Prospective Observational Cohort Study of Tenecteplase Versus Alteplase in Routine Clinical Practice.

BACKGROUND: A 10-hospital regional network transitioned to tenecteplase as the standard of care stroke thrombolytic in September 2019 because of potential workflow advantages and reported noninferior clinical outcomes relative to alteplase in meta-analyses of randomized trials. We assessed whether tenecteplase use in routine clinical practice reduced thrombolytic workflow times with noninferior clinical outcomes. METHODS: We designed a prospective registry-based observational, sequential cohort comparison of tenecteplase- (n=234) to alteplase-treated (n=354) stroke patients. We hypothesized: (1) an increase in the proportion of patients meeting target times for target door-to-needle time and transfer door-in-door-out time, and (2) noninferior favorable (discharge to home with independent ambulation) and unfavorable (symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, in-hospital mortality or discharge to hospice) in the tenecteplase group. Total hospital cost associated with each treatment was also compared. RESULTS: Target door-to-needle time within 45 minutes for all patients was superior for tenecteplase, 41% versus 29%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.85 (95% CI, 1.27-2.71); P=0.001; 58% versus 41% by Get With The Guidelines criteria. Target door-in-door-out time within 90 minutes was superior for tenecteplase 37% (15/43) versus 14% (9/65); adjusted odds ratio, 3.62 (95% CI, 1.30-10.74); P=0.02. Favorable outcome for tenecteplase fell within the 6.5% noninferiority margin; adjusted odds ratio, 1.26 (95% CI, 0.89-1.80). Unfavorable outcome was less for tenecteplase, 7.3% versus 11.9%, adjusted odds ratio, 0.77 (95% CI, 0.42-1.37) but did not fall within the prespecified 1% noninferior boundary. Net benefit (%favorable-%unfavorable) was greater for the tenecteplase sample: 37% versus 27%. P=0.02. Median cost per hospital encounter was less for tenecteplase cases ($13 382 versus $15 841; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Switching to tenecteplase in routine clinical practice in a 10-hospital network was associated with shorter door-to-needle time and door-in-door-out times, noninferior favorable clinical outcomes at discharge, and reduced hospital costs. Evaluation in larger, multicenter cohorts is recommended to determine if these observations generalize.

Neuroimaging in Ischemic Stroke Is Different Between Men and Women in the DEFUSE 3 Cohort.

Background and Purpose- Clinical deficits from ischemic stroke are more severe in women, but the pathophysiological basis of this sex difference is unknown. Sex differences in core and penumbral volumes and their relation to outcome were assessed in this substudy of the DEFUSE 3 clinical trial (Endovascular Therapy Following Imaging Evaluation for Ischemic Stroke). Methods- DEFUSE 3 randomized patients to thrombectomy or medical management who presented 6 to 16 hours from last known well with proximal middle cerebral artery or internal carotid artery occlusion and had target core and perfusion mismatch volumes on computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging. Using univariate and adjusted regression models, the effect of sex was assessed on prerandomization measures of core, perfusion, and mismatch volumes and hypoperfusion intensity ratio, and on core volume growth using 24-hour scans. Results- All patients were included in the analysis (n=182) with 90 men and 92 women. There was no sex difference in the site of baseline arterial occlusion. Adjusted by age, baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, baseline modified Rankin Scale score, time to randomization, and imaging modality, women had smaller core, hypoperfusion, and penumbral volumes than men. Median (interquartile range) volumes for core were 8.0 mL (1.9-18.4) in women versus 12.6 mL (2.7-29.6) in men, for Tmax>6 seconds 89.0 mL (63.8-131.7) versus 133.9 mL (87.0-175.4), and for mismatch 82.1mL (53.8-112.8) versus 108.2 (64.1-149.2). The hypoperfusion intensity ratio was lower in women, 0.31 (0.15-0.46) versus 0.39 (0.26-0.57), P=0.006, indicating better collateral circulation, which was consistent with the observed slower ischemic core growth than men within the medical group (P=0.003). Conclusions- In the large vessel ischemic stroke cohort selected for DEFUSE 3, women had imaging evidence of better collateral circulation, smaller baseline core volumes, and slower ischemic core growth. These observations suggest sex differences in hemodynamic and temporal features of anterior circulation large artery occlusions. Registration- URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02586415.