Use of the intramuscular route to administer pentamidine isethionate in Leishmania guyanensis cutaneous leishmaniasis increases the risk of treatment failure.

BACKGROUND: New world cutaneous leishmaniasis (NWCL) can be found in French Guiana as well as in several other parts of Central and South America. Leishmania guyanensis accounts for nearly 90% of cases in French Guiana and is treated with pentamidine isethionate, given by either intramuscular or intravenous injection. The military population is particularly exposed due to repeated missions in the rainforest. The purpose of the present study was to identify the factors associated with pentamidine isethionate treatment failure in a series of service members with L. guyanensis NWCL acquired in French Guiana. METHOD: All the French service members reported as having acquired leishmaniasis in French Guiana from December 2013 to June 2016 were included. RESULTS: Seventy-three patients infected with L. guyanensis were included in the final analysis. Patients treated with IV pentamidine isethionate had better response rates than those treated with IM pentamidine isethionate (p = 0.002, adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 0.15, 95% CI [0.04-0.50]). The rate of treatment success was 85.3% (95% CI [68.9-95.0]) for IV pentamidine isethionate and 51.3% (95% CI [34.8-67.6]) for IM pentamidine isethionate. CONCLUSIONS: The use of intramuscular pentamidine isethionate in the treatment of Leishmania guyanensis cutaneous leishmaniasis is associated with more treatment failures than intravenous pentamidine isethionate.

Adverse events following pandemic influenza vaccine Pandemrix® reported in the French military forces--2009-2010.

BACKGROUND: In the face of the A(H1N1) 2009 influenza pandemic, in October 2009 the French military health service (SSA) initiated a large vaccination campaign with Pandemrix(®) vaccine in the military forces. The aim of this study was to describe vaccine adverse events (VAE) reported during this campaign. METHODS: VAE and the number of people vaccinated were surveyed by the SSA Epidemiological network across all military forces during the campaign, from October 2009 to April 2010. For each case, a notification form was completed, providing patient and clinical information. Three types of VAE were considered: non-serious, serious and unexpected. RESULTS: There were 315.4 reported VAE per 100,000 vaccinations. Vaccination and VAE incidence rate peaks coincided with influenza epidemic peak in early December. The number of injected doses was 49,138, corresponding to a 14.5% vaccination coverage among military personnel, and 155 VAE were reported, including 5 serious VAE (1 Guillain-Barre syndrome, 2 malaises and 1 convulsive episode). Most VAE were non-serious (97.1%). Among these, 6 cases of local, rapidly regressive paresthesia were observed. DISCUSSION: The military VAE surveillance system constitutes the only observatory on benign VAE in France. The reporting rate was much higher after the pandemic vaccine than after the seasonal vaccine, which may be a reflection of stimulated reporting. This report provides a useful description of VAE among military personnel during a mass emergency vaccination program, showing that the tolerance of the pandemic vaccine appeared acceptable.