Single Oral Doses of MK-8507, a Novel Non-Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitor, Suppress HIV-1 RNA for a Week.

BACKGROUND: MK-8507 is a novel HIV-1 non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor being developed for treatment of HIV-1 infection. MK-8507 has high antiviral potency in vitro and pharmacokinetic (PK) properties that support once-weekly dosing. SETTING: A phase 1, open-label, proof-of-concept study was conducted in treatment-naive adults with HIV-1 infection to assess monotherapy antiviral activity. METHODS: In 3 sequential panels, participants aged 18-60 years with baseline plasma HIV-1 RNA ≥10,000 copies/mL and CD4+ T-cell count >200/mm3 received a single oral dose of 40, 80, or 600 mg MK-8507 in the fasted state. Participants were assessed for HIV-1 RNA for at least 7 days, PKs for 14 days, and safety and tolerability for 21 days postdose. RESULTS: A total of 18 participants were enrolled (6 per panel). The mean 7-day postdose HIV-1 RNA reduction ranged from ∼1.2 to ∼1.5 log10 copies/mL across the doses assessed. One patient had a viral rebound associated with emergence of an F227C reverse transcriptase variant (per chain-termination method sequencing) 14 days postdose; this variant was found in a second participant by ultra-deep sequencing as an emerging minority variant. MK-8507 PKs were generally dose-proportional and similar to observations in participants without HIV-1 infection in prior studies; mean MK-8507 half life was 56-69 hours in this study. MK-8507 was generally well tolerated at all doses. CONCLUSIONS: The robust antiviral activity, PK, and tolerability of MK-8507 support its continued development as part of a complete once weekly oral regimen for HIV-1 treatment; combination therapy could mitigate the emergence of resistance-associated variants.

A Phase 1 Trial to Evaluate the Relationship Between Fluoride Intake and Urinary Fluoride Excretion in Healthy Participants.

Chronic overexposure to fluoride can have deleterious effects in the musculoskeletal system. Some fluorine-containing therapeutics, such as voriconazole, release fluoride through metabolism. Therefore, drug-related fluoride exposure should be assessed for novel therapeutics suspected of releasing fluoride through metabolism. Two trials were conducted to identify the optimal method of assessing drug-related fluoride exposure. In trial 1, designed to assess reproducibility of fluoride pharmacokinetics in urine and plasma, 14 participants were administered a fluoride-restricted diet and once-daily doses of sodium fluoride (2.2 mg [1 mg of fluoride] on days 1 and 2; and 13.2 mg of sodium fluoride [6 mg of fluoride] on days 3 and 4). In trial 2, designed to confirm the selected method for fluoride detection, 12 participants were administered a fluoride-restricted diet and randomized to receive voriconazole (400 mg twice, 12 hours apart, on day 1 [131 mg/d of fluoride maximum], then 3 doses of 200 mg every 12 hours [65.3 mg/d of fluoride maximum]) or placebo. Plasma fluoride concentrations and urinary fluoride excretion were assessed in each trial. Assessment of plasma fluoride concentrations in trial 1 was limited by 301 of 854 samples (35.2%) below the lower limit of quantitation. Urine fluoride excretion was readily measured and demonstrated a decrease from baseline during the fluoride-restricted diet phase, as well as dose-proportional increases with fluoride administration. In trial 2, increases in urine fluoride were successfully observed in participants administered voriconazole. In conclusion, fluoride exposure was optimally assessed by urinary fluoride excretion in conjunction with strict dietary fluoride restrictions, as measurements were consistent and reproducible.

Fluoride Pharmacokinetics in Urine and Plasma Following Multiple Doses of MK-8507, an Investigational, Oral, Once-Weekly Nonnucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitor.

MK-8507 is an investigational HIV-1 nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor being developed for the treatment of HIV-1 infection. MK-8507 contains 2 trifluoromethyl groups that may result in fluoride release through metabolism, but the extent of MK-8507-related fluoride release in humans has yet to be determined. This double-blind, placebo-controlled, 2-period, parallel-group, multiple-dose trial in healthy participants without HIV-1 who were administered a fluoride-restricted diet and once-weekly doses of MK-8507 aimed to estimate the relationship between MK-8507 dose and fluoride exposure. A total of 15 adult male and 3 adult female (of non-childbearing potential) participants were randomized to receive MK-8507 200 mg (n = 6), MK-8507 800 mg (n = 6), or placebo (n = 6). Change from baseline in mean daily fluoride excretion averaged over 7 days following the administration of MK-8507 200 mg resulted in a net mean increase of 19.8 µmol (90% confidence interval, 12.2-27.4) relative to placebo and did not exceed 57 µmol, a threshold related to the mean difference between the daily reference dose set by the US Environmental Protection Agency and the average dietary fluoride intake in the United States. However, daily urinary fluoride excretion exceeded the threshold following administration of 800 mg MK-8507 (75.1 µmol [90% confidence interval, 67.5-82.7]). Assuming a linear relationship between MK-8507 dose and estimated mean daily fluoride released at steady-state, data interpolation suggests that the US Environmental Protection Agency reference dose for fluoride would not be exceeded in most patients when administering MK-8507 at doses currently under clinical investigation (≤400 mg once weekly).

A phase 1, open-label study to evaluate the drug interaction between islatravir (MK-8591) and the oral contraceptive levonorgestrel/ethinyl estradiol in healthy adult females.

INTRODUCTION: Hormonal contraceptives are among the most effective forms of reversible contraception, but many other compounds, including some antiretrovirals, have clinically meaningful drug-drug interactions (DDIs) with hormonal contraceptives. Islatravir is a novel human immunodeficiency virus nucleoside reverse transcriptase translocation inhibitor currently in clinical development for treatment and prevention of HIV infection. A phase 1 clinical trial was conducted to evaluate the DDI of islatravir and the combination of oral contraceptive levonorgestrel (LNG)/ethinyl estradiol (EE). METHODS: This was an open-label, two-period, fixed-sequence, DDI clinical trial in healthy, postmenopausal or bilaterally oophorectomized females aged 18 through 65 years in the United States between October 2016 and January 2017. A single dose of LNG 0.15 mg/EE 0.03 mg was given followed by a 7-day washout. Islatravir, 20 mg, was then dosed once weekly for 3 weeks; a single dose of LNG 0.15 mg/EE 0.03 mg was given concomitantly with the third dose of islatravir. Pharmacokinetic samples for plasma LNG and EE concentrations were collected pre-dose and up to 120 hours post-dose in each period. Safety and tolerability were assessed throughout the trial by clinical assessments, laboratory evaluations and examination of adverse events. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Fourteen participants were enrolled. The pharmacokinetics of LNG and EE were not meaningfully altered by co-administration with islatravir. For the comparison of (islatravir + LNG/EE)/(LNG/EE alone), the geometric mean ratios (GMRs) (90% confidence intervals [CIs]) for LNG AUC0-inf and Cmax were 1.13 (1.06, 1.20) and 0.965 (0.881, 1.06), respectively. For EE, the GMRs (90% CI) for AUC0-inf and Cmax were 1.05 (0.981, 1.11) and 1.02 (0.971, 1.08), respectively. Co-administration of all three drugs was generally well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this trial support the use of LNG/EE contraceptives in combination with islatravir without dose adjustment.

Safety and Pharmacokinetics of Once-Daily Multiple-Dose Administration of Islatravir in Adults Without HIV.

BACKGROUND: Islatravir (MK-8591) is a novel nucleoside analog in development for the treatment and prevention of HIV-1 infection. Islatravir has potent antiviral activity and a long intracellular half-life. SETTING: A 3-panel, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multiple-dose study in 36 adults without HIV evaluated the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of islatravir after daily administration. METHODS: Islatravir or placebo was administered orally once daily for 42 days (5 mg) or 28 days (0.25 mg; 0.75 mg). Blood samples were taken at prespecified time points for pharmacokinetic analysis of islatravir (plasma) and islatravir-triphosphate (ISL-TP; peripheral blood mononuclear cells [PBMCs]). Rectal and vaginal tissue samples were also collected in a subset of participants. Safety and tolerability were evaluated throughout. RESULTS: The pharmacokinetics of islatravir were approximately dose proportional, with concentrations approaching a steady state between days 14 and 21 in plasma and by day 28 for ISL-TP in PBMCs. Plasma exposure accumulation was 1.5-fold to 1.8-fold, and ISL-TP exposure accumulation was ∼10-fold. The apparent terminal half-life of ISL-TP was 177-209 hours. The ISL-TP pharmacokinetic trough threshold-the minimal concentration required for efficacy-of 0.05 pmol/106 cells was achieved after a single administration at all dose levels. Rectal and vaginal tissue also exhibited potentially therapeutic concentrations. Islatravir was generally well tolerated at all doses. CONCLUSIONS: ISL-TP levels in PBMCs were above the threshold projected for antiviral efficacy against wild-type HIV after a single 0.25-mg dose. Multiple once-daily dosing of islatravir in adults without HIV was generally well tolerated up to doses of 5 mg administered for up to 6 weeks.

Lack of a Clinically Meaningful Drug Interaction Between the HIV-1 Antiretroviral Agents Islatravir, Dolutegravir, and Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate.

Islatravir, an investigational nucleoside reverse transcriptase translocation inhibitor, is in clinical development for the treatment and prevention of HIV-1 infection. Because islatravir may be coadministered with other antiretroviral agents, assessment of potential drug-drug interactions are warranted. This phase 1, open-label, fixed-sequence, 2-period trial in adults without HIV (N = 12) assessed the safety and pharmacokinetic interactions of islatravir administered with dolutegravir and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF). In period 1, participants received a single oral dose of islatravir (20 mg). In period 2, participants received oral doses of dolutegravir (50 mg) and TDF (300 mg) once daily on days 1 through 11, with a single oral dose of islatravir (20 mg) coadministered on day 8. There were no clinically significant changes in islatravir, dolutegravir, or TDF pharmacokinetics following coadministration. Islatravir was generally well tolerated when administered alone or in combination with dolutegravir and TDF. Coadministration of islatravir, dolutegravir, and TDF is supported, with no clinically meaningful effect on pharmacokinetics, safety, or tolerability in participants without HIV.

Safety and pharmacokinetics of islatravir subdermal implant for HIV-1 pre-exposure prophylaxis: a randomized, placebo-controlled phase 1 trial.

Islatravir (MK-8591) is a highly potent type 1 human immunodeficiency virus (HIV-1) nucleoside reverse transcriptase translocation inhibitor with a long intracellular half-life that is in development for the prevention and treatment of HIV-1. We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1 trial in adults without HIV-1 infection. Participants received islatravir or placebo subdermal implants for 12 weeks and were monitored throughout this period and after implant removal. The co-primary end points were safety and tolerability of the islatravir implant and pharmacokinetics, including concentration at day 85, of islatravir triphosphate in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). Secondary end points included additional pharmacokinetic parameters for islatravir triphosphate in PBMCs and the plasma pharmacokinetic profile of islatravir. Based on preclinical data, two doses were assessed: 54 mg (n = 8, two placebo) and 62 mg (n = 8, two placebo). The most frequently reported adverse events were mild-to-moderate implant-site reactions (induration, hematoma, pain). Throughout the 12-week trial, geometric mean islatravir triphosphate concentrations were above a pharmacokinetic threshold of 0.05 pmol per 106 PBMCs, which was estimated to provide therapeutic reverse transcriptase inhibition (concentration at day 85 (percentage of geometric coefficient of variation): 54 mg, 0.135 pmol per 106 cells (27.3); 62 mg, 0.272 pmol per 106 cells (45.2)). Islatravir implants at both doses were safe and resulted in mean concentrations above the pharmacokinetic threshold through 12 weeks, warranting further investigation of islatravir implants as a potential HIV prevention strategy.

A Phase 1 Study to Evaluate the Drug Interaction Between Islatravir (MK-8591) and Doravirine in Adults Without HIV.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Islatravir (MK-8591) is a novel nucleoside analogue in development for the treatment and prevention of HIV-1 infection. Doravirine is a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor indicated for the treatment of HIV-1 infection. This study evaluated the pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of islatravir and doravirine coadministration in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, fixed-sequence study. METHODS: Adult participants without HIV infection were administered oral doravirine 100 mg (n = 10) or placebo (n = 4) once daily (QD) for 5 days, immediately followed by oral islatravir 2.25 mg (n = 10) or placebo QD (n = 4) for 14 days; islatravir 2.25 mg and doravirine 100 mg QD, or placebo QD, were then coadministered for 5 days. Pharmacokinetic and safety data were collected. RESULTS: Doravirine geometric least-squares mean ratios (90% confidence intervals (CIs)) of (doravirine + islatravir)/doravirine for the area under the plasma drug concentration-time curve over 24 h (AUC0-24h), maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), and plasma concentration at 24 h post-dose (C24h) were not meaningfully impacted. Islatravir geometric least-squares mean ratios (90% CI) of (islatravir + doravirine)/islatravir for AUC0-24h and Cmax were both close to unity, 1.06 (1.01, 1.12) and 1.08 (0.91, 1.27), respectively. All study regimens were generally well tolerated. CONCLUSION: These results indicate that coadministration of islatravir and doravirine had no clinically meaningful effect on the pharmacokinetics of either drug, and support further clinical investigation of islatravir in combination with doravirine for the treatment of HIV-1 infection.

Safety, pharmacokinetics, and antiretroviral activity of islatravir (ISL, MK-8591), a novel nucleoside reverse transcriptase translocation inhibitor, following single-dose administration to treatment-naive adults infected with HIV-1: an open-label, phase 1b, consecutive-panel trial.

BACKGROUND: Islatravir (also known as ISL and MK-8591) is a unique nucleoside reverse transcriptase translocation inhibitor in clinical development for treatment of people with HIV-1 infection. In preclinical studies, intracellular islatravir-triphosphate exhibits a long half-life and prolonged virological effects. In this study, we aimed to assess islatravir safety, pharmacokinetics, and antiretroviral activity in treatment-naive adults with HIV-1 infection. METHODS: This open-label, consecutive-panel, phase 1b trial was done at Charité Research Organisation (Berlin, Germany) and included men and women (aged 18-60 years, inclusive) with HIV-1 infection who were ART naive. Participants were required to have plasma HIV-1 RNA counts of at least 10 000 copies per mL within 30 days before the trial treatment phase, without evidence of resistance to nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors. Participants were enrolled in one of five consecutive dosing panels, receiving a single oral dose of islatravir (0·5-30 mg). The primary outcomes were safety and tolerability of islatravir and change from baseline in HIV-1 plasma RNA; secondary outcomes were islatravir plasma and islatravir-triphosphate intracellular pharmacokinetics. We obtained descriptive safety and pharmacokinetics statistics, and estimated efficacy results from a longitudinal data analysis model. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02217904, and EudraCT, 2014-002192-28. FINDINGS: Between Sept 17, 2015, and May 11, 2017, we enrolled 30 participants (six per panel). Islatravir was generally well tolerated. 27 (90%) participants had 60 adverse events after receipt of drug, of which 21 (35%) were deemed to be drug related. The most common (n>1) drug-related adverse events were headache (in nine [30%] participants) and diarrhoea (in two [7%]). No serious adverse events were reported, and no participants discontinued due to an adverse event. Plasma islatravir pharmacokinetics and intracellular islatravir-triphosphate pharmacokinetics were approximately dose proportional. The islatravir-triphosphate intracellular half-life was 78·5-128·0 h. Least-squares mean HIV-1 RNA at 7 days after dose decreased from 1·67 log10 copies per mL (95% CI 1·42-1·92) at 10 mg dose to 1·20 log10 copies per mL (0·95-1·46) at 0·5 mg dose. No genetic changes consistent with development of viral resistance were detected. INTERPRETATION: Single doses of islatravir as low as 0·5 mg significantly suppressed HIV-1 RNA by more than 1·0 log at day 7 in treatment-naive adults with HIV-1 infection and were generally well tolerated, supporting the further development of islatravir as a flexible-dose treatment for individuals with HIV-1 infection. FUNDING: Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp, a subsidiary of Merck & Co Inc, Kenilworth, NJ, USA.

Intake_epis_food(): An R Function for Fitting a Bivariate Nonlinear Measurement Error Model to Estimate Usual and Energy Intake for Episodically Consumed Foods.

We consider a Bayesian analysis using WinBUGS to estimate the distribution of usual intake for episodically consumed foods and energy (calories). The model uses measures of nutrition and energy intakes via a food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) along with repeated 24 hour recalls and adjusting covariates. In order to estimate the usual intake of the food, we phrase usual intake in terms of person-specific random effects, along with day-to-day variability in food and energy consumption. Three levels are incorporated in the model. The first level incorporates information about whether an individual in fact reported consumption of a particular food item. The second level incorporates the amount of intake from those individuals who reported consumption of the food, and the third level incorporates the energy intake. Estimates of posterior means of parameters and distributions of usual intakes are obtained by using Markov chain Monte Carlo calculations. This R function reports to users point estimates and credible intervals for parameters in the model, samples from their posterior distribution, samples from the distribution of usual intake and usual energy intake, trace plots of parameters and summary statistics of usual intake, usual energy intake and energy adjusted usual intake.

A NEW MULTIVARIATE MEASUREMENT ERROR MODEL WITH ZERO-INFLATED DIETARY DATA, AND ITS APPLICATION TO DIETARY ASSESSMENT.

In the United States the preferred method of obtaining dietary intake data is the 24-hour dietary recall, yet the measure of most interest is usual or long-term average daily intake, which is impossible to measure. Thus, usual dietary intake is assessed with considerable measurement error. Also, diet represents numerous foods, nutrients and other components, each of which have distinctive attributes. Sometimes, it is useful to examine intake of these components separately, but increasingly nutritionists are interested in exploring them collectively to capture overall dietary patterns. Consumption of these components varies widely: some are consumed daily by almost everyone on every day, while others are episodically consumed so that 24-hour recall data are zero-inflated. In addition, they are often correlated with each other. Finally, it is often preferable to analyze the amount of a dietary component relative to the amount of energy (calories) in a diet because dietary recommendations often vary with energy level. The quest to understand overall dietary patterns of usual intake has to this point reached a standstill. There are no statistical methods or models available to model such complex multivariate data with its measurement error and zero inflation. This paper proposes the first such model, and it proposes the first workable solution to fit such a model. After describing the model, we use survey-weighted MCMC computations to fit the model, with uncertainty estimation coming from balanced repeated replication.The methodology is illustrated through an application to estimating the population distribution of the Healthy Eating Index-2005 (HEI-2005), a multi-component dietary quality index involving ratios of interrelated dietary components to energy, among children aged 2-8 in the United States. We pose a number of interesting questions about the HEI-2005 and provide answers that were not previously within the realm of possibility, and we indicate ways that our approach can be used to answer other questions of importance to nutritional science and public health.

Fitting a bivariate measurement error model for episodically consumed dietary components.

There has been great public health interest in estimating usual, i.e., long-term average, intake of episodically consumed dietary components that are not consumed daily by everyone, e.g., fish, red meat and whole grains. Short-term measurements of episodically consumed dietary components have zero-inflated skewed distributions. So-called two-part models have been developed for such data in order to correct for measurement error due to within-person variation and to estimate the distribution of usual intake of the dietary component in the univariate case. However, there is arguably much greater public health interest in the usual intake of an episodically consumed dietary component adjusted for energy (caloric) intake, e.g., ounces of whole grains per 1000 kilo-calories, which reflects usual dietary composition and adjusts for different total amounts of caloric intake. Because of this public health interest, it is important to have models to fit such data, and it is important that the model-fitting methods can be applied to all episodically consumed dietary components.We have recently developed a nonlinear mixed effects model (Kipnis, et al., 2010), and have fit it by maximum likelihood using nonlinear mixed effects programs and methodology (the SAS NLMIXED procedure). Maximum likelihood fitting of such a nonlinear mixed model is generally slow because of 3-dimensional adaptive Gaussian quadrature, and there are times when the programs either fail to converge or converge to models with a singular covariance matrix. For these reasons, we develop a Monte-Carlo (MCMC) computation of fitting this model, which allows for both frequentist and Bayesian inference. There are technical challenges to developing this solution because one of the covariance matrices in the model is patterned. Our main application is to the National Institutes of Health (NIH)-AARP Diet and Health Study, where we illustrate our methods for modeling the energy-adjusted usual intake of fish and whole grains. We demonstrate numerically that our methods lead to increased speed of computation, converge to reasonable solutions, and have the flexibility to be used in either a frequentist or a Bayesian manner.