Supercharged cervical anastomosis for esophagectomy and gastric pull-up.

OBJECTIVE: Esophagectomy has high rates of morbidity and mortality. Anastomotic leakage is the most frequent complication and is likely caused by diminished anastomotic perfusion. Supercharged microvascular anastomosis has previously been performed in select patients to supplement the blood supply to the graft and anastomosis after esophagectomy. This study aimed to evaluate complications that may arise after performing the supercharged cervical anastomosis for esophagectomy procedure. METHODS: This prospective comparative study evaluated patients who underwent esophagectomy with gastric reconstruction and cervical anastomosis for locally advanced esophageal carcinoma. Patients were divided into group 1, in which conventional cervical anastomosis was performed, and group 2, in which cervical anastomosis using the supercharged cervical anastomosis for esophagectomy procedure was performed. The anastomotic perfusion areas in group 2 patients were evaluated using indocyanine and the SPY device (Novadaq Technologies, Inc, Toronto, Ontario, Canada) before and after supercharged cervical anastomosis for esophagectomy. Postesophagectomy complications were also recorded. RESULTS: The study enrolled 80 patients, which included 62 (77.5%) men, mean age 64.3 years. Groups 1 and 2 comprised 55 patients and 25 patients, respectively. Leakage occurred in 10.5% and 0% of patients in groups 1 and 2, respectively (P = .169), whereas the corresponding anastomotic stricture rates were 14.5% and 4%, respectively (P = .260). Perfusion analyses showed a 26.5% improvement in the anastomotic area after venous anastomosis and a 34.6% improvement after arterial and venous anastomosis. CONCLUSIONS: The supercharged cervical anastomosis for esophagectomy procedure may reduce the occurrence of anastomotic leakage and improve perfusion in the anastomotic area via vein and arterial microanastomoses.

Surgical resection, intraoperative radiotherapy and immediate plastic reconstruction: A good option for the treatment of distal extremity soft tissue sarcomas.

AIM: To show three patients with soft tissue sarcomas of distal extremities conservatively treated after tumor-board discussion, involving margin-free surgery, exclusive intraoperative radiotherapy, and immediate reconstruction. BACKGROUND: Current guidelines show clear and robust recommendations regarding the composition of the treatment of sarcomas of extremities. However, little evidence exists regarding the application of these treatments depending on the location of the primary neoplasia. Tumors that affect the distal extremities present different challenges and make multidisciplinary discussions desirable. METHODS/RESULTS: We reported 3 patients who were approached with a conservative intention, after tumor board recomendation. The goals from the treatment performed were aesthetic and functional preservation, while enruring locoregional control. We had wound healing complications in 2 of the cases, requiring additional reconstruction measures. Patients are followed up for 24, 20 and 10 months; local control is 100%, and functional preservation is 100%. CONCLUSIONS: Despite being a small series, it was sufficient to illustrate successful multidisciplinary planning, generating a therapeutic result with improved quality of life for patients who had an initial indication for extremity amputation.

The impact of COVID-19 on the plastic surgery activity in a high-complexity university hospital in Brazil: the importance of reconstructive plastic surgery during the pandemic.

BACKGROUND: The Hospital das Clínicas - University of Sao Paulo Medical School (HCFMUSP) is the largest university hospital complex in Brazil. HCFMUSP has been converted into a reference center for coronavirus disease 2019. The Division of Plastic Surgery postponed non-essential surgeries and outpatient consultations, accomplishing new guidelines (ANG) of national and international organizations. Even with these challenges arising from the pandemic, alternatives were considered to maintain institutional characteristics. This study aims to analyze this new scenario and the impact on patients' assistance and Plastic Surgery residents training. METHODS: Total number of surgeries, type of procedures, and outpatient consultations in 2020, before (pre-ANG) and after (post-ANG) ANG, were compared with the same period in 2019 (2019-pre and 2020-post). RESULTS: A marked reduction in the total number of surgeries and outpatient consultations was observed in the post-ANG period. In the post-ANG period, 267 operations were performed (26.7 ± 20.3/week), while in the 2019-post period, 1036 surgeries were performed (103.6 ± 9.7/week) (p = 0.0002). Similarly, 1571 consultations were conducted in the post-ANG period (157.1 ± 93.6/week), while in the 2019-post period, 3907 were performed (390.7 ± 43.1/week) (p = 0.0003). However, in the post-ANG period, an increase in the proportion of reconstructive compared with aesthetic surgery was observed. The maintenance of highly complex procedures such as microsurgical transplants was also identified. CONCLUSIONS: The predominant profile of reconstructive surgeries at the Division of Plastic Surgery allowed the continuity of procedures at all technical complexity levels, patient care maintenance, and Plastic Surgery residents training.Level of evidence: not ratable.