Analysis of the Trends and Influencing Factors for Postoperative Cough in Patients with Esophageal Cancer Based on Patient-Reported Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Cough is a common symptom that affects patients' recovery and quality of life after esophagectomy. This study sought to investigate trends in postoperative cough and the factors that influence cough. METHODS: A total of 208 of 225 patients were enrolled in this study. The Mandarin Chinese version of the Leicester Cough Questionnaire was administered the day before surgery and at three time points (1 week, 1 month, and 3 months) after esophagectomy to assess patient-reported outcomes. RESULTS: All patients' LCQ-MC scores after surgery were lower than presurgery (P < 0.05), with the lowest score found 1 week after esophagectomy. Factors associated with a cough 1 week after surgery included clinical stage of cancer (OR 0.782, 95% CI 0.647-0.944, P = 0.011), anastomotic position (OR 1.241, 95% CI 1.069-1.441, P = 0.005), duration of surgery (OR 0.759, 95% CI 0.577-0.998, P = 0.049), and subcarinal lymph node dissection (OR 0.682, 95% CI 0.563-0.825, P < 0.001). Factors associated with a cough one month after surgery included clinical stage (OR 0.782, 95% CI 0.650-0.940, P = 0.009), anastomotic position (OR 1.293, 95% CI 1.113-1.503, P = 0.001), and maintaining a semi-reclining position (OR 1.440, 95% CI 1.175-1.766, P < 0.001). Factors associated with a cough 3 months after surgery were clinical stage (OR 0.741, 95% CI 0.591-0.928, P = 0.009) and anastomotic position (OR 1.220, 95% CI 1.037-1.435, P = 0.016). CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that the factors influencing postoperative cough differed over time following esophagectomy. These results may warrant prospective intervention to better manage patients undergoing surgery for esophageal cancer to prevent postoperative cough.

Antiphospholipid antibodies and the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: This article aims to evaluate the magnitude of adverse pregnancy outcomes (APOs) risks associated with different antiphospholipid antibody (aPL) profiles in women with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). METHODS: Multiple databases were investigated to identify articles that explored the relationship between aPLs and APOs in SLE patients. A random effects model was used for calculating pooled odds ratios (OR). Stata version 15.0 was utilized to conduct the meta-analysis. RESULTS: There were 5234 patients involved in 30 studies. Overall aPL was linked to an increased incidence of any kind of APOs, fetal loss, and preterm birth. Any kind of APOs and preterm delivery were more common in patients with lupus anticoagulant (LA) positive. Anticardiolipin antibody (aCL) was associated with an increased risk of any kind of APOs and fetal loss. The association between aCL-IgM and fetal loss was also significant. Patients with anti-beta2-glycoprotein1 antibody (antiß2GP1) positivity had an increased risk of fetal loss. CONCLUSIONS: Both LA and aCL were risk factors of APOs in patients with SLE. Not only ACL, particularly aCL-IgM, but antiß2GP1 were associated with an increased risk of fetal loss, while LA appeared to indicate the risk of preterm birth.PROSPERO (CRD42023388122).

Efficacy and safety of acupuncture therapy combined with conventional pharmacotherapy in the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Currently, the mainstream treatments for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) are based on glucocorticoids and immunosuppressants, which are known to have considerable adverse effects. This meta-analysis is aimed at confirming the efficacy and safety of acupuncture therapy in combination with traditional medications in the treatment of SLE. METHODS: Multiple databases were searched for randomized controlled trials using acupuncture therapy in combination with conventional pharmacotherapy for the treatment of SLE, from the establishment of the database to March 2023. Study selection, data collection, as well as quality assessment were conducted by 2 reviewers independently. RevMan 5.4 and Stata 17 software were used for Meta-analysis. RESULTS: Seven eligible studies involving 514 patients with SLE were included. Meta-analysis demonstrated that in SLE patients, extra treatment with acupuncture was superior to drug therapy alone in improving the overall response rate (RR = 1.20, 95% confidence intervals [1.11, 1.29], P < .00001, heterogeneity P = .69, I2 = 0%) and regulating immunological indicators (C3, C4, IgG, T lymphocyte subpopulation, IL-6, ds-DNA, ESR) while reducing TCM symptom scores, the SLE Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) and the incidence of adverse events on treatment (P ≤ 0.05). Additionally, it was able to reduce BUN, Scr and 24 hours urine protein, suggesting that acupuncture treatment had a protective effect on the kidneys. CONCLUSIONS: Acupuncture therapy combined with conventional pharmacotherapy is an efficient and safe way in the treatment of SLE. However, the conclusions drawn from this meta-analysis have some limitations due to the small number and uneven quality of the included studies, leading to heterogeneity and bias. Thus more relevant high-quality randomized controlled trials are needed for further evaluation in the future.

The effectiveness of telephone and internet-based supportive care for patients with esophageal cancer on enhanced recovery after surgery in China: A randomized controlled trial.

Objective: The aim of this study was to establish a nurse-led supportive care program based on telephone and Internet support and evaluate its efficacy in comparison with conventional care on enhanced recovery after surgery. Methods: The study was designed as an open-label, randomized controlled trial to value the efficacy of a nurse-led supportive care program in comparison with conventional care. A convenience sampling method was employed to recruit patients with esophageal cancer in a tertiary Grade A cancer center in Beijing from November 2018 to January 2019. Patients were assigned randomly (1:1) to one of the two groups (intervention group vs control group) via a web randomization system. The control group received conventional care. Patients from the intervention group received conventional care and one-on-one phone calls from nurses following their discharge assessments and education about nutrition and symptoms. Nurses also set up a WeChat group, which they invited patients to join in before discharge for better communication during follow-up. Statistical testing, including nutritional status, quality of life, the helpfulness of the follow-up service, and the patients' satisfaction with their care, was conducted 6 months after discharge to assess for differences between the two groups. The independent sample t, chi-squared, and Mann-Whitney tests were used to compare between the experiences of the intervention and control groups. The Spearman correlation analysis was used for the analysis of correlation of the nutritional index and quality of life. Results: Finally, 168 patients were included in the study, with 86 patients in the intervention group and 82 in the control group. Significant differences between the intervention and control groups were found in the nutrition risk screening 2002 and simple diet self-assessment tool scores. The changes in blood albumin, prealbumin, and transferrin were also statistically significant. All (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire) QLQ-C30 results of the intervention group were better than those of the control group. A significant positive correlation of the simple diet self-assessment tool (the higher, the better) and the scores for total health/quality of life were detected (r â€‹= â€‹0.214, P â€‹= â€‹0.005). A significant negative correlation of the nutrition risk screening 2002 (the lower, the better) and the scores of total health/quality of life was detected (r â€‹= â€‹-0.446, P â€‹= â€‹0.000). The patients' scores on the helpfulness of the follow-up service and their satisfaction with it were both significantly higher in the intervention group than in the control group. Conclusions: This study highlighted the important role of nurse-led supportive care based on telephone and Internet-based support for patients after enhanced recovery after surgery. The supportive care improved patients' nutritional status, elevated their quality of life, and improved their satisfaction with the care provided to them.