Predictive Value of Jugulo-omohyoid Lymph Nodes in Lateral Lymph Node Metastasis of Papillary Thyroid Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Jugulo-omohyoid lymph nodes (JOHLN) metastasis has proven to be associated with lateral lymph node metastasis (LLNM). This study aimed to reveal the clinical features and evaluate the predictive value of JOHLN in PTC to guide the extent of surgery. METHODS: A total of 550 patients pathologically diagnosed with PTC between October 2015 and January 2020, all of whom underwent thyroidectomy and lateral lymph node dissection, were included in this study. RESULTS: Thyroiditis, tumor location, tumor size, extra-thyroidal extension, extra-nodal extension, central lymph node metastasis (CLNM), and LLMM were associated with JOHLN. Male, upper lobe tumor, multifocality, extra-nodal extension, CLNM, and JOHLN metastasis were independent risk factors from LLNM. A nomogram based on predictors performed well. Nerve invasion contributed the most to the prediction model, followed by JOHLN metastasis. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.855, and the p-value of the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness of fit test was 0.18. Decision curve analysis showed that the nomogram was clinically helpful. CONCLUSION: JOLHN metastasis could be a clinically sensitive predictor of further LLM. A high-performance nomogram was established, which can provide an individual risk assessment of LNM and guide treatment decisions for patients.

Distinct risk factors of lateral lymph node metastasis in patients with papillary thyroid cancer based on age stratification.

INTRODUCTION: Studies have revealed that age is associated with the risk of lateral lymph node metastasis (LLNM) in papillary thyroid cancer (PTC). This study aimed to identify the optimal cut point of age for a more precise prediction model of LLNM and to reveal differences in risk factors between patients of distinct age stages. METHODS: A total of 499 patients who had undergone thyroidectomy and lateral neck dissection (LND) for PTC were enrolled. The locally weighted scatterplot smoothing (LOWESS) curve and the 'changepoint' package were used to identify the optimal age cut point using R. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent risk factors of LLNM in each group divided by age. RESULTS: Younger patients were more likely to have LLNM, and the optimal cut points of age to stratify the risk of LLNM were 30 and 45 years old. Central lymph node metastasis (CLNM) was a prominent risk factor for further LNM in all patients. Apart from CLNM, sex(p = 0.033), tumor size(p = 0.027), and tumor location(p = 0.020) were independent predictors for patients younger than 30 years old; tumor location(p = 0.013), extra-thyroidal extension(p < 0.001), and extra-nodal extension(p = 0.042) were independent risk factors for patients older than 45 years old. CONCLUSIONS: Our study could be interpreted as an implication for a change in surgical management. LND should be more actively performed when CLNM is confirmed; for younger patients with tumors in the upper lobe and older patients with extra-thyroidal extension tumors, more aggressive detection of the lateral neck might be considered.

Comparative analysis of endoscopic R0 resection followed by additional chemoradiotherapy for early stage esophageal cancer compared with esophagectomy: A multi-center study from ECETC / 中国胸心血管外科临床杂志

@#Objective    To evaluate the strategy of chemoradiotherapy following endoscopic R0 resection for esophageal cancer in M3-T1b stage. Methods    There were 45 esophageal cancer patients with M3-T1b stage with endoscopic R0 resection followed by additional chemoradiotherapy from ECETC (Esophageal Cancer Endoscopic Therapy Consortium) as a trial group with 34 males and 11 females at age of 61.37±7.14 years. There were 90 patients with esophagectomy from Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center as a control group with 63 males and 27 females at age of 61.04±8.17 years. Propensity score match (1:2) was used to balance the factors: gender, age, position, depth of invasion and lymphovascular invasion (LVI), which may influence the outcomes. Overall survival (OS) rate, relapse free survival (RFS) rate, and local recurrence rate were compared between the two groups. Result    There was no statistical difference (HR=2.66 with 95%CI 0.87 to 8.11, P=0.179) in terms of OS rate between the two groups. One, two and three years overall survival rate of patients in the control group was 93%, 86%, and 84%, respectively. Nobody died in the trial group within 3 years after surgery. The RFS rate between the two groups didn’t significantly differ (HR=1.48, 95% CI 0.66 to 3.33, P=0.389). One, two and three years RFS rate of patients in the contorl group was 87%, 78%, and 76%, respectively, while 97%, 93%, and 73% in the trial group, respectively. The local recurrence rates between the two groups didn’t significantly differ either ( HR=0.53，95%CI 0.13 to 2.18, P=0.314). One, two and three years local recurrence rate of patients in the control group was 5%, 6% and 6%, respectively, while 0%, 0% and 21% in the trial group, respectively. Conclusion    Similar outcomes are found regarding OS, RFS and local recurrence rates between the two groups. The strategy of endoscopic R0 resection followed by additional chemoradiotherapy has prospect for the treatment of esophageal cancer in M3-T1b stage. And this kind of therapy may be provided for those with risk factors or can not tolerate surgery.