Epidemiological characteristics of neuroendocrine neoplasms in Beijing: a population-based retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) is rising rapidly worldwide. However, there are few reports on these heterogeneous diseases in China. Our study aimed to explore the epidemiological characteristics of NENs in Beijing. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using population-based cancer surveillance data in Beijing, China. All data were extracted from the Beijing Cancer Registry with incidence dates from 1 January 1998 to 31 December 2018; the follow-up period was through 31 December 2021. Segi's world standard population was used to estimate the age-standardized rate. Survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: From 1998 to 2018, the incidence of NENs in Beijing initially showed a significant increasing trend, from 1.07/100,000 to 3.53/100,000; this began to plateau after 2013. The age-specific incidence rate increased with age and peaked in the age group 70-74 years. The incidence in men was significantly higher than that in women (4.41/100,000 vs. 1.69/100,000). The most common sites of NENs were the lung (2.38/100,000) and rectum (0.14/100,000). Most NENs were diagnosed at a late stage. We found that NENs originating from the lung had worse overall survival than extrapulmonary NENs, and male patients had worse survival than female patients. CONCLUSIONS: This study retrospectively analyzed the epidemiological characteristics of NENs in Beijing from 1998 to 2018. Our findings provide a reference regarding the epidemiological statistics of NENs in Beijing to contribute to the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of these specific tumors.

Genetic and phenotypic profiling of single living circulating tumor cells from patients with microfluidics.

Accurate prediction of the efficacy of immunotherapy for cancer patients through the characterization of both genetic and phenotypic heterogeneity in individual patient cells holds great promise in informing targeted treatments, and ultimately in improving care pathways and clinical outcomes. Here, we describe the nanoplatform for interrogating living cell host-gene and (micro-)environment (NICHE) relationships, that integrates micro- and nanofluidics to enable highly efficient capture of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) from blood samples. The platform uses a unique nanopore-enhanced electrodelivery system that efficiently and rapidly integrates stable multichannel fluorescence probes into living CTCs for in situ quantification of target gene expression, while on-chip coculturing of CTCs with immune cells allows for the real-time correlative quantification of their phenotypic heterogeneities in response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). The NICHE microfluidic device provides a unique ability to perform both gene expression and phenotypic analysis on the same single cells in situ, allowing us to generate a predictive index for screening patients who could benefit from ICI. This index, which simultaneously integrates the heterogeneity of single cellular responses for both gene expression and phenotype, was validated by clinically tracing 80 non-small cell lung cancer patients, demonstrating significantly higher AUC (area under the curve) (0.906) than current clinical reference for immunotherapy prediction.

Patient-derived tumor-like cell clusters for personalized chemo- and immunotherapies in non-small cell lung cancer.

Many patient-derived tumor models have emerged recently. However, their potential to guide personalized drug selection remains unclear. Here, we report patient-derived tumor-like cell clusters (PTCs) for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), capable of conducting 100-5,000 drug tests within 10 days. We have established 283 PTC models with an 81% success rate. PTCs contain primary tumor epithelium self-assembled with endogenous stromal and immune cells and show a high degree of similarity to the original tumors in phenotypic and genotypic features. Utilizing standardized culture and drug-response assessment protocols, PTC drug-testing assays reveal 89% overall consistency in prospectively predicting clinical outcomes, with 98.1% accuracy distinguishing complete/partial response from progressive disease. Notably, PTCs enable accurate prediction of clinical outcomes for patients undergoing anti-PD1 therapy by combining cell viability and IFN-γ value assessments. These findings suggest that PTCs could serve as a valuable preclinical model for personalized medicine and basic research in NSCLC.

Molecular features of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma: A comparative analysis with lung neuroendocrine carcinoma and digestive adenocarcinomas.

Objective: There is an ongoing debate about whether the management of gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) should follow the guidelines of small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). We aim to identify the genetic differences of GEPNEC and its counterpart. Methods: We recruited GEPNEC patients as the main cohort, with lung NEC and digestive adenocarcinomas as comparative cohorts. All patients undergone next-generation sequencing (NGS). Different gene alterations were compared and analyzed between GEPNEC and lung NEC (LNEC), GEPNEC and adenocarcinoma to yield the remarkable genes. Results: We recruited 257 patients, including 99 GEPNEC, 57 LNEC, and 101 digestive adenocarcinomas. Among the mutations, KRAS, RB1, TERT, IL7R, and CTNNB1 were found to have different gene alterations between GEPNEC and LNEC samples. Specific genes for each site were revealed: gastric NEC ( TERT amplification), colorectal NEC ( KRAS mutation), and bile tract NEC ( ARID1A mutation). The gene disparities between small-cell NEC (SCNEC) and large-cell NEC (LCNEC) were KEAP1 and CDH1. Digestive adenocarcinoma was also compared with GEPNEC and suggested RB1, APC, and KRAS as significant genes. The TP53/ RB1 mutation pattern was associated with first-line effectiveness. Putative targetable genes and biomarkers in GEPNEC were identified in 22.2% of the patients, and they had longer progression-free survival (PFS) upon targetable treatment [12.5 months vs. 3.0 months, HR=0.40 (0.21-0.75), P=0.006]. Conclusions: This work demonstrated striking gene distinctions in GEPNEC compared with LNEC and adenocarcinoma and their clinical utility.

Heterogeneity of molecular subtyping and therapy-related marker expression in primary tumors and paired lymph node metastases of small cell lung cancer.

The classification of molecular subtypes and the identification of targetable molecules have been proposed for small cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients. Our aim was to investigate whether the expression of these markers evaluated using lymph node (LN) metastases represents that of primary tumors. We enrolled 46 surgically resected SCLC patients' primary tumors and paired mediastinal LN metastases. The protein expression of subtype-defining markers (ASCL1, NEUROD1, POU2F3, and YAP1) and therapeutic markers (DLL3, MYC, PD-L1, and MHC I) was examined by immunohistochemistry and was correlated with clinicopathological parameters and prognoses. In primary and metastatic tumors, the expression of these markers was 78.3% and 87.0%, 50.0% and 63.0%, 13.0% and 6.5%, 17.4% and 15.2%, 84.8% and 87.0%, 17.4% and 6.5%, 50.0% and 34.8%, and 60.9% and 37.0%, respectively. Positive tumor PD-L1 expression was less present in LN metastases (p = 0.015), and the same was true for MHC I expression (p = 0.036). NEUROD1 and DLL3 expression levels in metastatic tumors were stronger (p < 0.001 and p = 0.002, respectively); conversely, POU2F3, MYC, PD-L1, and MHC I expression levels were weaker (p = 0.018, p = 0.019, p = 0.001, and p < 0.001, respectively). In 15 (32.6%) patients, we observed a change in the molecular subtyping pattern, and a higher number of neuroendocrine (NE)-high phenotype patients were diagnosed when using the LN specimens (91.3% vs. 84.8%). TNM stage and postoperative chemotherapy were independent prognostic factors in surgically resected SCLC patients, and no prognostic differences were found among molecular subtypes. This study highlights the discordance of subtype-specific proteins and therapeutic markers between SCLC primary tumors and LN metastases. Additionally, our findings have therapeutic and prognostic implications and warrant further clinical investigation.

Real-world evaluation of first-line treatment of extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer with atezolizumab plus platinum/etoposide: a focus on patients with brain metastasis.

PURPOSE: A previous real-world study conducted in China confirmed that first-line atezolizumab, in combination with etoposide/platinum (EP), leads to significantly longer progression-free survival (PFS) compared to EP alone in patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). The present study aimed to provide updated survival outcome data and evaluate the clinical efficacy of atezolizumab plus chemotherapy in ES-SCLC patients with brain metastasis (BM). METHODS: This retrospective study included 225 patients with ES-SCLC who were treated with EP alone (EP group) or a combination of EP + atezolizumab (atezolizumab group). Survival outcomes for the total study sample and patients in the BM subgroup were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: The atezolizumab group continued to demonstrate significantly longer PFS than the EP group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.68). The median overall survival (OS) was 26.2 months in the atezolizumab group vs. 14.8 months in the EP group (HR, 0.63). Additionally, among the BM patients in our study, the median PFS was found to be longer in the atezolizumab group (7.0 months) than in the EP group (4.1 months) (HR, 0.46). The OS of the BM patients did not differ significantly between the two treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of atezolizumab to EP as a first-line treatment for ES-SCLC was found to improve survival outcomes. This treatment combination may also prolong PFS in patients with BM, regardless of the administration of cranial irradiation. However, among the BM patients in our study, there was no significant difference in OS between the two treatment groups.

Molecular subtypes, predictive markers and prognosis in small-cell lung carcinoma.

AIMS: A new molecular subtype classification was proposed for small-cell lung carcinoma (SCLC). We aimed to further validate the classification in various SCLC patient samples using immunohistochemistry (IHC) to highlight its clinical significance. METHODS: We analysed the protein expression of four subtype (achaete-scute family BHLH transcription factor 1 (ASCL1), neuronal differentiation 1 (NEUROD1), POU class 2 homeobox 3 (POU2F3) and Yes1-associated transcriptional regulator (YAP1)) and two predictive markers (delta-like ligand 3 (DLL3) and MYC) using IHC in 216 specimens from 195 SCLC patients, including 21 pairs of resected biopsy tumours. Associations among molecular subtypes, clinicopathological features and prognostic implications were also explored. RESULTS: The ASCL1, NEUROD1, POU2F3, YAP1, DLL3 and MYC-positive expression rates were 70.3%, 56.9%, 14.9%, 19.0%, 75.4% and 22.6%, respectively. DLL3 expression had positive and negative associations with that of ASCL1 and POU2F3/YAP1, respectively, whereas MYC had the opposite effect. Strong associations of ASCL1 (Ρ=0.8603, p<0.0001), NEUROD1 (Ρ=0.8326, p<0.0001), POU2F3 (Ρ=0.6950, p<0.0001) and YAP1 (Ρ=0.7466, p<0.0001) expressions were detected between paired resected biopsy tumours. In addition to SCLC-A (ASCL1-dominant), SCLC-N (NEUROD1-dominant) and SCLC-P (POU2F3-dominant), unsupervised hierarchical cluster analyses identified a fourth, quadruple-negative SCLC subtype (SCLC-QN) characterised by the low expression of all four subtype-specific proteins, and 55.4% (n=108), 27.2% (n=53), 11.8% (n=23) and 5.6% (n=11) were categorised as SCLC-A, SCLC-N, SCLC-P and SCLC-QN, respectively. Significant enrichment of SCLC-P in the combined SCLC cohort was observed, and adenocarcinoma was more prevalent in SCLC-A, while large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma was more commonly seen in SCLC-P. No survival difference was found among molecular subtypes. CONCLUSIONS: Our results provide clinical insights into the diagnostic, prognostic and predictive significance of SCLC molecular subtype classifications.

Molecular subtype expression and genomic profiling differ between surgically resected pure and combined small cell lung carcinoma.

A new molecular subtype classification method has been proposed for small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC). However, little is known about the differences between the pure (P-SCLC) and combined subtypes (C-SCLC). We aimed to compare the molecular subtype expression and genomic profiling in terms of clinical relevance between the two groups. 154 surgically resected SCLCs were analyzed for protein expression of four subtypes (ASCL1, NEUROD1, POU2F3, and YAP1) and two predictive markers (DLL3 and MYC) by immunohistochemistry (IHC). We also performed whole exome sequencing of 60 samples to examine genomic profiles. A total of 113 patients with P-SCLC and 41 with C-SCLC were included. In P-SCLC and C-SCLC, the expression of these markers was 78.8% and 41.5%, 98.2% and 97.6%, 42.5% and 51.2%, 38.9% and 85.4%, 85.0% and 68.3%, and 24.8% and 34.1%, respectively. ASCL1 and DLL3 were highly expressed in P-SCLC (p = 0.000 and p = 0.021, respectively), and YAP1 expression was significantly enriched in C-SCLC (p = 0.000). NGS results, including 45 P-SCLCs and 15 C-SCLCs, indicated that EGFR gene mutations were mostly observed in C-SCLCs (p = 0.000). C-SCLC showed higher CNA burden and wGII than P-SCLC (p < 0.01 and p < 0.05); conversely, P-SCLC had higher TMB burden and SDI (p < 0.05 and p < 0.05). YAP1 expression was associated with poor prognosis in P-SCLC but with favorable prognosis in C-SCLC. P-SCLC and C-SCLC are heterogeneous diseases characterized by different molecular subtype expressions and genomic profiles. Our data provide a basis for adopting histological subtype-based treatments, and further prospective studies are required to confirm our conclusions.

Characterization of Lung and Oral Microbiomes in Lung Cancer Patients Using Culturomics and 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing.

Recently, microbiota dysbiosis in lung cancer has attracted immense attention. Studies on lung microbes are mostly based on sequencing, which has left the potentially functional bacteria with extremely low abundance uncovered. In this study, we characterized and compared the lung and oral cavity microbiotas using culturomics and 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Of the 198 bacteria identified at the species level from bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) samples, Firmicutes was predominant (39.90%). Twenty bacterial species isolated from BALF samples were present in at least half of the patients and were also highly abundant in oral samples. Of all isolated strains, Streptococcus and Veillonella were highly dominant. The abundance of Prevotella and Veillonella decreased from the oral cavity to the lung, whereas that of Pseudomonas increased. Linear discriminant analysis effect size demonstrated that Prevotella was more abundant in the healthy samples than in the cancerous ones, which is in accordance with the isolation of Prevotella oralis only from the healthy group using culturomics. Moreover, Gemella sanguinis and Streptococcus intermedius were isolated only from the non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) group, and 16S rRNA gene sequencing showed that they were higher in the NSCLC than in the small-cell lung cancer group. Furthermore, while Bacillus and Castellaniella were enriched in lung adenocarcinoma, Brucella was enriched in lung squamous cell carcinoma. Overall, alterations were observed in the microbial community of patients with lung cancer, whose diversity might be site and pathology dependent. Using culturomics and 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing, this study has provided insights into pulmonary and oral microbiota alterations in patients with lung cancer. IMPORTANCE The relationship between lung microbiota and cancer has been explored based on DNA sequencing; however, culture-dependent approaches are indispensable for further studies on the lung microbiota. In this study, we applied a comprehensive approach combining culturomics and 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing to detect members of the microbiotas in saliva and BALF samples from patients with unilateral lobar masses. We found alterations in the microbial community of patients with lung cancer, whose diversity might be site and pathology dependent. These features may be potential bacterial biomarkers and new targets for lung cancer diagnosis and treatment. In addition, a lung and oral microbial biobank from lung cancer patients was established, which represents a useful resource for studies of host-microbe interactions.

Secreted proteins MDK, WFDC2, and CXCL14 as candidate biomarkers for early diagnosis of lung adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Early diagnosis of lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD), one of the most common types of lung cancer, is very important to improve the prognosis of patients. The current methods can't meet the requirements of early diagnosis. There is a pressing need to identify novel diagnostic biomarkers. Secretory proteins are the richest source for biomarker research. This study aimed to identify candidate secretory protein biomarkers for early diagnosis of LUAD by integrated bioinformatics analysis and clinical validation. METHODS: Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) of GSE31210, gene expression data of early stage of LUAD, were analyzed by GEO2R. Upregulated DEGs predicted to encode secreted proteins were obtained by taking the intersection of the DEGs list with the list of genes encoding secreted proteins predicted by the majority decision-based method (MDSEC). The expressions of the identified secreted proteins in the lung tissues of early-stage LUAD patients were further compared with the healthy control group in mRNA and protein levels by using the UALCAN database (TCGA and CPTAC). The selected proteins expressed in plasma were further validated by using Luminex technology. The diagnostic value of the screened proteins was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Cell counting kit-8 assay was carried out to investigate the proliferative effects of these screened proteins. RESULTS: A total of 2183 DEGs, including 1240 downregulated genes and 943 upregulated genes, were identified in the GSE31210. Of the upregulated genes, 199 genes were predicted to encode secreted proteins. After analysis using the UALCAN database, 16 molecules were selected for further clinical validation. Plasma concentrations of three proteins, Midkine (MDK), WAP four-disulfide core domain 2 (WFDC2), and C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 14 (CXCL14), were significantly higher in LUAD patients than in healthy donors. The area under the curve values was 0.944, 0.881, and 0.809 for MDK, WFDC2, and CXCL14, 0.962 when combined them. Overexpression of the three proteins enhanced the proliferation activity of A549 cells. CONCLUSIONS: MDK, WFDC2, and CXCL14 were identified as candidate diagnostic biomarkers for early-stage LUAD and might also play vital roles in tumorigenesis.

Maximum Somatic Allele Frequency-Adjusted Blood-Based Tumor Mutational Burden Predicts the Efficacy of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Recent studies exhibited the unstable prediction ability of blood-based tumor mutational burden (bTMB) when predicting the response of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) therapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) abundance, usually represented by maximum somatic allele frequency (MSAF), was one possible confounding factor influencing bTMB ability in ICIs response prediction. METHODS: MSAF-adjusted bTMB (Ma-bTMB) was established and validated in patients with advanced NSCLC among Geneplus Cancer Genome Database (GCGD, n = 1679), Zhuo (n = 35), Wang (n = 45), POPLAR (NCT01903993, n = 211) and OAK (NCT02008227, n = 642) cohorts. RESULTS: MSAF demonstrated a modest positive correlation with bTMB and a negative one with survival benefit. Improved survival outcomes of ICIs therapy have been observed among patients with high-Ma-bTMB compared to those with low-Ma-bTMB in Zhuo and Wang cohorts. In addition, compared to low-Ma-bTMB, high-Ma-bTMB was associated with more positive clinical benefits from ICIs therapy than chemotherapy both in POPLAR and OAK cohorts. Further exploration suggested that Ma-bTMB could precisely identify more potential ICIs beneficiaries compared to bTMB and LAF-bTMB, complementary to PD-L1 expression. CONCLUSIONS: We developed Ma-bTMB, a convenient, readily available, non-invasive predictive biomarker effectively differentiates beneficiaries of ICIs therapy in advanced NSCLC, warranting future clinical trials.

Clinical outcomes of atezolizumab in combination with etoposide/platinum for treatment of extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: A real-world, multicenter, retrospective, controlled study in China.

Objective: Atezolizumab along with chemotherapy has prolonged the survival of patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) worldwide, although real-world (RW) data are lacking in China. This study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and clinical outcomes of atezolizumab plus etoposide/platinum (EP). Methods: Data obtained in this retrospective study were captured from six oncology units of five medical facilities from January 2019 to April 2022. For first-line treatments, atezolizumab combined with EP vs. EP alone, we primarily evaluated progression-free survival (PFS); other efficacy indicators, including overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and patterns of SCLC progression and adverse events (AEs) were assessed. Results: The primary analysis included data from 225 patients, of whom 133 received EP along with atezolizumab (atezolizumab group) and 92 received EP alone (EP group). The PFS duration of the atezolizumab group [7.10 months; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 6.53-9.00] exceeded that of the EP group (6.50 months; 95% CI, 4.83-7.53). Overall, the hazard ratio (HR) was 0.69 (95% CI, 0.49-0.97) (P=0.029); particularly, the HR was 0.54 (95% CI, 0.36-0.80) among patients undergoing ≥4 chemotherapy cycles and 0.33 (95% CI, 0.20-0.56) among individuals with atezolizumab maintenance. The ORR and disease-control rate (DCR) were similar between the two groups. Because of incomplete OS data, the median OS was not determined for either group. Bone marrow suppression was the most common AE detected (58.6%) in the atezolizumab group. Immune-related AEs occurred in 19 patients in the atezolizumab group (14.3%), with only one case of grade 3 encephalitis. Conclusions: This RW study in China demonstrated improved clinical outcomes of atezolizumab along with EP for ES-SCLC, particularly in the chemosensitive population. These results align with the results of the IMpower133 study, although the impact of this treatment modality on OS warrants additional follow-up studies.

[Analysis of the Effcacy and Safety of Amivantamab in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer 
Patients with EGFR/MET Gene Abnormalities: A Single Center's Experience].

BACKGROUND: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and cellular-mesenchymal to epithelial transition factor (c-Met) are widely expressed on cancer cells. There is a synergistic effect of EGFR and HGF/c-Met pathways on proliferation, downstream activation of signal transduction and an additive effect. Studies show that combination of both signaling pathways could potentially be targeted in a synergistic fashion. Amivantamab, a bispecific monoclonal antibody targeting EGFR and c-Met, yielded robust and durable responses in a variety of clinicals trials. However, few researches have reported its efficacy in Chinese non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. This study was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness and tolerance of Amivantamab in NSCLC patients with EGFR/MET gene abnormalities at Peking University Cancer Hospital. METHODS: The study enrolled NSCLC patients who received Amivantamab in our hospital between August 2020 and December 2021, and analyzed the response, survival, and treatment-related adverse events. RESULTS: Fifteen patients were enrolled in this research, and six of them received Amivantamab treatment and the other nine patients received Amivantamab plus Lazertinib treatment. The rates of partial response (PR), stable disease (SD), and progressive disease (PD) were 46.7% (7/15), 46.7% (7/15) and 6.7% (1/15), respectively. The overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were 28.6% (2/7) and 100.0% (7/7) in seven patients with EGFR exon 20 insertion, respectively. The ORR and DCR were 40.0% (2/5) and 100.0% (5/5) in five post-osimertinib EGFR-mutant patients, respectively. After a median follow-up of 8.7 months, the median progression-free survival and overall survival were not reached. The most common treatment-related adverse events were rash (86.7%), paronychia (80.0%), and infusion-related reactions (60.0%), and most of them were graded as 1 to 2. Grade 3 to 4 adverse events included rash (33.3%), alanine aminotransferase elevation (13.3%), gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase elevation (13.3%), peripheral edema (6.7%), thromboembolism (6.7%), interstitial lung disease (6.7%), and thrombocytopenia (6.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Amivantamab was effective in Chinese NSCLC patients with EGFR exon 20 insertion and post-Osimertinib EGFR-mutant patients, similar to the results of clinical trials conducted in western countries. Amivantamab was well tolerated and emphases should be put on adverse events such as rash, paronychia, and infusion-related reactions.

The prevalence and real-world therapeutic analysis of Chinese patients with KRAS-Mutant Non-Small Cell lung cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) is an important driver gene of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Despite a rapid progress achieved in the targeted therapy, chemotherapy remains the standard treatment option for patients with KRAS-mutant NSCLC. This study aimed to assess real-world data of Chinese patients with KRAS-mutant NSCLC undergoing chemotherapy and/or immunotherapy. METHODS: KRAS mutational status was analyzed using next-generation sequencing of 150,327 NSCLC patients from the Lung Cancer Big Data Precise Treatment Collaboration Group (LANDSCAPE) project (Cohort I). Treatment data were collected and analyzed retrospectively from 4348 NSCLC patients who were admitted to the Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute between January 2009 and October 2020 (Cohort II). RESULTS: In Cohort I, 18,224 patients were detected with KRAS mutations (12.1%) of whom G12C (29.6%) was the most frequent subtype, followed by G12D (18.1%) and G12V (17.5%). In case of concomitant mutations, TP53 had the highest incidence of 33.6%, followed by EGFR (11.6%), STK11 (10.4%), KEAP1(6.2%), and CDKN2A (6.0%). Cohort II included 497 patients (11.4%) with KRAS mutations. In the first-line chemotherapeutic analysis of Cohort II, patients benefited more from the pemetrexed/platinum (PP) regimen than the gemcitabine/platinum (GP) or taxanes/platinum (TP) regimen (median progression-free survival [PFS], 6.4 vs. 4.9 vs. 5.6 months, hazard ratio [HR] = 0.65, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.48-0.88, p = 0.033 and HR = 0.69, 95% CI 0.47-1.00, p = 0.05, respectively), with no significant difference when combined with bevacizumab. Regarding patients who received immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), the objective response rate was 26% for a median PFS of 9.6 months (95% CI 6.16-13.03). Patients who received ICIs combined with chemotherapy had a significantly longer survival than monotherapy (median PFS, 13.9 vs. 5.2 months, HR = 0.59, 95% CI 0.35-0.99, p = 0.049). CONCLUSION: KRAS is an important driver gene in NSCLC, compromising 12.1% in this study, and G12C was noted as the most common subtype. Patients with KRAS-mutant NSCLC could benefit from pemetrexed-based chemotherapy and ICIs.

Genetic and treatment profiles of patients with concurrent Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) and Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase (ALK) mutations.

BACKGROUND: EGFR and ALK alternations often contribute to human malignancies, including lung cancer. EGFR and ALK mutations are usually sensitive to EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and ALK-TKIs. Although generally mutually exclusive, these mutations do co-exist in rare cases. This study investigated the frequencies, clinical characteristics, therapeutic efficacies, and genetic profiles of lung cancer patients with EGFR and ALK co-mutations. METHODS: Patients with concurrent EGFR and ALK mutations were included in this study, which analyzed mutation profiles and treatment histories. SPSS20.0 were used for survival analysis. RESULTS: Among 271 ALK-positive (ALK-pos) and 2975 EGFR-positive (EGFR-pos) patients in our database, nine (2.6% of ALK-pos and 0.2% of EGFR-pos) patients had concurrent EGFR and ALK mutations (including three exon19 Indel + EML4-ALK, two exon19 Indel + STRN-ALK, two L858R + L1152R, one L858R + EML4-ALK, and one G719C + S768I + STRN-ALK). Eight patients had at least one type of EGFR-TKIs treatment. The median progression free survival (PFS) of these patients on first-generation EGFR-TKIs was 14.5 months (95% CI: 11 - NR). Of these eight patients, one who progressed on Gefitinib and subsequently on Osimertinib had a T790M + C797G. The other seven EGFR-TKIs resistance patients had no known resistance mutations. No patients had ALK mutations before treatment, so ALK mutations may have developed as resistance mechanisms during EGFR-TKIs therapies. EGFR-TKIs-treated patients with EGFR/ALK L1152R mutations generally had a shorter PFS than patients with other mutation combinations. CONCLUSIONS: ALK and EGFR mutations coincide at a relatively low frequency in lung cancer patients. ALK mutations developed either synchronously or heterochronously with EGFR mutations. Two ALK mutations (L1152R and STRN-ALK) may co-exist with EGFR mutations at a higher frequency than others. Most EGFR/ALK co-alteration patients (other than the EGFR/ALK L1152R type) can benefit from first line EGFR-TKIs.

Efficacy and Safety of Combination Treatment With Apatinib and Osimertinib After Osimertinib Resistance in Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-Mutant Non-small Cell Lung Carcinoma-A Retrospective Analysis of a Multicenter Clinical Study.

Currently, there are limited treatment options for patients who developed resistance to osimertinib, a third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitor. Resistance to EGFR inhibitors is frequently associated with enhanced vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) levels. This multicenter, retrospective study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of the combination treatment with apatinib and osimertinib in 39 patients with EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) who developed osimertinib resistance. The patients received the combination of oral apatinib 250 mg qd and osimertinib 80 mg qd. The efficacy was evaluated after the first month then every 2 months thereafter. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). The overall response rate (ORR) and the disease control rate (DCR) of the combination of apatinib and osimertinib was 12.8% (5/39) and 79.5% (31/39), respectively. The median PFS was 4 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 3.5-4.5 months]. Fourteen patients were administered with at least 6 months of combination therapy, and 11 of them remained on treatment programs. The 6-month PFS rate was 38%. Nine patients underwent biopsies after failing osimertinib treatment, and five of six patients with TP53 mutations had PFS of less than 3 months. The spectrum of resistance to osimertinib mechanisms included c-mesenchymal-epithelial transition factor (c-Met) amplification, phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase catalytic subunit alpha (PIK3CA) gain-of-function mutation, phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) loss-of-function mutation, Erb-B2 receptor tyrosine kinase 2 (ERBB2) amplification, and insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor (IGF1R) mutation. The most common adverse events were hypertension (30.7%, 12/39), diarrhea (15.4%, 6/39), and proteinuria (12.8%, 5/39). The combination of apatinib and osimertinib improved the ORR and the DCR of patients with osimertinib-refractory EGFR-positive NSCLC, thus making it a reasonable treatment choice after the development of osimertinib resistance.

Evaluation of different treatment strategies between right-sided and left-sided pneumonectomy for stage I-IIIA non-small cell lung cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to assess the different survival outcomes of stage I-IIIA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who received right-sided and left-sided pneumonectomy, and to further develop the most appropriate treatment strategies. METHODS: We accessed data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database from the United States for the present study. An innovative propensity score matching analysis was used to minimize the variance between groups. RESULTS: For 2,683 patients who received pneumonectomy, cancer-specific survival [hazard ratio (HR) =0.863, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.771 to 0.965, P=0.010] and overall survival (OS; HR =0.875, 95% CI: 0.793 to 0.967, P=0.008) were significantly superior in left-sided pneumonectomy patients compared with right-sided pneumonectomy patients. Cancer-specific survival (HR =0.847, 95% CI: 0.745 to 0.963, P=0.011) and OS (HR =0.858, 95% CI: 0.768 to 0.959, P=0.007) were also significantly longer with left-sided compared to right-sided pneumonectomy after matching analysis of 2,050 patients. Adjuvant therapy could significantly prolong cancer-specific survival (67 versus 51 months, HR =1.314, 95% CI: 1.093 to 1.579, P=0.004) and OS (46 versus 30 months, HR =1.458, 95% CI: 1.239 to 1.715, P<0.001) among left-sided pneumonectomy patients after the matching procedure, while adjuvant therapy did not increase cancer-specific survival for right-sided pneumonectomy patients (46 versus 42 months, HR =1.112, 95% CI: 0.933 to 1.325, P=0.236). Subgroup analysis showed that adjuvant chemotherapy could significantly improve cancer-specific survival and OS for all pneumonectomy patients. However, radiotherapy was associated with worse survival for patients with right-sided pneumonectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Pneumonectomy side can be deemed as an important factor when physicians determine the most optimal treatment strategies.

Efficacy and safety of pemetrexed maintenance chemotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer in a real-world setting.

BACKGROUND: Pemetrexed maintenance therapy offers a survival benefit in patients with nonprogressive advanced nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with good tolerability. This study was designed to analyze the efficacy and safety of pemetrexed maintenance chemotherapy in advanced nonsquamous NSCLC patients in a real-world setting. METHODS: The response rate (RR) and adverse events in 71 nonsquamous NSCLC patients treated with pemetrexed-based chemotherapy were observed until disease progression or unacceptable toxicities. Measures of survival were analyzed during follow-up. RESULTS: Of 69 efficacy-evaluable patients, the objective response rate (ORR) was 46.4% and the disease control rate (DCR) was 98.6%. ORR showed no significant difference between patients who received pemetrexed as first-line therapy and those who received pemetrexed as second-line or higher treatment. The median treatment cycle for all patients was 8. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 9.5 months (m) and median overall survival (OS) was 30.5 m. The univariate and multivariate analyses showed that the number of chemotherapy cycles was an independent factor for PFS. The most common adverse reactions were grade 1 to 2 hematologic toxicities, gastrointestinal reactions, and liver enzyme abnormalities. Only 1 patient experienced a grade 3 gastrointestinal event. CONCLUSIONS: Pemetrexed maintenance chemotherapy can improve PFS in patients with advanced nonsquamous NSCLC with good tolerability.

Identification of serum biomarkers to predict pemetrexed/platinum chemotherapy efficacy for advanced lung adenocarcinoma patients by data-independent acquisition (DIA) mass spectrometry analysis with parallel reaction monitoring (PRM) verification.

BACKGROUND: Pemetrexed/platinum chemotherapy has been the standard chemotherapy regimen for lung adenocarcinoma patients, but the efficacy varies considerably. METHODS: To discover new serum biomarkers to predict the efficacy of pemetrexed/platinum chemotherapy, we analyzed 20 serum samples from advanced lung adenocarcinoma patients who received pemetrexed/platinum chemotherapy with the data-independent acquisition (DIA) quantitative mass spectrometry (MS). RESULTS: The 20 patients were categorized as "good response" [12 patients achieving partial response (PR)] and "poor response" [8 patients with progressive disease (PD)] groups. Altogether 23 significantly different expressed proteins were identified, which had relative ratios higher than 1.2 or lower than -0.83, with 7 proteins having an area under the curve (AUC) above 0.8. To further validate the DIA results, we used the parallel reaction monitoring (PRM) method to examine 16 candidate serum biomarkers in the study cohort of 20 patients and another cohort of 22 advanced lung adenocarcinoma patients (16 PR and 6 PD). Quantitative validation using PRM correlated well with the DIA results, and 10 promising proteins exhibited a similar up- or downregulation. It is worth noting that glutathione peroxidase 3 (GPX3) exhibits significant upregulation in the poor response group compared with the good response group, which was validated by both DIA and PRM methods. CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirmed that combined DIA MS and PRM approaches were effective in identifying serum predictive biomarkers for advanced lung adenocarcinoma patients. Further studies are needed to explore the potential biological mechanism underlying these biomarkers.

Plasma cytokines interleukin-18 and C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 10 are indicative of the anti-programmed cell death protein-1 treatment response in lung cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: Although programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1)/programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) checkpoint inhibitors have shown prominent efficacy for treatment of advanced lung cancer, the outcomes of metastatic lung cancer remain poor throughout the world. Although progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) have improved in the first- and second-line therapy settings for advanced lung cancer, the response rates to PD-1/PD-L1 inhibition range from 20% to 40%. Furthermore, patients may be at risk for immune-related adverse events (irAEs); hence, appropriate patient selection is crucial. This study aimed to identify a panel of plasma cytokines representing prognostic and predictive biomarkers of the response to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 treatment. METHODS: We prospectively studied 32 lung cancer patients who received anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibody immunotherapy. Plasma cytokines in peripheral blood samples were evaluated and analyzed using flow cytometry at the time of diagnosis and at 2 months after the initiation of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibition. RESULTS: The baseline plasma concentrations of interleukin-18 (IL-18) and C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 10 (CXCL10) were correlated with the degree of tumor response. Moreover, the magnitude of plasma IL-18 and CXCL10 level fluctuations were correlated significantly with the objective tumor response to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy, and patients with high CXCL10 expression had significantly shorter PFS than those with low CXCL10 expression. A strong positive correlation between the fluctuation of IL-18 and interleukin-8 (IL-8) levels was detected, as was a negative correlation between the fluctuation of IL-18 and CXCL10 levels. The level of plasma C-C motif chemokine ligand 5 (CCL5) was significantly higher in patients with irAEs than in those without irAEs. CONCLUSIONS: Plasma cytokines are related to the clinical efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. IL-18 and CXCL10 are potential predictive markers for anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy in lung cancer patients and may play an important role in selecting patients who would benefit from PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors.