Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
2.
Malays J Med Sci ; 31(3): 252-256, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38984241

ABSTRACT

The incidence of aggression within healthcare environments has exhibited a discernible rise. As a response, restrictive measures, including restraints, are enforced. Due to the safety and ethical concerns associated with using restraint, de-escalation measures are regarded as the most efficient course of action. The paper posits that it is critical to identify the causes of aggression before employing restraint through a multidisciplinary risk assessment. In addition, the reasonableness and proportionality of administering restraint must be carefully measured. The significance of cultivating a therapeutic and compassionate environment is emphasised. The paper will exclusively examine physical restraint as a form of restriction intervention.

4.
6.
SAGE Open Nurs ; 10: 23779608241233862, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38362462
7.
Nurs Ethics ; : 9697330231225392, 2024 Jan 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38165167

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In recent years, patient advocacy has emerged as a prominent concept within healthcare. How nursing students decide what is best for their patients is not well understood. OBJECTIVE: The objective is to examine nursing students' views on doing what is best for patients during their clinical experiences and how they seek to establish patient interests when providing care. Research questions guiding the interview were as follows: (1) What are nursing students' perceptions of patient interests? (2) What factors influence nursing students' perceptions of advocating for patient's interests? RESEARCH DESIGN: Qualitative descriptive research using thematic analysis. PARTICIPANTS AND RESEARCH CONTEXT: Data was collected through individual online interviews with nine nursing students with clinical experience. ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS: The study was approved by the University Research Ethics Committee. Participants provided digital informed consent. RESULTS: The students asserted that they are able to understand the patients' interests by placing emphasis on the patients' needs. They believe that it is crucial to adopt a collaborative strategy for the provision of care to meet these requirements. In addition, some of them expressed concern over the most effective methods of advocating for the interests of patients. Three themes were identified. (1) Focussing on patient needs first, (2) taking a collective approach, and (3) learning how to advocate. CONCLUSIONS: Students understand and value the ethical commitments associated with advocating for the patient's best interest by considering factors such as prioritising the patient's needs, adopting a strategy that involves everyone, and acquiring the ability to undertake the advocacy role. Additionally, nursing education strategies in clinical contexts require additional study to inspire students to do what is in their patient's best interests.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL