Comparisons of soft tissue changes after Herbst appliance treatment in three different growth phases.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare the soft tissue effects of Herbst appliance in Class II malocclusion patients treated in three different craniofacial growth phases: prepubertal (PRE), circumpubertal (CIR), and postpubertal (POS). METHODS: In total, 95 patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion previously treated with a Herbst appliance were analyzed. Through the cervical vertebral maturation stages method, patients were allocated into three groups depending on the growth craniofacial phase at the beginning of treatment: PRE, CIR, and POS. Seventeen cephalometric measures were evaluated from each lateral radiograph before and after Herbst therapy using the Radiocef 2 software (Radio Memory, Belo Horizonte). Intragroup and intergroup treatment changes were compared statistically using a paired t test and MANOVA test, respectively. RESULTS: Soft tissue thickness changes were related only to mandible; all three mandibular measurements (L1_LL, B_B', and Pog_Pog') showed thickening for the PRE group ranging from 0.92 mm (Pog_Pog') to 2.02 mm (B_B'), and only lower lip thickened overtime for the POS group (L1_LL = 0.99 mm). Soft and hard tissue pogonion displaced anteriorly, but only the soft tissue showed differences among groups; PRE group presented more anterior displacement than POS group (3.61 mm and 1.39 mm, respectively). Hard and soft tissue facial convexity decreased more in the PRE and CIR groups than in the POS group. Mentolabial sulcus depth reduced more in the PRE (1.07 mm) and CIR (1.29 mm) groups than in the POS (0.55 mm) group. Horizontal movement of the skeletal and soft pogonion presented a moderate-high positive correlation (r = 0.783), and hard and soft facial convexity showed a moderate-low positive correlation (r = 0.403). CONCLUSIONS: Herbst appliance therapy produces soft tissue improvements in the three phases of craniofacial growth, being greater in patients in the PRE and CIR phases.

Dental changes induced by a modified Herbst appliance followed by fixed appliances: A digital dental model analysis.

BACKGROUND: Herbst therapy is an effective treatment for Class II malocclusions. However, the maintenance of the effects after fixed appliances treatment remains questionable. This retrospective study aimed to assess, using digital dental models, the sagittal and transverse dental arch changes in young patients during two Class II Division 1 treatment phases, first with modified Herbst appliance (HA) and then with fixed appliances. METHODS: The treated group (TG) comprised 32 patients (17 boys, 15 girls; mean age, 12.85 ± 1.16 years) treated with HA and fixed appliances. The control group comprised 28 patients (13 boys, 15 girls; mean age, 12.21 ± 1.35 years) with untreated Class II malocclusions. Digital models were obtained immediately before and after HA therapy and after fixed appliances. Data were statistically analyzed. RESULTS: Compared with the control group, the TG showed an increase in maxillary and mandibular arch perimeters and in intercanine and intermolar arch widths, a decrease in overjet and overbite, and an improvement in canine and molar relationships. In the time after HA therapy until the end of fixed appliances treatment, the TG showed a decrease in maxillary and mandibular arch perimeters, overjet, upper and lower intermolar widths; an increase in molar Class II relationship; and no changes in canine relationship, overbite, and upper and lower intercanine widths. CONCLUSIONS: In this sample of patients treated with HA, on average, there was an improvement in the Class II relationship, which seemed to remain after fixed appliances. The transverse dental changes achieved in HA phase relapsed after treatment with fixed appliances.

Evaluation of the stability of treatment with Herbst appliance associated with Hyrax expander and fixed orthodontics through counterpart analysis: A longitudinal follow-up study.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the stability of treatment with a Herbst appliance associated with Hyrax expander (Stage I), followed by fixed appliances (Stage II) and follow-up for an average of 4 years after Stage II, on dentoskeletal facial structures. METHODS: This study involved 50 adolescents with Angle Class II division 1 malocclusion associated with mandibular retrognathism: Treated Group (TG-25) and Control Group (CG-25). Lateral cephalometric radiographs were taken: T1, immediately before Stage I (TG) or at the beginning of the follow-up period (CG); T2, at the end of Stage I (TG) or the follow-up period (CG); T3, at the end of Stage II (TG); and T4, on average, 4 years after Stage II (TG). Enlow's counterpart analysis and some cephalometric measurements were evaluated. Parametric and non-parametric tests were used (P ≤ 0.05). RESULTS: The ramus alignment variables (P < 0.001), SNB (0.040), ANB (<0.001), 1.PP (P = 0.015), 1.MP (P < 0.001), ms/RLp (P < 0.001), mi/RLp (P < 0.001) and S-LS (P = 0.005) showed differences between TG and CG from T1 to T2. Longitudinally, there were differences in ramus alignment, P = 0.003, T1 > T2 < T3 = T4; SNB, P = 0.016, T1 < T2 = T3 = T4; ANB, P < 0.001, T1 > T2 = T3 = T4; 1.MP, P < 0.001, T1 < T2 = T3 = T4; ms/RLp, P = 0.002, T1 = T2 < T3 = T4; mi/RLp, P < 0.001, T1 < T2 = T3 = T4; S-LS, P < 0.001, T1 > T2 = T3 = T4 and S-LI, P = 0.003, T1 = T2 = T3 > T4. CONCLUSION: The nasomaxillary complex (MCF/PM alignment) tended to a retrusive effect to compensate the degree of mandibular retrusion. The protrusive effect of the lower facial third was evident after the Herbst stage and did not remain stable in the follow-up. The dentoalveolar compensation and improvement in facial profile remained stable.

Dental and skeletal changes in patients with mandibular retrognathism following treatment with Herbst and pre-adjusted fixed appliance.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the dentoskeletal changes observed in treatment of Class II, division 1 malocclusion patients with mandibular retrognathism. Treatment was performed with the Herbst orthopedic appliance during 13 months (phase I) and pre-adjusted orthodontic fixed appliance (phase II). METHODS: Lateral cephalograms of 17 adolescents were taken in phase I onset (T1) and completion (T2); in the first thirteen months of phase II (T3) and in phase II completion (T4). Differences among the cephalometric variables were statistically analyzed (Bonferroni variance and multiple comparisons). RESULTS: From T1 to T4, 42% of overall maxillary growth was observed between T1 and T2 (P<0.01), 40.3% between T2 and T3 (P<0.05) and 17.7% between T3 and T4 (n.s.). As for overall mandibular movement, 48.2% was observed between T1 and T2 (P<0.001) and 51.8% between T2 and T4 (P<0.01) of which 15.1% was observed between T2 and T3 (n.s.) and 36.7% between T3 and T4 (P<0.01). Class II molar relationship and overjet were properly corrected. The occlusal plane which rotated clockwise between T1 and T2, returned to its initial position between T2 and T3, remaining stable until T4. The mandibular plane inclination did not change at any time during treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Mandibular growth was significantly greater in comparison to maxillary, allowing sagittal maxillomandibular adjustment. The dentoalveolar changes (upper molar) that overcorrected the malocclusion in phase I, partially recurred in phase II, but did not hinder correction of the malocclusion. Facial type was preserved.

Temporomandibular joint evaluation with magnetic resonance imaging in children with functional unilateral posterior crossbite, treated with rapid maxillary expansion.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this prospective study was to evaluate qualitatively articular disc position and configuration of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in children with functional unilateral posterior crossbite (FUPXB) treated with Haas-type orthopedic appliances. METHODS: The sample included 30 Brazilian children (60 TMJs) of both sexes (8 boys, 22 girls), aged 6.8 to 14.2 years (mean, 10.5 years; SD, 2.1 years). The MRIs were acquired in closed-mouth (CM), maximum-intercuspal (MI), and open-mouth (OM) positions in 3 stages of treatment: initial (T1), at the beginning of treatment; intermediate (T2), immediately after the removal of the expander, and final (T3), 9 months later, at the end of the observation period. RESULTS: No changes were found in articular disc positions of 96.6% of the TMJs in the CM and MI positions, and in 95% in the OM position at T1, T2, and T3. For the articular disc configuration, no changes were observed in 96.66% of the TMJs in the CM and MI positions, and in all TMJs in the OM position, at T1, T2, and T3. CONCLUSIONS: On average, this treatment method did not change articular disc positions and configurations.