Effect of High-Intensity Statin Therapy on Atherosclerosis (IBIS-4): Manual Versus Automated Methods of IVUS Analysis.

AIMS: Standard manual analysis of IVUS to study the impact of anti-atherosclerotic therapies on the coronary vessel wall is done by a core laboratory (CL), the ground truth (GT). Automatic segmentation of IVUS with a machine learning (ML) algorithm has the potential to replace manual readings with an unbiased and reproducible method. The aim is to determine if results from a CL can be replicated with ML methods. METHODS: This is a post-hoc, comparative analysis of the IBIS-4 (Integrated Biomarkers and Imaging Study-4) study (NCT00962416). The GT baseline and 13-month follow-up measurements of lumen and vessel area and percent atheroma volume (PAV) after statin induction were repeated by the ML algorithm. RESULTS: The primary endpoint was change in PAV. PAV as measured by GT was 43.95 % at baseline and 43.02 % at follow-up with a change of -0.90 % (p = 0.007) while the ML algorithm measured 43.69 % and 42.41 % for baseline and follow-up, respectively, with a change of -1.28 % (p < 0.001). Along the most diseased 10 mm segments, GT-PAV was 52.31 % at baseline and 49.42 % at follow-up, with a change of -2.94 % (p < 0.001). The same segments measured by the ML algorithm resulted in PAV of 51.55 % at baseline and 47.81 % at follow-up with a change of -3.74 % (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: PAV, the most used endpoint in clinical trials, analyzed by the CL is closely replicated by the ML algorithm. ML automatic segmentation of lumen, vessel and plaque effectively reproduces GT and may be used in future clinical trials as the standard.

Fully automated lumen and vessel contour segmentation in intravascular ultrasound datasets.

Segmentation of lumen and vessel contours in intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) pullbacks is an arduous and time-consuming task, which demands adequately trained human resources. In the present study, we propose a machine learning approach to automatically extract lumen and vessel boundaries from IVUS datasets. The proposed approach relies on the concatenation of a deep neural network to deliver a preliminary segmentation, followed by a Gaussian process (GP) regressor to construct the final lumen and vessel contours. A multi-frame convolutional neural network (MFCNN) exploits adjacency information present in longitudinally neighboring IVUS frames, while the GP regression method filters high-dimensional noise, delivering a consistent representation of the contours. Overall, 160 IVUS pullbacks (63 patients) from the IBIS-4 study (Integrated Biomarkers and Imaging Study-4, Trial NCT00962416), were used in the present work. The MFCNN algorithm was trained with 100 IVUS pullbacks (8427 manually segmented frames), was validated with 30 IVUS pullbacks (2583 manually segmented frames) and was blindly tested with 30 IVUS pullbacks (2425 manually segmented frames). Image and contour metrics were used to characterize model performance by comparing ground truth (GT) and machine learning (ML) contours. Median values (interquartile range, IQR) of the Jaccard index for lumen and vessel were 0.913, [0.882,0.935] and 0.940, [0.917,0.957], respectively. Median values (IQR) of the Hausdorff distance for lumen and vessel were 0.196mm, [0.146,0.275]mm and 0.163mm, [0.122,0.234]mm, respectively. Also, the mean value of lumen area predictions, and limits of agreement were -0.19mm2, [1.1,-1.5]mm2, while the mean value and limits of agreement of plaque burden were 0.0022, [0.082,-0.078]. The results obtained with the model developed in this work allow us to conclude that the proposed machine learning approach delivers accurate segmentations in terms of image metrics, contour metrics and clinically relevant variables, enabling its use in clinical routine by mitigating the costs involved in the manual management of IVUS datasets.

Coronary arterial geometry: A comprehensive comparison of two imaging modalities.

The characterization of vascular geometry is a fundamental step towards the correct interpretation of coronary artery disease. In this work, we report a comprehensive comparison of the geometry featured by coronary vessels as obtained from coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) and the combination of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) with bi-plane angiography (AX) modalities. We analyzed 34 vessels from 28 patients with coronary disease, which were deferred to CCTA and IVUS procedures. We discuss agreement and discrepancies between several geometric indexes extracted from vascular geometries. Such an analysis allows us to understand to which extent the coronary vascular geometry can be reliable in the interpretation of geometric risk factors, and as a surrogate to characterize coronary artery disease.

Automated lumen segmentation using multi-frame convolutional neural networks in intravascular ultrasound datasets.

Aims: Assessment of minimum lumen areas in intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) pullbacks is time-consuming and demands adequately trained personnel. In this work, we introduce a novel and fully automated pipeline to segment the lumen boundary in IVUS datasets. Methods and results: First, an automated gating is applied to select end-diastolic frames and bypass saw-tooth artefacts. Second, within a machine learning (ML) environment, we automatically segment the lumen boundary using a multi-frame (MF) convolutional neural network (MFCNN). Finally, we use the theory of Gaussian processes (GPs) to regress the final lumen boundary. The dataset consisted of 85 IVUS pullbacks (52 patients). The dataset was partitioned at the pullback-level using 73 pullbacks for training (20 586 frames), 6 pullbacks for validation (1692 frames), and 6 for testing (1692 frames). The degree of overlapping, between the ground truth and ML contours, median (interquartile range, IQR) systematically increased from 0.896 (0.874-0.933) for MF1 to 0.925 (0.911-0.948) for MF11. The median (IQR) of the distance error was also reduced from 3.83 (2.94-4.98)% for MF1 to 3.02 (2.25-3.95)% for MF11-GP. The corresponding median (IQR) in the lumen area error remained between 5.49 (2.50-10.50)% for MF1 and 5.12 (2.15-9.00)% for MF11-GP. The dispersion in the relative distance and area errors consistently decreased as we increased the number of frames, and also when the GP regressor was coupled to the MFCNN output. Conclusion: These results demonstrate that the proposed ML approach is suitable to effectively segment the lumen boundary in IVUS scans, reducing the burden of costly and time-consuming manual delineation.