Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Med Mal Infect ; 50(1): 63-73, 2020 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31611135

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: 16S rRNA PCR (16S PCR) performed on clinical samples contributes to bacterial identification in cases of negative culture due to an antibiotic therapy. Sensitivity of the 16S PCR is low (19-42%). Little data is available on its impact on the management of patients. We aimed to evaluate the contribution of 16S PCR to diagnosis and therapeutic management at the university hospital of Dijon, France. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 16S PCR was performed on the clinical specimens of 132 patients. Clinical settings, laboratory results, and data on antibiotic therapy were collected, as well as conclusions drawn from the 16S PCR result by physicians. Each case was analyzed to determine if the 16S PCR was helpful. The relevance of the 16S PCR was also assessed. RESULTS: The 16S PCR yield was 27.3%, ranging from 14.3% to 64.3% depending on the type of specimen. 16S PCR had a positive impact on diagnosis in 28.8% of cases. Five negative 16S PCR results were considered helpful as they contributed to ruling out bacterial infection. 16S PCR led to treatment changes in six patients (4.5%): three narrower spectrums, two treatment adaptations, and one discontinuation. The 16S PCR was considered "non-relevant" in 35 cases (26.5%). None of these 35 PCRs contributed to the patient's management. CONCLUSION: Physicians should be aware of performances of 16S PCR. Dialogue between physicians and bacteriologists is essential for appropriate selection of indications and correct interpretation of results.


Subject(s)
Bacterial Infections/diagnosis , Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , RNA, Ribosomal, 16S/analysis , Humans , Prospective Studies , Retrospective Studies
2.
Epidemiol Infect ; 144(16): 3527-3530, 2016 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27535588

ABSTRACT

Achromobacter spp. are emerging opportunistic Gram-negative rods responsible for diverse nosocomial or community-acquired infections. We describe, for the first time, the distribution of Achromobacter spp., defined by nrdA gene sequencing, and their antimicrobial susceptibility in a variety of non-respiratory samples recovered from hospitalized patients from 2010 to 2015. Of the 63 isolates studied, A. xylosoxidans was the most prevalent (41 isolates), and with the exception of A. insuavis (four isolates), the remaining 10 species identified were represented by one or two isolates only. All isolates were uniformly susceptible to piperacillin and piperacillin-tazobactam and 97% to meropenem, but 76% showed resistance to ciprofloxacin. This study confirms the diversity of Achromobacter spp. in non-cystic fibrosis (CF) isolates and the predominance of A. xylosoxidans, as previously reported for CF sputum isolates. There was no apparent link between the clinical site of infection and the species of Achromobacter.

3.
New Microbes New Infect ; 10: 1-5, 2016 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26904200

ABSTRACT

Achromobacter spp. are emerging respiratory pathogens in cystic fibrosis patients. Since 2013 the genus Achromobacter includes 15 species for which innate antibiotic resistance is unknown. Previously the AxyXY-OprZ efflux system has been described to confer aminoglycoside (AG) resistance in A. xylosoxidans. Nevertheless, some Achromobacter spp. strains are susceptible to AG. This study including 49 Achromobacter isolates reveals that AG resistance is correlated with different Achromobacter spp. It is noteworthy that the axyXY-oprZ operon is detected only in AG-resistant species, including the most frequently encountered in cystic fibrosis patients: A. xylosoxidans, A. ruhlandii, A. dolens and A. insuavis.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL