Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Mar Pollut Bull ; 49(4): 291-4, 2004 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15341821

ABSTRACT

Previous studies of neustonic debris have been limited to surface sampling. Here we conducted two trawl surveys, one before and one shortly after a rain event, in which debris and zooplankton density were measured at three depths in Santa Monica Bay, California. Surface samples were collected with a manta trawl, mid-depth samples with a bongo net and bottom samples with an epibenthic sled, all having 333 micron nets. Density of debris was greatest near the bottom, least in midwater. Debris density increased after the storm, particularly at the sampling site closest to shore, reflecting inputs from land-based runoff and resuspended matter. The mass of plastic collected exceeded that of zooplankton, though when the comparison was limited to plastic debris similar to the size of most zooplankton, zooplankton mass was three times that of debris.


Subject(s)
Environmental Monitoring/statistics & numerical data , Environmental Pollution/statistics & numerical data , Plastics , Seawater/analysis , Water Pollutants/analysis , Zooplankton/physiology , Animals , California , Population Density , Rain
2.
Mar Pollut Bull ; 44(10): 1035-8, 2002 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12474963

ABSTRACT

The density of neustonic plastic particles was compared to that of zooplankton in the coastal ocean near Long Beach, California. Two trawl surveys were conducted, one after an extended dry period when there was little land-based runoff, the second shortly after a storm when runoff was extensive. On each survey, neuston samples were collected at five sites along a transect parallel to shore using a manta trawl lined with 333 micro mesh. Average plastic density during the study was 8 pieces per cubic meter, though density after the storm was seven times that prior to the storm. The mass of plastics was also higher after the storm, though the storm effect on mass was less than it was for density, reflecting a smaller average size of plastic particles after the storm. The average mass of plastic was two and a half times greater than that of plankton, and even greater after the storm. The spatial pattern of the ratio also differed before and after a storm. Before the storm, greatest plastic to plankton ratios were observed at two stations closest to shore, whereas after the storm these had the lowest ratios.


Subject(s)
Plastics , Water Pollutants/analysis , Zooplankton , Animals , California , Environmental Monitoring , Particle Size , Population Dynamics , Rain , Water Movements
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL