ABSTRACT
STUDY QUESTION: What is the incidence rate of complications in women undergoing ART procedures compared to the period prior to their first oocyte retrieval? SUMMARY ANSWER: The study shows a significant increase in the post-ART incidence rate of some complications but a low overall rate of occurrence relative to the total number of oocyte retrievals. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: ART, widely used in Europe, accounts for 3.3% of births in France. The various studies of ART complications are fairly reassuring, showing relatively low overall complication rates but only few studies have used exhaustive national registers. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: The cohort for this study was identified from the comprehensive French national hospital-discharge database and includes women under 50 years with a first oocyte retrieval (T0) in 2012-2017, classified in three population subgroups according to the indication for oocyte retrieval: infertility (IF), oocyte donation (OD), and fertility preservation (FP). This study includes 156 916 women whose first oocyte retrieval occurred in 2012-2017 and 542 775 hospitalizations in 2010-2019 (excluding first retrieval). PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Hospitalizations for complications or others events (oocyte retrieval, delivery, pregnancy loss, and death in the hospital) during the 2 years before (control period) and after their first oocyte retrieval (post-oocyte retrieval period) were compared and expressed per 10 000 person-months (pm). MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: In the IF subgroup, incidence rates were significantly higher after (vs before) retrieval for hospitalized ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) (162 vs 6/10 000 pm), adnexal torsion (14 vs 3), venous thrombosis (8 vs 1), arterial thrombosis (3 vs 1), trauma (2 vs 1), and significantly lower for infections (61 vs 87). The higher incidences of OHSS, adnexal torsion and venous thrombosis could only partially be explained by the occurrence of pregnancy.In the FP subgroup, incidence increased significantly after (vs before) retrieval for hospitalized OHSS (55 vs 0), venous thrombosis (59 vs 4), and infections (176 vs 56). For the OD subgroup, hospitalized OHSS (116 vs 0) and bleeding (24 vs 0) were significantly higher after (vs before) retrieval. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The French national health data system, despite all its advantages, present some limitations such as the risk of coding errors. The unavailability of some personal information and the absence of consideration of risk factors prevented us from adjusting the risk. Finally, only complications resulting in hospitalization were analyzed which probably leads to their underestimation. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: The use of medico-administrative bases will be a valuable tool in public health and will furnish a better overview of the complications. Further studies are needed to complete this analysis. Adding information on drugs would help to better define T0 and less severe complications. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): N/A. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.
Subject(s)
Fertilization in Vitro , Oocyte Retrieval , Female , Hospitalization , Humans , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Rate , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The main objective of this study was to screen the prenatal follow-up of women with live birth trisomy 21 child in order to evaluate the proportion of prenatal screening failure versus cases where the women refused either the screening or the prenatal diagnosis of Down syndrome. This study covers the period of time from 2009 to 2012 when the national prenatal screening policy changed from second to first trimester and allows for a comparative assessment of the nationwide efficiency of the various maternal serum marker based strategies. METHOD: All authorized cytogenetic laboratories sent required data for all cases of trisomy 21 diagnosed in FRANCE in new-borns (less than 1-year-old) from January 2010 to July 2013. RESULTS: A total of 1253 cases of trisomy 21 were diagnosed before 1 year of age whose mother did not had prenatal diagnosis. For 861 of them, information on the prenatal follow-up was available, with 72% of cases where a prenatal screening was organized either by maternal serum marker or by ultrasound. Results of the screening strategy was positive with maternal serum marker in 28% of cases (calculated risk≥1/250), positive because of abnormal ultrasound in 5% and negative with maternal marker screening (whatever the strategy used) in 67% of cases. Detection rate over the period of the study was 82%, with similar efficiency of first and second trimester strategies (83%) but significantly lower with sequential association of first trimester Nuchal translucency measurement and second trimester serum screening (70%). CONCLUSION: Switching from second trimester to first trimester screening strategy, with as many trisomy 21 foetuses diagnosed with half invasive procedures fulfilled national health policy objectives. Analysis of these data gives useful insights to elaborate a future screening policy involving cell-free foetal DNA sequencing.