Non-invasive assessment of early stage diabetic nephropathy by DTI and BOLD MRI.

OBJECTIVE: Patients with diabetes mellitus, diabetic nephropathy (DN) and healthy donor were analyzed to test whether the early DN patients can be detected using both blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) and diffusion tensor imaging. METHODS: This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of our hospital. MR images were acquired on a 3.0-Tesla MR system (Discovery MR750, General Electric, Milwaukee, WI). 30 diabetic patients were divided into NAU (normal to mildly increased albuminuria, N = 15) and MAU (moderately increased albuminuria, N = 15) group based on the absence or presence of microalbuminuria. 15 controls with sex- and age-matched were enrolled in the study. Prior to MRI scan, all participants were instructed to collect their fresh morning urine samples for quantitative measurement of urinary microalbumin and urinary creatinine. Then, the estimations of serum creatinine, serum uric acid, HbAlc and fasting plasma glucose as well as fundus examinations were performed in all subjects. Then, the values of albumin-creatinine ratio (ACR) and estimated glomerular filtration rate were also calculated. All subjects underwent renal diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and BOLD acquisition after fasting for 4 h. Regions of interest were placed in renal medulla and cortex for evaluating apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), fractional anisotropy (FA) and R2* values by two experienced radiologists. The consistency between the two observations was estimated using intragroup correlation coefficients. To test differences in ADC, FA and R2* values across the three groups, the data were analyzed using separate one-way ANOVAs. Post-hoc pair wise comparisons were then performed using t-test. To investigate the clinical relevance of imaging parameters in both regions across the three groups, the correlations of values of the ACR/estimated glomerular filtration rate and of the ADC/FA/R2* were calculated. RESULTS: There was a high level of consistency of those ADC, FA and R2* values across the three groups on both renal cortex and medulla measured by the two doctors. The FA value of medulla in MAU group was lower than that in control (p < 0.01). The R2* value of medulla in the NAU group was higher than that in the control (p < 0.01), and the R2* value of medulla in the MAU group was lower than that in the control (p = 0.009) . Moreover, the current study revealed a decreasing trend in FA values of the renal medulla from the control group to NAU and MAU groups. Finally, a weak negatively correlation between medullary R2* and ACR was found in current study. CONCLUSION: Medullary R2* value might be a new more sensitive predictor of early DN. Meanwhile, BOLD imaging detected the medullary hypoxia at the simply diabetic stage, while DTI didn't identify the medullary directional diffusion changes at this stage. Based on our assumption mentioned above, it's presumable that BOLD imaging may be more sensitive for assessment of the early renal function changes than DTI. These imaging techniques are more accurate and practical than conventional tests. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Non-invasive MRI was used to detect renal function changes at early DN stage.

Elevated RBP4 plasma levels were associated with diabetic retinopathy in type 2 diabetes.

The retinol-binding protein 4 (RBP4) has been postulated to play a role in glucose homeostasis, insulin resistance, and diabetes mellitus in human and animal studies. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the role of RBP4 in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus with and without diabetic retinopathy (DR). Plasma RBP4 concentrations were tested in 287 patients with type 2 diabetes. At baseline, demographic and clinical information including presence of DR and vision-threatening DR (VTDR) was collected. The relationship between RBP4 and DR (VTDR) was investigated using logistic regression. Patients with DR or VTDR had significantly higher plasma levels of RBP4 on admission (P<0.0001). Receiver operating characteristics (ROCs) to predict DR and VDTR demonstrated areas under the curve for RBP4 of 0.79 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.73-0.85) and 0.90 (95% CI: 0.85-0.94), respectively, which were superior to other factors. For each 1 µg/ml increase in plasma level of RBP4, the unadjusted and adjusted risk of DR would be increased by 8% (with the odds ratio (OR) of 1.08 (95% CI: 1.05-1.13), P<0.001) and 5% (1.05 (1.02-1.11), P=0.001), respectively. It was 12% (with the OR of 1.12 (95% CI: 1.07-1.18), P<0.001) and 9% (1.09 (1.05-1.15), P<0.001) for VTDR. The present study shows that elevated plasma levels of RBP4 were associated with DR and VDTR in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes, suggesting a possible role of RBP4 in the pathogenesis of DR complications. Lowering RBP4 could be a new strategy for treating type 2 diabetes with DR.