Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 13 de 13
Filter
1.
Crit Care Med ; 52(3): 407-419, 2024 Mar 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37909824

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Metabolic syndrome is known to predict outcomes in COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) but has never been studied in non-COVID-19 ARDS. We therefore aimed to determine the association of metabolic syndrome with mortality among ARDS trial subjects. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study of ARDS trials' data. SETTING: An ancillary analysis was conducted using data from seven ARDS Network and Prevention and Early Treatment of Acute Lung Injury Network randomized trials within the Biologic Specimen and Data Repository Information Coordinating Center database. PATIENTS: Hospitalized patients with ARDS and metabolic syndrome (defined by obesity, diabetes, and hypertension) were compared with similar patients without metabolic syndrome (those with less than three criteria). INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary outcome was 28-day mortality. Among 4288 ARDS trial participants, 454 (10.6%) with metabolic syndrome were compared with 3834 controls (89.4%). In adjusted analyses, the metabolic syndrome group was associated with lower 28-day and 90-day mortality when compared with control (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.70 [95% CI, 0.55-0.89] and 0.75 [95% CI, 0.60-0.95], respectively). With each additional metabolic criterion from 0 to 3, adjusted 28-day mortality was reduced by 18%, 22%, and 40%, respectively. In subgroup analyses stratifying by ARDS etiology, mortality was lower for metabolic syndrome vs. control in ARDS caused by sepsis or pneumonia (at 28 d, aOR 0.64 [95% CI, 0.48-0.84] and 90 d, aOR 0.69 [95% CI, 0.53-0.89]), but not in ARDS from noninfectious causes (at 28 d, aOR 1.18 [95% CI, 0.70-1.99] and 90 d, aOR 1.26 [95% CI, 0.77-2.06]). Interaction p = 0.04 and p = 0.02 for 28- and 90-day comparisons, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Metabolic syndrome in ARDS was associated with a lower risk of mortality in non-COVID-19 ARDS. The relationship between metabolic inflammation and ARDS may provide a novel biological pathway to be explored in precision medicine-based trials.


Subject(s)
Acute Lung Injury , Metabolic Syndrome , Pneumonia , Respiratory Distress Syndrome , Humans , Metabolic Syndrome/complications , Retrospective Studies
2.
BMJ Open ; 13(11): e076036, 2023 11 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37949623

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a life-threatening condition commonly seen in the intensive care unit. COVID-19 has dramatically increased the incidence of ARDS-with this rise in cases comes the ability to detect predisposing factors perhaps not recognised before, such as metabolic syndrome (MetS) and its associated conditions (hypertension, obesity, dyslipidaemia and type 2 diabetes mellitus). In this systematic review, we seek to describe the complex relationship between MetS, its associated conditions and ARDS (including COVID-19 ARDS). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, CINAHL and Web of Science will be conducted. The population of interest is adults with ARDS and MetS (as defined according to the study author recognising that MetS definitions vary) or any MetS-associated condition. The control group will be adult patients with ARDS without MetS or any individual MetS-associated condition. We will search studies published in English, with a date restriction from the year 2000 to June 2023 and employ the search phrases 'metabolic syndrome', 'acute respiratory distress syndrome' and related terms. Search terms including 'dyslipidaemia', 'hypertension', 'diabetes mellitus' and 'obesity' will also be utilised. Outcomes of interest will include mortality (in-hospital, ICU, 28-day, 60-day and 90-day), days requiring mechanical ventilation and hospital and/or ICU length of stay. Study bias will be assessed using the NIH Bias Scale. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is not required because this study includes previously published and publicly accessible data. Findings from this review will be disseminated via publication in a peer-reviewed journal. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42023405816.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 , Metabolic Syndrome , Respiratory Distress Syndrome , Adult , Humans , Metabolic Syndrome/complications , COVID-19/complications , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/etiology , Intensive Care Units , Obesity/complications , Systematic Reviews as Topic
3.
Prim Care Diabetes ; 17(6): 661-664, 2023 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37827908

ABSTRACT

In the U.S., ethnic minorities with pre-diabetes, undiagnosed type 2 diabetes (T2D), and newly diagnosed T2D had a higher prevalence of microvascular complications than non-Hispanic Whites and exhibited distinct risk factors, whereas Whites had a higher rate of cardiovascular disease.


Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Diseases , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 , Prediabetic State , Humans , United States/epidemiology , Prediabetic State/diagnosis , Prediabetic State/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/diagnosis , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/epidemiology , Risk Factors , Cardiovascular Diseases/diagnosis , Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology , Prevalence , White
4.
J Endocr Soc ; 7(5): bvad029, 2023 Mar 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36911320

ABSTRACT

Context: Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is associated with increased risk of severe COVID-19. MetS inflammatory biomarkers share similarities with those of COVID-19, yet this association is poorly explored. Objective: Biomarkers of COVID-19 patients with and without MetS, the combination of diabetes, hypertension, obesity, and/or dyslipidemia, were analyzed to identify biological predictors of COVID-19 severity. Methods: In this prospective observational study, at a large academic emergency department in Boston, Massachusetts, clinical and proteomics data were analyzed from March 24 to April 30, 2020. Patients age ≥18 with a clinical concern for COVID-19 upon arrival and acute respiratory distress were included. The main outcome was severe COVID-19 as defined using World Health Organization COVID-19 outcomes scores ≤4, which describes patients who died, required invasive mechanical ventilation, or required supplemental oxygen. Results: Among 155 COVID-19 patients, 90 (58.1%) met the definition of MetS and 65 (41.9%) were identified as Control. The MetS cohort was more likely to have severe COVID-19 compared with the Control cohort (OR 2.67 [CI 1.09-6.55]). Biomarkers, including CXCL10 (OR 1.94 [CI 1.38-2.73]), CXCL9 (OR 1.79 [CI 1.09-2.93]), HGF (OR 3.30 [CI 1.65-6.58]), and IL6 (OR 2.09 [CI 1.49-2.94]) were associated with severe COVID-19. However, when stratified by MetS, only CXCL10 (OR 2.39 [CI 1.38-4.14]) and IL6 (OR 3.14 [CI 1.53-6.45]) were significantly associated with severe COVID-19. Conclusions: MetS-associated severe COVID-19 is characterized by an immune signature of elevated levels of CXCL10 and IL6. Clinical trials targeting CXCL10 or IL6 antagonism in this population may be warranted.

5.
Maturitas ; 170: 39-41, 2023 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36773498

ABSTRACT

Whether menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) lessens the severity of COVID-19 among women is unclear. Leveraging a U.S. national COVID-19 cohort and a cross-sectional analysis, we found MHT use was marginally associated with a lower risk of mortality (odds ratio [OR] 0.73, 95 % CI 0.53-1.01) and significantly associated with a lower risk of prolonged hospital stay (0.7, 0.49-0.99) among inpatient women. When stratifying by MHT type, estrogen-only and estrogen-plus-progestin therapies had a more prominent protective effect than progestin-only therapy, although this difference did not achieve statistical significance. Women with COVID-19 can continue to use MHT. Clinical trials are needed to evaluate MHT's therapeutic effect on COVID-19, especially in terms of severity.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Menopause , Female , Humans , Estrogen Replacement Therapy , Progestins , Cross-Sectional Studies , Hormone Replacement Therapy , Estrogens
6.
Psychol Res Behav Manag ; 16: 109-118, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36660255

ABSTRACT

Background: Early childhood is the key life course period for development of social-emotional skills, providing the foundation for school readiness and resilience in later life. Age-appropriate yoga and mindfulness programs may contribute to the development of critical skills in children. Young children from minoritized communities that face structural racism and health disparities may benefit from programs that support social-emotional development and contribute to future academic success. Systematic reviews of yoga interventions for young children have indicated the potential for effectiveness in supporting social-emotional development, executive function, and physical activity. However, studies of yoga and mindfulness with non-White children are sparse and, overall, the evidence base to date for such programs remains limited by non-controlled studies and the variable quality of studies evaluating programs in early childhood settings. Methods: The analysis of data from a non-randomized, controlled intervention aimed to assess the effect of exposure to a yoga and mindfulness program for early childhood development of social-emotional skills in a majority Black/African American urban preschool setting in southeastern US. Children in the intervention received group yoga and mindfulness led by a certified children's yoga teacher who also had training and experience as a school teacher. Intervention participants engaged in activities for 20 minutes once per week for 32 weeks, while the control group had no yoga. The final sample included 579 in the historical control group and 122 in the intervention group. Results: Results indicated that children who participated in the yoga and mindfulness program had higher total protective factor (TPF) subscores on the Devereux Early Childhood Assessment over time than children who did not receive yoga and mindfulness programming, and that the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Participation in the intervention group significantly predicted increases in initiative score, self-control score, and TPF score, as well as a decrease in the behavioral concerns. Discussion: School based yoga and mindfulness programming can support social-emotional skills and resilience in young children. Additional studies with larger sample sizes and randomization are needed on use of yoga and mindfulness in young children for social-emotional development, particularly for Black/African American children and others from minoritized communities.

7.
Am J Prev Med ; 64(3): 423-427, 2023 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36437142

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Women of reproductive age are less prone to cardiovascular disease than men. However, diabetes mellitus negates this female advantage. The prevalence change of prediabetes (prediabetes mellitus) and diabetes mellitus and diabetes mellitus‒associated cardiovascular risk factors have not been clearly described in women before menopause. METHODS: Using National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data (1999-2018), this study estimated the age-adjusted prevalence of prediabetes mellitus (2005-2018), diagnosed diabetes mellitus, and undiagnosed diabetes mellitus in premenopausal women. Logistic regression was used to examine cardiovascular risk factors, including obesity, central obesity, hypercholesterolemia, hypertension, and hypertriglyceridemia, associated with prediabetes mellitus, diagnosed diabetes mellitus, or undiagnosed diabetes mellitus in premenopausal women. The magnitude of the association among age-matched men and postmenopausal women was compared. The analysis was conducted in 2022. RESULTS: Premenopausal women experienced an increased prevalence of prediabetes mellitus and undiagnosed diabetes mellitus, contrasting with steady trends in all U.S. adults over the last 2 decades. Premenopausal women with prediabetes mellitus or diabetes mellitus (versus those with normoglycemia) have significant obesity risk, and the risk is equivalent to that among age-matched men and higher than that among postmenopausal women. The association between prediabetes mellitus and hypercholesterolemia or hypertriglyceridemia was significant in premenopausal women only. Hypercholesterolemia and hypertension associated with undiagnosed diabetes mellitus were significant in premenopausal women and men of the same age, respectively. Diagnosed and undiagnosed diabetes mellitus was associated with hypertriglyceridemia in men and postmenopausal women, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Premenopausal women had increased prediabetes mellitus and undiagnosed diabetes mellitus in the past 2 decades. They face a considerable cardiovascular risk burden associated with prediabetes mellitus and diabetes mellitus. Cardiometabolic risk screening and patient education should be improved in young and early middle-aged adults, particularly in women.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Hypercholesterolemia , Hypertension , Hypertriglyceridemia , Prediabetic State , Adult , Middle Aged , Male , Female , Humans , Prediabetic State/diagnosis , Prediabetic State/epidemiology , Nutrition Surveys , Hypercholesterolemia/diagnosis , Hypercholesterolemia/epidemiology , Hypercholesterolemia/complications , Diabetes Mellitus/diagnosis , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Risk Factors , Hypertension/complications , Obesity/complications , Hypertriglyceridemia/epidemiology , Hypertriglyceridemia/complications , Prevalence
8.
BMC Infect Dis ; 22(1): 784, 2022 Oct 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36224551

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The impact of comorbidities and biomarkers on COVID-19 severity vary by sex but have not yet been verified in population-based studies. We examined the association of comorbidities, inflammatory biomarkers, and severe outcomes in men and women hospitalized for COVID-19. DESIGN: This is a retrospective cohort analysis based on the National COVID Cohort Collaborative (N3C). We included 574,391 adult patients admitted for COVID-19 at hospitals or emergency rooms between 01/01/2020 and 12/31/2021. METHODS: We defined comorbidities at or before the first admission for COVID-19 by Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and CCI components. We used the averaged lab values taken within 15 days before or after the admission date to measure biomarkers including c-reactive protein (CRP), ferritin, procalcitonin, N-terminal pro b-type natriuretic peptide (NT proBNP), d-dimer, absolute lymphocyte counts, absolute neutrophil counts, and platelets. Our primary outcome was all-cause mortality; secondary outcomes were invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) and hospital length of stay (LOS). We used logistic regression adjusted for age, race, ethnicity, visit type, and medications to assess the association of comorbidities, biomarkers, and mortality disaggregating by sex. RESULTS: Moderate to severe liver disease, renal disease, metastatic solid tumor, and myocardial infarction were the top four fatal comorbidities among patients who were hospitalized for COVID-19 (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] > 2). These four comorbid conditions remained the most lethal in both sexes, with a higher magnitude of risk in women than in men (p-interaction < 0.05). Abnormal elevations of CRP, ferritin, procalcitonin, NT proBNP, neutrophil, and platelet counts, and lymphocytopenia were significantly associated with the risk of death, with procalcitonin and NT proBNP as the strongest predictors (aOR > 2). The association between the abnormal biomarkers and death was stronger in women than in men (p-interaction < 0.05). CONCLUSION: There are sex differences in inpatient mortality associated with comorbidities and biomarkers. The significant impact of these clinical determinants in women with COVID-19 may be underappreciated as previous studies stressed the increased death rate in male patients that is related to comorbidities or inflammation. Our study highlights the importance and the need for sex-disaggregated research to understand the risk factors of poor outcomes and health disparities in COVID-19.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Adult , Biomarkers , C-Reactive Protein/analysis , COVID-19/epidemiology , Female , Ferritins , Humans , Male , Natriuretic Peptide, Brain , Procalcitonin , Retrospective Studies , Sex Characteristics
9.
Front Public Health ; 10: 881660, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36033801

ABSTRACT

Background: The differential effect of comorbidities on COVID-19 severe outcomes by sex has not been fully evaluated. Objective: To examine the association of major comorbidities and COVID-19 mortality in men and women separately. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort analysis using a large electronic health record (EHR) database in the U.S. We included adult patients with a clinical diagnosis of COVID-19 who also had necessary information on demographics and comorbidities from January 1, 2016 to October 31, 2021. We defined comorbidities by the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) using ICD-10 codes at or before the COVID-19 diagnosis. We conducted logistic regressions to compare the risk of death associated with comorbidities stratifying by sex. Results: A total of 121,342 patients were included in the final analysis. We found significant sex differences in the association between comorbidities and COVID-19 death. Specifically, moderate/severe liver disease, dementia, metastatic solid tumor, and heart failure and the increased number of comorbidities appeared to confer a greater magnitude of mortality risk in women compared to men. Conclusions: Our study suggests sex differences in the effect of comorbidities on COVID-19 mortality and highlights the importance of implementing sex-specific preventive or treatment approaches in patients with COVID-19.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Adult , COVID-19 Testing , Comorbidity , Female , Humans , Male , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Sex Characteristics
10.
JAMA Netw Open ; 4(12): e2140568, 2021 12 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34935924

ABSTRACT

Importance: Obesity, diabetes, and hypertension are common comorbidities in patients with severe COVID-19, yet little is known about the risk of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) or death in patients with COVID-19 and metabolic syndrome. Objective: To determine whether metabolic syndrome is associated with an increased risk of ARDS and death from COVID-19. Design, Setting, and Participants: This multicenter cohort study used data from the Society of Critical Care Medicine Discovery Viral Respiratory Illness Universal Study collected from 181 hospitals across 26 countries from February 15, 2020, to February 18, 2021. Outcomes were compared between patients with metabolic syndrome (defined as ≥3 of the following criteria: obesity, prediabetes or diabetes, hypertension, and dyslipidemia) and a control population without metabolic syndrome. Participants included adult patients hospitalized for COVID-19 during the study period who had a completed discharge status. Data were analyzed from February 22 to October 5, 2021. Exposures: Exposures were SARS-CoV-2 infection, metabolic syndrome, obesity, prediabetes or diabetes, hypertension, and/or dyslipidemia. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included ARDS, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, need for invasive mechanical ventilation, and length of stay (LOS). Results: Among 46 441 patients hospitalized with COVID-19, 29 040 patients (mean [SD] age, 61.2 [17.8] years; 13 059 [45.0%] women and 15713 [54.1%] men; 6797 Black patients [23.4%], 5325 Hispanic patients [18.3%], and 16 507 White patients [57.8%]) met inclusion criteria. A total of 5069 patients (17.5%) with metabolic syndrome were compared with 23 971 control patients (82.5%) without metabolic syndrome. In adjusted analyses, metabolic syndrome was associated with increased risk of ICU admission (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.32 [95% CI, 1.14-1.53]), invasive mechanical ventilation (aOR, 1.45 [95% CI, 1.28-1.65]), ARDS (aOR, 1.36 [95% CI, 1.12-1.66]), and mortality (aOR, 1.19 [95% CI, 1.08-1.31]) and prolonged hospital LOS (median [IQR], 8.0 [4.2-15.8] days vs 6.8 [3.4-13.0] days; P < .001) and ICU LOS (median [IQR], 7.0 [2.8-15.0] days vs 6.4 [2.7-13.0] days; P < .001). Each additional metabolic syndrome criterion was associated with increased risk of ARDS in an additive fashion (1 criterion: 1147 patients with ARDS [10.4%]; P = .83; 2 criteria: 1191 patients with ARDS [15.3%]; P < .001; 3 criteria: 817 patients with ARDS [19.3%]; P < .001; 4 criteria: 203 patients with ARDS [24.3%]; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that metabolic syndrome was associated with increased risks of ARDS and death in patients hospitalized with COVID-19. The association with ARDS was cumulative for each metabolic syndrome criteria present.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/mortality , Hospitalization , Metabolic Syndrome/epidemiology , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/epidemiology , Adult , COVID-19/therapy , Comorbidity , Critical Care , Female , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Length of Stay , Male , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Prospective Studies , Respiration, Artificial , Risk Factors , SARS-CoV-2
11.
Biol Sex Differ ; 12(1): 20, 2021 02 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33546750

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Determine if sex differences exist in clinical characteristics and outcomes of adults hospitalized for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in a US healthcare system. DESIGN: Case series study. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Sequentially hospitalized adults admitted for COVID-19 at two tertiary care academic hospitals in New Orleans, LA, between 27 February and 15 July 2020. MEASURES AND OUTCOMES: Measures included demographics, comorbidities, presenting symptoms, and laboratory results. Outcomes included intensive care unit admission (ICU), invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV), and in-hospital death. RESULTS: We included 776 patients (median age 60.5 years; 61.4% women, 75% non-Hispanic Black). Rates of ICU, IMV, and death were similar in both sexes. In women versus men, obesity (63.8 vs 41.6%, P < 0.0001), hypertension (77.6 vs 70.1%, P = 0.02), diabetes (38.2 vs 31.8%, P = 0.06), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, 22.1 vs 15.1%, P = 0.015), and asthma (14.3 vs 6.9%, P = 0.001) were more prevalent. More women exhibited dyspnea (61.2 vs 53.7%, P = 0.04), fatigue (35.7 vs 28.5%, P = 0.03), and digestive symptoms (39.3 vs 32.8%, P = 0.06) than men. Obesity was associated with IMV at a lower BMI (> 35) in women, but the magnitude of the effect of morbid obesity (BMI ≥ 40) was similar in both sexes. COPD was associated with ICU (adjusted OR (aOR), 2.6; 95%CI, 1.5-4.3) and IMV (aOR, 1.8; 95%CI, 1.2-3.1) in women only. Diabetes (aOR, 2.6; 95%CI, 1.2-2.9), chronic kidney disease (aOR, 2.2; 95%CI, 1.3-5.2), elevated neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (aOR, 2.5; 95%CI, 1.4-4.3), and elevated ferritin (aOR, 3.6; 95%CI, 1.7-7.3) were independent predictors of death in women only. In contrast, elevated D-dimer was an independent predictor of ICU (aOR, 7.3; 95%CI, 2.7-19.5), IMV (aOR, 6.5; 95%CI, 2.1-20.4), and death (aOR, 4.5; 95%CI, 1.2-16.4) in men only. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights sex disparities in clinical determinants of severe outcomes in COVID-19 patients that may inform management and prevention strategies to ensure gender equity.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/diagnosis , Hospitalization , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , COVID-19/mortality , COVID-19/therapy , Female , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Male , Middle Aged , New Orleans , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Sex Factors , Survival Rate
12.
Trials ; 21(1): 1019, 2020 Dec 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33308290

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Burnout is an occupational syndrome that leads to mental health problems, job turnover, and patient safety events. Those caring for critically ill patients are especially susceptible due to high patient mortality, long hours, and regular encounters with trauma and ethical issues. Interventions to prevent burnout in this population are needed. Preliminary studies suggest debriefing sessions may reduce burnout. This study aims to assess whether participation in regular debriefing can prevent burnout in intensive care unit (ICU) clinicians. METHODS: A randomized controlled trial will be conducted in two large academic medical centers. Two hundred ICU clinicians will be recruited with target enrollment of 100 physicians and 100 non-physicians (nurses, pharmacists, therapists). Participants must have worked in the ICU for the equivalent of at least 1 full time work week in the preceding 4 weeks. Enrolled subjects will be randomized to virtually attend biweekly debriefing sessions facilitated by a psychotherapist for 3 months or to a control arm without sessions. Our debriefs are modeled after Death Cafés, which are informal discussions focusing on death, dying, loss, grief, and illness. These sessions allow for reflection on distressing events and offer community and collaboration among hospital employees outside of work. The primary outcome is clinician burnout as measured by the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI) Score. Secondary outcomes include depression and anxiety, as measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire 8 (PHQ-8) and Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item scale (GAD-7), respectively. Questionnaires will be administered prior to the intervention, at 1 month, at 3 months, and at 6 months after enrollment. These values will be compared between groups temporally. Qualitative feedback will also be collected and analyzed. DISCUSSION: With ICU clinician burnout rates exceeding 50%, Death Café debriefing sessions may prove to be an effective tool to avert this debilitating syndrome. With COVID-19 limiting social interactions and overloading ICUs worldwide, the virtual administration of the Death Café for ICU clinicians provides an innovative strategy to potentially mitigate burnout in this vulnerable population. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04347811 . Registered on 15 April 2020.


Subject(s)
Burnout, Professional/prevention & control , Intensive Care Units/statistics & numerical data , Occupational Stress/psychology , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , Terminal Care/psychology , Anxiety/diagnosis , Anxiety/epidemiology , Awareness/physiology , Burnout, Professional/epidemiology , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/virology , Case-Control Studies , Communication , Critical Illness/mortality , Critical Illness/psychology , Depression/diagnosis , Depression/epidemiology , Humans , Occupational Stress/epidemiology , Patient Health Questionnaire/statistics & numerical data , Patient Safety/statistics & numerical data , Personnel Turnover/statistics & numerical data , Surveys and Questionnaires , User-Computer Interface
13.
Diabetes Care ; 2020 Aug 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32843337

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) mortality is high in patients with hypertension, obesity, and diabetes. We examined the association between hypertension, obesity, and diabetes, individually and clustered as metabolic syndrome (MetS), and COVID-19 outcomes in patients hospitalized in New Orleans during the peak of the outbreak. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Data were collected from 287 consecutive patients with COVID-19 hospitalized at two hospitals in New Orleans, LA from 30 March to 5 April 2020. MetS was identified per World Health Organization criteria. RESULTS: Among 287 patients (mean age 61.5 years; female, 56.8%; non-Hispanic black, 85.4%), MetS was present in 188 (66%). MetS was significantly associated with mortality (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 3.42 [95% CI 1.52-7.69]), intensive care unit (ICU) (aOR 4.59 [CI 2.53-8.32]), invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) (aOR 4.71 [CI 2.50-8.87]), and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) (aOR 4.70 [CI 2.25-9.82]) compared with non-MetS. Multivariable analyses of hypertension, obesity, and diabetes individually showed no association with mortality. Obesity was associated with ICU (aOR 2.18 [CI, 1.25-3.81]), ARDS (aOR 2.44 [CI 1.28-4.65]), and IMV (aOR 2.36 [CI 1.33-4.21]). Diabetes was associated with ICU (aOR 2.22 [CI 1.24-3.98]) and IMV (aOR 2.12 [CI 1.16-3.89]). Hypertension was not significantly associated with any outcome. Inflammatory biomarkers associated with MetS, CRP, and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) were associated with mortality (CRP [aOR 3.66] [CI 1.22-10.97] and LDH [aOR 3.49] [CI 1.78-6.83]). CONCLUSIONS: In predominantly black patients hospitalized for COVID-19, the clustering of hypertension, obesity, and diabetes as MetS increased the odds of mortality compared with these comorbidities individually.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...