ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: This study sought to investigate the outcome of high-risk and inoperable patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis undergoing transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in hospitals with (iOSCS) versus without institutional on-site cardiac surgery (no-iOSCS). BACKGROUND: Current guidelines recommend the use of TAVR only in institutions with a department for cardiac surgery on site. METHODS: In this analysis of the prospective multicenter Austrian TAVI registry, 1,822 consecutive high-risk patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis undergoing transfemoral TAVR were evaluated. A total of 290 (15.9%) underwent TAVR at no-iOSCS centers (no-iOSCS group), whereas the remaining 1,532 patients (84.1%) were treated in iOSCS centers (iOSCS group). RESULTS: Patients of the no-iOSCS group had a higher perioperative risk defined by the logistic EuroSCORE (20.9% vs. 14.2%; p < 0.001) compared with patients treated in hospitals with iOSCS. Procedural survival was 96.9% in no-iOSCS centers and 98.6% in iOSCS centers (p = 0.034), whereas 30-day survival was 93.1% versus 96.0% (p = 0.039) and 1-year survival was 80.9% versus 86.1% (p = 0.017), respectively. After propensity score matching for confounders procedural survival was 96.9% versus 98.6% (p = 0.162), 93.1% versus 93.8% (p = 0.719) at 30 days, and 80.9% versus 83.4% (p = 0.402) at 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing transfemoral TAVR in hospitals without iOSCS had a significantly higher baseline risk profile. After propensity score matching short- and long-term mortality was similar between centers with and without iOSCS.
Subject(s)
Aortic Valve Stenosis/surgery , Cardiac Surgical Procedures , Cardiology Service, Hospital , Catheterization, Peripheral , Femoral Artery , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Aortic Valve Stenosis/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Valve Stenosis/mortality , Aortic Valve Stenosis/physiopathology , Austria , Catheterization, Peripheral/adverse effects , Catheterization, Peripheral/mortality , Female , Humans , Male , Prospective Studies , Registries , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Severity of Illness Index , Time Factors , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/adverse effects , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/mortality , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Recommendations for optimal first-shock energies with biphasic waveforms are conflicting. We evaluated prospectively the relation between type and duration of atrial tachyarrhythmias and the probability of successful cardioversion with a specific biphasic shock waveform to develop recommendations for the initial energy setting aiming at the lowest total cumulative energy with 2 or less consecutive shocks. METHODS: We analyzed 453 consecutive patients undergoing their first transthoracic electrical cardioversion, including 358 attempts for atrial fibrillation (AF) and 95 attempts for atrial flutter (AFL) or atrial tachycardia (AT). A step-up protocol with a truncated exponential biphasic waveform starting at 50 J was used. Total cumulative energies were estimated under the assumption of a 2-tiered escalating shock protocol with different initial energy settings and a "rescue shock" of 250 J for AFL/AT or 360 J for AF. The initial energy setting leading to the lowest total cumulative energy was regarded as the optimal first-shock level. RESULTS: Cardioversion was successful in 448 patients (cumulative efficacy, 99 %). In patients with AFL/AT, the lowest total cumulative energy was attained with an initial energy setting of 50 J. In patients with AF, lowest values were achieved with an initial energy of 100 J for arrhythmia durations of 2 days or less and an initial energy of 150 J for arrhythmia durations of more than 2 days. CONCLUSION: We recommend an initial energy setting of 50 J in patients with AFL/AT, of 100 J in patients with AF 2 days or less, and of 150 J with AF more than 2 days.
Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation/therapy , Atrial Flutter/therapy , Electric Countershock/methods , Tachycardia, Ectopic Atrial/therapy , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Prospective Studies , RecurrenceABSTRACT
AIMS: Data on the diagnostic accuracy of neuron-specific enolase (NSE) as marker of hypoxic brain damage are conflicting. The purpose of this prospective observational cohort study was to explore the prognostic value of serum NSE after cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and to define the most sensitive cutoff value with a specificity of 100% for the prediction of persistent coma. METHODS AND RESULTS: Serum NSE concentrations were serially determined in 227 consecutive unconscious patients after CPR who were classified according to the best Glasgow-Pittsburgh cerebral performance categories (CPC, 1-4) achieved within 6 months follow-up. Sixteen patients were excluded due to incomplete NSE data and 34 due to death under analgesia sedation. The prevalence of poor neurological outcome (persistent coma, CPC 4) in our 177 analysed patients was 33%. At a specificity of 100%, a peak NSE concentration above 80 ng/mL predicted persistent coma with a sensitivity of 63%, a positive predictive value of 100%, a negative predictive value of 84%, and a predictive accuracy of 88%. CONCLUSION: A peak serum NSE concentration exceeding 80 ng/mL is a highly specific but only moderately sensitive marker for a poor neurological outcome after CPR.
