ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Esophagectomies are known to be technically challenging operations that create significant physiologic changes. These patients often require assisted care postoperatively that necessitates a nonhome discharge. The purpose of this study was to assess factors associated with nonhome discharge after esophagectomy for neoplastic disease. METHODS: The 2016 to 2017 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Esophagectomy database was queried to identify patients who underwent esophagectomy for a neoplasm. Patients were excluded if they died within 30 days of their operation, the index operation was considered emergent, or had missing data for the variables of interest. Multivariable analysis was performed to identify which factors were predictive of nonhome discharge. RESULTS: One thousand seven patients were included. Of those, 121 (12.0%) had a nonhome discharge. Multivariable analysis showed that the following factors were associated with nonhome discharge: Modified Charlson comorbidity index (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.04; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.49-2.86), partially dependent preoperative functional status (aOR, 13.18; 95% CI, 1.07-315.67), urinary tract infection (aOR, 5.25; 95% CI, 1.32-20.41), and length of stay (aOR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.08-1.16). CONCLUSIONS: We identified various factors associated with nonhome discharge. Early identification of patients who are at risk for nonhome discharge is important for early discharge planning, which may decrease nonmedical delays and healthcare costs.
Subject(s)
Esophageal Neoplasms/surgery , Esophagectomy/methods , Patient Discharge/trends , Aged , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Patient Readmission/trends , Postoperative Period , Retrospective Studies , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Chest computed tomography (CCT) is a method of screening for intrathoracic injuries in hemodynamically stable patients with penetrating thoracic trauma. The objective of this study was to examine the changes in utilization of CCT over time and evaluate its contribution to guiding therapeutic intervention. METHODS: A level 1 trauma center registry was queried between 2006 and 2011. Patients undergoing CCT in the emergency department after penetrating thoracic trauma as well as patients undergoing thoracic operations for penetrating thoracic trauma were identified. Patient demographics, operative indications, use of CCT, injuries, and hospital admissions were analyzed. RESULTS: In all, 617 patients had CCTs performed, of whom 61.1% (371 of 617) had a normal screening plain chest radiograph (CXR). In 14.0% (51 of 371) of these cases, the CCT revealed findings not detected on screening CXR. The majority of these injuries were occult pneumothoraces or hemothoraces (84.3%; 43 of 51), of which 27 (62.8%) underwent tube thoracostomy. In only 0.5% (2 of 371), did the results of CCT alone lead to an operative indication: exploration for hemopericardium. The use of CCT in our patients significantly increased overall (28.8% to 71.4%) as well as after a normal screening CXR (23.3% to 74.6%) over the study period. CONCLUSIONS: The use of CCT for penetrating thoracic trauma increased 3.5-fold during the study period with a concurrent increase in findings of uncertain clinical significance. Patients with a normal screening CXR should be triaged with 3-hour delayed CXR, serial physical examinations, and focused assessment with sonography for trauma; and CCT should only be used selectively as a diagnostic modality.
Subject(s)
Mass Screening , Thoracic Injuries/diagnostic imaging , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/statistics & numerical data , Wounds, Penetrating/diagnostic imaging , Adolescent , Adult , Diagnostic Errors , Emergency Service, Hospital , Female , Hemothorax/diagnostic imaging , Hemothorax/surgery , Humans , Male , Pericardial Effusion/diagnostic imaging , Pericardial Effusion/surgery , Pneumothorax/diagnostic imaging , Pneumothorax/surgery , Predictive Value of Tests , Registries , Thoracic Injuries/surgery , Thoracostomy , Trauma Centers , Utilization Review/statistics & numerical data , Wounds, Penetrating/surgery , Young AdultABSTRACT
We report a case of a rare, large mediastinal liposarcoma diagnosed in a 74-year-old woman after a syncopal episode. Chest roentgenogram and computed tomographic scan showed a large mass occupying most of the right chest and abutting the great vessels and pericardium. A thoracoscopic approach was used for exploration and surgical excision of this large mediastinal mass. Despite the large size of the mass, the thoracoscopic approach offered excellent visualization of all the mass attachments and required only a small extension of the access incision for tumor removal. The mass was a well-differentiated liposarcoma, which was completely resected with clear margins. The patient remains disease-free almost 3 years after the resection.
Subject(s)
Liposarcoma/surgery , Mediastinal Neoplasms/surgery , Thoracoscopy/methods , Aged , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Liposarcoma/diagnosis , Mediastinal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Severity of Illness Index , Tomography, X-Ray ComputedABSTRACT
We have developed a way to measure performance during a camera-guided rigid bronchoscopy using manikin-based simulation. In an effort to measure contact pressures within the airway during a rigid bronchoscopy, we instrumented pressure sensors in a commercially available bronchoscopy task trainer. Participants were divided into two groups based on self-reported levels of expertise: novice (none to minimal experience in rigid bronchoscopy) and experts (moderate to extensive experience). There was no significant difference between experts and novices in the time taken to complete the rigid bronchoscopy. However, novices touched a greater number of areas than experts, showing that novices induce a higher number of unnecessary soft-tissue contact compared to experts. Moreover, our results show that experts exert significantly less soft tissue pressure compared to novices.
Subject(s)
Bronchoscopy/education , Bronchoscopy/methods , Computer-Assisted Instruction/methods , Models, Biological , Professional Competence , Surgery, Computer-Assisted/methods , User-Computer Interface , Computer Simulation , Humans , Teaching/methods , United StatesABSTRACT
We set out to perform resection of a chest wall mass with subsequent reconstruction using a pure thoracoscopic approach. Using video-assisted thoracic surgery via a three-incision approach, we successfully removed an 8.5 × 3.5-cm specimen en bloc. We then reconstructed the chest wall with 2-mm polytetrafluoroethylene. A total thoracoscopic approach to chest wall resection and reconstruction represent an additional option in this area of thoracic surgery. This approach avoids some of the drawbacks of more invasive procedures. This report outlines a totally thoracoscopic approach that we feel represents a safe and viable option for patients requiring chest wall resection and reconstruction.
ABSTRACT
Acute development of superior vena cava syndrome is unusual. This report describes a patient who suddenly presented with a superior vena cava obstruction after esophageal and tracheal stenting for a malignant tracheoesophageal fistula. Stenting of the superior vena cava rapidly alleviated the obstruction and resulted in resolution of symptoms.
Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma/complications , Lung Neoplasms/complications , Stents , Superior Vena Cava Syndrome/therapy , Tracheoesophageal Fistula/therapy , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Superior Vena Cava Syndrome/etiology , Tracheoesophageal Fistula/etiologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common sarcoma of the gastrointestinal tract, but occur rarely in the esophagus. Use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors has revolutionized therapy for GISTs but complete resection remains the treatment of choice. Esophageal GISTs require special consideration regarding perioperative treatment, evaluation, and conduct of operation. METHODS: We report our experience (from 2000 to 2003) with four patients who underwent resection of esophageal GIST, reviewed consensus management guidelines, and performed a literature review for reported cases. Query of the National Cancer Database was made to assess national experience with esophageal GISTs. RESULTS: All four patients had esophageal GISTs successfully differentiated from leiomyomata by immunohistochemistry on fine needle aspirates obtained during endoscopic ultrasound. At the time of resection all tumors were noted to be adherent to tissues other than submucosa that required resection of esophageal muscularis, periesophageal tissue, or mucosa. All patients were thought to have complete resection and were alive at last contact (median, 33 months). Two of four patients recurred, one of whom underwent esophagectomy; the other patient is alive on imatinib. Seven case reports with median follow-up of three years reported no recurrence with either enucleation or esophagectomy. The National Cancer Database contains 33 cases of esophageal GIST reported since 1999. Nine of 24 patients died within six months of diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Esophagectomy is the treatment of choice for esophageal GISTs but requires attention to operative details that emphasize complete en bloc excision of surrounding tissue. Preoperative imatinib may improve resectability.