Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Contact Dermatitis ; 84(6): 395-406, 2021 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33534191

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Fragrances constitute the second most frequent cause of allergic contact dermatitis in Spain. OBJECTIVES: To determine the rate of sensitization to the individual fragrances of fragrance mix (FM) I and FM II for each of the demographic and clinical factors included in the MOAHLFA (male, occupational dermatitis, atopic dermatitis, hand dermatitis, leg dermatitis, facial dermatitis, age) index. METHODS: We conducted a 5-year retrospective study in 23 Spanish centres. We identified the patients who had undergone patch testing with a specific fragrance series after reacting positively to fragrance markers in a baseline series. We obtained the MOAHLFA index items in this population, then calculated for each demographic and clinical factor the frequencies of sensitization to the individual fragrances of FM I and FM II. RESULTS: A specific fragrance series was patch tested in 1013 patients. The most frequent allergens in men, women, children, and retired people were Evernia prunastri (16%), geraniol (16.6%), isoeugenol (17.9%), and geraniol (22.4%), respectively. Citral (20.5%) and hydroxyisohexyl 3-cyclohexene carboxaldehyde (HICC) (14.5%) were the most common allergens in occupational eczemas and were also associated with a large proportion of hand and facial dermatitis. CONCLUSIONS: Frequency of sensitization to the individual fragrances of FM I and FM II varies with age, sex, affected body region, and history of occupational or atopic dermatitis.


Subject(s)
Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/epidemiology , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/etiology , Odorants , Adult , Age of Onset , Child , Dermatitis, Atopic/epidemiology , Dermatitis, Atopic/etiology , Dermatitis, Occupational/epidemiology , Dermatitis, Occupational/etiology , Facial Dermatoses/epidemiology , Facial Dermatoses/etiology , Female , Hand Dermatoses/etiology , Humans , Leg Dermatoses/epidemiology , Leg Dermatoses/etiology , Male , Patch Tests/methods , Retrospective Studies , Spain/epidemiology
2.
Contact Dermatitis ; 80(2): 94-100, 2019 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30430587

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Fragrance chemicals constitute the second most frequent cause of contact allergy in Spain. There are no data available concerning the individual fragrances that are most frequently involved. OBJECTIVES: To describe the diagnostic contribution provided by specific fragrance series to the results obtained with baseline series fragrance markers by correlating the results of both series. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a 5-year retrospective study of fragrance marker-positive patients tested with specific fragrance series in 23 Spanish centres. We collected the demographic and clinical characteristics, and compared the results of patch tests obtained from different suppliers. RESULTS: Of 19 588 patients patch tested with the Spanish baseline series, 1590 (8.1%) reacted positively to a fragrance marker. Of these, 1013 (63.7%) were patch tested with a fragrance series, and 664 patients reacted positively to at least one individual fragrance other than hydroxyisohexyl 3-cyclohexene carboxaldehyde. Geraniol was the most frequent allergen. Positive reactions to substances not included in fragrance mix (FM) I or FM II were found in 230 patients. Of the 436 FM I-positive patients and the 419 FM II-positive patients, 184 (42%) and 64 (39.1%), respectively, had no positive reactions to fragrance series. In the case of FM I, negative results were more common when individual fragrances were patch tested at low concentrations. CONCLUSIONS: We recommend patch testing all patients positive for any fragrance marker with a specific fragrance series. The correlation between the results of baseline series and fragrance series could be improved by increasing the concentrations of individual fragrances.


Subject(s)
Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/epidemiology , Dermatitis, Occupational/epidemiology , Facial Dermatoses/epidemiology , Hand Dermatoses/epidemiology , Leg Dermatoses/epidemiology , Perfume/adverse effects , Acyclic Monoterpenes , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Aldehydes/adverse effects , Anti-Infective Agents/adverse effects , Coumarins/adverse effects , Cyclohexenes/adverse effects , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/etiology , Dermatitis, Occupational/etiology , Eugenol/adverse effects , Eugenol/analogs & derivatives , Facial Dermatoses/etiology , Farnesol/adverse effects , Female , Hand Dermatoses/etiology , Humans , Leg Dermatoses/etiology , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Middle Aged , Monoterpenes/adverse effects , Myroxylon/adverse effects , Patch Tests , Propanols/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Spain/epidemiology , Terpenes/adverse effects
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL