefitinib as first-line therapy for Chinese patients with locally advanced or metastatic EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (FURLONG): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised phase 3 study.

BACKGROUND: Furmonertinib (AST2818) is an irreversible, selective, third-generation EGFR tyrosine-kinase inhibitor. We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of furmonertinib versus the first-generation EGFR tyrosine-kinase inhibitor gefitinib as first-line treatment in patients with EGFR mutation-positive locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: The FURLONG study is a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, phase 3 study done in 55 hospitals across mainland China. We enrolled patients who were aged 18 years or older and had histologically confirmed, locally advanced or metastatic, stage IIIB, IIIC, or IV unresectable NSCLC with EGFR exon 19 deletions or exon 21 Leu858Arg mutation on tissue biopsy confirmed by a central laboratory. Eligible patients were stratified according to EGFR mutation (exon 19 deletions or exon 21 Leu858Arg) and CNS metastases (with or without) and randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either oral furmonertinib (80 mg/day) or oral gefitinib (250 mg/day) in 21-day cycles until disease progression, the occurrence of intolerable toxicities, withdrawal of consent, or other discontinuation reasons judged by the investigators. Investigators, clinicians, participants, independent review centre (IRC) members, the sponsor, and those analysing the data were all masked to treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was IRC-assessed progression-free survival and, along with safety, was analysed in the full analysis set, which comprised all randomly assigned patients who had received at least one dose of study drug. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03787992, and is ongoing for survival follow-up. FINDINGS: Between May 30, 2019, and Dec 5, 2019, 750 patients were screened, of whom 358 were randomly assigned to receive either furmonertinib and gefitinib-matching placebo (n=178) or gefitinib and furmonertinib-matching placebo (n=180). 178 patients randomly assigned to furmonertinib and 179 patients randomly assigned to gefitinib were treated and were included in the full analysis set. Median follow-up was 21·0 months (IQR 18·0-23·5) in the furmonertinib group and 21·0 months (18·0-23·5) in the gefitinib group. Median IRC-assessed progression-free survival was 20·8 months (95% CI 17·8-23·5) in the furmonertinib group and 11·1 months (9·7-12·5) in the gefitinib group (hazard ratio 0·44, 95% CI 0·34-0·58; p<0·0001). Treatment-related adverse events of a grade 3 or more occurred in 20 (11%) of 178 patients in the furmonertinib group and in 32 (18%) of 179 patients in the gefitinib group. Treatment-related serious adverse events were reported in ten (6%) patients in the furmonertinib group and in 11 (6%) patients in the gefitinib group. Ten (6%) patients in the furmonertinib group and three (2%) patients in the gefitinib group died due to adverse events, which were all judged to be possibly unrelated to study treatment by the investigators. INTERPRETATION: Furmonertinib showed superior efficacy compared with gefitinib as first-line therapy in Chinese patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC, along with an acceptable safety profile without new signals. Furmonertinib is a new potential treatment option for this population. FUNDING: Shanghai Allist Pharmaceuticals and the China National Major Project for New Drug Innovation. TRANSLATION: For the Chinese translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Efficacy and Safety of Befotertinib (D-0316) in Patients With EGFR T790M-Mutated NSCLC That Had Progressed After Prior EGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Therapy: A Phase 2, Multicenter, Single-Arm, Open-Label Study.

INTRODUCTION: Befotertinib (D-0316) is a novel, third-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). This study evaluated befotertinib in patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC who developed an EGFR T790M mutation after progression on first- or second-generation EGFR TKI therapy. METHODS: This was a single-arm, open-label, phase 2 study at 49 hospitals across mainland China. Patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC harboring EGFR T790M mutations with disease progression after prior first- or second-generation EGFR TKI therapy received oral befotertinib of 50 mg (cohort A) or 75 to 100 mg (cohort B) once daily. The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR) assessed by an independent review committee in intention-to-treat population. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT03861156. RESULTS: A total of 176 patients and 290 patients were included in cohorts A (50 mg) and B (75-100 mg), respectively. At data cutoff (August 15, 2021), independent review committee-assessed ORR was 67.6% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 61.9%-72.9%) in cohort B. The investigator-assessed ORR was 54.0% (95% CI: 46.3%-61.5%) in cohort A and 65.9% (95% CI: 60.1%-71.3%) in cohort B. The median investigator-assessed progression-free survival was 11.0 (95% CI: 9.6-12.5) months in cohort A and 12.5 (95% CI: 11.1-13.8) months in cohort B. The median independent review committee-assessed progression-free survival in cohort B was 16.6 (95% CI: 15.0-not evaluable [NE]) months. The intracranial ORR was 26.7% (95% CI: 7.8%-55.1%) in cohort A by investigator assessment, while 57.1% (95% CI: 34.0%-78.2%) and 55.9% (95% CI: 37.9%-72.8%) in cohort B by investigator and independent review committee assessment, respectively. The median investigator-assessed intracranial progression-free survival was 16.5 (95% CI: 8.6-NE) months in cohort A, while the median intracranial progression-free survival was not evaluable in cohort B due to immature data regardless of investigator or independent review committee assessment. and NE (95% CI: 13.8-NE) in cohort B. The overall survival was immature. Grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events and treatment-related serious adverse events occurred in 20.5% and 11.4% of patients in cohort A and in 29.3% and 10.0% of patients in cohort B, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Befotertinib of 75 to 100 mg has satisfying efficacy and manageable toxicity in patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC harboring T790M mutation with resistance to first- or second-generation EGFR TKIs. A phase 3 randomized trial is underway (NCT04206072).

CRISPR/Cas9­induced saturated mutagenesis identifies Rad51 haplotype as a marker of PARP inhibitor sensitivity in breast cancer.

Breast cancer treatment with poly(ADP­ribose)polymerase (PARP) inhibitors is currently limited to cells defective in the homologous recombination repair (HRR) pathway. The chemical inhibition of many HRR deficiency genes may sensitize cancer cells to PARP inhibitors. In the present study, Rad51, a central player in the HRR pathway, was selected to explore additional low variation and highly representative markers for PARP inhibitor activity. A CRISPR/Cas9­based saturated mutation approach for the Rad51 WALKER domain was used to evaluate the sensitivity of the PARP inhibitor olaparib. Five amino acid mutation sites were identified in olaparib­resistant cells. Two Rad51 haplotypes were assembled from the mutations, and may represent useful pharmacogenomic markers of PARP inhibitor sensitivity.

Efficacy and Safety of Limertinib (ASK120067) in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic EGFR Thr790Met-Mutated NSCLC: A Multicenter, Single-Arm, Phase 2b Study.

INTRODUCTION: Limertinib (ASK120067) is a newly developed third-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor targeting both sensitizing EGFR and EGFR Thr790Met (T790M) mutations. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of limertinib in patients with locally advanced or metastatic EGFR T790M-mutated NSCLC. METHODS: This is a single-arm, open-label, phase 2b study conducted at 62 hospitals across the People's Republic of China. Patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC with centrally confirmed EGFR T790M mutations in tumor tissue or blood plasma who progressed after first- or second-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors or with primary EGFR T790M mutations were enrolled. Patients received limertinib 160 mg orally twice daily until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR) assessed by independent review committee per the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. Secondary end points included disease control rate, progression-free survival (PFS), duration of response (DoR), overall survival, and safety. Safety was assessed according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.03. RESULTS: From July 16, 2019, to March 10, 2021, a total of 301 patients were enrolled and started the treatment of limertinib. All patients entered the full analysis set and safety set. By the data cutoff date on September 9, 2021, 76 (25.2%) remained on treatment. The median follow-up time was 10.4 months (range: 0.3-26.3). On the basis of full analysis set, the independent review committee-assessed ORR was 68.8% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 63.2%-74.0%) and disease control rate was 92.4% (95% CI: 88.8%-95.1%). The median PFS was 11.0 months (95% CI: 9.7-12.4), median DoR was 11.1 months (95% CI: 9.6-13.8), and median OS was not reached (95% CI 19.7 months-not evaluable). Objective responses were achieved across all prespecified subgroups. For 99 patients (32.9%) with central nervous system (CNS) metastases, the ORR was 64.6% (95% CI: 54.4%-74.0%), median PFS was 9.7 months (95% CI: 5.9-11.6), and median DoR was 9.6 months (95% CI: 8.1-15.2). For 41 patients who had assessable CNS lesion, the confirmed CNS-ORR was 56.1% (95% CI: 39.7%-71.5%) and median CNS-PFS was 10.6 months (95% CI: 5.6-not evaluable). In safety set, 289 patients (96.0%) experienced at least one treatment-related adverse event (TRAE), with the most common being diarrhea (81.7%), anemia (32.6%), rash (29.9%), and anorexia (28.2%). Grade ≥3 TRAEs occurred in 104 patients (34.6%), with the most common including diarrhea (13.0%), hypokalemia (4.3%), anemia (4.0%), and rash (3.3%). TRAEs leading to dose interruption and dose discontinuation occurred in 24.6% and 2% of patients, respectively. No TRAE leading to death occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Limertinib (ASK120067) was found to have promising efficacy and an acceptable safety profile for the treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic EGFR T790M-mutated NSCLC. CLINICAL TRIAL INFORMATION: NCT03502850.

Elevation of microRNA-365 impedes malignant behaviors of gastric cancer cells by inhibiting PAX6.

MicroRNA-365 (miR-365) has been revealed to be a vital regulator in tumorigenesis of multiple cancers, while there is a large gap in the knowledge about miR-365 expression and gastric cancer (GC). This research focused on the effects of miR-365 and paired box 6 (PAX6) on GC development. Levels of miR-365 and PAX6 in GC tissues and cell lines were determined, followed by the screening of the AGS and NCI-N87 cells. Gain- or loss-of-function assays were used to analyze the effect of miR-365, PAX6 on AGS and NCI-N87 cell behaviors. The effects of altered miR-365 and PAX6 on animal models were observed. Moreover, to assess the interaction between miR-365 and PAX6, we implemented the bioinformatic method and dual luciferase reporter gene assay. MiR-365 was decreased while PAX6 was increased in GC tissues and cell lines. There existed a negative association between miR-365 and PAX6. The promoted miR-365 could repress oncogenicity in vivo and malignant transformation in vitro of GC. PAX6 was the target gene of miR-365. Overexpression of PAX6 reversed the inhibitory effect of up-regulated miR-365 on malignant behavior of gastric cancer cells. Our research displays that the amplification of miR-365 could suppress the malignant behaviors of GC cells via inhibiting PAX6, which may be helpful for GC treatment.

SEMA3D Plays a Critical Role in Peptic Ulcer Disease-Related Carcinogenesis Induced by H. pylori Infection.

BACKGROUND: Immune cell infiltration plays a critical role in regulating peptic ulcer disease (PUD) and gastrointestinal cancer (GC). However, regulators of the cell signaling hubs remain unclear. AIM: This study characterizes genes that are differentially expressed in PUD and GC tissue samples. Bioinformatics is used to define the immune-associated hub genes associated with the malignant transfer process of PUD to GC. METHODS: Total expression data from PUD and early-stage GC tissue samples were obtained from GEO and TCGA. Differentially expressed genes were assessed and immunological enrichment analysis was performed. Protein-protein interaction (PPI) and Cytoscape analysis were used together to identify the hub genes. CIBERSORT and COX analysis were used to analyze the differentially infiltrated immune cell landscapes and determine HR scores of the hub genes. RESULTS: Expression data identified 437 DEGs as common to both GC and PUD tissue. Of these, 49 immune-related DEGs were grouped by function, and seven hub genes were identified by PPI analysis. The NRP2 and SEMA3D genes were then selected for survival analysis. SEMA3D had a higher hazard ratio than NRP2 and was defined as the hub for PUD carcinogenesis. CONCLUSION: SEMA3D was characterized as the hub gene for PUD carcinogenesis.

Efficacy and safety of GLS-010 (zimberelimab) in patients with relapsed or refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma: A multicenter, single-arm, phase II study.

BACKGROUND: GLS-010 (zimberelimab) is a novel, fully human, anti-programmed death-1 monoclonal antibody that shows promising efficacy and safety in advanced solid tumors. This trial aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of GLS-010 (zimberelimab) in Chinese patients with relapsed or refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma (r/r-cHL). METHODS: This phase II, single-arm, open-label, multicenter clinical trial was conducted at 24 centers in China and enrolled patients with r/r-cHL after two or more lines of therapy. The patients were administered intravenous GLS-010 (zimberelimab) (240 mg, once every 2 weeks) until progression, death, unacceptable toxicity, or consent withdrawal. The primary end-point was the objective response rate assessed by an independent radiology review committee (IRC). This study was registered (NCT03655483). RESULTS: Eighty-five patients were enrolled between August 2018 and August 2019. The median follow-up was 15.8 months. Seventy-seven patients (90.6%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 82.3-95.9) had an IRC-assessed objective response. The complete response rate was 32.9% (n = 28). The 12-month progression-free survival and overall survival rates were 78% (95% CI 67.5-85.6) and 99% (95% CI 91.9-99.8), respectively. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were observed in 92.9% of participants. Grade III or IV TRAEs occurred in 24 (28.2%) of the 85 participants. The most common grade III or IV TRAEs were abnormal hepatic function (5.9%), hyperuricemia (4.7%), decreased neutrophil count (3.5%), and increased weight (3.5%). Only one grade V AE, gastrointestinal infection, occurred. CONCLUSIONS: GLS-010 (zimberelimab) appears to be effective and safe for the treatment of Chinese patients with r/r-cHL. Long-term follow-up is required to confirm these clinical benefits.

Paclitaxel liposome for injection (Lipusu) plus cisplatin versus gemcitabine plus cisplatin in the first-line treatment of locally advanced or metastatic lung squamous cell carcinoma: A multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel controlled clinical study.

BACKGROUND: Lipusu is the first commercialized liposomal formulation of paclitaxel and has demonstrated promising efficacy against locally advanced lung squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC) in a small-scale study. Here, we conducted a multicenter, randomized, phase 3 study to compare the efficacy and safety of cisplatin plus Lipusu (LP) versus cisplatin plus gemcitabine (GP) as first-line treatment in locally advanced or metastatic LSCC. METHODS: Patients enrolled were aged between 18 to 75 years, had locally advanced (clinical stage IIIB, ineligible for concurrent chemoradiation or surgery) or metastatic (Stage IV) LSCC, had no previous systemic chemotherapy and at least one measurable lesion as per the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (version 1.1) before administration of the trial drug. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), and safety profiles. To explore the possible predictive value of plasma cytokines for LP treatment, plasma samples were collected from the LP group at baseline and first efficacy evaluation time and were then subjected to analysis by 45-Plex ProcartaPlex Panel 1 to detect the presence of 45 cytokines using the Luminex xMAP technology. The correlation between treatment outcomes and dynamic changes in the levels of cytokines were evaluated in preliminary analyses. RESULTS: The median duration of follow-up was 15.4 months. 237 patients in the LP group and 253 patients in the GP group were included in the per protocol set (PPS). In the PPS, the median PFS was 5.2 months versus 5.5 months in the LP and GP group (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.03, P = 0.742) respectively. The median OS was 14.6 months versus 12.5 months in the LP and GP group (HR: 0.83, P = 0.215). The ORR (41.8% versus 45.9%, P = 0.412) and DCR (90.3% versus 88.1%, P = 0.443) were also similar between the LP and GP group. A significantly lower proportion of patients in the LP group experienced adverse events (AEs) leading to treatment interruptions (10.9% versus 26.4%, P < 0.001) or treatment termination (14.3% versus 23.1%, P = 0.011). The analysis of cytokine levels in the LP group showed that low baseline levels of 27 cytokines were associated with an increased ORR, and 15 cytokines were associated with improved PFS, with 14 cytokines, including TNF-α, IFN-γ, IL-6, and IL-8, demonstrating an overlapping trend. CONCLUSION: The LP regimen demonstrated similar PFS, OS, ORR and DCR as the GP regimen for patients with locally advanced or metastatic LSCC but had more favorable toxicity profiles. The study also identified a spectrum of different cytokines that could be potentially associated with the clinical benefit in patients who received the LP regimen.