ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Improving surgical access in low- and middle-income countries is vital for the 5 billion people who lack safe surgical care. Tailoring a culturally sensitive approach to consent is essential for patient comprehension and comfort, thereby alleviating the effects of resource constraints and advancing equitable care. This study examines the consenting process for endoscopy at Kyabirwa Surgical Center in Kyabirwa, Jinja, Uganda, to assess patients' knowledge and attitudes as a potential barrier to participating in endoscopic procedures. METHODS: All adult upper endoscopy (EGD) and colonoscopy patients were recruited to participate in a survey of their demographics, knowledge, and attitudes toward their procedure. All patients received a standard consultation explaining the procedure and its risks and benefits. RESULTS: 75 patients were included; median age was 54 years and 56% (n = 42) were women. 92% (n = 69) of patients had never had an endoscopy before and 73% (n = 55) of patients were scheduled for an EGD while the remaining 27% (n = 20) were scheduled for a colonoscopy. Most patients 80% (n = 60) had a basic understanding of what an endoscopy is and 87% (n = 65) its diagnostic purpose. Few patients 15% (n = 11) knew of the most common side effects or if they would have a surgical scar 27% (n = 20). Overall, 46.7% (n = 35) of patients were moderately or severely fearful of getting an endoscopy. Additionally, 45.3% (n = 34) of patients were moderately or severely fearful of receiving anesthesia during their endoscopic procedure. Despite this fear, most patients 85.3% (n = 64) stated that they understood the benefits of the procedure either very well or extremely well. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients understood the role that an endoscopic procedure plays in their care and its potential benefits. Despite this, many patients continued to have high levels of fear associated with both the endoscopic procedure and with receiving anesthesia during their procedure. Future patient education should focus on addressing patients' fears and the risks of undergoing an endoscopy, which may improve the utilization of surgical services.
Subject(s)
Colonoscopy , Comprehension , Informed Consent , Humans , Female , Uganda , Male , Middle Aged , Adult , Aged , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Rural Population , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Access to minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is limited in Sub-Saharan African countries. In 2019, the Mount Sinai Department of Surgery in New York collaborated with local Ugandans to construct the Kyabirwa Surgical Center (KSC), an independent, replicable, self-sustaining ambulatory surgical center in Uganda. We developed a focused MIS training program using a combination of in-person training and supervised telementoring. We present the results of our initial MIS telementoring experience. METHODS: We worked jointly with Ugandan staff to construct the KSC in the rural province of Jinja. A solar-powered backup battery system ensured continuous power availability. Underground fiber optic cables were installed to provide stable high-speed Internet. The local Ugandan general surgeon (JOD) underwent a mini-fellowship in MIS and then trained extensively using the Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery program. After a weeklong in-person session to train the Ugandan OR team, JOD performed laparoscopic cases with telementoring, which was conducted remotely by surgeons in New York via audiovisual feeds from the KSC OR. RESULTS: From October 2021 to February 2024, JOD performed 61 telementored laparoscopic operations at KSC including 37 appendectomies and 24 cholecystectomies. Feedback was provided regarding patient positioning, port placement, surgical technique, instrument use, and critical steps of the operation. There were no intra-operative complications. Postoperatively, field medical workers visited patients at home to collect follow-up information. Two superficial wound infections (3.3%) were reported in the short-term follow-up. CONCLUSION: Telementoring can be safely implemented to assist surgeons in previously underserved areas to provide advanced laparoscopic surgical care to the local patient population.
Subject(s)
Mentoring , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures , Telemedicine , Uganda , Humans , Mentoring/methods , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/education , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/methods , Rural Health Services , International Cooperation , Laparoscopy/education , Female , Male , AdultABSTRACT
Globally, barriers to the widespread adoption of robotic surgery have worsened existing inequities in surgical care between low- and middle- income countries (LMICs) and high-income countries (HICs). This article advocates for the creation of sustainable robotic surgery programs in LMICs by drawing from ethical and philosophical theories, including preference utilitarianism, procedural justice, structural violence, and human rights. On this basis, robotic telesurgery is proposed as a form of global health diplomacy (GHD) between LMICs and HICs, and particular emphasis is placed on considerations in robotic surgery GHD program negotiations between LMICs and HICs and on political and ethical questions related to the transnational use of artificial intelligence.
Subject(s)
Diplomacy , Robotic Surgical Procedures , Humans , Global Health , Artificial Intelligence , Social JusticeABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: In low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), surgical care can be limited by access to pathology services. In Uganda, the pathologist-to-population ratio is less than 1 to 1 million people. The Kyabirwa Surgical Center in Jinja, Uganda, created a telepathology service in collaboration with an academic institution in New York City. This study demonstrated the feasibility and considerations of implementing a telepathology model to supplement the critical pathology needs of a low-income country. METHODS: This was a retrospective, single-center study of an ambulatory surgery center with pathology capability using virtual microscopy. The remote pathologist (also known as a telepathologist) controlled the microscope and reviewed histology images transmitted across the network in real time. In addition, this study collected demographics, clinical histories, the surgeon's preliminary diagnoses, and the pathology reports from the center's electronic medical record. RESULTS: Nikon's NIS Element Software was used as a dynamic, robotic microscopy model with a video conferencing platform for communication. An underground fiber optic cable established Internet connectivity. After a two-hour tutorial session, the lab technician and pathologist were able to proficiently use the software. The remote pathologist read (1) pathology slides with inconclusive reports from external pathology labs, and (2) tissues labeled by the surgeon as suspicious for malignancy, which belonged to patients who lacked financial means for pathology services. Between April 2021 and July 2022, tissue samples of 110 patients were examined by a telepathologist. The most common malignancies on histology were squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus, ductal carcinoma of the breast, and colorectal adenocarcinoma. CONCLUSION: With the increasing availability of video conference platforms and network connections, telepathology is an emerging field that can be used by surgeons in LMICs to improve access to pathology services, confirming histological diagnosis of malignancies to ensure appropriate treatment.
Subject(s)
Neoplasms , Telepathology , Humans , Telepathology/methods , Developing Countries , Retrospective Studies , UgandaABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic surgery is rapidly expanding in low-and middle-income countries (LMICs), yet many surgeons in LMICs have limited formal training in laparoscopy. In 2017, the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) implemented Global Laparoscopic Advancement Program (GLAP), an in-person simulation-based laparoscopic training curriculum for surgeons in LMICs. In light of COVID-19, SAGES adapted GLAP to a virtual format with telesimulation. This study explores the feasibility and efficacy of virtual laparoscopic simulation training in resource-limited settings. METHODS: Participants from San Jose, Costa Rica, Leon, México, and Guadalajara, México enrolled in the virtual GLAP curriculum, meeting biweekly for 2-h didactic classes and 2-h hands-on live simulation practice. Surgical residents' laparoscopic skills were evaluated using the five Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS) tasks during the initial and final weeks of the program. Participants also completed pre-and post-program surveys assessing their perception of simulation-based training. RESULTS: The study cohort consisted of 16 surgical attendings and 20 general surgery residents. A minimum 70% response rate was recorded across all surveys in the study. By the end of GLAP, residents completed all five tasks of the FLS exam within less time relative to their performance at the beginning of the training program (p < 0.05). Respondents (100%) reported that the program was a good use of their time and that education via telesimulation was easily reproduced. Participants indicated that the practice sessions, guidance, and feedback offered by mentors were their favorite elements of the training. CONCLUSION: A virtual simulation-based curriculum can be an effective strategy for laparoscopic skills training. Participants demonstrated an improvement in laparoscopic skills, and they appreciated the mentorship and opportunity to practice laparoscopic skills. Future programs can expand on using a virtual platform as a low-cost, effective strategy for providing laparoscopic skills training to surgeons in LMICs.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Internship and Residency , Laparoscopy , Simulation Training , Humans , Developing Countries , Laparoscopy/education , Curriculum , Clinical CompetenceABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Mount Sinai Hospital in New York introduced a laparoscopic surgery simulation center to a public hospital in Santiago, Dominican Republic to determine the feasibility of training programs in low-and-middle income countries (LMICs). METHODS: In August 2018, recruitment and preliminary data were collected at the Hospital Jose Maria Cabral y Báez in Santiago, Dominican Republic. The simulation room consists of three simulation stations. Residents were required to practice 1 h/wk guided by a general surgery postgraduate year 3 (PGY3) Mount Sinai resident. Number of hours practiced was self-reported and follow-up data was collected in June 2019. The study endpoints include times on three simulated laparoscopic tasks including peg-transfer, precision cutting, and intracorporeal knot tying. Wilcoxon-signed rank tests were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: The partnership between hospitals allowed for successful integration into the Dominican general surgery training. Over 10 mo, residents averaged 25 h of practice (range: 8-35 h; SD 9.95 h). In total, 85% of the residents participated in the study (5 postgraduate year 1 [PGY1], 2 postgraduate year 2 [PGY2], and 4 postgraduate year 3 [PGY3]). Resident median simulation times significantly improved for precision cutting (3:49 min versus 2:09 min, P = 0.002) and intracorporeal knot tying (5:20 min versus 2:47 min, P = 0.037). There was neither significant difference in peg-transfer times nor performance between resident years (P = 0.12). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the successful integration of a laparoscopic simulation program into an LMIC surgical resident training program. With commitment from local institutions and external resources, establishing laparoscopic simulation centers are feasible and expandable, thereby allowing general surgery residents in other LMICs, the opportunity to improve their laparoscopic skills.
Subject(s)
General Surgery , Internship and Residency , Laparoscopy , Simulation Training , Clinical Competence , Dominican Republic , General Surgery/education , Humans , Laparoscopy/educationABSTRACT
COVID-19 is a pandemic which has affected almost every aspect of our life since starting globally in November 2019. Given the rapidity of spread and inadequate time to prepare for record numbers of sick patients, our surgical community faces an unforeseen challenge. SAGES is committed to the protection and care of patients, their surgeons and staff, and all who are served by the medical community at large. This includes physical health, mental health, and well-being of all involved. The fear of the unknown ahead can be paralyzing. International news media have chronicled the unthinkable situations that physicians and other health care providers have been thrust into as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. These situations include making life or death decisions for patients and their families regarding use of limited health care resources. It includes caring for patients with quickly deteriorating conditions and limited treatments available. Until recently, these situations seemed far from home, and now they are in our own hospitals. As the pandemic broadened its reach, the reality that we as surgeons may be joining the front line is real. It may be happening to you now; it may be on the horizon in the coming weeks. In this context, SAGES put together this document addressing concerns on clinician stressors in these times of uncertainty. We chose to focus on the emotional toll of the situation on the clinician, protecting vulnerable persons, reckoning with social isolation, and promoting wellness during this crisis. At the same time, the last part of this document deals with the "light at the end of the tunnel," discussing potential opportunities, lessons learned, and the positives that can come out of this crisis.
Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/psychology , Delivery of Health Care/organization & administration , Delivery of Health Care/standards , Pneumonia, Viral/psychology , Stress, Psychological , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Delivery of Health Care/economics , Fear , Forecasting , Guidelines as Topic , Health Personnel/psychology , Health Promotion , Humans , Occupational Stress/prevention & control , Occupational Stress/psychology , Pandemics , Quarantine/psychology , SARS-CoV-2 , Stress, Psychological/prevention & control , Stress, Psychological/psychology , Surgeons/psychology , Vulnerable Populations/psychologyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The goal of the study was to evaluate the impact of Mount Sinai's international rotation on physician practices and attitudes following residency. DESIGN: An anonymous, retrospective study was conducted using an email survey. The initial survey was sent out in July 2015 with a second opportunity in September 2015. SETTING: Mount Sinai Hospital, New York City. PARTICIPANTS: All 62 graduates of the Mount Sinai General and Plastic Surgery residencies who participated in the international rotation over the last 10 years. RESULTS: The primary outcome was level of involvement in service medicine with a secondary outcome examining participants views on the value of international rotations during residency. The response rate for the survey was 71% (44/62). Since leaving residency, 53% have been involved in one or more types of service medicine, 59% have been involved in at least one experience practicing medicine in an underserved area and 45% state that their current practice incorporates global surgery or service. 61% report that the rotation encouraged an interest in practicing in an underserved area and 44% (8/18) of those with no prior interest in global health reported that the rotation encouraged an interest. Respondents generally believe global health work could be rewarding (89%), provide opportunity for professional development (77%), and that residency should include global health electives (93%). CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that a mandatory global health rotation may encourage an interest in service medicine. Thus, program directors should continue to provide and encourage participation in international rotations during surgical residency.
Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , General Surgery/education , Global Health/education , International Educational Exchange , Internship and Residency/organization & administration , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Surgery, Plastic/education , Adult , Female , Health Care Surveys , Hospitals , Humans , Male , New York City , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Global surgery and volunteerism in surgery has gained significant interest in recent years for general surgery residents across the country. However, there are few well-established long-term surgical programs affiliated with academic institutions. The present report discusses the implementation process and challenges facing an academic institution in building a long-term sustainable global surgery program. METHODS: As one of the pioneer programs in global surgery for residents, the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai global surgery rotation has been successfully running for the last 10 years in a small public hospital in the Dominican Republic. The present report details many key components of implementing a sustainable global surgery program and the evolution of this program over time. FINDINGS: Since 2005, 80 general surgery residents have rotated through Juan Pablo Pina Hospital in the Dominican Republic. They have performed a total of 1239 major operations and 740 minor operations. They have also participated in 328 emergency cases. More importantly, this rotation helped shape residents' sense of social responsibility and ownership in their surgical training. Residents have also contributed to the training of local residents in laparoscopic skills and through cultural exchange. CONCLUSIONS: As interest in global surgery grows among general surgery residents, it is essential that supporting academic institutions create sustainable and capacity-building rotations for their residents. These programs must address many of the barriers that can hinder maintenance of a sustainable global surgery experience for residents. After 10 years of sending our residents to the Dominican Republic, we have found that it is possible and valuable to incorporate a formal global surgery rotation into a general surgery residency.
Subject(s)
Clinical Competence , Education, Medical, Graduate/organization & administration , General Surgery/education , Global Health/education , Internship and Residency/organization & administration , Academic Medical Centers , Curriculum , Dominican Republic , Hospitals, University , Humans , Program Development , Program Evaluation , Schools, MedicalABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair (LVHR) is associated with considerable postoperative pain. Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) blocks have proven effective in controlling postoperative pain in a variety of laparoscopic abdominal operations. To date, no studies have focused on TAP blocks in LVHR. Our goal was to assess whether TAP blocks reduce opioid requirements and pain scores after LVHR. STUDY DESIGN: Patients undergoing LVHR were randomly assigned to receive a TAP block or placebo injection. The primary end points were cumulative opioid use at 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 hours postoperatively and pain scores recorded at 1 and 24 hours postoperatively. RESULTS: Patients in the experimental TAP group (n = 52) and control group (n = 48) were comparable with respect to patient demographics and clinical characteristics. In the postanesthesia care unit, the TAP group had significantly lower pain scores than the control group (p < 0.05). Patients in the TAP group used less opioids than the control group at each time point assessed after 6 hours postoperatively (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in pain scores at 24 hours postoperatively (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Transversus abdominis plane blocks given during LVHR significantly decrease both short-term postoperative opioid use and pain experienced by patients.
Subject(s)
Anesthetics, Local , Bupivacaine , Herniorrhaphy , Laparoscopy , Nerve Block/methods , Pain, Postoperative/prevention & control , Abdominal Muscles/innervation , Adult , Aged , Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Double-Blind Method , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Herniorrhaphy/methods , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Morphine/therapeutic use , Pain Measurement , Pain, Postoperative/diagnosis , Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy , Prospective Studies , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Intraoperative perforation is a potentially major complication of laparoscopic (lap) foregut surgery. This study analyzed the incidence, mechanism, and outcomes of intraoperative perforations during these procedures in a large institutional experience. METHODS: All patients who underwent lap foregut surgery including laparoscopic antireflux surgery (LARS), paraesophageal hernia (PEH) repair, Heller myotomy, and reoperative hiatal hernia (redo HH) repair at the authors' institution from August 2004 to September 2012 were reviewed retrospectively. Perforation events and postoperative outcomes were analyzed, and complications were graded by the modified Clavien system. All data are expressed as means ± standard deviations or as medians. Statistical analysis was performed using Fisher's exact test and the Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS: In this study, the repairs for 1,223 patients were analyzed (381 LARS procedures, 379 PEH repairs, 313 Heller myotomies, 150 redo HH repairs). Overall, 51 patients (4.2 %) had 56 perforations resulting from LARS (n = 4, 1 %), PEH repair (n = 7, 1.8 %), Heller myotomy (n = 18, 5.8 %), and redo HH repair (n = 22, 14.6 %). Redo HH was significantly more likely to result in perforations than LARS or PEH repair (p < 0.001). The locations of the perforations were esophageal in 13 patients (23.6 %), gastric in 40 patients (72.7 %), and indeterminate in 2 patients (3.6 %). The most common mechanisms of perforations were suture placement for LARS (75 %) and traction for PEH repair (43 %) and for Heller myotomy during the myotomy (72 %). The most redo HH perforations resulted from dissection/wrap takedown (73 %) and traction (14 %). Perforations were recognized and repaired intraoperatively in 43 cases (84 %) and postoperatively in eight cases (16 %). Perforations discovered postoperatively were more likely to require reoperation (75 vs 2 %; p < 0.001), to require more gastrointestinal and radiologic interventions (50 vs 2 %; p = 0.004), and to have higher morbidity (88 vs 26 %; p = 0.004) than perforations recognized intraoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: In a high-volume center, intraoperative perforations are the most frequent with reoperative HH repair. If perforations are recognized and repaired intraoperatively, they require minimal postoperative intervention. Unrecognized perforations usually require reoperation and result in significantly greater morbidity.
Subject(s)
Esophageal Perforation/epidemiology , Laparoscopy/adverse effects , Laparoscopy/statistics & numerical data , Stomach/injuries , Wounds, Penetrating/epidemiology , Adult , Aged, 80 and over , Critical Care/statistics & numerical data , Esophageal Perforation/etiology , Female , Hernia, Hiatal/surgery , Herniorrhaphy/adverse effects , Herniorrhaphy/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Iatrogenic Disease/epidemiology , Incidence , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Male , Middle Aged , Missouri , Reoperation , Retrospective Studies , Stomach Diseases/surgery , Treatment Outcome , Wounds, Penetrating/etiologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Laparoscopic gastrojejunostomy (LGJ) has been proposed as the technique preferred over open gastrojejunostomy for relieving gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) due to malignant and benign disease. This study investigates the feasibility and safety of LGJ for GOO. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of patients who underwent LGJ at Mount Sinai Medical Center from 2004 to 2008. Patient's operative course and longterm outcomes were collected. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients were reviewed (16 had malignancy, 7 had PUD, 3 had Crohn's disease, and one had obstruction of unclear cause). Average operative time was 170 minutes, and estimated blood loss was 80cc. One case was converted to open; another had stapler misfiring. Patients regained bowel function at a median of 3 days and remained in the hospital for a median of 8 days. There were 4 major postoperative complications (14%): 1 anastomotic leak and 1 trocar-site hemorrhage requiring reoperation and 2 gastrointestinal bleeds requiring endoscopic intervention. There were 5 minor complications (18%), including a partial small bowel obstruction, 1 patient developed bacteremia, and 3 patients had delayed gastric emptying. One patient had persistent GOO requiring reoperation 3 months later. CONCLUSION: LGJ can be performed for GOO with improved outcome and an acceptable complication rate compared to the open GJ reported in the literature.
Subject(s)
Gastric Bypass/methods , Gastric Outlet Obstruction/surgery , Laparoscopy/methods , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Comorbidity , Feasibility Studies , Female , Gastric Outlet Obstruction/epidemiology , Gastric Outlet Obstruction/etiology , Humans , Length of Stay , Male , Middle AgedABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Strictureplasty is well established as a safe and effective surgical therapy for Crohn's disease (CD). Yet, postoperative recurrence after strictureplasty remains a problem for CD patients, and associated risk factors are still uncertain. The goal of this study was to examine the relationship between recurrence and the number of strictures (NSX) and strictureplasties (NSXP). STUDY DESIGN: The authors' prospectively created database was used to retrospectively identify patients who had undergone strictureplasty between 1984 and 2004. Recurrence was defined as reoperation, and rates were compared based on the NSX and NSXP using Kaplan-Meier curves. Cox regression analyses were used to evaluate the relationship between both NSX and NSXP and recurrence after adjusting for potential confounders. RESULTS: There were 339 strictureplasties performed in 88 patients at initial operation. The 5-year reoperation rates were 14% for patients with Subject(s)
Constriction, Pathologic/surgery
, Crohn Disease/surgery
, Postoperative Complications/surgery
, Adolescent
, Adult
, Aged
, Constriction, Pathologic/etiology
, Crohn Disease/complications
, Female
, Humans
, Male
, Middle Aged
, Prognosis
, Recurrence
, Reoperation
, Retrospective Studies
, Risk Factors
, Young Adult
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The development of fulminant Clostridium difficile colitis (FCDC) requires prompt operative intervention and is associated with a high mortality rate. The aim of this study was to use a case-control design to define the clinical and laboratory parameters that predict which patients with Clostridium difficile infection are most likely to progress to FCDC. METHODS: Cases from 1994 to 2006 with documented in-hospital progression of Clostridium difficile infection to FCDC were matched retrospectively at the start of medical therapy by age, sex, and intensive care unit (ICU) status to controls with Clostridium difficile infection who did not develop FCDC. Chi-Square and multivariable logistic regression were used to identify risk factors for progression to FCDC. RESULTS: A total of 35 patients with FCDC were matched to 70 controls with Clostridium difficile infection who did not develop FCDC. The patients with FCDC underwent colectomy after an average of 4.6 days of medical therapy and had a mortality rate of 40%. On multivariate analysis, independent risk factors for the development of FCDC were a WBC > 16,000 cells/mm(3) (P < .01) at initiation of therapy, operative therapy within the last 30 days (P = .03), a history of inflammatory bowel disease (P = .04), and a history of intravenous immunoglobulin treatment (P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: Leukocytosis, recent prior operative therapy, and a history of inflammatory bowel disease and intravenous immunoglobulin treatment were negative prognostic indicators for patients with Clostridium difficile infection. The presence of these factors merits close observation for progression to FCDC and acceleration of the planning process for operative intervention.