Discordances between clinical and ultrasound measurements of disease activity among RA patients followed in real life.

OBJECTIVE: Measurements of disease activity, such as the clinical disease activity score (DAS28) or ultrasound (US) scores, often yield discordant results. This study's objectives were to determine the proportion of disagreements between the two assessment methods in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and to describe factors associated with discrepancy in assessment. METHODS: All RA patients in the Swiss registry for inflammatory arthritides (SCQM) with at least one concomitant DAS28 and US score, were included. Disease activity was categorized as remission, low-to-moderate, and high, based on previously established cut-offs, for both the DAS28 and the US score. A longitudinal analysis was performed among patients who underwent at least two assessments. RESULTS: Of 2369 assessments included (1091 patients), 1196 (50.4%) were discordant. The US score both over- and under-estimated disease activity compared to the DAS28 score (23.5% and 26.8% respectively). Clinical and demographic factors significantly associated with discordant results were the individual components of the DAS28 score when US was used as the reference and age, disease duration, and the swollen joint count when the DAS28 was used as the reference. The main US-related factor associated with discordance was the presence of US tenosynovitis. In the longitudinal analysis of 1081 patients, the proportion of disagreements remained essentially unchanged. CONCLUSION: Rates of disagreement between clinical and US assessments of disease activity among RA patients are high and remain high during follow-up, even when the US assessors were aware of the clinical examination findings. Both clinical- and ultrasound- related factors were associated with discordances.

Can Ultrasound Be Used to Predict Loss of Remission in Patients with RA in a Real-life Setting? A Multicenter Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVE: Several studies have suggested that patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) presenting with ultrasound (US) synovitis despite clinical remission have more subsequent flares than those who show both clinical and sonographic remission. The objective of our study was to investigate whether these results could be translated to a real-life setting. METHODS: We compared the time from the first US performed in clinical remission to loss of remission (defined by a DAS28 > 2.6 or the need for stepping up treatment with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs) within the Swiss Clinical Quality Management cohort of patients with RA, and we adjusted for relevant confounders. Analyses were repeated for different definitions of US-detected synovitis (US+) using greyscale, Doppler, and combined modes based on previously validated scores, and they were adjusted for relevant confounders. RESULTS: There were 318 RA patients with 378 remission phases included. Loss of clinical remission was observed in 60% of remission phases. Residual US synovitis was associated with a shorter duration of clinical remission (median 2-5 mos) and a moderately increased hazard ratio (HR) for loss of remission (HR 1.2-1.5), with the highest HR for the combined US score. The association between US+ and loss of remission was strongest when the US measurement had taken place early in remission (shorter median duration of 6-20 mos) and when followup time was limited to the first 3 or 6 months (most HR between 2-4). CONCLUSION: US-detected synovitis, particularly when US is performed early in clinical remission, has a moderate predictive power for loss of remission in a real-life setting.

Ultrasound can be useful to predict an evolution towards rheumatoid arthritis in patients with inflammatory polyarthralgia without anticitrullinated antibodies.

INTRODUCTION: Ultrasound (US) subclinical synovitis in prerheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients has been demonstrated in anticitrullinated antibodies (ACPA) positive patients to be predictive for future development of RA. The aim of the study was to assess the value of the US as a predictive factor for the future development of RA in patients with polyarthralgia without ACPA. METHOD: Eighty consecutive ACPA-patients with polyarthralgia without clinical synovitis or ACPA before the US examination were included. To detect significant US synovitis, we applied the criteria of a US score (SONAR) validated among RA patients and controls. The diagnosis of RA was based on the ACR/EULAR criteria. RESULTS: Significant US synovitis were present at baseline in 20 (25%) of the patients. The mean (SD) follow-up time was 18 (7) months in both groups. Seven (9%) patients developed a clear RA and 2 another inflammatory arthritis. US synovitis at baseline was significantly associated with evolution to RA: 5/20 (25%) versus 2/60 (3%) (P<0.05). The free time to RA was significantly shorter when US synovitis were present (P<0.01). Moreover, after multivariate analysis, US appeared to be the only independent predictor of an evolution to RA (OR: 7.4). Results remained similar after including all patients developing another inflammatory arthritis. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that US can be used as a predictor for the evolution to RA or other inflammatory arthritis in patients presenting polyarthralgia without ACPA.

Isometric rate of force development, maximum voluntary contraction, and balance in women with and without joint hypermobility.

OBJECTIVE: To determine differences between hypermobile subjects and controls in terms of maximum strength, rate of force development, and balance. METHODS: We recruited 13 subjects with hypermobility and 18 controls. Rate of force development and maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) during single leg knee extension of the right knee were measured isometrically for each subject. Balance was tested twice on a force plate with 15-second single-leg stands on the right leg. Rate of force development (N/second) and MVC (N) were extracted from the force-time curve as maximal rate of force development (= limit Deltaforce/Deltatime) and the absolute maximal value, respectively. RESULTS: The hypermobile subjects showed a significantly higher value for rate of force development (15.2% higher; P = 0.038, P = 0.453, epsilon = 0.693) and rate of force development related to body weight (16.4% higher; P = 0.018, P = 0.601, epsilon = 0.834) than the controls. The groups did not differ significantly in MVC (P = 0.767, P = 0.136, epsilon = 0.065), and MVC related to body weight varied randomly between the groups (P = 0.921, P = 0.050, epsilon = 0.000). In balance testing, the mediolateral sway of the hypermobile subjects showed significantly higher values (11.6% higher; P = 0.034, P = 0.050, epsilon = 0.000) than that of controls, but there was no significant difference (4.9% difference; P = 0.953, P = 0.050, epsilon = 0.000) in anteroposterior sway between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: Hypermobile women without acute symptoms or limitations in activities of daily life have a higher rate of force development in the knee extensors and a higher mediolateral sway than controls with normal joint mobility.