Characterization of the lncRNA-mediated ceRNA regulatory networks in preeclampsia by integrated bioinformatics.

Preeclampsia (PE) is a significant threat to all pregnancies that is highly associated with maternal mortality and developmental disorders in infants. However, the etiopathogenesis of this condition remains unclear. This study aims to explore the regulatory roles of long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) and the mediated competing endogenous RNAs (ceRNA) in the etiopathogenesis of PE through analysis of lncRNA expression patterns in PE and healthy pregnant women (HPW), as well as the construction of lncRNA-mediated ceRNA regulatory networks using bioinformatics. A total of 896 significant differentially expressed lncRNAs, including 586 upregulated lncRNAs and 310 downregulated lncRNAs, were identified in comparison between PE and HPW. Analysis of these differential expressed lncRNAs revealed their predominant enrichment in molecular functions such as sphingosine-1-phosphate phosphatase activity, lipid phosphatase activity, phosphatidate phosphatase activity, thymidylate kinase activity, and UMP kinase activity. Moreover, these differential expressed lncRNAs were predominantly enriched in KEGG analyses such as fat digestion and absorption, lysine degradation, ether lipid metabolism, glycerolipid metabolism, and sphingolipid metabolism. Two ceRNA regulatory networks were constructed based on ceRNA score, including one that had 31 upregulated lncRNAs, 11 downregulated miRNAs, and 34 upregulated mRNAs, while the other contained 128 downregulated lncRNAs, 40 upregulated miRNAs, and 113 downregulated mRNAs. These results may provide a clue to explore the roles of lncRNAs in the etiopathogenesis of PE.

Cefoperazone-sulbactam and ornidazole for Gardnerella vaginalis bloodstream infection after cesarean section: A case report.

BACKGROUND: Gardnerella vaginalis (G. vaginalis) is a facultative anaerobic bacteria known to cause bloodstream infections. However, cases are very rare in clinics. There is very limited clinical experience in the treatment of bloodstream infections caused by G. vaginalis. Therefore, there is an urgent need for effective antibacterial drugs to treat patients with bloodstream infections caused by G. vaginalis. CASE SUMMARY: A woman who underwent a cesarean section presented with a sudden onset of high fever 1-d post-surgery. The blood cultures suggested an infection due to G. vaginalis, and treatment with cefoperazone-sulbactam was started. After 5 d of treatment, there was a decrease in the hemogram; however, the temperature and C-reactive protein levels remained high. Based on clinical experience and a review of literature, the treatment was modified to include ornidazole in combination with cefoperazone-sulbactam. Following a week of treatment, the temperature, hemogram and C-reactive protein levels returned to normal, and blood cultures turned negative, suggesting a therapeutic effect of the combination treatment. CONCLUSION: This case highlighted the effective use of cefoperazone-sulbactam combined with ornidazole for bloodstream infection caused by G. vaginalis following a cesarean section.

Knockdown of lncRNA GHET1 inhibits osteosarcoma cells proliferation, invasion, migration and EMT in vitro and in vivo.

OBJECTIVE: Osteosarcoma is the most common primary malignant skeleton tumor that derives from mesenchymal cells. Emerging evidences have identified the vital role of long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) in the development of osteosarcoma. In this study, we aimed to investigate the role of lncRNA gastric carcinoma highly expressed transcript 1 (GHET1) in osteosarcoma progression. METHODS: The expression levels of relevant genes in clinical samples and cell lines were determined by quantitative real-time PCR. Cell proliferation was determined by CCK8 and cell colony formation assays. Transwell assay was used to detect the invasion and migration of osteosarcoma cells. Cell apoptosis and cell cycle were detected by flow cytometry. Protein levels were detected by western blot. In vivo tumor growth was investigated in the xenograft nude mice model. To determine whether growth inhibition and apoptosis are responsible for antitumor activity of silencing GHET1, immunohistochemistry for proliferation and TUNEL assay was performed in xenograft tissues. In vivo lung metastasis was performed to detect the effect of GHET1 on cell metastasis ability. RESULTS: Our results revealed that GHET1 was up-regulated in osteosarcoma tissues compared to normal tissues. GHET1 was also increased in osteosarcoma cell lines compared to normal osteoplastic cell line. The up-regulation of GHET1 was significantly associated with TNM stage, distant metastasis and lymph node metastasis in patients with osteosarcoma. In vitro studies showed that silencing GHET1 in MG-63 and U2OS cells inhibited cell proliferation, cell invasion and migration and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT), promoted cell apoptotic rate, and also caused an increase in cell population at G0/G1 phase with a decrease in cell population at S phase. Overexpression of GHET1 promoted the proliferation, invasion and migration of osteosarcoma cells. Importantly, silencing GHET1 inhibited tumor growth and tumor metastasis in mice MG-63-xenograft model in association with changes of EMT-related genes, reduced expression of Ki-67 and promotion of apoptosis. CONCLUSION: GHET1 was up-regulated in osteosarcoma tissues and cell lines, inhibited cell apoptosis, promoted cell proliferation, invasion and migration by affecting EMT in vitro, and was correlated with the tumor growth and metastasis in vivo. GHET1 may be a potential therapeutic target of osteosarcoma treatment.

[Prognostic analysis of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer with propensity score matching method].

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy on the prognosis of patients with locally advanced gastric cancer using propensity score matching method. METHODS: Clinical data of patients with locally advanced gastric cancer undergoing open D2 radical gastrectomy between January 2012 and December 2014 at the Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Zhengzhou University were analyzed retrospectively. Sixty-five patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) were allocated into the NAC group and 1243 patients receiving postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) were allocated into the AC group. INCLUSION CRITERIA: (1) age ranged from 18 to 75 years old, and biopsy specimen was confirmed as adenocarcinoma; (2) all the operative procedures were open D2 radical gastrectomy;(3)image examinations showed no distant metastasis or other unresectable factors. EXCLUSION CRITERIA: no open D2 radical gastrectomy, undergoing laparoscopic surgery, neoadjuvant chemotherapy course <2 cycles, without adjuvant chemotherapy, history of other malignancies, severe complications, incomplete data. SOX (tegafur-gimeracil-oteracil plus oxaliplatin) or XELOX (capecitabine plus oxaliplatin) was used as neoadjuvant and postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy regimen. One-to-two propensity score matching was performed to balance the covariance between two groups. Survival was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Differences between the curves were tested using log-rank test. RESULTS: After balancing the covariates including gender, age, tumor location, degree of differentiation, clinical stage, chemotherapy regimen, chemotherapy course and surgical approach, 195 patients were enrolled, including 65 patients of the NAC group and 130 patients of the AC group. The number of harvested lymph nodes in NAC and AC group was 22.3±4.6 and 22.6±5.1 respectively, without statistically significant difference(t=1.125, P=0.263). Pathological response assessment for NAC group showed TRG0 in 6 cases, TRG1 in 8 cases, TRG2 in 17 cases, TRG3 in 34 cases; sensitive (TRG 0 to 2) in 31 cases (47.7%), non-sensitive in 34 cases (52.3%). The 3-year progression-free survival rate of NAC and AC group was 73.6%(95%CI: 62.8-84.3) and 69.9%(95%CI:62.1-77.7) respectively, which was not significantly different(P=0.361). The 3-year overall survival rate of NAC and AC group was 80.0%(95%CI:70.2-89.8) and 74.6%(95%CI:67.2-82.0) respectively, which was not significantly different as well(P=0.387). Subgroup analysis revealed that the 3-year progression-free survival rate and 3-year overall survival rate of sensitive patients in NAC group were 83.3%(95%CI:70.0-96.6) and 87.1%(95%CI:75.3-98.9) respectively, which were significantly higher than 62.4%(95%CI:46.1-78.7, P=0.037) and 70.2%(95%CI:54.7-85.7, P=0.033) of non-sensitive patients in NAC group, and those in AC group(P=0.044 and P=0.040). CONCLUSIONS: Effects of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy on the prognosis of patients with locally advanced gastric cancer are similar. Patients who are sensitive to neoadjuvant chemotherapy have better prognosis. It may be beneficial to improve prognosis that some appropriate patients with locally advanced gastric cancer are screened for neoadjuvant chemotherapy.