Willingness to experience unpleasant thoughts, emotions, and bodily sensations at admission does not predict treatment outcome in inpatients with obsessive-compulsive disorder.

BACKGROUND: Some persons with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) refuse or drop out of treatment because of the aversive nature of exposure and response prevention therapy when they have to face and tolerate unpleasant thoughts, emotions, and bodily sensations. Indeed, one study suggested that a higher willingness to experience unpleasant thoughts, emotions, and bodily sensations (WTE) predicts a better treatment outcome, but this finding has not been replicated yet. METHODS: We examined whether WTE at admission predicted treatment outcome in a sample of 324 inpatients with OCD who received a multimodal treatment that included cognitive-behavioral therapy with exposure and response prevention sessions. RESULTS: Obsessive-compulsive symptoms (based on OCD-specific self-report questionnaires) decreased with medium-to-large effect sizes (all ps < 0.001) and global functioning (based on therapist ratings) increased with a large effect size (d = 1.3, p < 0.001) from admission to discharge. In contrast to previous findings, however, WTE did not predict treatment outcome (all ps > 0.005). The effect of WTE on treatment outcome remained non-significant when controlling for any comorbidity, age, sex, length of stay, and antidepressant medication and was not moderated by these variables. CONCLUSIONS: Results indicate that higher WTE at the beginning of inpatient treatment does not facilitate improvements in obsessive-compulsive symptoms from admission to discharge. However, they also indicate that lower WTE at the beginning of inpatient treatment does not adversely affect treatment outcome, that is, even patients who indicate that they are unwilling to face the negative experiences associated with exposure and response prevention can still achieve considerable symptom reductions.

Effects of inpatient, residential, and day-patient treatment on obsessive-compulsive symptoms in persons with obsessive-compulsive disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with severe or treatment-refractory obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) often need an extensive treatment which cannot be provided by outpatient care. Therefore, we aimed to estimate the effects and their moderators of inpatient, residential, or day-patient treatment on obsessive-compulsive symptoms in patients with OCD. METHODS: PubMed, PsycINFO, and Web of Science were systematically screened according to the PRISMA guidelines. Studies were selected if they were conducted in an inpatient, residential, or day-patient treatment setting, were using a number of pre-defined instruments for assessing OCD symptom severity, and had a sample size of at least 20 patients. RESULTS: We identified 43 eligible studies in which inpatient, residential, or day-patient treatment was administered. The means and standard deviations at admission, discharge, and-if available-at follow-up were extracted. All treatment programs included cognitive-behavioral treatment with exposure and response prevention. Only one study reported to not have used psychopharmacological medication. Obsessive-compulsive symptoms decreased from admission to discharge with large effect sizes (g = -1.59, 95%CI [-1.76; -1.41]) and did not change from discharge to follow-up (g = 0.06, 95%CI [-0.09; 0.21]). Length of stay, age, sex, and region did not explain heterogeneity across the studies but instrument used did: effects were larger for clinician-rated interviews than for self-report measures. CONCLUSIONS: Persons with OCD can achieve considerable symptom reductions when undertaking inpatient, residential, or day-patient treatment and effects are-on average-maintained after discharge.

Duration of daily life activities in persons with and without obsessive-compulsive disorder.

Persons with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) are often impaired in their daily level of functioning due to their time-consuming obsessions and/or compulsions. To date, however, studies are lacking that quantify how much time persons with OCD actually spend on activities of daily living. Therefore, the current study assessed 13 daily life activities (in minutes) with a self-report questionnaire in 299 persons with OCD at admission to inpatient treatment and 300 age- and sex-matched persons without OCD. A majority of persons with OCD indicated that they experienced obsessions and/or compulsions when leaving (84%) and cleaning (70%) the apartment, grocery shopping (66%), changing clothes (66%), and showering with (62%) and without (63%) shampooing. Persons with OCD who experienced obsessions and/or compulsions during a given daily life activity-but not those who did not experience obsessions and/or compulsions during these activities-reported longer durations for performing 10 of the 13 activities than persons without OCD. For most activities, longer durations related weakly but significantly to higher OCD symptom severity. Results indicate that the duration of daily life activities seems to depend more on whether persons with OCD experience obsessions and/or compulsions during a specific activity and less on whether a person is diagnosed with OCD in general. Future studies may use other assessment methods that allow for tracking the duration in daily life in real time.

Effects of acceptance-based strategies on psychological responses to disorder-relevant stimuli in inpatients with obsessive-compulsive disorder: An experimental study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Preliminary findings suggest that acceptance and commitment therapy-informed exposure therapy may be an effective treatment for obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). However, there is a lack of experimental studies that have examined immediate effects of acceptance-based strategies during exposure to disorder-relevant stimuli in persons with OCD. METHODS: Fifty-three inpatients (64% female) with OCD participated in an experimental study during which they were exposed to obsessive-compulsive washing-relevant pictures and were instructed to either passively view these pictures for 5 s (neutral condition), to accept their feelings (acceptance condition) or to intensify their feelings (exposure condition) for 90 s each. RESULTS: The acceptance condition led to higher acceptance and lower unpleasantness of patients' current feelings compared to the neutral condition and to lower strength of obsessions and urge to perform compulsions but only when compared to the exposure condition. Higher self-reported OCD symptom severity related to higher unpleasantness and strength of obsessions, particularly in the neutral condition. LIMITATIONS: Future studies need to test whether the current findings translate to other stimuli and other forms of obsessions and compulsions. Due to the short duration, the exposure condition might have only mimicked the early phase of exposure and response prevention. CONCLUSIONS: Acceptance-based strategies during cue exposure immediately increase acceptance of and reduce unpleasant feelings. In line with the rationale of acceptance-based treatment approaches, which do not aim at immediate disorder-specific symptom reductions, effects on obsessions and compulsions may be more delayed or require repeated training sessions.