Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 61
Filter
1.
Rev Neurol (Paris) ; 2024 Apr 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38599976

ABSTRACT

Anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies are highly-effective B-cell-depleting therapies in multiple sclerosis (MS). These treatments have expanded the arsenal of highly effective disease-modifying therapies, and have changed the landscape in understanding the pathophysiology of MS and the natural course of the disease. Nevertheless, these treatments come at the cost of immunosuppression and risk of serious infections, diminished vaccination response and treatment-related secondary hypogammaglobulinemia. However, the COVID pandemic has given way to a possibility of readapting these therapies, with most notably extended dosing intervals. While these new strategies show efficacy in maintaining inflammatory MS disease control, and although it is tempting to speculate that tailoring CD20 therapies will reduce the negative outcomes of long-term immunosuppression, it is unknown whether they provide meaningful benefit in reducing the risk of treatment-related secondary hypogammaglobulinemia and serious infections. This review highlights the available anti-CD20 therapies that are available for treating MS patients, and sheds light on encouraging data, which propose that tailoring anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies is the next step in rethinking the current treatment strategy.

2.
Rev Med Interne ; 45(2): 79-99, 2024 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38220493

ABSTRACT

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) for severe ADs was developed over the past 25years and is now validated by national and international medical societies for severe early systemic sclerosis (SSc) and relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS) and available as part of routine care in accredited center. HSCT is also recommended, with varying levels of evidence, as an alternative treatment for several ADs, when refractory to conventional therapy, including specific cases of connective tissue diseases or vasculitis, inflammatory neurological diseases, and more rarely severe refractory Crohn's disease. The aim of this document was to provide guidelines for the current indications, procedures and follow-up of HSCT in ADs. Patient safety considerations are central to guidance on patient selection and conditioning, always validated at the national MATHEC multidisciplinary team meeting (MDTM) based on recent (less than 3months) thorough patient evaluation. HSCT procedural aspects and follow-up are then carried out within appropriately experienced and Joint Accreditation Committee of International Society for Cellular Therapy and SFGM-TC accredited centres in close collaboration with the ADs specialist. These French recommendations were performed according to HAS/FAI2R standard operating procedures and coordinated by the Île-de-France MATHEC Reference Centre for Rare Systemic Autoimmune Diseases (CRMR MATHEC) within the Filière FAI2R and in association with the Filière MaRIH. The task force consisted of 3 patients and 64 clinical experts from various specialties and French centres. These data-derived and consensus-derived recommendations will help clinicians to propose HSCT for their severe ADs patients in an evidence-based way. These recommendations also give directions for future clinical research in this area. These recommendations will be updated according to newly emerging data. Of note, other cell therapies that have not yet been approved for clinical practice or are the subject of ongoing clinical research will not be addressed in this document.


Subject(s)
Autoimmune Diseases , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Scleroderma, Systemic , Humans , Transplantation Conditioning/methods , Autoimmune Diseases/diagnosis , Autoimmune Diseases/therapy , Transplantation, Autologous , Scleroderma, Systemic/diagnosis , Scleroderma, Systemic/therapy
3.
Rev Med Interne ; 44(12): 632-640, 2023 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37923588

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Several studies suggest the relevance of healthcare simulation to prepare future doctors to deliver bad news. A such, we designed a role-play workshop to train first-year residents enrolled in Lille University School of Medicine to break bad news. The objective of this work is to report on our experience of this training and to assess its educational value through its capacity to satisfy residents' expectations, to induce a feeling of ease towards bad news disclosure, and to change trainees' preconceptions regarding these situations. METHODS: The training consisted of a 45-minute heuristic reflective activity, aimed at identifying residents' preconceptions regarding bad news disclosure, followed by 4 30-min role-plays in which they played the parts of the physician, the patient and/or their relatives. Trainees were asked to answer 2 questionnaires (pre- and post-training), exploring previous experiences, preconceived ideas regarding bad news disclosure and workshop satisfaction. RESULTS: Almost all residents felt very satisfied with the workshop, which they regarded as formative (91%) and not too stressful (89%). The majority felt "more capable" (53% vs. 83%) and "more comfortable" (27% vs. 62%) to deliver bad news, especially regarding "finding the right words" (12% vs. 22%). Trainees tended to overestimate their skills before the workshop and lowered their assessment of their performance after attending the training, especially when they played the role of a patient in the simulation. CONCLUSION: Healthcare role-play seems an interesting technique for training to breaking bad news. Placing residents in the role of patients or relatives is an active approach that encourages reflexivity.


Subject(s)
Internship and Residency , Physician-Patient Relations , Humans , Truth Disclosure , Universities , Educational Status
4.
Rev Neurol (Paris) ; 179(10): 1095-1102, 2023 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37714728

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Immunological checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have led to a therapeutic revolution in the management of many cancers and indications are increasing. Neurological complications seem to have a profile quite distinct from that of toxicities related to chemotherapy, although it is possible that some manifestations remain under-reported or misdiagnosed. OBJECTIVES: (i) To evaluate the value of a self-questionnaire in screening for neurological ICI-related complications. (ii) To investigate whether, apart from the subacute complications described in the literature, neurological complications of more insidious onset might occur. METHOD: Patients followed in dermatology department for skin cancers treated with ICI, completed every infusion a neurological screening auto-questionnaire. Patients were selected for a neurological expertise based on the questionnaire's data. RESULTS: In total, 149 patients completed≥1 questionnaire, with a median delay of 174 days from the start of treatment. A total of 229 questionnaires were completed between July 2019 and December 2019. 38 patients were identified for a neurological consultation. None of these patients had a neurological event attributable to ICI. During the follow-up, only one patient had a neurological event related to ICI, which was not revealed by the questionnaire. DISCUSSION: Neurological signs in ICI-treated-skin-cancer context are more often due to tumoral progression. Neurological complications of ICI remain rare and unpredictable. The systematic neurological questionnaire has not been shown to be useful in this context. These results highlight the need to educate patients about possible subacute signs that should lead to contact the treating physicians and the need for a close cooperation between dermatologists/oncologists and neurologists.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological , Neoplasms , Humans , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/adverse effects , Neoplasms/complications , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Surveys and Questionnaires , Retrospective Studies
5.
Rev Neurol (Paris) ; 179(8): 894-901, 2023 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37202259

ABSTRACT

Natalizumab is a well-established disease-modifying therapy used in active multiple sclerosis (MS). The most serious adverse event is progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy. For safety reasons, hospital implementation is mandatory. The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has deeply affected hospital practices leading French authorities to temporarily authorize to administer the treatment at home. The safety of natalizumab home administration should be assessed to allow ongoing home infusion. The aim of the study is to describe the procedure and assess the safety in a home infusion natalizumab model. Patients presenting relapsing-remitting MS treated by natalizumab for over two years, non-exposed to John Cunningham Virus (JCV) and living in the Lille area (France) were included from July 2020 to February 2021 to receive natalizumab infusion at home every four weeks for 12 months. Teleconsultation occurrence, infusion occurrence, infusion cancelling, JCV risk management, annual MRI completion were analyzed. The number of teleconsultations allowing infusion was 365 (37 patients included in the analysis), all home infusions were preceded by a teleconsultation. Nine patients did not complete the one-year home infusion follow-up. Two teleconsultations canceled infusions. Two teleconsultations led to a hospital visit to assess a potential relapse. No severe adverse event was reported. All 28 patients who have completed the follow-up benefited from biannual hospital examination and JCV serologies and annual MRI. Our results suggested that the established home natalizumab procedure was safe using the university hospital home-care department. However, the procedure should be evaluated using home-based services outside the university hospital.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , JC Virus , Leukoencephalopathy, Progressive Multifocal , Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting , Multiple Sclerosis , Humans , Natalizumab/adverse effects , Immunologic Factors/adverse effects , SARS-CoV-2 , Multiple Sclerosis/drug therapy , Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting/drug therapy , Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting/epidemiology , Risk Management
6.
BMC Med Res Methodol ; 22(1): 155, 2022 05 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35637426

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Natalizumab and fingolimod are used as high-efficacy treatments in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Several observational studies comparing these two drugs have shown variable results, using different methods to control treatment indication bias and manage censoring. The objective of this empirical study was to elucidate the impact of methods of causal inference on the results of comparative effectiveness studies. METHODS: Data from three observational multiple sclerosis registries (MSBase, the Danish MS Registry and French OFSEP registry) were combined. Four clinical outcomes were studied. Propensity scores were used to match or weigh the compared groups, allowing for estimating average treatment effect for treated or average treatment effect for the entire population. Analyses were conducted both in intention-to-treat and per-protocol frameworks. The impact of the positivity assumption was also assessed. RESULTS: Overall, 5,148 relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients were included. In this well-powered sample, the 95% confidence intervals of the estimates overlapped widely. Propensity scores weighting and propensity scores matching procedures led to consistent results. Some differences were observed between average treatment effect for the entire population and average treatment effect for treated estimates. Intention-to-treat analyses were more conservative than per-protocol analyses. The most pronounced irregularities in outcomes and propensity scores were introduced by violation of the positivity assumption. CONCLUSIONS: This applied study elucidates the influence of methodological decisions on the results of comparative effectiveness studies of treatments for multiple sclerosis. According to our results, there are no material differences between conclusions obtained with propensity scores matching or propensity scores weighting given that a study is sufficiently powered, models are correctly specified and positivity assumption is fulfilled.


Subject(s)
Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting , Multiple Sclerosis , Fingolimod Hydrochloride/therapeutic use , Humans , Multiple Sclerosis/drug therapy , Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting/drug therapy , Natalizumab/therapeutic use , Treatment Outcome
7.
Rev Neurol (Paris) ; 177(9): 1145-1150, 2021 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34187691

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In multiple sclerosis (MS), the prevalence of alexithymia, defined as an inability to identify and describe emotions, is close to 50% but the prevalence of this symptom in clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) is unknown. Characterizing alexithymia at an early stage of the disease can help to clarify psychobehavioural disturbances in CIS patients. METHODS: Forty CIS patients, who fulfilled the MRI criteria for dissemination in space, were matched with 40 healthy subjects. They completed self-assessment scales for alexithymia, depression, anxiety, apathy and empathy. Cognitive functions were assessed using a battery of neuropsychological tests. RESULTS: The mean delay (± standard deviation) between the occurrence of CIS and inclusion in the study was 3.9 (2.8) months. The frequency of alexithymia was higher in CIS patients than in controls, with a prevalence of 42% (P<0.0001). Alexithymia correlated with anxiety and depression but not with cognition. Alexithymia was dependent only on depression (P=0.003). CONCLUSION: Alexithymia, characterized by difficulty identifying feelings, is present in patients in the early stage of MS, and seems to be strongly associated with depression. Difficulty in social interaction could be a risk of future affective disorders.


Subject(s)
Affective Symptoms , Anxiety Disorders , Affective Symptoms/epidemiology , Anxiety , Cognition , Emotions , Humans
8.
Rev Neurol (Paris) ; 177(1-2): 39-50, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33046261

ABSTRACT

Our knowledge of the radiological spectrum of myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody associated disease (MOGAD) is growing rapidly. An update on the radiological features of the disease, and its evolution is thus necessary. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has an increasingly important role in the differential diagnosis of MOGAD particularly from aquaporin-4 antibody-positive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (AQP4-NMOSD), and multiple sclerosis (MS). Differentiating these conditions is of prime importance because the management is different between the three inflammatory diseases, and thus could prevent further attack-related disability. Therefore, identifying the MRI features suggestive of MOGAD has diagnostic and prognostic implications. We herein review optic nerve, spinal cord and the brain MRI findings from MOGAD adult patients, and compare them to AQP4-NMOSD and MS.


Subject(s)
Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Adult , Aquaporin 4 , Autoantibodies , Humans , Myelin-Oligodendrocyte Glycoprotein , Neuromyelitis Optica/diagnostic imaging
9.
J Neurol ; 265(10): 2251-2259, 2018 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30054790

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Tumefactive demyelinating lesions of the central nervous system can be the initial presentation in various pathological entities [multiple sclerosis (the most common), Balo's concentric sclerosis, Schilder's disease and acute disseminated encephalomyelitis] with overlapping clinical presentation. The aim of our study was to better characterize these patients. METHODS: Eighty-seven patients (62 women and 25 men) from different MS centers in France were studied retrospectively. Inclusion criteria were (1) a first clinical event (2) MRI showing one or more large demyelinating lesions (20 mm or more in diameter) with mass-like features. Patients with a previous demyelinating event (i.e. confirmed multiple sclerosis) were excluded. RESULTS: Mean age at onset was 26 years. The most common initial symptoms (67% of the patients) were hemiparesis or hemiplegia. Aphasia, headache and cognitive disturbances (i.e. atypical symptoms for demyelinating diseases) were observed in 15, 18 and 15% of patients, respectively. The mean largest diameter of the tumefactive lesions was 26.9 mm, with gadolinium enhancement in 66 patients (81%). Twenty-one patients (24%) had a single tumefactive lesion. During follow-up (median time 5.7 years) 4 patients died, 70 patients improved or remained stable and 12 worsened. 86% of patients received initial corticosteroid treatment, and 73% received disease-modifying therapy subsequently. EDSS at the end of the follow-up was 2.4 ± 2.6 (mean ± SD). CONCLUSION: This study provides further evidence that the clinical course of MS presenting with large focal tumor-like lesions does not differ from that of classical relapsing-remitting MS, once the noisy first relapsing occurred.


Subject(s)
Multiple Sclerosis/diagnostic imaging , Adult , Brain/diagnostic imaging , Diffuse Cerebral Sclerosis of Schilder/diagnostic imaging , Disease Progression , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Male , Multiple Sclerosis/pathology , Multiple Sclerosis/therapy , Retrospective Studies
10.
Rev Neurol (Paris) ; 174(4): 255-264, 2018 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29606320

ABSTRACT

There is growing evidence of a preventive effect of Rituximab (RTX) in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMO-SD). This monoclonal antibody against CD20 is becoming the most widely used preventive therapy in NMO-SD, as a first-line therapy or as a rescue therapy. Nevertheless, considerable heterogeneity still exists concerning the pre-treatment work-up, the vaccinations required before and under treatment, the number and dosage of infusions, prevention of the risk of infusion-related reactions, prevention of infections under treatment, and frequency of therapeutic cycles. Thanks to a collaborative work among NMO-SD experts belonging to the NOMADMUS project, we provide here recommendations for all these topics concerning RTX use in NMO-SD.


Subject(s)
Neuromyelitis Optica/drug therapy , Rituximab/therapeutic use , Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use , Humans , Neuromyelitis Optica/diagnosis , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Rituximab/administration & dosage
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL