Development of an Ultrasound-based Nomogram for Predicting Pathologic Complete Response and Axillary Response in Node-Positive Patients with Triple- Negative Breast Cancer.

BACKGROUND: The accurate prediction of pathological complete response (pCR) in the breast and axillary lymph nodes (ALN) before neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is of utmost importance for the development of treatment strategies. We aim to construct a nomogram on ultrasound (US) and clinical-pathologic factors to predict breast and ALN pCR in node-positive triple-negative breast cancers (TNBCs). METHODS: Patients identified with TNBCs from institution 1 (n = 328) were used for training cohort and those from institution 2 (n = 192) were for validation cohort. US was conducted before and after NAC, and characteristics were obtained from medical records. Univariate and multivariate regression analysis were performed to identify US and clinical-pathologic factors associated with breast and ALN pCR in the training cohort. The assessment of predictive performance was conducted using the receiving operating characteristic curve (ROC), discrimination, and calibration. RESULTS: Overall, 34.6% of patients achieved breast pCR and 48.1% of patients achieved ALN pCR. The nomogram 1 used for predicting pCR in the breast (AUC, 0.84; 95% CI: 0.79, 0.88) outperformed the clinical (AUC, 0.73; 95% CI: 0.68, 0.78) and US models (AUC, 0.79; 95% CI: 0.74, 0.83). The nomogram 2 used for predicting pCR in the axllia (AUC, 0.83; 95% CI: 0.78, 0.87) also outperformed the clinical (AUC, 0.64; 95% CI: 0.58, 0.69) and US models (AUC, 0.80; 95% CI: 0.75, 0.84). The calibration curve and discrimination curve indicate that the nomogram has good calibration performance and clinical applicability. CONCLUSION: The nomogram showed promising predictive performance for predicting breast and ALN pCR in patients with TNBCs.

Combining Potential Strain Elastography and Radiomics for Diagnosing Breast Lesions in BI-RADS 4: Construction and Validation a Predictive Nomogram.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To develop a nomogram by integrating B-mode ultrasound (US), strain ratio (SR), and radiomics signature (RS) effectively differentiating between benign and malignant lesions in the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) 4. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively recruited 709 consecutive patients who were assigned a BI-RADS 4 and underwent curative resection or biopsy between 2017 and 2022. US images were collected before surgery. A RS was developed through a multistep feature selection and construction process. Histology findings served as the gold standard. Univariate and multivariate regression analysis were employed to analyze the clinical and US characteristics and identify variables for developing a nomogram. The calibration and discrimination of the nomogram were conducted to evaluate its performance. RESULTS: The study included a total of 709 patients, with 497 in the training set and 212 in the validation set. In the training set, the B-mode US had an AUC of 0.84 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.80, 0.87). The SR demonstrated an AUC of 0.78 (95% CI, 0.74, 0.82), while the RS showed an AUC of 0.85 (95% CI, 0.81, 0.88). Notably, the nomogram exhibited superior performance compared to the conventional US, SR, and RS (AUC=0.93, both p < 0.05, as per the Delong test). The clinical usefulness of the nomogram was favorable. CONCLUSION: The calibrated nomogram can be specifically designed to predict the malignancy of breast lesions in the BI-RADS 4 category.

Prediction of pathological complete response of breast cancer patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy with a nomogram based on clinicopathologic variables, ultrasound, and MRI.

OBJECTIVE: To establish a nomogram for predicting the pathologic complete response (pCR) in breast cancer (BC) patients after NAC by applying magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasound (US). METHODS: A total of 607 LABC women who underwent NAC before surgery between January 2016 and June 2022 were retrospectively enrolled, and then were randomly divided into the training (n = 425) and test set (n = 182) with the ratio of 7:3. MRI and US variables were collected before and after NAC, as well as the clinicopathologic features. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were applied to confirm the potentially associated predictors of pCR. Finally, a nomogram was developed in the training set with its performance evaluated by the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (ROC) and validated in the test set. RESULTS: Of the 607 patients, 108 (25.4%) achieved pCR. Hormone receptor negativity (odds ratio [OR], 0.3; P < .001), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positivity (OR, 2.7; P = .001), small tumour size at post-NAC US (OR, 1.0; P = .031), tumour size reduction ≥50% at MRI (OR, 9.8; P < .001), absence of enhancement in the tumour bed at post-NAC MRI (OR, 8.1; P = .003), and the increase of ADC value after NAC (OR, 0.3; P = .035) were all significantly associated with pCR. Incorporating the above variables, the nomogram showed a satisfactory performance with an AUC of 0.884. CONCLUSION: A nomogram including clinicopathologic variables and MRI and US characteristics shows preferable performance in predicting pCR. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: A nomogram incorporating MRI and US with clinicopathologic variables was developed to provide a brief and concise approach in predicting pCR to assist clinicians in making treatment decisions early.

Ultrasound radiomics-based nomogram to predict lymphovascular invasion in invasive breast cancer: a multicenter, retrospective study.

OBJECTIVES: To develop and validate an ultrasound (US) radiomics-based nomogram for the preoperative prediction of the lymphovascular invasion (LVI) status in patients with invasive breast cancer (IBC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this multicentre, retrospective study, 456 consecutive women were enrolled from three institutions. Institutions 1 and 2 were used to train (n = 320) and test (n = 136), and 130 patients from institution 3 were used for external validation. Radiomics features that reflected tumour information were derived from grey-scale US images. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator and the maximum relevance minimum redundancy (mRMR) algorithm were used for feature selection and radiomics signature (RS) building. US radiomics-based nomogram was constructed by using multivariable logistic regression analysis. Predictive performance was assessed with the receiving operating characteristic curve, discrimination, and calibration. RESULTS: The nomogram based on clinico-ultrasonic features (menopausal status, US-reported lymph node status, posterior echo features) and RS yielded an optimal AUC of 0.88 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.84-0.91), 0.89 (95% CI, 0.84-0.94) and 0.95 (95% CI, 0.92-0.99) in the training, internal and external validation cohort. The nomogram outperformed the clinico-ultrasonic and RS model (p < 0.05). The nomogram performed favourable discrimination (C-index, 0.88; 95% CI: 0.84-0.91) and was confirmed in the validation (0.88 for internal, 0.95 for external) cohorts. The calibration and decision curve demonstrated the nomogram showed good calibration and was clinically useful. CONCLUSIONS: The radiomics nomogram incorporated in the RS and US and the clinical findings exhibited favourable preoperative individualised prediction of LVI. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: The US radiomics-based nomogram incorporating menopausal status, posterior echo features, US reported-ALN status, and radiomics signature has the potential to predict lymphovascular invasion in patients with invasive breast cancer. KEY POINTS: • The clinico-ultrsonic model of menopausal status, posterior echo features, and US-reported ALN status achieved a better predictive efficacy for LVI than either of them alone. • The radiomics nomogram showed optimal prediction in predicting LVI from patients with IBC (ROC, 0.88 and 0.89 in the training and validation sets). • A nomogram demonstrated favourable performance (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.95) and well calibration (C-index, 0.95) in an independent validation cohort (n = 130).

An integrated radiomics nomogram based on conventional ultrasound improves discriminability between fibroadenoma and pure mucinous carcinoma in breast.

Objective: To evaluate the ability of integrated radiomics nomogram based on ultrasound images to distinguish between breast fibroadenoma (FA) and pure mucinous carcinoma (P-MC). Methods: One hundred seventy patients with FA or P-MC (120 in the training set and 50 in the test set) with definite pathological confirmation were retrospectively enrolled. Four hundred sixty-four radiomics features were extracted from conventional ultrasound (CUS) images, and radiomics score (Radscore) was constructed using the Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) algorithm. Different models were developed by a support vector machine (SVM), and the diagnostic performance of the different models was assessed and validated. A comparison of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA) was performed to evaluate the incremental value of the different models. Results: Finally, 11 radiomics features were selected, and then Radscore was developed based on them, which was higher in P-MC in both cohorts. In the test group, the clinic + CUS + radiomics (Clin + CUS + Radscore) model achieved a significantly higher area under the curve (AUC) value (AUC = 0.86, 95% CI, 0.733-0.942) when compared with the clinic + radiomics (Clin + Radscore) (AUC = 0.76, 95% CI, 0.618-0.869, P > 0.05), clinic + CUS (Clin + CUS) (AUC = 0.76, 95% CI, 0.618-0.869, P< 0.05), Clin (AUC = 0.74, 95% CI, 0.600-0.854, P< 0.05), and Radscore (AUC = 0.64, 95% CI, 0.492-0.771, P< 0.05) models, respectively. The calibration curve and DCA also suggested excellent clinical value of the combined nomogram. Conclusion: The combined Clin + CUS + Radscore model may help improve the differentiation of FA from P-MC.

Construction and validation of a personalized nomogram of ultrasound for pretreatment prediction of breast cancer patients sensitive to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

OBJECTIVE: To construct a combined radiomics model based on pre-treatment ultrasound for predicting of advanced breast cancers sensitive to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). METHODS: A total of 288 eligible breast cancer patients who underwent NAC before surgery were enrolled in the retrospective study cohort. Radiomics features reflecting the phenotype of the pre-NAC tumors were extracted. With features selected using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression, radiomics signature (Rad-score) was established based on the pre-NAC ultrasound. Then, radiomics nomogram of ultrasound (RU) was established on the basis of the best radiomic signature incorporating independent clinical features. The performance of RU was evaluated in terms of calibration curve, area under the curve (AUC), and decision curve analysis (DCA). RESULTS: Nine features were selected to construct the radiomics signature in the training cohort. Combined with independent clinical characteristics, the performance of RU for identifying Grade 4-5 patients was significantly superior than the clinical model and Rad-score alone (p < 0.05, as per the Delong test), which achieved an AUC of 0.863 (95% CI, 0.814-0.963) in the training group and 0.854 (95% CI, 0.776-0.931) in the validation group. DCA showed that this model satisfactory clinical utility, suggesting its robustness as a response predictor. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that RU has a potential role in predicting drug-sensitive breast cancers. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Aiming at early detection of Grade 4-5 breast cancer patients, the radiomics nomogram based on ultrasound has been approved as a promising indicator with high clinical utility. It is the first application of ultrasound-based radiomics nomogram to distinguish drug-sensitive breast cancers.

Ultrasound-based radiomics nomogram for differentiation of triple-negative breast cancer from fibroadenoma.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to develop a radiomics nomogram that incorporates radiomics, conventional ultrasound (US) and clinical features in order to differentiate triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) from fibroadenoma. METHODS: A total of 182 pathology-proven fibroadenomas and 178 pathology-proven TNBCs, which underwent preoperative US examination, were involved and randomly divided into training (n = 253) and validation cohorts (n = 107). The radiomics features were extracted from the regions of interest of all lesions, which were delineated on the basis of preoperative US examination. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator model and the maximum relevance minimum redundancy algorithm were established for the selection of tumor status-related features and construction of radiomics signature (Rad-score). Then, multivariate logistic regression analyses were utilized to develop a radiomics model by incorporating the radiomics signature and clinical findings. Finally, the usefulness of the combined nomogram was assessed by using the receiver operator characteristic curve, calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA). RESULTS: The radiomics signature, composed of 12 selected features, achieved good diagnostic performance. The nomogram incorporated with radiomics signature and clinical data showed favorable diagnostic efficacy in the training cohort (AUC 0.986, 95% CI, 0.975-0.997) and validation cohort (AUC 0.977, 95% CI, 0.953-1.000). The radiomics nomogram outperformed the Rad-score and clinical models (p < 0.05). The calibration curve and DCA demonstrated the good clinical utility of the combined radiomics nomogram. CONCLUSION: The radiomics signature is a potential predictive indicator for differentiating TNBC and fibroadenoma. The radiomics nomogram associated with Rad-score, US conventional features, and clinical data outperformed the Rad-score and clinical models. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Recent advances in radiomics-based US are increasingly showing potential for improved diagnosis, assessment of therapeutic response and disease prediction in oncology. Rad-score is an independent predictive indicator for differentiating TNBC and fibroadenoma. The radiomics nomogram associated with Rad-score, US conventional features, and clinical data outperformed the Rad-score and clinical models.

Diagnostic and Predictive Values of Strain Ratios in the Regions of Interests in Reference Tissue for Breast Tumor.

PURPOSE: To investigate the diagnostic and predictive value of strain ratios in the regions of interests (ROIs) in reference tissue for breast tumor. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 707 lesions in 665 consecutive patients were examined with B-mode Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) and Ultrasonic elastography (UE). Elasticity score (ES) and strain ratio (SR) in each lesion were calculated. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to assess the diagnostic value of BI-RADS, ES, SR1, SR2, BI-RADS combined with ES (BI-RADS+ES), BI-RADS combined with SR1 (BI-RADS+SR1), and BI-RADS combined with SR2 (BI-RADS+SR2). The sensitivity, specificity, and areas under the ROC curves (Az) were obtained. Scatter plots were generated to demonstrate the correlation between SR1 and SR2. Kruskal-Walls H-test, Mann-Whitney U-test and one-way ANOVA were performed to evaluate SRs and tumor-related variables. Multiple linear regression analysis was carried out to determine variables independently associated with SRs. RESULTS: BI-RADS had high sensitivity and low specificity in the diagnosis of breast tumor. The specificity of BI-BADS combined with ES or SR was even higher. The Az value of BI-RADS+ES or BI-RADS+SRs was higher than that of BI-RADS (P < 0.001). The Az value of ES was higher than those of SR1 and SR2 (P < 0.001), and those of SR1 and SR2 were similar. SR1 and SR2 were highly positively correlated. There was no statistical difference between Az values of BI-RADS+ES, BI-RADS+SR1, and BI-RADS+SR2. Indistinct margin, high histologic grade, histological type, and negative human epidermal growth factor receptor (Her-2) were associated with SR1 and SR2. Progesterone receptor (PR) status and molecular subtype were associated with SR2. Histologic grade and tumor margin were significantly associated with SR1, and tumor margin was associated with SR2. CONCLUSION: SRs in different ROIs in the reference tissue at the same depth showed no different diagnostic value for breast tumor. Both SR1 and SR2 could be useful in assessing the biological characteristics of invasive breast carcinoma.

Preoperative ultrasound-based radiomics score can improve the accuracy of the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center nomogram for predicting sentinel lymph node metastasis in breast cancer.

PURPOSE: To develop a combined nomogram by incorporating the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) nomogram and ultrasound (US)-based radiomics score (Radscore) for predicting sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastasis in invasive breast cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study was approved by the ethics committee of our institution, and written informed consent was waived. A total of 452 patients with invasive breast cancer who received SLN Biopsy in a single center were included between January 2016 and December 2019. The patients were divided into a training set (n = 318) and a validation set (n = 134). A total of 1216 features were extracted from the regions of interest (ROIs) of the tumors on conventional ultrasound. The maximum relevance minimum redundancy (mRMR) and the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) algorithm were used to build the Radscore. Afterward, the diagnostic performance was assessed and validated. Comparison of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and decision curve analysis (DCA) were performed to evaluate the incremental value of the combined model. RESULTS: Obtained from 18 features, the Radscore indicated a favorable discriminatory capability in the training set with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.834, whereas a value of 0.770 was observed in the validation set. The AUC of the combined model was 0.901 (95 % confidence interval (95 % CI): 0.865-0.938) in the training set and 0.833 (95 % CI: 0.788-0.878) in the validation set. Both of them were superior to MSKCC or imaging Radscore alone (P < 0.05). DCA demonstrated that the combined model was superior to the others in terms of clinical practicability. CONCLUSION: Preoperative US-based Radscore can improve the accuracy of clinical MSKCC nomogram for SLN metastasis prediction in breast cancer.