Association of Lipoprotein (a) with peri-coronary inflammation in persons with and without HIV infection.

BACKGROUND: Persons with HIV (PWH) have an increased risk of developing cardiovascular disease (CVD) compared to persons without HIV (PWoH). Lipoprotein a (Lp(a)) is a known atherosclerotic risk factor in PWoH, but there are no studies investigating Lp(a) and peri-coronary inflammation. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether Lp(a) is associated with peri-coronary inflammation as assessed by the fat attenuation index (FAI) and activated monocytes and T lymphocytes in PWH and PWoH. METHODS: We measured plasma levels of Lp(a) at study entry in 58 PWH and 21 PWoH without CVD and who had FAI measurements. Associations of Lp(a) with FAI values of the right coronary artery (RCA) and left anterior descending artery (LAD) were evaluated using multivariable regression models adjusted for potential confounders. Correlations between Lp(a) levels and systemic inflammatory markers and immune cell subsets were examined. RESULTS: Lp(a) was associated with greater peri-coronary inflammation among PWH compared to PWoH (ß=1.73, P=0.019) in the RCA, in adjusted models. Significant correlations were observed with certain inflammatory markers (TNFR-I, b=0.295, P<0.001; TNFR-II, b=0.270, P=0.002; hs-CRP, b=0.195, P=0.028). Significant correlations were found between Lp(a) levels and several markers of monocyte activation: CD16 -CD163+ (b= -0.199, P=0.024), and CD16 -DR+ MFI (b= -0.179, P=0.042) and T cell subset CD38+CD4+ TEMRA (b= 0.177, P= 0.044). CONCLUSIONS: Lp(a) was associated with greater peri-coronary inflammation in the RCA in PWH compared to PWoH, as well as with select systemic inflammatory markers and specific subsets of immune cells in peripheral circulation.

Patients with inflammatory bowel disease are more hesitant about Coronavirus disease 2019 vaccination.

Despite the impact of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, vaccine hesitancy remains common in the general public and patients with Inflammatory Bowel Diseases (IBD). We sought to examine the reasons for vaccine hesitancy in patients with IBD. In this case-control study, we performed a retrospective chart review of 1,349 IBD patients and 215 non-IBD patients seen at University of Maryland Medical Center, a tertiary referral medical center, between March 2020 and October 2021. Data obtained included demographics, vaccination records, disease history, number of IBD-related surgeries, and IBD medications. 813/1,349 (60.3%) IBD patients received at least one dose of either the Pfizer/BioNTech, Moderna, or Johnson & Johnson vaccines. In a multivariate logistic regression, COVID vaccination was found to be positively associated with older age (p-value = 1.65e-5), female sex (p = 0.00194), Asian and White races (p = 0.02330, 0.00169), number of clinic visits (p = 1.11e-08), and biologic use (p = 7.82e-5). There was no association between vaccination and other types of vaccination nor with the use of other IBD medications. There was a negative association between vaccination status and the total number of IBD related surgeries (p = 0.02857). In non-IBD patients, only the number of clinic visits was positively associated with COVID-19 vaccination. Although the majority of IBD patients are immunosuppressed, COVID-19 vaccination rate was only 60.3%. Younger adults, males, African Americans, and those requiring IBD-related surgeries were less likely to receive COVID-19 vaccine. Healthcare providers need to recognize these potential risk factors for COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy.

Association of hepatitis C infection and acute coronary syndrome: A case-control study.

ABSTRACT: Infections with hepatitis C virus (HCV) represent a substantial national and international public health burden. HCV has been associated with numerous extrahepatic conditions and can lead to metabolic derangements that are associated with atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease. We investigated whether HCV infection is associated with an increased number of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) events among hospitalized patients in an inner-city tertiary hospital.We performed a matched (age, sex, and race/ethnicity) case-control study on patients at least 18 years old admitted to inpatient medical and cardiac services at the University of Maryland Medical Center from 2015 through 2018. The primary outcome was ACS and the primary exposure was HCV infection. Covariates of interest included: alcohol use, tobacco use, illicit drug use, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, human immunodeficiency virus infection, body mass index, dyslipidemia, and family history of coronary heart disease. Covariates with significant associations with both exposure and outcome in bivariate analyses were included in the multivariable analyses of the final adjusted model.There were 1555 cases and 3110 controls included in the final sample. Almost 2% of cases and 2.4% of controls were HCV infected. In adjusted models, there was no significant association found between experiencing an ACS event in those with HCV infection compared to those without HCV infection (odds ratio 0.71, 95% confidence interval 0.45-1.11).We found no significant association between HCV infection and ACS in our study population. However, given the mixed existing literature, the association between HCV and ACS warrants further investigation in future prospective cohort and/or interventional studies.