ABSTRACT
Intraretinal or subretinal fluid in the peripapillary area can be clinically visualized in conditions such as peripapillary choroidal neovascularization, optic disc pit maculopathy, and optic nerve head tumors and granulomas. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) helps to visualize peripapillary fluid in many other chorioretinal conditions such as peripapillary pachychoroid syndrome, posterior uveitis, central retinal vein occlusion, malignant hypertension, hypotonic maculopathy as well as neuro-ophthalmological conditions such as glaucoma, microcystic macular edema and disc edema due papilledema, non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy, neuroretinitis, and diabetic papillopathy. Often, the differential diagnosis of peripapillary fluid is a bit tricky and may lead to misdiagnosis and improper management. We describe a diagnostic algorithm for peripapillary fluid on OCT and outline the salient features and management of these conditions.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to compare visual and anatomical outcome in vitrectomized and non-vitrectomized eyes treated with dexamethasone (DEX) implant due to diabetic macular oedema (DMO). DESIGN: Multicenter, retrospective, interventional study. PARTICIPANTS: 236 eyes from 234 patients with DMO with or without previous vitrectomy performed with follow-up of 12 months. METHODS: Records were reviewed for cases of DMO treated with DEX implant in vitrectomized and not vitrectomized eyes. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central subfoveal thickness (CST), and intraocular pressure (IOP) were recorded at baseline and 12 months after treatment with DEX implants. Correlations between vitreous status and visual and anatomical outcome, as well as safety profile were analysed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: BCVA and CST over follow-up period. SECONDARY OUTCOMES: cataract rate formation, intraocular pressure increase, number of implants needed. RESULTS: The non-vitrectomized group included 130 eyes (55.1%), the vitrectomized group included 106 eyes (44.9%). The groups were well balanced for age and gender (p = 0.540, and p = 0.053, respectively). Both groups showed statistically significant improvement in BCVA and CST (for all groups: p < 0.001). There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of change in vision (p = 0.89) and anatomy (p = 0.65). The mean number of DEX implants given during follow-up was 3.5 in both groups, and there was no significant difference between the groups (p = 0.81). CONCLUSION: We demonstrated similar anatomical and functional efficacy of DEX implant in non-vitrectomized and vitrectomized eyes. Its efficacy was not influenced by full vitrectomy for diabetic retinopathy complications. Safety profile was well balanced between groups.
Subject(s)
Diabetic Retinopathy , Macular Edema , Humans , Macular Edema/drug therapy , Macular Edema/etiology , Macular Edema/surgery , Glucocorticoids/therapeutic use , Diabetic Retinopathy/drug therapy , Diabetic Retinopathy/surgery , Dexamethasone/therapeutic use , Retrospective Studies , Drug Implants/therapeutic use , Intravitreal Injections , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to compare visual and anatomical outcome in subretinal aflibercept vs. intravitreal aflibercept in the context of Pars Plana Vitrectomy (PPV), pneumatic displacement with subretinal air and subretinal tPA in patients with naïve submacular haemorrhage (SMH) secondary to neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). DESIGN: Retrospective interventional cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: 80 patients treated with subretinal aflibercept vs. intravitreal aflibercept in the context of PPV, subretinal air and subretinal tPA in patients with SMH secondary to naïve nAMD. METHODS: Records were reviewed. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central subfoveal thickness (CST), and intraocular pressure (IOP) were recorded at baseline and 24 months after treatment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: BCVA, CST, and number of anti VEGF treatment over follow-up period. RESULTS: The average duration from onset of symptoms to surgery was 1.26 days (range 0-3 days). Based on review of OCT images, SMH was subretinal in all 80 patients (100%), and sub-RPE in 29 patients (36.3%). Forty-one patients (51.25%) were treated with subretinal aflibercept ("subretinal group"), and 39 patients (48.75%) were treated with intravitreal aflibercept injections ("intravitreal group"). The groups were well balanced for age and gender p = 0.6588, and p = 0.263, respectively). Both groups showed statistically significant improvement in BCVA and CST (for all groups: p < 0.001). The mean number of anti VEGF given during follow-up period was statistically significantly lower in the "subretinal group" (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: This study shows better management of the CNV, with a statistically significant lower need for anti-VEGF injections when treated with subretinal aflibercept compared to intravitreal application.
Subject(s)
Macular Degeneration , Tissue Plasminogen Activator , Humans , Tissue Plasminogen Activator/therapeutic use , Fibrinolytic Agents/therapeutic use , Retrospective Studies , Cohort Studies , Treatment Outcome , Recombinant Fusion Proteins/therapeutic use , Retinal Hemorrhage/drug therapy , Retinal Hemorrhage/etiology , Intravitreal Injections , Macular Degeneration/drug therapy , Tomography, Optical CoherenceABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To evaluate the follow up and treatment outcome of central serous chorioretinopathy (CSCR) based on the new multimodal imaging-based classification and identify the predictors for anatomic and visual outcome. METHODS: Retrospective, multicentric study on 95 eyes diagnosed with CSCR and a follow up of at least 12 months were included. Eyes with macular neovascularization, atypical CSCR or any other disease were excluded. RESULTS: At the baseline, observation was advised to 70% eyes with simple CSCR whereas photodynamic therapy (PDT) was performed in 49% eyes with complex CSCR. Over the follow up, decrease in CMT was significantly higher in simple CSCR as compared to complex CSCR (P = 0.008) and the recurrences were significantly more in eyes with lower CMT at baseline (P = 0.0002). Median time of resolution of SRF was 3 months and 6 months in simple and complex CSCR respectively (P = 0.09). For the 12 months follow up, the median fluid free period was greater (P = 0.03) while number of interventions performed was lesser in eyes with simple CSCR as compared to complex CSCR (P = 0.006). Multiple regression analysis showed baseline best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and baseline persistent SRF to be significantly predictive of BCVA and persistent SRF at 12 months (P < 0.0001, 0.04) respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Complex CSCR more often required PDT, was associated with shorter fluid free interval and longer time for SRF resolution. Baseline BCVA and persistent SRF were predictive of final visual and anatomical outcome. The new multimodal imaging based classification is helpful in establishing objective criteria for planning treatment approaches for CSCR.
Subject(s)
Central Serous Chorioretinopathy , Photochemotherapy , Central Serous Chorioretinopathy/diagnostic imaging , Central Serous Chorioretinopathy/drug therapy , Chronic Disease , Fluorescein Angiography , Humans , Multimodal Imaging , Photochemotherapy/methods , Retrospective Studies , Tomography, Optical Coherence , Treatment Outcome , Visual AcuityABSTRACT
The treatment and outcomes of diabetic macular oedema (DMO) have improved with the introduction of intravitreal injections. However, real-world data reveal that the burden of DMO treatment causes large gaps in outcomes between randomized clinical trials and daily clinical practice. Long-lasting intravitreal drugs and devices for DMO might reduce this disparity by achieving optimal treatment due to more feasible injection regimens. In this manuscript, we cover pharmacodynamics, preliminary results from clinical trials, and safety behavior about brolucizumab, faricimab, conbercept, KSI-301, and port-delivery system WR42221. These treatments might present the first step to control the global epidemic of diabetic eye disease in real life.
Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Diabetic Retinopathy , Macular Edema , Angiogenesis Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Bevacizumab/therapeutic use , Diabetic Retinopathy/complications , Diabetic Retinopathy/drug therapy , Humans , Intravitreal Injections , Macular Edema/drug therapy , Macular Edema/etiology , Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A/therapeutic useABSTRACT
To analyze functional and anatomical response patterns to dexamethasone (DEX) implant in diabetic macular edema (DME), to describe proportion of responders and non-responders, and to propose a new DME grading system. Retrospective, multicenter, observational cohort study. Naïve and non-naïve DME patients were treated with DEX, with visual acuity (VA) ≥ 0.2 logMAR and central subfield thickness (CST) of ≥ 300 µm. Functional and anatomical responses were graded after 2 and 4 months, and categorized as early and stable improvement, early and progressive improvement, pendular response, delayed improvement, and persistent non-response. 417 eyes were included (175 treatment naïve eyes). Compared to non-naïve eyes, naïve eyes showed a very good functional response (VA gain ≥ 10 letters) more frequently after 2 and 4 months (56% and 57% [naïve] vs. 33% and 28% [non-naïve], p < 0.001). A VA gain < 5 letters (non-response) after 2 and 4 months was seen in 18% and 16% of naïve eyes, and in 49% and 53% of non-naïve eyes (p < 0.001). A lack of anatomical response was rare in both groups, but more frequently in non-naïve eyes (12% vs. 4%, p = 0.003). Functionally and anatomically, naïve eyes showed most frequently an early and stable improvement (functionally: 77/175 44%; anatomically: 123/175 eyes, 70%). Most non-naïve eyes experienced no significant improvement functionally (97/242 eyes, 40%), despite a mostly early and stable improvement anatomical response pattern (102/242 eyes, 42%). Functional but not anatomical response patterns were influenced by baseline VA. Naïve and non-naïve eyes show different functional and anatomical response patterns to DEX implant. Functional non-responders are rare in naïve eyes, whereas anatomical non-response is unusual in both groups.
Subject(s)
Angiogenesis Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Dexamethasone/therapeutic use , Diabetic Retinopathy/drug therapy , Macular Edema/drug therapy , Aged , Cohort Studies , Diabetic Retinopathy/pathology , Female , Humans , Intravitreal Injections , Macular Edema/pathology , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Visual Acuity/drug effectsABSTRACT
The treatment of neovascular AMD (nAMD) has been revolutionized by the introduction of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents. Though, there is a tremendous gap between the outcomes in randomized clinical trials and real-world settings, where long-term outcomes are not as good as expected. This is due to undertreatment, i.e., fewer injection and low monitoring frequency. Treatment burden due to frequent injections remains a major limitation. Long-lasting treatments provide promising solutions for this unmet need by achieving better results with less mandatory injections. This review aims to cover the current state in this field and also discuss the mechanism of action, data from pivotal trials, and safety profile of long-acting treatments in present and future, going into details about the following agents: Brolucizumab, Faricimab, Abipicar, and Conbercept.
Subject(s)
Angiogenesis Inhibitors , Wet Macular Degeneration , Angiogenesis Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Humans , Intravitreal Injections , Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A , Visual Acuity , Wet Macular Degeneration/drug therapyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: To report a case of autologous corneal transplant in a patient with corneal leukoma and choroidal melanoma in the fellow eye. CASE PRESENTATION: A 56-year-old woman was complaining about decrease in vision in her left eye. The patient was on the waiting list for a corneal transplant on her right eye due to corneal leucoma after a previous herpes infection. The patient was diagnosed with choroidal melanoma in her left eye. Due to the tumor size (longitudinal diameter >10 mm; anterior-posterior diameter >16 mm) the patient decided to undergo enucleation, after being informed about different treatment options (brachytherapy and enucleation). The patient showed her willingness to use the cornea of the left eye as a transplant for her right eye. After discussion with the ethical committee and its approval, and signing informed consent, the patient underwent enucleation of her left eye. The sample was examined by a pathologist and found to be free of melanoma cells in the corneolimbal tissue. Afterwards, trepanation of the donor cornea button was performed and transplanted to the left eye. CONCLUSION: Autologous corneal transplantation is a safe and feasible procedure in selected cases.
ABSTRACT
AIMS: Intraoperative complications in cataract surgery are more common in diabetic patients. Solving aphakia in these circumstances remains a challenge, as the scleral structure has been shown to be different in diabetes. This study aims to analyze the role of a secondary sutureless scleral intraocular lens (IOL) flanged fixation in diabetic patients without capsular support and to compare the anatomical and functional outcomes using a 30 gauge (G) ultrathin wall needle vs. a 27G needle. METHODS: Retrospective, observational cohort study. 105 eyes (105 patients) who underwent PPV with secondary IOL fixation using a sutureless 27G (n = 51) or a 30G ultrathin wall (UTW) needle technique (n = 54) and had a 24 months postoperative follow up. Consecutive patients' records were reviewed for lens stability and centration parameters, intra- and postoperative complications at 7 days, 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery. Correlations between outcome measures and needle size (27G vs. 30G UTW) were analyzed. RESULTS: IOL displacement occurred in 30 patients (41.2%) in the 27G group and did not occur in the 30G UTW needle group (p < 0.001). Mean time until IOL displacement was 10.5 ± 7.0 months (range: 7 days-24 months). IOL centricity was significantly better in the 30G ultrathin wall needle group compared to 27 G (p = 0.001). Additional surgical interventions were necessary only in the 27G group (n = 14). CONCLUSIONS: Sutureless IOL flanged technique using a 30G UTW needle is more predictable and has less complications in aphakic diabetic patients, compared to a 27G needle technique.
Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus/surgery , Diabetic Retinopathy/surgery , Lens Implantation, Intraocular/instrumentation , Needles , Sutureless Surgical Procedures/instrumentation , Adult , Aged , Aphakia/epidemiology , Aphakia/surgery , Argentina/epidemiology , Cohort Studies , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Diabetic Retinopathy/epidemiology , Equipment Design , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Lens Implantation, Intraocular/adverse effects , Lens Implantation, Intraocular/methods , Lenses, Intraocular , Male , Middle Aged , Needles/adverse effects , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Retrospective Studies , Sclera/surgery , Sutureless Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Sutureless Surgical Procedures/methods , Visual AcuityABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Iris microhemangiomatosis is a rare vascular iris tumor, with potential severe complications such as increased intraocular pressure (IOP). We aim to describe a case report of a patient presenting with hyphema secondary to iris microhemangiomatosis triggered by excessive high blood pressure. CASE PRESENTATION: A 74-year-old woman was treated for hypertensive crisis. After her high blood pressure had been controlled and stabilized, she was discharged home. However, the same day, she complained about an acute decrease in vision in her left eye. Best corrected visual acuity was 20/20 on the right eye and 20/200 on the left eye. On biomicroscopy, a hyphema was seen. Iris neovascularization was absent, IOP and fundus examination were normal. After spontaneous resolution of the hyphema, a fluorescein angiography of the anterior segment was performed, which revealed bilateral subtle early hyperfluorescence with late staining scattered at the pupillary margin. The patient was diagnosed with iris microhemangiomatosis. During the follow-up of 24 months, the blood pressure was stable and well controlled. The patient did not experience any recurrent hemorrhage. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Spontaneous hyphema is the most common complication of iris vascular tumors. We report the occurrence of a spontaneous hyphema triggered by uncontrolled blood pressure in a patient with a very rare condition, i.e., iris microhemangiomatosis. In order to avoid complications of microhemangiomatosis such as uncontrolled glaucoma or recurrent bleeding requiring surgery, blood pressure should be monitored closely and controlled.
ABSTRACT
AIMS: We aimed to investigate a novel optical coherence tomography (OCT) finding of outer retinal hyperreflective deposits (ORYDs) in patients with naïve diabetic macular oedema (DMO) seen after small gauge pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling. Furthermore, we evaluated the predictive value of ORYD for visual outcome over 24 months follow-up. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study including 111 eyes from 111 patients with naïve DMO treated by PPV and ILM peeling with a follow-up of 24 months. OCT scans were analysed for the presence of ORYD 1 week and 1, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months after surgery. Change in baseline best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central subfoveal thickness (CST) after surgery were measured over the follow-up period. Presence of ORYD was correlated with baseline characteristics and BCVA after 24 months. RESULTS: Hundred and eleven eyes from 111 patients were included (mean age 67.5±14.8 years). ORYD was identified in the outer plexiform layer as hyperreflective deposits in 92 patients (82.8%) 7 days after surgery but it was not present before surgery. There was a significant reduction in the presence of ORYD. After 24 months ORYD disappeared in all cases (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: We describe a novel OCT feature of ORYD present in the early postoperative phase in the majority of patients after PPV with ILM peeling for naïve DMO, disappearing over the postoperative course. These deposits might be a result of sudden desinflammation and could shed new light on the process of DMO resolution after operative intervention.
Subject(s)
Basement Membrane/surgery , Diabetic Retinopathy/complications , Macular Edema/diagnosis , Retinal Photoreceptor Cell Outer Segment/pathology , Tomography, Optical Coherence/methods , Visual Acuity , Vitrectomy/methods , Adult , Aged , Diabetic Retinopathy/diagnosis , Diabetic Retinopathy/surgery , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Macular Edema/etiology , Macular Edema/surgery , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
AIM: Main failure of diabetic tractional retinal detachment (TRD) surgery is the development of proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR), causing higher re-detachment rates. We investigated whether the use of dexamethasone (DEX) implant at the end of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with silicone oil tamponade might have an impact on these outcomes. DESIGN: Comparative, nonrandomized, retrospective study. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 148 eyes from 148 patients that underwent PPV with silicone oil tamponade for diabetic TRD (with DEX implant, n = 52; without DEX implant, n = 96). METHODS: Consecutive patients' records were reviewed for time between TRD diagnosis and surgery; lens status before surgery and after 6, 12, and 24 months; retina attachment rate after primary PPV; change in postoperative PVR severity; rate of re-detachment at 6, 12, and 24 months; use of IOP lowering treatment after 6, 12, and 24 months; surgery details; intra- and postoperative complications. Correlations between outcome measures, postoperative PVR severity, and re-detachment rates were analyzed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Change in postoperative PVR severity and retinal re-detachment rates with and without the adjuvant use of DEX implant. RESULTS: Retinal re-detachment rates were significantly higher in the group of patients that did not receive DEX implant [11/96 (11.5%) vs. 0/52 (0%), p = 0.049; 11/84 (12.9%) vs. 4/52 (7.7%), p = 0.007; 14/71 (19.7%) vs. 5/52 (10%) p < 0.001 at 6, 12, and 24 months, respectively]. PVR severity correlated with retinal status at 12 and 24 months (p = 0.018 and p = 0.027, respectively). The difference in PVR severity between the two groups was statistically significant at 6, 12, and 24 months (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: DEX implant at the end of PPV in patients with diabetic TRD improves PVR severity and decreases re-detachment rates. This should be considered as an option in the customized treatment of TRD.
Subject(s)
Dexamethasone/administration & dosage , Diabetic Retinopathy/drug therapy , Diabetic Retinopathy/surgery , Retinal Detachment/drug therapy , Retinal Detachment/surgery , Vitrectomy/methods , Adult , Aged , Combined Modality Therapy , Dexamethasone/adverse effects , Diabetic Retinopathy/complications , Drug Implants/administration & dosage , Drug Implants/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Intravitreal Injections , Male , Middle Aged , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Period , Retina/drug effects , Retina/physiopathology , Retrospective Studies , Silicone Oils/administration & dosage , Silicone Oils/adverse effects , Visual Acuity/drug effects , Vitrectomy/adverse effects , Vitreoretinopathy, Proliferative/drug therapy , Vitreoretinopathy, Proliferative/etiology , Vitreoretinopathy, Proliferative/surgeryABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To investigate efficacy and safety of repeated dexamethasone (DEX) implants over 24 months, in diabetic macular edema (DME) eyes that were treatment naive compared with eyes refractory to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatment, in a real-life environment. METHODS: This multicenter international retrospective study assessed best-corrected visual acuity and central subfield thickness (CST) of naive and refractory eyes to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injections treated with dexamethasone implants. Safety data (intraocular pressure rise and cataract surgery) were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 130 eyes from 125 patients were included. Baseline best-corrected visual acuity and CST were similar for naive (n = 71) and refractory eyes (n = 59). Both groups improved significantly in vision after 24 months (P < 0.001). However, naive eyes gained statistically significantly more vision than refractory eyes (+11.3 ± 10.0 vs. 7.3 ± 2.7 letters, P = 0.01) and were more likely to gain ≥10 letters (OR 3.31, 95% CI 1.19-9.24, P = 0.02). At 6, 12, and 24 months, CST was significantly decreased compared with baseline in both naive and refractory eyes; however, CST was higher in refractory eyes than in naive eyes (CST 279 ± 61 vs. 313 ± 125 µm, P = 0.10). CONCLUSION: Over a follow-up of 24 months, vision improved in diabetic macular edema eyes after treatment with dexamethasone implants, both in eyes that were treatment naive and eyes refractory to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatment; however, improvement was greater in naive eyes.
Subject(s)
Angiogenesis Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Dexamethasone/administration & dosage , Diabetic Retinopathy/drug therapy , Drug Resistance , Macula Lutea/pathology , Macular Edema/drug therapy , Visual Acuity , Aged , Diabetic Retinopathy/complications , Diabetic Retinopathy/physiopathology , Drug Implants , Endothelial Growth Factors/antagonists & inhibitors , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Glucocorticoids/administration & dosage , Humans , Intraocular Pressure/physiology , Intravitreal Injections , Macular Edema/etiology , Macular Edema/physiopathology , Male , Retrospective Studies , Time Factors , Tomography, Optical Coherence , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To report a cohort with optic disk pit maculopathy (ODPM) presenting with neurosensory macular detachment that were initially misdiagnosed and mistreated; and to describe structural features on spectral domain optical coherence tomography in misdiagnosed and all other consecutive cases of ODPM. METHODS: Multicenter international retrospective cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: 59 eyes from 59 patients with ODPM. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: 1) Proportion of patients with ODPM initially misdiagnosed, inaccurate diagnosis and treatment. 2) Morphologic features on spectral domain optical coherence tomography: other causes of subretinal and/or intraretinal fluid, inner/outer retinoschisis, communication with optic disk pit, and retinal pigment epithelium alterations. 3) Visual and anatomical outcomes 6 months after proper treatment. RESULTS: Fifteen patients (25.4%) with ODPM were correctly diagnosed initially and those were significantly younger than misdiagnosed cases (age 33.8 ± 15.2 vs. 58.7 ± 15.8 years, P < 0.0001). Forty of forty-four misdiagnosed eyes (90.9%) were treated for their presumed diagnosis before referral. Eyes with initial misdiagnosis had significantly more outer retinoschisis at baseline (88.4 vs. 40.0%, P = 0.0002) and more retinal pigment epithelium alterations (90.0 vs. 27.3%, P < 0.0001) 6 months after proper treatment. CONCLUSION: Optic disk pit maculopathy is an underdiagnosed entity and can mimic other causes for subretinal fluid. Awareness and identification of pertinent spectral domain optical coherence tomography features can help avoid inappropriate and delayed treatment.
Subject(s)
Eye Abnormalities/pathology , Macula Lutea/pathology , Macular Degeneration/diagnosis , Optic Disk/abnormalities , Tomography, Optical Coherence/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Eye Abnormalities/complications , Female , Humans , Macular Degeneration/etiology , Male , Middle Aged , Optic Disk/pathology , Reproducibility of Results , Retrospective Studies , Young AdultABSTRACT
PURPOSE: We aimed to investigate biomarkers and predictive factors for visual and anatomical outcome in patients with naïve diabetic macular edema (DME) who underwent small gauge pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling as a first line treatment. DESIGN: Multicenter, retrospective, interventional study. PARTICIPANTS: 120 eyes from 120 patients with naïve DME treated with PPV and ILM peeling with a follow up of 24 months. METHODS: Change in baseline best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central subfoveal thickness (CST) 1, 6, 12 and 24 months after surgery. Predictive value of baseline BCVA, CST, optical coherence tomography (OCT) features (presence of subretinal fluid (SRF) and photoreceptor damage), and time between DME diagnosis and surgery. Additional treatment for DME needed. Intra- and post-operative complications (cataract rate formation, increased intraocular pressure). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The correlation between baseline characteristics and BCVA response (mean change from baseline; categorized improvement ≥5 or ≥10; Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letters) 12 and 24 months after surgery. RESULTS: Mean BCVA was 0.66 ± 0.14 logMAR, 0.52 ± 0.21 logMAR, and 0.53 ± 0.21 logMAR (p<0.001) at baseline, 12 and 24 months, respectively. Shorter time from DME diagnosis until PPV (OR: 0.98, 95% CI: 0.97-0.99, p<0.001) was a predictor for good functional treatment response (area under the curve 0.828). For every day PPV is postponed, the patient's chances to gain ≥5 letters at 24 months decrease by 1.8%. Presence of SRF was identified as an anatomical predictor of a better visual outcome, (OR: 6.29, 95% CI: 1.16-34.08, p = 0.033). Safety profile was acceptable. CONCLUSIONS: Our results reveal a significant functional and anatomical improvement of DME 24 months after primary PPV, without the need for additional treatment. Early surgical intervention and presence of SRF predict good visual outcome. These biomarkers should be considered when treatment is chosen.
Subject(s)
Diabetes Complications/diagnosis , Diabetes Complications/surgery , Macular Edema/diagnosis , Macular Edema/surgery , Vitrectomy , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Eye/diagnostic imaging , Eye/pathology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Macular Edema/etiology , Male , Middle Aged , Organ Size , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Time-to-Treatment , Tomography, Optical CoherenceABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents have been shown to reduce diabetic retinopathy (DR) progression; data on the effects of intravitreal corticosteroids on modifying disease severity are limited. This study evaluates the long-term effect of intravitreal dexamethasone implant (DEX) on the severity and progression of non-proliferative DR (NPDR). METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study. Sixty eyes from 60 consecutive patients with NPDR and diabetic macular edema (DME) treated with dexamethasone implant (DEX group) and 49 eyes from consecutive 49 patients without DME requiring observation only. Fundus angiography images from baseline and after 24 months were graded by two masked assessors into mild, moderate and severe NPDR and PDR, according to the ETDRS classification. Patients were followed up 1-3 and 4-6 months after each DEX implant. Re-treatment with DEX implant was on a pro re nata basis. Records were reviewed for performance of panretinal photocoagulation. Main outcome was as follows: change of DR ≥ 1 grade and progression to proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). RESULTS: Three eyes (5%) in the DEX group and 43 (87.8%) eyes in the control group progressed to PDR (P < 0.0001). Twenty-five eyes (41.7%) in the DEX group but none in the control group demonstrated an improvement in DR severity (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: This study provides the first long-term evidence that DEX implant has the potential to not only delay progression of DR and PDR development, but may also improve DR severity over 24 months. Better understanding of the effects of corticosteroids will help guide its use in the treatment pathway of DR.