Liver Transplant Costs and Activity After United Network for Organ Sharing Allocation Policy Changes.

Importance: A new liver allocation policy was implemented by United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) in February 2020 with the stated intent of improving access to liver transplant (LT). There are growing concerns nationally regarding the implications this new system may have on LT costs, as well as access to a chance for LT, which have not been captured at a multicenter level. Objective: To characterize LT volume and cost changes across the US and within specific center groups and demographics after the policy implementation. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study collected and reviewed LT volume from multiple centers across the US and cost data with attention to 8 specific center demographics. Two separate 12-month eras were compared, before and after the new UNOS allocation policy: March 4, 2019, to March 4, 2020, and March 5, 2020, to March 5, 2021. Data analysis was performed from May to December 2022. Main Outcomes and Measures: Center volume, changes in cost. Results: A total of 22 of 68 centers responded comparing 1948 LTs before the policy change and 1837 LTs postpolicy, resulting in a 6% volume decrease. Transplants using local donations after brain death decreased 54% (P < .001) while imported donations after brain death increased 133% (P = .003). Imported fly-outs and dry runs increased 163% (median, 19; range, 1-75, vs 50, range, 2-91; P = .009) and 33% (median, 3; range, 0-16, vs 7, range, 0-24; P = .02). Overall hospital costs increased 10.9% to a total of $46 360 176 (P = .94) for participating centers. There was a 77% fly-out cost increase postpolicy ($10 600 234; P = .03). On subanalysis, centers with decreased LT volume postpolicy observed higher overall hospital costs ($41 720 365; P = .048), and specifically, a 122% cost increase for liver imports ($6 508 480; P = .002). Transplant centers from low-income states showed a significant increase in hospital (12%) and import (94%) costs. Centers serving populations with larger proportions of racial and ethnic minority candidates and specifically Black candidates significantly increased costs by more than 90% for imported livers, fly-outs, and dry runs despite lower LT volume. Similarly, costs increased significantly (>100%) for fly-outs and dry runs in centers from worse-performing health systems. Conclusions and Relevance: Based on this large multicenter effort and contrary to current assumptions, the new liver distribution system appears to place a disproportionate burden on populations of the current LT community who already experience disparities in health care. The continuous allocation policies being promoted by UNOS could make the situation even worse.

Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the intrahepatic bile duct: a review of literature and a rare case report.

Background: Intraductal papillary neoplasm of the bile duct is a rare variant of bile duct tumors, which is characterized by papillary or villous growth inside the bile duct. Having papillary and mucinous features such as those found in pancreatic intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) is extremely rare. We report a rare case of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the intrahepatic bile duct. Case report: A 65-year-old male Caucasian with multiple comorbidities presented to the emergency room with moderate constant pain at the right upper quadrant (RUQ) abdomen for the last several hours. On physical examination, he was found to have normal vital signs, with icteric sclera and pain on deep palpation at the RUQ region. His laboratory results were significant for jaundice, elevated liver function tests and creatinine, hyperglycemia, and leukocytosis. Multiple imaging studies revealed a 5 cm heterogeneous mass in the left hepatic lobe that demonstrated areas of internal enhancement, mild gall bladder wall edema, dilated gall bladder with mild sludge, and 9 mm common bile duct (CBD) dilatation without evidence of choledocholithiasis. He underwent a CT-guided biopsy of this mass, which revealed intrahepatic papillary mucinous neoplasm. This case was discussed at the hepatobiliary multidisciplinary conference, and the patient underwent an uneventful robotic left partial liver resection, cholecystectomy, and lymphadenectomy. Conclusion: IPMN of the biliary tract may represent a carcinogenesis pathway different from that of CBD carcinoma arising from flat dysplasia. Complete surgical resection should be performed whenever possible because of its significant risk of harboring invasive carcinoma.

A rare synchrony of adenocarcinoma of the ampulla with an ileal gastrointestinal stromal tumor: A case report.

BACKGROUND: This is a unique case of a patient who was found to have two extremely rare primary malignancies synchronously, i.e., an ampullary adenocarcinoma arising from a high-grade dysplastic tubulovillous adenoma of the ampulla of Vater (TVAoA) with a high-grade ileal gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST). Based on a literature review and to the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of this synchronicity. Primary ampullary tumors are extremely rare, with an incidence of four cases per million population, which is approximately 0.0004%. Distal duodenal polyps are uncommon and have a preponderance of occurring around the ampulla of Vater. An adenoma of the ampulla ( AoA) may occur sporadically or with a familial inheritance pattern, as in hereditary genetic polyposis syndrome such as familial adenomatous polyposis syndrome (FAPS). We report a case of a 77-year-old male who was admitted for painless obstructive jaundice with a 40-pound weight loss over a two-month period and who was subsequently diagnosed with two extremely rare primary malignancies, i.e., an adenocarcinoma of the ampulla arising from a high-grade TVAoA and a high-grade ileal GIST found synchronously. CASE SUMMARY: A 77-year-old male was admitted for generalized weakness with an associated weight loss of 40 pounds in the previous two months and was noted to have painless obstructive jaundice. The physical examination was benign except for bilateral scleral and palmar icterus. Lab results were significant for an obstructive pattern on liver enzymes. Serum lipase and carbohydrate antigen-19-9 levels were elevated. Computed tomography (CT) of the abdomen and pelvis and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography were consistent with a polypoid mass at the level of the common bile duct (CBD) and the ampulla of Vater with CBD dilatation. The same lesions were visualized with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Histopathology of endoscopic forceps biopsy showed TVAoA. Histopathology of the surgical specimen of the resected ampulla showed an adenocarcinoma arising from the TVAoA. Abdominal and pelvic CT also showed a coexisting heterogeneously enhancing, lobulated mass in the posterior pelvis originating from the ileum. The patient underwent ampullectomy and resection of the mass and ileo-ileal side-to-side anastomosis followed by chemoradiation. Histopathology of the resected mass confirmed it as a high-grade, spindle cell GIST. The patient is currently on imatinib, and a recent follow-up positron emission tomography (PET) scan showed a complete metabolic response. CONCLUSION: This case is distinctive because the patient was diagnosed with two synchronous and extremely rare high-grade primary malignancies, i.e., an ampullary adenocarcinoma arising from a high-grade dysplastic TVAoA with a high-grade ileal GIST. An AoA can occur sporadically and in a familial inheritance pattern in the setting of FAPS. We emphasize screening and surveillance colonoscopy when one encounters an AoA in upper endoscopy to check for FAPS. An AoA is a premalignant lesion, particularly in the setting of FAPS that carries a high risk of metamorphism to an ampullary adenocarcinoma. Final diagnosis should be based on a histopathologic study of the surgically resected ampullary specimen and not on endoscopic forceps biopsy. The diagnosis of AoA is usually incidental on upper endoscopy. However, patients can present with constitutional symptoms such as significant weight loss and obstructive symptoms such as painless jaundice, both of which occurred in our patient. Patient underwent ampullectomy with clear margins and ileal GIST resection. Patient is currently on imatinib adjuvant therapy and showed complete metabolic response on follow up PET scan.

Addressing the worldwide hepatocellular carcinoma: epidemiology, prevention and management.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the sixth most common cancer in the world with rising incidence. Globally, there has been substantial variation in prevalence of risk factors for HCC over years, like control of viral hepatitis in developing countries but growing epidemic of fatty liver disease in developed world. Changing epidemiology of HCC is related to trends in these risk factors. HCC remains asymptomatic until it is very advanced which makes early detection by surveillance important in reducing HCC related mortality. Management of HCC. depends on stage of the tumor and severity of underlying liver disease. At present, resection and transplant are still the best curative options for small HCC, but recent advances in locoregional therapy and molecular targeted systemic therapy has changed the management for HCC at intermediate and advanced stages. This review is overview of global epidemiology, prevention, surveillance and emerging therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Considerations for resuming global surgery outreach programs during and after the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.

BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic has disrupted the delivery of safe surgical care worldwide. One specific aspect of global surgical care that has been severely limited is the ability for physicians and trainees to participate in global surgical outreach programs in low- and middle-income countries. METHODS: A narrative review of the literature regarding global surgical outreach programs during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic was performed. Factors that must be considered in the reinstatement of global surgical outreach programs were identified, and suggestions to address them were provided based on the available literature and the experiences of the senior authors. RESULTS: As global surgical outreach programs were canceled at the start of the pandemic, many academic surgeons turned to digital solutions to continue to engage with low- and middle-income country partners. With the advent of coronavirus disease 2019 vaccines and improved access to testing and treatment worldwide, the recommencement of global surgical outreach programs may begin to be considered. Important considerations before initiation include vaccine and testing availability for visiting providers, local staff, and patients, local hospital capacity, staff and equipment shortages, and the characteristics of the patient population and visiting providers. Region- and country-specific factors, including local infection rates and concomitant health crises, must also be taken into account. Expansion of digital collaborative efforts may further deepen international connections and promote sustainable models of care. CONCLUSION: With careful consideration, global surgical outreach programs may begin to be safely restarted in the near future. The current article evaluates individual factors that must be considered to safely restart global surgical outreach programs as the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic is better controlled.

Incidental liver metastasis in pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Exocrine cancer of pancreas is the fourth leading cause of death in the USA among both men and women. Contrast enhanced multidetector-row computer tomography (MDCT) is the current modality of choice for the detection of distant metastasis in pancreatic cancer as a part of pre-operative workup, which helps decide on resectability. Authors present a first ever reported case of an incidental liver metastasis found on intra-operative wedge hepatic biopsy during Whipple's procedure for pancreatic cancer. This pancreatic cancer was initially thought to be resectable based on MDCT staging per guidelines. The case highlights the importance of diagnostic staging laparoscopy and neoadjuvant chemotherapy before resecting pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Influence of facility type on survival outcomes after pancreatectomy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

INTRODUCTION: Although a volume-outcome relationship has been well established for pancreatectomy, little is known about differences in mortality by facility type. The objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of facility type on short-term and long-term survival outcomes for patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma who underwent pancreatectomy and identify determinants of overall survival (OS). METHODS: A cohort of 33,382 patients with Stage I-III pancreatic adenocarcinoma diagnosed between 1998 and 2011 were evaluated from the National Cancer Data Base. Clinicopathological, sociodemographic and treatment variables were compared among three facility types where patients received resection: (i) community cancer program (CCP), (ii) comprehensive community cancer program (CCCP), and (iii) academic research program (ARP). 5-year OS was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Despite ARP having significantly higher percentage of poorly differentiated tumors, higher T-stage tumors, more positive lymph nodes, and greater circle distance compared to the other facilities, it had the highest 5-yr OS. The 5-yr OS for CCP, CCCP, and ARP was 11.2%, 13.2%, and 16.6%, respectively (P < 0.0001) and the median survival time (months) was 12.4, 15.6 and 19.1, respectively. CONCLUSION: Patients receiving pancreatic resection at an ARP yielded a higher 5-year OS compared to CCP or CCCP.

Kidney outcomes in patients with liver cirrhosis and chronic kidney disease receiving an orthotopic liver transplant alone.

Kidney transplant in patients with liver cirrhosis and nondialysis chronic kidney disease (CKD) is controversial. We report 14 liver cirrhotic patients who had persistently low MDRD-6 estimated glomerular filtration rate (e-GFR) <40 mL/min/1.73 m2 for ≥3 months and underwent either liver transplant alone (LTA; n=9) or simultaneous liver-kidney transplant (SLKT; n=5). Pretransplant, patients with LTA compared with SLKT had lower serum creatinine (2.5±0.73 vs 4.6±0.52 mg/dL, P=.001), higher MDRD-6 e-GFR (21.0±7.2 vs 10.3±2.0 mL/min/1.73 m2 , P=.002), higher 24-hour urine creatinine clearance (34.2±8.8 vs 18.0±2.2 mL/min, P=.002), lower proteinuria (133.2±117.7 vs 663±268.2 mg/24 h, P=.0002), and relatively normal kidney biopsy and ultrasound findings. Post-LTA, the e-GFR (mL/min/1.73 m2 ) increased in all nine patients, with mean e-GFR at 1 month (49.8±8.4), 3 months (49.6±8.7), 6 months (49.8±8.1), 12 months (47.6±9.2), 24 months (47.9±9.1), and 36 months (45.1±7.3) significantly higher compared to pre-LTA e-GFR (P≤.005 at all time points). One patient developed end-stage renal disease 9 years post-LTA and another patient expired 7 years post-LTA. The low e-GFR alone in the absence of other markers or risk factors of CKD should not be an absolute criterion for SLKT in patients with liver cirrhosis.

Torsed hepaticoileostomy-an unusual complication of Bile Duct injury repair.

We present a 42-year-old male with strictured bilioenteric anastomosis after bile duct injury repair. The patient improved after percutaneous biliary drainage and balloon dilation of the stricture. Persistent bile reflux around the catheter insertion site prompted a cholangiogram that suggested an error in the enteric limb. Surgical exploration revealed that a torsed ileal loop was used for bilioenteric anastomosis. This error was repaired surgically. The patient had immediate and long-term resolution of symptoms.

Aberrant left main bile duct draining directly into the cystic duct or gallbladder: an unreported anatomical variation and cause of bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Despite recent advances, iatrogenic bile duct injury remains one of the most common complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Aberrant biliary tract anatomy is one of the major risk factors for iatrogenic bile duct injury. In this case report, for the first time, we report a case of aberrant left main bile duct draining directly into the cystic duct or gallbladder that presented with bile duct injury after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. We hope that the diagnostic and management approach used in this case will help physicians to identify and manage their patients should they face such a rare anatomy.

Portal-endocrine and gastric-exocrine drainage technique of pancreas transplantation provides an easy access for evaluation of pancreatic allograft dysfunction: six-year experience at a single center.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to report our six-year experience with portal-endocrine and gastric-exocrine drainage technique of pancreatic transplantation, which was first developed and implemented at our center in 2007. METHODS: In this study, the outcomes of all patients at our center who had pancreas transplantation with portal-endocrine and gastric-exocrine drainage technique were evaluated. RESULTS: From October 2007 to November 2013, 38 patients had pancreas transplantation with this technique - 31 simultaneous kidney pancreas and seven pancreas alone. Median duration of follow-up was 3.8 years. One-, three-, and five-year patient and graft survival rates were 94%, 87%, 70% and 83%, 65%, 49%, respectively. For pancreas allograft dysfunction evaluation, 51 upper endoscopies were performed in 14 patients; donor duodenal biopsies were successfully obtained in 45 (88%). We detected nine episodes of acute rejection (eight patients) and seven episodes of cytomegalovirus (CMV) duodenitis (six patients). No patient developed any complication due to upper endoscopy. CONCLUSIONS: Portal-endocrine and gastric-exocrine drainage technique of pancreas transplantation provides lifelong easy access to the transplanted duodenum for evaluation of pancreatic allograft dysfunction.

Curative resection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma with major venous resection/repair is safe procedure but will not improve survival.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and survival benefit of combined curative resection (CR) of the pancreas and major venous resection in the management of borderline resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma. METHODS: In this IRB approved retrospective cohort study, patients who had pancreatic surgery (n=274) between 1998-2012 were reviewed. One hundred and seventy-five patients had malignant causes, of which 119 underwent CR. One hundred and two patients who did not require venous resection/repair (Group-I) were compared with 17 patients who had major vascular involvement (portal-vein/superior-mesenteric-vein) and underwent a vascular resection/repair (Group-II) during the CR. Demographics, operative and follow-up data were reviewed. RESULT: Type of the operations were: standard Whipple (n=53), pylorus-sparing-Whipple (n=41), total pancreatectomy (n=11), and distal pancreatectomy (n=13). In Group-II, venous involvement was excised and primarily repaired (n=12), or repaired using other veins (n=4) or a synthetic patch (n=1). Group-II had a significantly larger tumor size and more perineural invasion and peripancreatic soft tissue involvement (P<0.05). While complication rate, margin status, and duration of stay were not different between the groups, the median-overall-survival was higher for Group-I (15.34 months) than Group-II patients (7.18 months) (P=0.003). CONCLUSION: Pancreatic CR requiring intra-operative venous resection/repair is feasible and safe, but the survival of the patients who have pancreatic adenocarcinoma with venous involvement is poor irrespective of a successful venous resection.

Local graft irradiation for kidney allograft rejection: a case series and review of the literature.

INTRODUCTION: Due to its immunosuppressive properties, local graft irradiation (LGI) has been proposed as a second line therapy for treatment of acute kidney rejection. CASE PRESENTATION: In this case-series we report 6 patients with biopsy proven acute kidney allograft rejection refractory to conventional antirejection therapy who underwent LGI for treatment of acute rejection at our center. Three of these patients had living donor transplants, 2 had deceased donor transplants, and one had received a simultaneous kidney/pancreas transplant. All patients were treated with anti thymocyte-globulin or muromonab-CD3, and intravenous steroids for initial treatment of rejection. Three patients also received intravenous immunoglobulin. LGI was tried as a last resort and was well tolerated and resulted in either improvement or stabilization of renal function in 5 patients. One patient could not be given the complete course of chemical immunosuppression for treatment of rejection due to concomitant cryptococcal meningitis and was switched to LGI with good short-term response. DISCUSSION: Our results suggest that LGI could be considered a second line therapy to the conventional anti-rejection therapy for patients with refractory acute kidney allograft rejection, or for patients who cannot receive systemic immunosuppression due to severe infection.

Mucinous cystic neoplasm of pancreas in a male patient: a case report and review of the literature.

Mucinous cystic neoplasms (MCNs) are among the most common primary cystic neoplasms of pancreas. These lesions usually occur in body and tail of the pancreas and are characterized by the presence of ovarian type stroma in the pathological evaluation. Mucinous cystic neoplasms have significant malignant potential; therefore, their diagnosis and resection is of utmost importance. Mucinous cystic neoplasms typically occur in women. Only a few cases have been previously reported in male patients. In this case report, we present a 48-year-old man who was referred to our center due to an incidentally found cystic lesion in the tail of the pancreas that was increasing in size in serial evaluation. The patient underwent open distal pancreatectomy. The pathology showed mucinous cystic neoplasm with characteristic ovarian type stroma and positive staining for estrogen and progesterone receptors. This case report shows that mucinous cystic neoplasms can occur in men and should be considered in differential diagnosis of cystic pancreatic lesions in this population.

Peripancreatic soft tissue involvement: independent outcome predictor in patients with resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

The impact of cancer involving the peripancreatic soft tissue (PST), irrespective of margin status, following a resection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma is not known. The purpose of this study is to determine such an impact on a cohort of patients. Data from 274 patients who underwent pancreatic surgery by our team between 1998 and 2012 was reviewed. Of those 119 patients who had pancreatic resection for adenocarcinoma were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were categorized into 3 groups: Group 1 = R1 resection (N = 39), Group 2 = R0 with involved PST (N = 54), and Group 3 = R0 with uninvolved PST (N = 26). Demographics, operative data, tumor characteristics and overall survival (OS) were evaluated. Operations performed were: Whipple (N = 53), pylorus sparing Whipple (N = 41), total pancreatectomy (N = 11), and other (N = 14). Median OS for Groups 1, 2, and 3 were 8.5 months, 12 months, and 69.6 months respectively (P < 0.001). Tumor size (P = 0.016), margin status (P = 0.006), grade (P = 0.001), stage (P = 0.037), PST status (P < 0.001), complications (P = 0.046), transfusion history (P = 0.003) were all predictors of survival. Cox regression analysis demonstrated that grade (HR = 3.1), PST involvement (HR = 2.7), transfusion requirement (HR = 2.6) and margin status (HR = 2.0) were the only independent predictors of mortality. PST is a novel predictor of poor outcome for patients with resected pancreatic cancer.

Laparoscopic versus open liver resection for benign and malignant solid liver tumors: a case-matched study.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) is proposed as an alternative to open liver resection (OLR) for treatment of liver tumors. The aim of this study was to compare the surgical and oncological outcomes of LLR versus OLR in benign and malignant solid liver tumors. STUDY DESIGN: In this case-matched study, charts of 497 patients with liver lesions who had LLR or OLR in our center were retrospectively reviewed. Among them, 54 consecutive patients with benign or malignant solid liver tumors who had LLR were matched with a similar number of patients with OLR based on the pathology and extent of liver resection. Additionally, the surgical and oncological outcomes such as operating room time, amount of blood transfusion requirement, free resection margin rate, length of hospital stay, complication rate, perioperative mortality, and survival were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Demographics, pathological characteristics of the tumor, and extent of liver resection were similar between the two groups. Twenty-nine (54%) patients in each group had malignant lesions. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of operating room time, amount of blood transfusion requirement, free resection margin, or postoperative complication rate or survival. However, hospital stay was significantly shorter in the laparoscopic group (5.9 versus 9 days, P=.006). Although no perioperative mortality was observed in patients with benign tumors, among the patients with malignant tumors, 2 died perioperatively in each group. CONCLUSIONS: Our results in accordance with previous studies demonstrated that although the oncological outcomes of LLR and OLR were comparable, LLR patients had a shorter hospital stay.