Correlations of insulin-like growth factor I and insulin-like growth factor I receptor with the clinicopathological features and prognosis of patients with colon cancer.

OBJECTIVE: This study is designed to evaluate the correlations of insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) and insulin-like growth factor I receptor (IGF-IR) expressions with the clinicopathological features and prognosis of patients with colon cancer. METHODS: From January 2010 to January 2009, tissue samples were collected from 121 colon cancer patients, 147 with colon adenoma and 63 patients with chronic diarrhea. Real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction was used to analyze the mRNA expressions of IGF-I and IGF-IR. Immunohistochemistry was utilized to detect the protein expressions of IGF-I and IGF-IR. RESULTS: The IGF-I and IGF-IR mRNA expressions in colon cancer tissues were higher than those in colon adenoma tissues and normal tissues. The positive protein expressions of IGF-I and IGF-IR in colon cancer tissues were also higher than those in colon adenoma tissues and normal tissues. The mRNA expressions of IGF-I and IGF-IR were associated with the degree of differentiation, tumor node metastasis stage and lymphatic metastasis of colon cancer. Tumor node metastasis stage, lymphatic metastasis, postoperative chemotherapy and IGF-IR protein expression were independent factors for the prognosis of colon cancer. CONCLUSIONS: This study has demonstrated that overexpression of IGF-I and IGF-IR contributes to the development and progression of colon cancer.

Antitumor effect of Gefitinib, an epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, combined with cytotoxic agent on murine hepatocellular carcinoma.

AIM: To investigate the inhibitory effect of gefitinib combined with cytotoxic agent cisplatin (CDDP) on hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS: Female Kunming mice and H22 hepatocarcinoma cells were used. Gefitinib at daily dose of 100 mg/kg body weight (BW) or lecithin liquid was given by gastrogavage once a day for 5 or 10 successive days. CDDP or normal saline (NS) was administered intraperitoneally (i.p.) once a day for 5 successive days. Mice were randomly divided into control group (lecithin, or NS, i.p.), CDDP group (daily dose, 1.2 mg/kg BW; d1-5, or d6-10), Gefitinib (d1-5, or d6-10, or d1-10), and Gefitinib combined with CDDP groups. The inhibitory rate (IR) of tumor, net BW, spleen index (SI), thymus index (TI) and the amount of peripheral blood cells of mice were detected on the 12th experiment day. RESULTS: The growth of HCC in mice was inhibited by Gefitinib alone (IR: 41% in d1-10 group and 30% in d1-5 group, respectively) or CDDP alone (IR: 32-54% in d1-5 group or d6-10 group). The highest inhibitory effect (IR: 56%) on HCC growth was observed in Gefitinib (d1-10) combined with CDDP (d1-5) group. Higher inhibition was also observed in CDDP (d1-5) followed by Gefitinib (d6-10) group than that in Gefitinib (d1-5) followed by CDDP (d6-10) group (IR: 61% vs 36%, P < 0.01) in the independent study. Net BW, SI, TI and the amount of blood cells of mice in Gefitinib alone group were not significantly different from those in control groups. CONCLUSION: Gefitinib can significantly inhibit the growth of murine H22 hepatocellular carcinoma. If Gefitinib is used after CDDP treatment in animal experiments, the inhibitory effect could be enhanced.

[The effect of IRESSA on H22 mouse hepatocellular carcinoma].

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of IRESSA (gefitinib, ZD1839) on H22 murine hepatocellular carcinoma. METHODS: Mice bearing H22 hepatocellular carcinoma were randomly divided into oral control group, Normal saline (NS) control group, cisplatin (CDDP) d1-5 group, CDDP d6-10 group, IRESSA group, IRESSA combined with CDDP early (IRESSA + CDDP d1-5) group, and IRESSA combined with CDDP lately (IRESSA + CDDP d6-10) group. IRESSA was given by daily gastrogavage for 10 days (day 1-day 10) at 100 mg/kg in body weight (BW). CDDP was given by daily intraperitoneal injection for 5 days (day 1-day 5, or day 6-day 10) at 1.2 mg/kg in BW. The growth inhibiting rate (IR) of tumor, change of BW, spleen index (SI), and amounts of blood leucocyte or hemoglobin were detected. RESULTS: IR of tumor in IRESSA group was not significantly difference with that in CDDP d1-5 group, CDDP d6-10 group, IRESSA + CDDP d1-5 group (P > 0.05). IR of tumor in IRESSA group, CDDP d1-5 group, CDDP d6-10 group, IRESSA and IRESSA + CDDP d1-5 group were 41%, 54%, 46%, and 56%, respectively. IR of tumor in IRESSA + CDDP d6-10 group (26%) was significantly lower than that in CDDP d6-10 group (P < 0.05) or in IRESSA + CDDP d1-5 group (P < 0.01). Compared with oral or NS control groups, SI and net BW in IRESSA group was not significantly difference (P > 0.05). SI and net BW in both IRESSA + CDDP d1-5 group and IRESSA + CDDP d6-10 group were lower markedly than those in IRESSA group (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Tumor growth of H22 bearing mice was markedly inhibited by IRESSA.

[Enhancement of antioxidant capability of cancer patients during chemotherapy by reduced glutathione].

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE: It is unknown how administration of reduced glutathione (GSH) affects chemotherapy of cancer patients. This study was designed to investigate the effect of GSH on lipid peroxidation, and activities of antioxidant enzyme among cancer patients with chemotherapy. METHODS: Sixty-two cancer patients with chemotherapy were enrolled randomly into AB or BA group in cross-over pattern. In AB group, combination of chemotherapy and GSH was administrated first, then following chemotherapy alone was given 21 or 28 days later. In group BA, chemotherapy alone was administrated first, then the combination therapy was given. Duration of chemotherapy was 2-5 days, 21-28 days for a cycle, depended on chemotherapy strategies. GSH was given as a 15 minute intravenous infusion at the dose of 1 500 mgx(m(2)xd)(-1) for 7 days from day 1. Serum samples were collected from the patients on the day just before the chemotherapy, the 7(th) day, and the 21(st) (if 21 days per cycle of the chemotherapy) or 28(th) day of treatment. Concentration of malondialdehyde (MDA), activity of glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px), and total superoxide dismutase (T-SOD) of serum samples were analyzed biochemically. RESULTS: (1)Administration of chemotherapy significantly increased serum MDA level on the 7(th) day compared with that before chemotherapy (mean+/-SD,6.12+/-1.94 micromol/L versus 4.63+/-1.87 micromol/L,P< 0.01). The increased serum MDA level was restored partially (5.05+/-2.07)micromol/L on the 21(th) or 28(th) day, but still higher than that before chemotherapy (P< 0.05). (2)Serum activity of T-SOD and GSH-Px decreased on the 7(th) day (P< 0.01) and restored partially on the 21(th) or 28th day, but still lower than that before chemotherapy (T-SOD, P< 0.05;GSH-Px,P< 0.01).(3)Co-treatment of GSH prevents lipid peroxidation and depletion of antioxidant enzymes by chemotherapy partially but significantly (P< 0.01). (4)Similar results were obtained in both AB group and BA group. CONCLUSION: Chemotherapy depletes antioxidant capability of cancer patients and co- treatment of GSH might prevent such depletion.