The prevalence and patterns of hearing loss in Jordan: A cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Hearing loss is known to be a serious issue that impedes human communication. The World Health Organization (WHO) estimates that approximately 20 in 100,000 newborns demonstrate congenital hearing impairments, leading to severely impacted language, academic, and social abilities of these children. OBJECTIVE: The reduced quality of life and work productivity among hearing-impaired individuals eventually affects societal outcomes and development. Since limited studies address the nature of hearing-impaired individuals in Jordan, this research aimed to define the prevalence and nature of hearing loss in Jordan, highlighting important facts about hearing loss epidemiology across Jordanians. METHODS: The current research focused on assessing hearing function for 1000 individuals over 12 years to define the rate, most prominent configurations, and the most common characteristics of hearing difficulties in Jordan. RESULTS: The results showed that sixty-three per 1,000 people have hearing loss, most frequently sensorineural hearing loss. The age range of people with hearing loss was 12 to 89 years old, with a median age of 51. The incidence of hearing loss appeared at a later age (33.33%, X2 = 15.74, p<0.05). The percentages of hearing loss were similar across the main Jordanian governorates (X2 = 7.14, p>0.05), with sensorineural hearing loss reported to be the most common type of hearing loss (N = 46, 73.00%), and mild is the most frequent severity (N = 25, X2 = 23.58, p<0.05). No statistical variation was reported in the prevalence of hearing loss based on gender. CONCLUSION: The rate of hearing loss in Jordan is higher than worldwide prevalence, which was assumed to be due to genetic factors impacting the auditory system. These findings will assist in creating effective hearing conservation programs to reasonably prevent or minimize the spread of hearing loss in Jordan.

Correction: Impact of hearing impairment on the mental status of the adults and older adults in Jordanian society.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298616.].

Impact of hearing impairment on the mental status of the adults and older adults in Jordanian society.

BACKGROUND: Hearing loss is a common disorder, affecting both children and adults worldwide. Individuals with hearing loss suffer from mental health problems that affect their quality of life. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the social and emotional consequences of hearing loss in a Jordanian population using Arabic versions of the Hearing Handicap Inventory for Adults (HHIA) and the Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly (HHIE). METHODS: This study included 300 Jordanian participants aged 18-90 years with hearing loss. Each participant underwent a complete audiological evaluation before answering the questionnaires. RESULTS: The median overall scores of the HHIA and HHIE groups were 39 and 65, respectively. Both HHIA (Cronbach's alpha = 0.79, p < 0.001) and HHIE (Cronbach's alpha = 0.78, p < 0.001) were significantly associated with the social, emotional, and overall scores. Compared to the adult group, the median emotional and social scores of the older adults group were significantly higher than the adults group (Z = -4.721, p = 0.001), using the Mann-Whitney test. CONCLUSION: The present research revealed that psychological disabilities associated with hearing loss in the adult Jordanian population are more frequent and severe than in other nations. This may be attributed to the lack of awareness of the mental consequences of hearing loss among Jordanian healthcare providers and the public.

Sensorineural hearing loss among children at risk: A 16-year audiological records review in a tertiary referral center.

OBJECTIVES: Hearing loss (HL) constitutes an increasing worldwide health problem. Neonatal hearing screening improved early detection and management to alleviate HL detriments on the person and society. Still, HL in childhood, beyond infancy, is under-investigated, especially in developing countries. This study aimed to explore the prevalence of HL in childhood amongst Jordanian children with HL risk factors and investigate the associated risk factors. METHODS: Retrospective cross-sectional review of audiological records in a tertiary public and teaching hospital. The data of 1307 children aged 0-15 years who underwent audiological assessment from 2000 to 2016 were included. A review of diagnostic audiological and medical records was conducted to investigate the prevalence of sensorineural HL in high-risk (HR) children and the most contributing risk factors. RESULTS: Descriptive statistical analysis showed that the prevalence of sensorineural HL was 29.2% in the study sample. The HL was bilateral in 95% and mild to moderate HL in 73%. The mean age at the diagnosis was around 4.5 years. The most common risk factors were parental concern about their child's hearing, ototoxic drug use, and developmental and speech delay. The Chi-squared test showed that parental concern and ototoxic drug use were associated with an increased probability of having HL. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of HL amongst at-risk children in Jordan is relatively high, and the diagnosis is delayed. The results highlight the importance of implementing a hearing screening program in at-risk children. This needs to start from birth and include a serial follow-up to detect cases of delayed-onset HL.

The audiological rehabilitation of workers with hearing loss in the UK: a qualitative study of workers' perspectives.

PURPOSE: Unaddressed hearing loss can adversely affect employment and day-to-day work-life. Efficient and effective audiology support can help optimise hearing in the workplace. This study explores the audiological rehabilitation experiences of workers with hearing loss (WHL). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-four WHL with experience of a wide range of audiology services across the UK participated in semi-structured interviews. Interviews were analysed using inductive thematic analysis. RESULTS: Three main themes were generated: Theme 1: mixed experiences with audiology services (subdivided into two subthemes and four sub-subthemes). Theme 2: audiology role in work support (subdivided into three subthemes). Theme 3: "I think support could be improved if…" (subdivided into two subthemes). CONCLUSION: The audiological rehabilitation for working-age adults with hearing loss needs improvements to deliver sufficient support and quality care. Some of the barriers to having better-functioning hearing healthcare require fundamental standards in healthcare quality, such as access to services, staff (including audiologists) deaf awareness, information and technology support, and personalised care that considers work-life needs. Further research is required to evaluate the feasibility and cost-effectiveness of improvements, such as support that extends beyond hearing aid care, whether from audiology or non-audiology services.

Workers with hearing loss need audiologists' support to address their work life needs beyond hearing-aids care.Improving audiologists' competencies, audiology departments' efficiency and developing relevant resources may promote better healthcare for workers with hearing loss.Audiologists, employers, workers, and the healthcare system need to collaborate in developing person-centred solutions to sufficiently assist workers with hearing loss.

Hearing healthcare for workers with hearing loss: audiologists' experiences and views.

PURPOSE: This study explored audiologists' perspectives regarding their interactions with workers with hearing loss (WHL). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with twenty-five audiologists working in the National Health Service (NHS) and independent companies (IC) in the UK and were thematically analysed. RESULTS: The developed themes and sub-themes (shown in parenthesis) are (1) Current practices and routines (Same approach for most patients; Variations between hearing care services; Audiologists' personal experience of hearing loss) (2) Perceived challenges (Non-routine and challenging cases; The role of hearing technology; Concerns about lack of awareness and knowledge; Communication difficulties between services, Limited funding and resources) (3) Scope for better support (Would like to be informed; Other potential service improvements). CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed that audiologists' perceived deficiencies in the hearing rehabilitation for WHL and identified ways to improve it. Key priorities for improvement were found to include addressing audiologists' informational and training needs, facilitating WHLs' access to appointments, improving communication between services, raising awareness in the workplace, developing relevant resources and extending funding for provision of longer appointments and hearing technologies. This is the first time this information has been reported in the literature. Opportunities for conducting further research in this area are suggested.Implications for rehabilitationWorkers with hearing loss face many challenges in work life and have the option of audiologic rehabilitation to alleviate their difficulties and improve their wellbeing; however, this study suggests that workers' audiological care needs improvements.Audiologists should assess and consider patients' work needs and psychosocial concerns in consultations to provide personalised care.Audiology educational programmes, services, and the healthcare system can assist audiologists in helping workers with hearing loss by providing updated knowledge, continuous training and improved interprofessional communication and patients' access to useful resources.

Association between Gasdermin A, Gasdermin B Polymorphisms and Allergic Rhinitis Amongst Jordanians.

BACKGROUND: Gasdermin A (GSDMA) and Gasdermin B (GSDMB) have been associated with childhood and to a lesser extent with adult asthma in many populations. In this study, we investigate whether there is an association between GSDMA (rs7212938, T/G) and GSDMB (rs7216389, T/C) at locus 17q21.2 and risk of Allergic Rhinitis among Jordanians. Also, we aimed to determine if there is an association between such polymorphisms and the IgE level. METHODS: The study included 112 rhinitis patients and 111 Healthy controls. Gasdermin A (GSDMA) (rs7212938, T/G) and Gasdermin B (rs7216389, T/C) polymorphisms were genotyped using the PCRRFLP method. RESULTS: On the genotype level, three analysis models were applied namely co-dominant, dominant and recessive genotypes. GSDMB CC genotype was found to have a significant protective effect against allergic Rhinitis (< 0.05). cc genotype was also significantly associated with higher IgE level among the studied population. CONCLUSION: The GSDMB CC of homozygous minor genotype showed a protective effect against Allergic rhinitis. It also was found to be significantly associated with lower IgE level among the studied population. No association was found between GSDMA with the risk of allergic Rhinitis.

Assessment of occupational noise-related hearing impairment among dental health personnel.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of the study was to examine hearing thresholds among dental personnel. The secondary aim was to evaluate sound levels among dental equipment that dental personnel are exposed to. METHODS: Two hundred forty-four dentists, dental technicians, dental assistants, and dental students participated. Sixty-two participated as a control group. Audiological thresholds for the test groups were compared to the control group. All participants were from Jordan University Hospital. Participants completed a questionnaire in addition to their audiometric testing. Otoscopy, tympanometry, and pure tone audiometry were included in their assessment. Three-factor ANOVA and t tests were utilized to assess the statistical differences of hearing thresholds among the groups and between the two ears. Pearson correlation test was used to assess the effect of age, experience, and duration of exposure on the degree of hearing loss in the test groups for both ears. RESULTS: The authors reported statistically significant differences among hearing thresholds between the control group and others. Left hearing thresholds were noted to be significantly poorer in the left versus right ear at 1000, 2000, 4000, and 8000 Hz in dental assistants. The authors also reported a significant relationship between the degree of hearing impairment among dental assistants and the daily duration of exposure to dental occupational noise, followed by age. CONCLUSION: Hearing impairment was higher among dental professionals than the control group and especially among dental assistants and technicians. The authors recommended screening guidelines and adapting hearing protection methods for dental professionals and particularly for dental assistants and technicians.