Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
2.
Ther Adv Med Oncol ; 11: 1758835919833863, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30923578

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the benefits from the addition of induction chemotherapy (IC) to concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) in N2-3 nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). METHODS: A total of 3089 patients with nonmetastatic NPC, staged as N2-3 were retrospectively reviewed. IC contained cisplatin (80 mg/m2) with 5-fluorouracil (800 mg/m2/day over 120 h), or cisplatin (80 mg/m2) with docetaxel (80 mg/m2), or cisplatin (60 mg/m2) with 5-fluorouracil (600 mg/m2 over 120 h), and docetaxel (60 mg/m2) administered at 3-week intervals for two or three cycles. Concurrent chemotherapy consisted of cisplatin (80 or 100 mg/m2) given in weeks 1, 4, and 7 of radiotherapy, or cisplatin (40 mg/m2) given weekly during radiotherapy. Overall, three well-matched risk groups (low, intermediate, and high risk) were created using propensity score matching, and IC plus CCRT was compared with CCRT in each risk group. Our primary endpoint was distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS). RESULTS: A nomogram for DMFS was established with good prognostic accuracy (C-index, 0.69; 95% confidence interval, 0.64-0.73). The survival curves for low, intermediate, and high-risk groups stratified by the nomogram were significantly different between all three risk groups, with corresponding 5-year DMFS rates of 90.7%, 79.4%, and 64.9%, respectively (p < 0.001). IC plus CCRT was significantly associated with superior DMFS as compared with CCRT alone (69.5% versus 56.7%, p = 0.004) in the high-risk group. However, no significant difference between IC plus CCRT and CCRT was observed (p = 0.831 and 0.608, respectively) in the intermediate and low-risk groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings can help accurately guide the treatment of individual patients with advanced N-stage NPC.

3.
J Cancer ; 9(12): 2123-2131, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29937931

ABSTRACT

Background: Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) have been demonstrated to mitigate radiation-induced lung damage in animal models and preclinical studies. Our study aims to evaluate whether ACEIs or ARBs reduce the incidence of radiation-induced pneumonitis (RP) in lung cancer patients. Methods: Publications were searched from EMBASE, PubMed and Web of Science databases. Seven studies published from April 2000 to August 2016 met inclusion criteria and included 1412 patients in total. Only patients with grade 2 and above pneumonitis within 12 months after radiotherapy were analyzed. Results: Patients taking ACEIs had a lower risk of developing radiation pneumonitis compared with non-users (OR = 0.46, 95%CI = 0.31-0.67, p < 0.0001). While the use of ARBs couldn't reduce the incidence of RP (OR = 1.42, 95%CI = 0.94-2.14, p = 0.10). Elderly patients (age ≥ 70) benefited more from ACEIs (OR = 0.12, 95%CI = 0.02-0.67, p = 0.02). In addition, smokers were found to have a lower risk of developing RP than non-smokers (OR = 0.49, 95%CI = 0.30-0.81, p = 0.005), but sex and the use of statin or NSAID had no influence on the appearance of RP (p = 0.59, p = 0.70, p = 0.40, respectively). Conclusions: ACE inhibitors could decrease the incidence of symptomatic RP among lung cancer patients. However, the use of ARBs has a slight trend to develop RP but not above statistical significance. Elderly patients (age ≥ 70) benefited the most from ACEIs.

4.
World J Surg Oncol ; 15(1): 169, 2017 Sep 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28886717

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Association between dietary protein intake and colorectal cancer risk has not been fully quantified, while the results were controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the role of protein intake in the development of colorectal cancer. METHODS: PUBMED and EMBASE were searched up to December 2016. Two independent reviewers independently extracted data from eligible studies. Relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) was pooled using random-effects model to estimate the result. Besides, publication bias and sensitivity analysis were conducted. RESULTS: Thirteen articles involving 21 studies comprising 8187 cases were included in this report. The pooled RR of colorectal cancer was 1.006 (95% CI = 0.857-1.179) indicating that there is no significant association between dietary protein intake and colorectal cancer risk. Furthermore, the pooled RRs for colon cancer and rectum cancer were 1.135(95% CI = 0.871-1.480) and 0.773(95% CI = 0.538-1.111), respectively, with the highest category of dietary protein intake. The association was not significant either in subgroup analysis of study design, protein type (animal protein or vegetable protein), sex, and or geographic locations. CONCLUSIONS: The present study indicated that the highest category compared to the lowest category of protein intake had no significant association on colorectal cancer risk. Dose-response analysis was not conducted due to limited information provided. Therefore, more studies with large cases and participants as well as detailed amounts of dietary protein intake are wanted to confirm this result.


Subject(s)
Colonic Neoplasms/epidemiology , Dietary Proteins , Feeding Behavior , Rectal Neoplasms/epidemiology , Humans , Incidence , Risk Factors
5.
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 26(11): 1217-21, 2014 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25187299

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The prevalence of fundic gland polyps (FGPs) is increasing. Some researchers consider this increase to be associated strongly with the long-term use of proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs); however, not all researchers share this belief. There are minimal data on the development of FGPs in China. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the prevalence of FGPs and risk factors associated with the development of this disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We studied 10 904 consecutive patients who underwent gastroduodenal endoscopies at our digestive endoscopy center between February 2011 and January 2013. Information on sex, age, Helicobacter pylori infection, PPIs intake, and the pathological results of the polyps were collected in the FGPs group and in the control group. The use of PPIs, sex, and H. pylori infection were statistically evaluated as dichotomous variables using a χ-test; age was evaluated as a continuous variable using a t-test. Finally, these factors were evaluated using a multiple logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Gastric polyps were found in 759 (7.0%) patients, and 213 (2.0%) of these patients had FGPs. FGPs accounted for 28.1% of the gastric polyps. In the FGPs group, the percentage of H. pylori infection was 66.8% and the percentage of PPIs intake for at least 12 months was 23.1%. In the control group, the percentage of H. pylori infection was 77.4% and the percentage of PPIs intake for at least 12 months was 2.3%. The difference in the long-term use of PPIs was statistically significant between these two groups [χ=33.98, P<0.05, odds ratio (OR)=12.83, 95% confidence interval (CI): 4.47-36.80]. The results of the logistic regression were as follows: long-term use of PPIs (P<0.01, OR=14.11, 95% CI: 4.15-47.93); age (P<0.01, OR=1.69, 95% CI: 1.31-2.18). The P-values for sex and H. pylori infection were higher than 0.05. CONCLUSION: Age and the long-term use of PPIs were risk factors for the presence of FGPs; the long-term use of PPIs was a particularly strong risk factor.


Subject(s)
Polyps/epidemiology , Stomach Neoplasms/epidemiology , Adult , Age Factors , China/epidemiology , Drug Administration Schedule , Drug Utilization/statistics & numerical data , Female , Gastric Fundus , Helicobacter Infections/complications , Helicobacter Infections/epidemiology , Helicobacter pylori , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Polyps/chemically induced , Polyps/microbiology , Prevalence , Proton Pump Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Proton Pump Inhibitors/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Stomach Neoplasms/chemically induced , Stomach Neoplasms/microbiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL