ABSTRACT
This work explores the challenges of delivering medical care in the geographically dispersed and resource-constrained environment of Distributed Maritime Operations (DMO) and Expeditionary Advanced Base Operations (EABO). Traditional medical planning approaches may struggle to adapt to the vast operational space, extended evacuation times, and limited medical force present in these scenarios. The concept of a Medical Common Operating Picture (COP) emerges as a potential solution. By providing a shared view of the medical situation across the theater, encompassing logistics, personnel, and patient data, a medical COP has the potential to facilitate medical command and control (MED C2) in DMO/EABO. The implementation of a medical COP has the potential to optimize resource allocation, enhance situational awareness, streamline medical evacuation, and reduce healthcare provider moral injury in large-scale combat operations. A medical COP will allow medical planners to make informed decisions on triage, resupply, and evacuation, ensuring the best use of limited medical resources. This is done by leveraging a comprehensive understanding of the medical landscape, enabling informed clinical and operational decision-making by humanitarian and combat personnel respectively. A fully realized medical COP system will enable a dynamic theater evacuation policy, balancing the conflicting needs of patient care at higher echelons with the operational expediency of returning servicemembers to their operational units, thereby maximizing evacuation effectiveness. It will further enable medical personnel to perform dynamic casualty triage based on operational realities, mitigating potential ethical dilemmas. Implementing such a medical COP system will require overcoming communication limitations to facilitate data exchange and potentially integrating clinical decision support tools for real-time data analysis and recommendations. It will also require the rapid adoption of modernized operational medicine documentation solutions by medical assets within the operational forces. Ultimately, this work suggests that a medical COP has the potential to bridge the gap between traditional medical planning and the unique demands of DMO/EABO, ultimately optimizing casualty care, maximizing resource efficiency, and preserving the fighting force.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Introduction: Medical readiness is an integral component of total readiness and a prime indicator of an individual's overall fitness to deploy. Promoting medical readiness is the prime directive for military medical departments; however, there are few studies evaluating specific factors of care delivery that will improve medical readiness. In this study, we evaluated one of the common patient perceptions that access to routine and specialty care will have a positive effect on military medical readiness. Surprisingly, there appeared to be a reverse relationship between a patient's perception of access to care and the correlation to their medical readiness. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study uses the Joint Outpatient Experience Survey data of Army active duty soldiers (December 2017 through May 2018) to investigate the relationship between access to care and medical readiness. Medical readiness scores were examined a month before and a month after a medical encounter. Medical Readiness Categories (MRC) were collected from the Army Medical Operational Data System Mainframe. Respondents of the survey were matched to MRC data. Comparisons were made using chi-square tests and Wilcoxon rank-sum non-parametric tests to determine whether there were differences in readiness and patient experience ratings before and after the encounter. Logistic regressions were also conducted to predict the odds of non-readiness based on the type of health care visit. RESULTS: Soldiers who were medically non-ready were more likely to be above age 35 years or have specialty care encounters. Results indicated those meeting all medical readiness requirements or having minor medical issues that could be resolved quickly, generally rated access to care slightly lower compared to those who were medically non-ready. Musculoskeletal Injuries (MSKIs) are the leading cause of medical non-readiness. As a result, this study explored access to care for MSKIs. Although there were no statistical differences in access ratings for those with MSKIs compared to those without MSKIs, there were statistically significant differences in self-reported health. Individuals with MSKIs tended to report poorer health status. Those with specialty care visits had 1.79 times significantly greater odds (p is less than .05) of being non-medically ready compared to those with primary care. For visits related to MSKI (e.g., physical medicine, orthopedic, or chiropractic etc.), those with an orthopedic or occupational therapy visit had 1.25 and 1.59 significantly greater odds (p is less than .05) of being considered not medically ready compared to all other MSKI related visits before the encounter. However, after the encounter, those with orthopedic care had significantly higher odds of improved readiness. CONCLUSIONS: Findings from this study help contextualize who is considered medically non-ready as well as differences in access to care experiences for this group. The lowest scoring areas for improving access to care include ease of making appointment, time between scheduling an appointment and the visit, and being seen past the scheduled time. Given that musculoskeletal injuries tend to require long term specialized treatments such as physical and occupational therapy, findings from the logistic regressions suggest that access and adherence to such treatments, particularly for orthopedic care, are helpful in improving medical readiness.