ABSTRACT
Maraviroc is a first-in-class chemokine coreceptor type-5 (CCR5) antagonist with demonstrated immunovirologic activity in treatment-experienced (TE) patients with CCR5 (R5)-tropic HIV-1; however, experience in regimens containing newer antiretroviral agents is limited. The primary objective of this 96-week open-label, noncomparative, multicenter Phase 3b study (NCT00478231) was to assess the safety of maraviroc in combination with optimized background therapy (OBT), which could include recently introduced agents such as darunavir and raltegravir in TE patients in Brazil with R5 HIV-1 and limited therapeutic options. Immunovirologic activity was a secondary endpoint. Of 638 patients screened, 206 were treated and 125 completed the study. Approximately 70% were male; the mean age was 43.2 years. Most patients (65.0%) received an OBT combination of protease inhibitor plus nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor. Adverse event (AE) and treatment-related AE incidence was 91.3% and 36.9%, respectively. The most common AEs were diarrhea, nasopharyngitis, and headache. Serious AEs and treatment-related serious AEs occurred in 16.5% and 4.4% of patients. Only eight patients (3.9%) discontinued due to AEs. Few AIDS-defining events were observed (4.9%). The proportion of patients with viral load <400 copies/ml increased from 2.4% at baseline to 43.9% at week 8, remaining >40% until week 48. At the end of treatment, 26.7% of patients had a viral load <400 copies/ml. Median CD4(+) cell count increased throughout the study; the mean change from baseline to end of treatment was 174.1 cells/µl. In conclusion, maraviroc, combined with different agents from multiple classes, was well tolerated in highly TE patients. Maraviroc plus OBT was associated with an immunovirologic response in this population.
Subject(s)
CCR5 Receptor Antagonists , Cyclohexanes/adverse effects , Cyclohexanes/therapeutic use , HIV Infections/drug therapy , HIV-1/drug effects , Triazoles/adverse effects , Triazoles/therapeutic use , Adult , Anti-HIV Agents/adverse effects , Anti-HIV Agents/therapeutic use , Brazil , CD4 Lymphocyte Count , Darunavir , Drug Therapy, Combination , Female , HIV Fusion Inhibitors/adverse effects , HIV Fusion Inhibitors/therapeutic use , HIV Protease Inhibitors/adverse effects , HIV Protease Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Humans , Male , Maraviroc , Middle Aged , Protease Inhibitors/adverse effects , Protease Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Pyrrolidinones/adverse effects , Pyrrolidinones/therapeutic use , Raltegravir Potassium , Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors/adverse effects , Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Sulfonamides/adverse effects , Sulfonamides/therapeutic use , Treatment Failure , Viral Load/drug effects , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Vicriviroc, a novel HIV CCR5 antagonist, demonstrated significant efficacy and favorable tolerability in phase II trials in treatment-experienced subjects, supporting further evaluation in phase III studies. METHODS: Two identical double-blind, placebo (PBO)-controlled trials in CCR5-tropic HIV-infected subjects with documented resistance to two antiretroviral classes were conducted. Subjects were randomized to vicriviroc 30 mg QD (N = 571) or PBO (N = 286) with open-label optimized background therapy (OBT) containing ≥2 fully active antiretroviral drugs. The primary endpoint was percentage of subjects with <50 copies/mL HIV RNA at 48 weeks. It was analyzed in a logistic regression with treatment (vicriviroc + OBT/PBO + OBT), use of enfuvirtide in baseline OBT (yes/no), and baseline HIV RNA (≤100,000/>100,000 copies/mL) as covariates. In addition, a pre-planned analysis to examine other efficacy and safety endpoints was conducted. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics of the pooled mITT population (vicriviroc, n = 486; PBO, n = 235) included mean HIV RNA of 4.6 log(10) copies/mL and mean CD4 count of 257 cells/µL. Approximately 60% of subjects received ≥3 active drugs in the OBT. The percentage of subjects with <50 copies/mL HIV RNA was not significantly different between vicriviroc and PBO at week 48 (64% vs 62%, p = 0.6). However, in subjects receiving ≤2 active drugs in their OBT, the proportion achieving <50 copies/mL HIV RNA was higher in those receiving vicriviroc compared with PBO (70% vs 55%, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: The studies failed to show significant efficacy gains when vicriviroc was added to OBT. However, given the efficacy results of earlier vicriviroc trials and other CCR5 antagonist, studies are needed to define the role of this class of drugs in the treatment of HIV. Clinical trial identifier: http://www.clinicaltrial.gov/: VICTOR-E3 (NCT00523211) and VICTOR-E4 (NCT00474370).