ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To investigate treatment selection in a naturalistic sample of MDD outpatients and the factors influencing treatment selection in specialized psychiatric care. METHOD: Multinomial Logistic Regression analysis investigated associations between treatment selection and patients' sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, using retrospective chart review data and Routine Outcome Monitoring (ROM) data of MDD outpatients. RESULTS: Of the patients included for analyses (Nâ¯=â¯263), 34% received psychotherapy, 32% received an antidepressant (AD) and 35% received a combination. Men were more likely than women to receive AD with reference to psychotherapy (ORADâ¯=â¯5.57, 95% CI 2.38-13.00). Patients with severe depression and patients with AD use upon referral, prescribed by their general practitioner, were more likely to receive AD (ORsevere depressionâ¯=â¯5.34, 95% CI 1.70-16.78/ORAD GPâ¯=â¯9.26, 95% CI 2.53-33.90) or combined treatment (ORsevere depressionâ¯=â¯6.32, 95% CI 1.86-21.49/ORAD GPâ¯=â¯22.36, 95% CI 5.89-83.59) with respect to psychotherapy. More severe patients with AD upon referral received combined treatment less often compared to psychotherapy (ORâ¯=â¯0.14, 95% CI 0.03-0.68). CONCLUSION: AD prescriptions in primary care, severity and gender influenced treatment selection for depressive disorders in secondary psychiatric care. Other factors such as the accessibility of treatment and patient preferences may have played a role in treatment selection in this setting and need further investigation.
Subject(s)
Antidepressive Agents/therapeutic use , Clinical Decision-Making , Depressive Disorder, Major/therapy , Drug Prescriptions/statistics & numerical data , Mental Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Patient Preference/statistics & numerical data , Primary Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Psychotherapy/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Combined Modality Therapy , Depressive Disorder, Major/drug therapy , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Retrospective Studies , Sex FactorsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Standardized Diagnostic Interviews (SDIs) such as the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) are widely used to systematically screen for psychiatric disorders in research. To support generalizability of results to clinical practice, we assessed agreement between the MINI and clinical diagnoses. METHODS: Agreement was assessed in a large, real life dataset (n = 7016) using concordance statistics such as sensitivity, specificity, efficiency and area under the curve (AUC). RESULTS: 41.5% of clinical diagnoses were mood disorders, 26.5% were anxiety disorders. Overall, we found moderate agreement between MINI and clinical diagnoses (median efficiency: 0.92, median AUC: 0.79). For mood disorders, the AUC for all participants showed a range between 0.55 and 0.81 (median: 0.73), and for anxiety disorders the AUC ranged from 0.78 to 0.88 (median: 0.83). The AUC showed better agreement for mood disorders in the single diagnosis group than in the total group (median 0.77 vs. 0.71). For anxiety disorders, the AUC for the single diagnosis group was comparable to the AUC of the total group (median: 0.81 vs. 0.83 respectively). Numbers of false positives were high for both mood and anxiety diagnoses, but less so in the single diagnosis group. LIMITATIONS: Time lag between MINI and clinical diagnosis, the availability of only the primary clinical diagnosis, and relatively high severity of the current sample are limitations of the current study. CONCLUSIONS: Agreement between MINI and clinical diagnoses was moderate at best, which partly reflects the difference between the different measures used in the current study.
Subject(s)
Anxiety Disorders/diagnosis , Mood Disorders/diagnosis , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Adult , Anxiety Disorders/epidemiology , Anxiety Disorders/psychology , Area Under Curve , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Mood Disorders/epidemiology , Mood Disorders/psychology , Outpatients , Personality Assessment/statistics & numerical data , Personality Inventory/statistics & numerical data , Prevalence , Sensitivity and SpecificityABSTRACT
Early onset is regarded as an important characteristic of anxiety disorders, associated with higher severity. However, previous findings diverge, as definitions of early onset vary and are often unsubstantiated. We objectively defined early onset in social phobia, panic disorder, agoraphobia, and generalised anxiety disorder, using cluster analysis with data gathered in the general population. Resulting cut-off ages for early onset were ≤22 (social phobia), ≤31 (panic disorder), ≤21 (agoraphobia), and ≤27 (generalised anxiety disorder). Comparison of psychiatric comorbidity and general wellbeing between subjects with early and late onset in the general population and an outpatient cohort, demonstrated that among outpatients anxiety comorbidity was more common in early onset agoraphobia, but also that anxiety- as well as mood comorbidity were more common in late onset social phobia. A major limitation was the retrospective assessment of onset. Our results encourage future studies into correlates of early onset of psychiatric disorders.
Subject(s)
Agoraphobia/diagnosis , Anxiety Disorders/diagnosis , Panic Disorder/diagnosis , Phobic Disorders/diagnosis , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Age of Onset , Cluster Analysis , Female , Humans , Male , Retrospective Studies , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Depressive and anxiety disorders contribute to a high disease burden. This paper investigates whether concise formats of cognitive behavioral- and/or pharmacotherapy are equivalent with longer standard care in the treatment of depressive and/or anxiety disorders in secondary mental health care. METHODS: A pragmatic randomized controlled equivalence trial was conducted at five Dutch outpatient Mental Healthcare Centers (MHCs) of the Regional Mental Health Provider (RMHP) 'Rivierduinen'. Patients (aged 18-65 years) with a mild to moderate anxiety and/or depressive disorder, were randomly allocated to concise or standard care. Data were collected at baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months by Routine Outcome Monitoring (ROM). Primary outcomes were the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI) and the Web Screening Questionnaire (WSQ). We used Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE) to assess outcomes. RESULTS: Between March 2010 and December 2012, 182 patients, were enrolled (n=89 standard care; n=93 concise care). Both intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses demonstrated equivalence of concise care and standard care at all time points. Severity of illness reduced, and both treatments improved patient's general health status and subdomains of quality of life. Moreover, in concise care, the beneficial effects started earlier. DISCUSSION: Concise care has the potential to be a feasible and promising alternative to longer standard secondary mental health care in the treatment of outpatients with a mild to moderate depressive and/or anxiety disorder. For future research, we recommend adhering more strictly to the concise treatment protocols to further explore the beneficial effects of the concise treatment. The study is registered in the Netherlands Trial Register, number NTR2590. Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT01643642.
Subject(s)
Anti-Anxiety Agents/therapeutic use , Antidepressive Agents/therapeutic use , Anxiety Disorders/therapy , Cognitive Behavioral Therapy/methods , Depressive Disorder/therapy , Psychotherapy, Brief/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Anxiety Disorders/epidemiology , Combined Modality Therapy , Comorbidity , Depressive Disorder/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Netherlands , Severity of Illness Index , Treatment Outcome , Young AdultABSTRACT
AIM: J.A.P. and M.A.L. contributed equally to this manuscript.The aim of this article is to determine whether support by a headache nurse in the treatment of medication-overuse headache (MOH) increases successful withdrawal, and to study determinants of response to withdrawal therapy. METHODS: A retrospective, controlled follow-up study was performed with 416 MOH patients. All patients were treated with outpatient withdrawal therapy, with two treatment arms: with or without the support of a specialised headache nurse. The outcome measures were: i) successful withdrawal, defined as discontinuation of all headache medication according to the study protocol; and ii) the responder rate, defined as the percentage of patients with ≥ 50% reduction in headache days after successful withdrawal and iii) relative reduction in headache days after successful withdrawal. RESULTS: Successful withdrawal percentages were significantly higher in the group supported by the headache nurse than in the group without support (73.1% vs. 60.7%; p = 0.008), which was confirmed in multivariate analysis (OR 1.73, 95% CI 1.11-2.71, p = 0.016). Support by a headache nurse was not associated with response. The underlying primary headache diagnosis, determined after withdrawal, was significantly correlated with response. CONCLUSION: The support by a headache nurse results in an increased adherence to detoxification.
Subject(s)
Headache Disorders, Secondary/chemically induced , Headache Disorders, Secondary/nursing , Substance Withdrawal Syndrome/nursing , Substance-Related Disorders/nursing , Adult , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: A strong association has been established between migraine and depression. However, this is the first study to differentiate in a large sample of migraine patients for symptom dimensions of the affective disorder spectrum. METHODS: Migraine patients (n=3174) from the LUMINA (Leiden University Medical Centre Migraine Neuro-analysis Program) study and patients with current psychopathology (n=1129), past psychopathology (n=477), and healthy controls (n=561) from the NESDA (Netherlands Study of Depression and Anxiety) study, were compared for three symptom dimensions of depression and anxiety. The dimensions -lack of positive affect (depression specific); negative affect (nonspecific); and somatic arousal (anxiety specific)- were assessed by a shortened adaptation of the Mood and Anxiety Symptom Questionnaire (MASQ-D30). Within the migraine group, the association with migraine specific determinants was established. Multivariate regression analyses were conducted. RESULTS: Migraine patients differed significantly (p<0.001) from healthy controls for all three dimensions: Cohen's d effect sizes were 0.37 for lack of positive affect, 0.68 for negative affect, and 0.75 for somatic arousal. For the lack of positive affect and negative affect dimensions, migraine patients were predominantly similar to the past psychopathology group. For the somatic arousal dimension, migraine patients scores were more comparable with the current psychopathology group. Migraine specific determinants for high scores on all dimensions were high frequency of attacks and cutaneous allodynia during attacks. CONCLUSION: This study shows that affective symptoms in migraine patients are especially associated with the somatic arousal component.
Subject(s)
Migraine Disorders/psychology , Mood Disorders/psychology , Adult , Affect , Anxiety/complications , Anxiety/epidemiology , Anxiety/psychology , Arousal , Cohort Studies , Depression/complications , Depression/epidemiology , Depression/psychology , Female , Humans , Hyperalgesia/complications , Hyperalgesia/etiology , Hyperalgesia/psychology , Male , Mental Disorders/complications , Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Migraine Disorders/complications , Migraine Disorders/epidemiology , Mood Disorders/complications , Mood Disorders/etiology , Netherlands/epidemiology , Socioeconomic Factors , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
Depression and anxiety disorders are highly comorbid and share neurobiological characteristics. However, this is usually not explicitly addressed in studies on intrinsic brain functioning in these disorders. Contrary to previous resting-state reports on small, monodiagnostic subsets of the current sample, we investigated resting-state functional connectivity (RSFC) in medication-free patients with depression, anxiety, comorbid depression and anxiety, and a healthy control group. RSFC was investigated in 140 medication-free subjects: 37 major depressive disorder patients (MDD), 30 patients with one or more anxiety disorders (ANX), 25 patients with MDD and one or more anxiety disorders (COM), and 48 healthy controls (HC). RSFC networks were calculated using a probabilistic independent component analysis. Using a dual regression approach, individuals׳ timecourses were extracted and regressed to obtain subjects-specific spatial maps, which were used for group comparisons in four networks of interest (limbic, default mode, salience and sensory-motor networks). When compared to HC, the COM group showed increased RSFC of the limbic network with a cluster containing the bilateral precuneus, intracalcarine cortex, lingual gyrus, and posterior cingulate, and with a cluster including the right precentral gyrus, inferior frontal gyrus, and middle frontal gyrus. This effect was specific for comorbid depression and anxiety. No abnormal RSFC of other networks or in the MDD and ANX groups was observed. No association was found between strength of RSFC and symptom severity. These results indicate that altered RSFC of cortical regions with a limbic network could be specific for comorbid depression and anxiety.
Subject(s)
Anxiety Disorders/complications , Anxiety Disorders/physiopathology , Brain/physiopathology , Depressive Disorder, Major/complications , Depressive Disorder, Major/physiopathology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Anxiety Disorders/epidemiology , Brain Mapping , Comorbidity , Depressive Disorder, Major/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Middle Aged , Neural Pathways/physiopathology , Rest , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Evidence-based therapies for major depression, as described in the clinical guidelines, are based on results from randomised controlled trials (RCTs). So far, it is not known to what extent results of RCTs on major depression can be generalised to 'real life' clinical practice. AIM: To compare treatment results for major depression from RCTs (efficacy) and results from daily practice (effectiveness); furthermore, to assess to what extent eligibility criteria and (un)intended selection by recruitment procedures influences treatment outcomes in daily practice. METHOD: In a 'real life' patient population (n=1653) suffering from major depression (established by the MINIplus) and assessed in routine outcome monitoring at baseline, we explored how many patients met the eligibility criteria for antidepressant and psychotherapy efficacy trials. Furthermore we explored to what extent RCT participants differed in socio-demographic and socio-economic status from 'daily practice' patients. 626 of the ROM patients had at least one follow-up assessment. In this follow-up group we compared the treatment outcome (assessed by the MADRS and BDI-II) to the results of 15 meta-analyses of RCTs. We also explored to what extent patient selection based on eligibility criteria and socio-demographic/socio-economic status influenced treatment outcome. RESULTS: Remission percentages (21-27% in ROM versus 34-58% in RCTs) and effect sizes (0.85 in ROM versus 1.71 in RCTs, within-group data) were lower in daily practice than in RCTs. ROM patients differed from RCT participants in many disease-specific and socio-economic features. These differences are due to patient selection in RCTs. However, the influence of patient selection based on eligibility criteria and socio-demographic differences in treatment outcome were very modest (explained variances 1-11%). CONCLUSION: Treatment success for major depression is lower in daily practice than in RCTs and 'real life' patients differ in many features from RCT participants. However, these differences cannot explain the difference between efficacy and effectiveness. The generalisability of the results of depression trials to daily practice might not be jeopardised by the use of eligibility criteria and recruitment procedures to the extent suggested in earlier research.
Subject(s)
Ambulatory Care/statistics & numerical data , Antidepressive Agents/therapeutic use , Depressive Disorder, Major/therapy , Outcome Assessment, Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Psychotherapy/methods , Ambulatory Care/methods , Combined Modality Therapy , Evidence-Based Medicine , Humans , Outcome Assessment, Health Care/methods , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Severity of Illness Index , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: There is a strong association between migraine and depression. The aim of this study is to identify migraine-specific factors involved in this association. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study in a large, well-defined cohort of migraine patients (n=2533). We assessed lifetime depression using validated questionnaires, and diagnosed migraine based on the International Classification of Headache Disorders III-beta criteria. Multivariate regression analyses were conducted. RESULTS: Of the 2533 migraineurs that were eligible, 1137 (45%) suffered from lifetime depression. The following independent factors were associated with an increased depression prevalence: i) migraine-specific risk factors: high migraine attack frequency and the presence of allodynia, ii) general factors: being a bad sleeper, female gender, high BMI, being single, smoking, and a low alcohol consumption. CONCLUSION: This study identified allodynia, in addition to high migraine attack frequency, as a new migraine-specific factor associated with depression.
Subject(s)
Depression/epidemiology , Hyperalgesia/psychology , Migraine Disorders/psychology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Cross-Sectional Studies , Depression/complications , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Migraine Disorders/complications , Prevalence , Surveys and Questionnaires , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Routine outcome monitoring (rom) is a method for the systematic monitoring of treatment-progression. Because rom data are collected regularly and systematically, we believe it should be possible to use these data in clinical epidemiological research. AIM: To describe, on the basis of publications of the Leiden Routine Outcome Monitoring Study, a number of potential research topics in which rom data can play a role. METHOD: We used rom data of patients referred, between 2004 and 2009, to secondary or tertiary care for treatment of a mood, anxiety or somatoform disorder. RESULTS: We describe three cross-sectional studies and one prospective study in which we aimed to identify predictors of outcome. CONCLUSION: These studies demonstrate clearly that it is feasible to use rom data to supplement clinical epidemiological research done on patients. Together these findings can be a useful addition to data derived from randomised clinical trials.
Subject(s)
Anxiety Disorders/epidemiology , Mood Disorders/epidemiology , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Somatoform Disorders/epidemiology , Adult , Anxiety Disorders/psychology , Anxiety Disorders/therapy , Female , Humans , Male , Mood Disorders/psychology , Mood Disorders/therapy , Netherlands/epidemiology , Somatoform Disorders/psychology , Somatoform Disorders/therapy , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Little is known about the predictors of outcome in anxiety disorders in naturalistic outpatient settings. We analyzed 2-year follow-up data collected through Routine Outcome Monitoring (ROM) in a naturalistic sample of 917 outpatients in psychiatric specialty care in order to identify factors predicting outcome. We included patients with panic disorder with or without agoraphobia, agoraphobia without panic, social phobia, or generalized anxiety disorder. Main findings from Cox regression analyses demonstrated that several socio-demographic variables (having a non-Dutch ethnicity [HR = 0.71)], not having a daily occupation [HR = 0.76]) and clinical factors (having a diagnosis of agoraphobia [HR = 0.67], high affective lability [HR = 0.80] and behavior problems [HR = 0.84]) decreased chances of response (defined as 50% reduction of anxiety severity) over the period of two years. Living with family had a protective predictive value [HR = 1.41]. These results may imply that factors that could be thought to limit societal participation, are associated with elevated risk of poor outcome. A comprehensive ROM screening process at intake may aid clinicians in the identification of patients at risk of chronicity.
Subject(s)
Anxiety Disorders/epidemiology , Monitoring, Physiologic , Outpatients/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Predictive Value of Tests , Regression Analysis , Statistics, Nonparametric , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Childhood emotional maltreatment (CEM) has been associated with disturbances in emotional and behavioral functioning, and with changes in regional brain morphology. However, whether CEM has any effect on the intrinsic organization of the brain is not known. In this study, we investigated the effects of CEM on resting-state functional connectivity (RSFC) using seeds in the limbic network, the default-mode network (DMN) and the salience network, and the left dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (dmPFC). Method Using 3-T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), resting-state functional MRI (RS-fMRI) scans were obtained. We defined seeds in the bilateral amygdala, the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC), the posterior cingulate cortex (PCC) and the left dmPFC, and used these to examine whether individuals reporting CEM (n=44) differed from individuals reporting no CEM (n=44) in RSFC with other brain regions. The two groups were matched for age, gender, handedness and the presence of psychopathology. RESULTS: CEM was associated with decreased RSFC between the right amygdala and the bilateral precuneus and a cluster extending from the left insula to the hippocampus and putamen. In addition, CEM was associated with decreased RSFC between the dACC and the precuneus and also frontal regions of the brain. CONCLUSIONS: We found that CEM has a profound effect on RSFC in the limbic network and the salience network. Regions that show aberrant connectivity are related to episodic memory encoding, retrieval and self-processing operations.
Subject(s)
Adult Survivors of Child Abuse , Brain/physiopathology , Neural Pathways/physiopathology , Adult , Amygdala/physiopathology , Case-Control Studies , Female , Functional Neuroimaging , Gyrus Cinguli/physiopathology , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Male , Middle Aged , Parietal Lobe/physiopathology , Prefrontal Cortex/physiopathologyABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Sociodemographic and socioeconomic characteristics of participants in antidepressant and psychotherapy efficacy trials (AETs and PETs) for major depressive disorder (MDD) may limit the generalizability of the results. We compared trial participants with daily practice patients. We subsequently assessed the influence of socio-demographic and socioeconomic status on treatment outcome in daily practice. METHODS: Data on daily practice patients were derived through routine outcome monitoring (ROM). We included 626 patients with MDD according to the MINIplus. Distributions of age, gender, race, marital status and employment status were compared with participants in 63 selected AETs and PETs. Influence of these features on treatment outcome was explored through multivariate regression analysis. RESULTS: Trial participants were older, more often male (diff. 4 %, p = 0.05), white (diff. 4 %, p < 0.001) and not married (diff. 7 %, p = 0.003). Although significant, most differences were relatively small. However, the difference in employment status was striking: 34 % of the ROM patients were currently working versus 68 % of the trial participants (diff. 34 %, p < 0.001). Being employed contributed to a positive treatment outcome: OR 1.8 for response [50 % reduction of Montgomery Asberg Rating Scale for Depression (MADRS)], OR 1.9 for remission (MADRS ≤10). CONCLUSIONS: Employment status should be taken into account while interpreting results from randomized controlled trials and as predictor of treatment success in daily practice.
Subject(s)
Depressive Disorder, Major/therapy , Employment/psychology , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic/methods , Social Class , Socioeconomic Factors , Adolescent , Adult , Antidepressive Agents/therapeutic use , Cognitive Behavioral Therapy , Community Mental Health Services/methods , Community Mental Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Employment/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Male , Netherlands , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Treatment Outcome , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Different types of adverse events may have general or specific effects on depression and anxiety symptomatology. We examined the effects of adversities on the dimensions of the tripartite model: general distress, anhedonic depression and anxious arousal. METHODS: Data were from 2615 individuals from the Netherlands Study for Depression and Anxiety (NESDA), with or without depressive or anxiety disorders. We analysed associations of childhood trauma, childhood life events (childhood trauma interview), and recent life events (List of Threatening Events Questionnaire, LTE-Q) with anhedonic depression, anxious arousal, and general distress (assessed by the adapted Mood and Anxiety Symptoms Questionnaire, MASQ-D30). RESULTS: We controlled for co-occurrence of adversities. Regarding childhood trauma, only emotional neglect was associated with all three symptom dimensions. Psychological and sexual abuse were associated with general distress and anxious arousal, whereas physical abuse was associated only with anxious arousal. Particularly strong associations were seen for emotional neglect with anhedonic depression and for sexual abuse with anxious arousal. Childhood life events showed no associations with symptom dimensions. The recent life events 'Serious problems with friend', 'Serious financial problems', and 'Becoming unemployed' were associated with all three dimensions. The recent life event 'death of parent/child/sibling' was associated with anxious arousal. Several associations remained significant when controlled for current diagnosis of depression or anxiety. LIMITATIONS: Our cross-sectional analyses do not allow for causal interpretation. CONCLUSIONS: Distinct childhood traumas had different effects on the symptom dimensions, whereas most recent adult life events were associated with all three symptom dimensions. Our observations help to understand the often reported associations of these adversities with depressive and anxiety symptomatology. In addition, symptom dimensions of the tripartite model were shown to capture effects of adverse events on top of those captured by diagnostic categories.
Subject(s)
Adult Survivors of Child Abuse/psychology , Anxiety/epidemiology , Depression/epidemiology , Life Change Events , Adult , Adult Survivors of Child Abuse/statistics & numerical data , Anhedonia , Arousal , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Models, Psychological , Netherlands/epidemiology , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Staging and profiling can make a valuable contribution to more effective and tailor-made treatments. In psychiatry these techniques have so far played only a very limited role. Routine outcome monitoring ROM ) may be able to alter the situation. AIM: To describe the criteria of a ROM-system that is ideal for staging and profiling and to find out to what extent some existing rom-systems satisfy these criteria. METHOD: The method used was to investigate to what extent the minimal dataset of the Stichting Benchmark GGZ and the ROM of the Leiden Routine Outcome Monitoring Study meet the criteria formulated in this article for an ideal ROM and provide a 'proof of principle'. RESULTS: The minimal dataset of the Stichting Benchmark ggz satisfies fewer criteria than the ROM of the Leiden Routine Outcome Monitoring Study, but neither fulfils all the criteria. Nevertheless, even without adequate datasets the Leiden Routine Outcome Monitoring Study can make a useful contribution to the staging of depression and mental health in general and to the profiling of depression. CONCLUSION: ROM is an important instrument for the development of staging and profiling in psychiatry.
Subject(s)
Evidence-Based Medicine , Mental Disorders/classification , Mental Disorders/diagnosis , Mental Health Services/standards , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Psychiatry/standards , Benchmarking , Humans , Mental Disorders/therapy , Netherlands , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Comorbidity among anxiety and depressive disorders is the rule rather than the exception. The Integrative Hierarchical Model proposes that each of these disorders contains general (common to all), specific (common to some) and unique components. However, research into this model is limited and hampered by small (clinical) sample sizes. The aim of the present study is to investigate the incremental validity of the cognitive constructs Anxiety Sensitivity, Pathological Worry and Cognitive Reactivity to sad mood over and above the personality traits neuroticism and extraversion. Symptomatic (N = 1,111) and remitted (N = 834) patients were selected from the 2,981 participants of the Netherlands Study of Depression and Anxiety (NESDA). Results revealed both specific and unique cognitive components of anxiety and depression. Across symptomatic and remitted groups, Anxiety Sensitivity was specific to social anxiety disorder and panic disorder, Aggression Reactivity was a unique component of dysthymia, and Rumination on Sadness was unique to major depressive disorder. We conclude that cognitive constructs have additional value in understanding anxiety and depressive disorders. Moreover, they prove to be more than mere epiphenomena of current disorders.
ABSTRACT
Major depressive disorder (MDD) is characterized by affective symptoms and cognitive impairments, which have been associated with changes in limbic and prefrontal activity as well as with monoaminergic neurotransmission. A genome-wide association study implicated the polymorphism rs2522833 in the piccolo (PCLO) gene--involved in monoaminergic neurotransmission--as a risk factor for MDD. However, the role of the PCLO risk allele in emotion processing and executive function or its effect on their neural substrate has never been studied. We used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to investigate PCLO risk allele carriers vs noncarriers during an emotional face processing task and a visuospatial planning task in 159 current MDD patients and healthy controls. In PCLO risk allele carriers, we found increased activity in the left amygdala during processing of angry and sad faces compared with noncarriers, independent of psychopathological status. During processing of fearful faces, the PCLO risk allele was associated with increased amygdala activation in MDD patients only. During the visuospatial planning task, we found no genotype effect on performance or on BOLD signal in our predefined areas as a function of increasing task load. The PCLO risk allele was found to be specifically associated with altered emotion processing, but not with executive dysfunction. Moreover, the PCLO risk allele appears to modulate amygdala function during fearful facial processing in MDD and may constitute a possible link between genotype and susceptibility for depression via altered processing of fearful stimuli. The current results may therefore aid in better understanding underlying neurobiological mechanisms in MDD.
Subject(s)
Alleles , Cytoskeletal Proteins/genetics , Depressive Disorder, Major/genetics , Emotions/physiology , Executive Function/physiology , Genome-Wide Association Study , Genotype , Neuropeptides/genetics , Polymorphism, Genetic/genetics , Adult , Amygdala/physiopathology , Depressive Disorder, Major/physiopathology , Dominance, Cerebral/physiology , Facial Expression , Female , Genetic Carrier Screening , Genetic Predisposition to Disease/genetics , Humans , Image Enhancement , Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Male , Middle Aged , Oxygen/blood , Pattern Recognition, Visual/physiology , Synaptic Transmission/genetics , Synaptic Transmission/physiologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Routine Outcome Monitoring ROM is an important instrument for measuring the effectiveness of treatment and has been implemented in the Dutch mental health care system. AIM: To review the effectiveness of ROM with regard to diagnosis, treatment, and other outcomes. METHOD: The literature study focused on randomised controlled trials RCT's of ROM performed on patients of all age groups, some being general patients, others being psychiatric patients. The main search words were 'routine outcome monitoring' or 'routine outcome measurement'. RESULTS: 52 RCTs on adult patients were included in the study; 45 of these trials were performed on patients with mental health problems, but not always in a psychiatric setting or as primary outcome measure. rom appears to have positive effects on diagnosis and treatment and on the communication between patient and therapist. Other results were less clear. CONCLUSION: ROM seems to be particularly effective for the monitoring of treatments which have not been entirely successful. Further research needs to be done into the clinical and cost-effectiveness of ROM when used with adults and children who have mental health problems.
Subject(s)
Evidence-Based Medicine , Mental Disorders/therapy , Mental Health Services/standards , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Psychiatry/standards , Humans , Mental Disorders/diagnosis , Netherlands , Randomized Controlled Trials as TopicABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Since 2002 the Leiden University Medical Center and the psychiatric hospital Rivierduinen have been using routine outcome monitoring in patients suffering from mood, anxiety and somatoform disorders (ROM). AIM: To describe the ROM-MAS set-up, explain how the system was implemented and report on the data-based scientific research that ensued. METHOD: The study is mainly descriptive. RESULTS: Circa 80% of the patients were assessed at intake, 50% via follow-up measurements. ROM-MAS has become a regular component of patient care. However, it has proved difficult to make full use of the outcomes in clinical practice and particularly in benchmarking. The data for 8357 patients have generated various publications relating to psychometrics, epidemiology and effects of treatment. CONCLUSION: ROM-MAS is now generally accepted and has been introduced in most psychiatric clinics. The next step is to make better use of the results for clinical practice and for benchmarking. ROM-MAS provides valuable data and generates publications relating to a naturalistic secondary-care cohort.
Subject(s)
Anxiety Disorders/therapy , Mental Health Services/standards , Mood Disorders/therapy , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Somatoform Disorders/therapy , Benchmarking , Cognitive Behavioral Therapy , Evidence-Based Medicine , Humans , Netherlands , Patient Satisfaction , Psychiatric Status Rating Scales , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Data on the impact of childhood life events and childhood trauma on the clinical course of depressive and anxiety disorders are limited. METHOD: Longitudinal data were collected from 1209 adult participants in the Netherlands Study of Depression and Anxiety (NESDA). Childhood life events and trauma at baseline were assessed with a semi-structured interview and the clinical course after 2 years with a DSM-IV-based diagnostic interview and Life Chart Interview. RESULTS: At baseline, 18.4% reported at least one childhood life event and 57.8% any childhood trauma. Childhood life events were not predictive of any measures of course trajectory. Emotional neglect, psychological and physical abuse, but not sexual abuse, were associated with persistence of both depressive and comorbid anxiety and depressive disorder at follow-up. Emotional neglect and psychological abuse were associated with a higher occurrence of a chronic course. Poor course outcomes were mediated mainly through a higher baseline severity of depressive symptoms. CONCLUSION: Childhood trauma, but not childhood life events, was associated with an increased persistence of comorbidity and chronicity in adults with anxiety and/or depressive disorders. More unfavourable clinical characteristics at baseline mediate the relationship between childhood trauma and a poorer course of depressive and anxiety disorders.