Preoperative psychological factors influence analgesic consumption and self-reported pain intensity following breast cancer surgery.

BACKGROUND: Psychological factors such as anxiety and mood appear to influence acute postoperative pain; however, there is conflicting evidence on the relationship between preoperative psychological parameters and the severity of postoperative pain. In the context of the stressful setting of initial surgery for breast cancer, we conducted a prospective observational study of patients who were scheduled to undergo initial breast cancer surgery. METHODS: The objectives were to examine the potential associations between predefined preoperative psychological parameters and (i) Self-reported pain scores at discharge from the postoperative acute care unit, (ii) Cumulative perioperative opioid consumption at four hours postoperatively and (iii) Self-reported pain as measured during the first seven days after surgery. Patients completed the following questionnaires during the three hours prior to surgery: the Spielberger State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI State and Trait), the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), the Cohen Stress Questionnaire (CSQ), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS A and D), and the short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire. Postoperative pain experience was assessed using patient self-reports of pain (SF Magill Pain questionnaire on discharge from the postanaesthesia care unit and a pain diary for seven days postoperatively) and records of analgesic consumption. RESULTS: Pre- to postoperative self-reported pain was significantly different with respect to the STAI State, Cohen score and PCS for both low and high values (p < 0.001), but only patients categorized as having low STAI Trait, HADS A, and HADS D values achieved significant differences (p < 0.001). A significant positive correlation was demonstrated between preoperative state anxiety (STAI) and the most severe pain reported during the first seven days postoperatively (r = 0.271, p = 0.013). Patients who were categorized preoperatively as having a "high value" for each of the psychological parameters studied (HADS A and D, STAI State and Trait and PCS) tended to have greater perioperative opioid consumption (up to four hours postoperatively); this trend was statistically significant for HADS D and HADS A only. Using a linear regression model, state anxiety was found to be a significant predictor of postoperative pain based on self-reports during the first seven postoperative days (standardized ß = 0.271, t = 2.286, p = 0.025). CONCLUSION: Preoperative state anxiety, in particular, is associated with the severity of postoperative pain experienced by women undergoing initial breast cancer surgery. Formal preoperative assessment of anxiety may be warranted in this setting with a view to optimize perioperative analgesia and wellbeing.

Prone positioning for mechanically ventilated patients with coronavirus disease 2019: the experience of an Irish regional hospital intensive care unit.

BACKGROUND: The benefits of prone positioning in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) have been known for many years. While some controversy exists regarding whether coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia should be treated with the same therapeutic strategies as for non-COVID ARDS, the Surviving Sepsis Campaign still provide a weak recommendation to utilise prone positioning in this setting. AIMS: The aims of this study are to ascertain if prone positioning improves oxygenation significantly in mechanically ventilated patients with severe COVID-19 ARDS and to describe the feasibility of frequent prone positioning in an Irish regional hospital intensive care unit (ICU) with limited prior experience. METHODS: In this retrospective, observational cohort study, we investigate if the PaO2/FiO2 ratio and ventilatory ratio improve during and following prone positioning, and whether this improvement correlates with patient baseline characteristics or survival. RESULTS: Between March 2020 and 2021, 12 patients underwent prone positioning while mechanically ventilated for severe COVID ARDS. Sixty-six percent were male, mean age 60.9 (± 10.5), mean BMI 33.5 (± 6.74) and median APACHE II score on admission to ICU was 10.5 (7.25-16.3). Further, 83% were proned within 24 h of being intubated due to refractory hypoxaemia. PaO2/FiO2 ratio improved from 11.6 kPa (9.80-13.8) to 15.80 kPa (13.1-19.6) while prone, p < 0.0001. CONCLUSIONS: We found prone positioning to be a safe method of significantly improving oxygenation in mechanically ventilated patients with severe COVID-19 ARDS. We did not find a relationship between patient baseline characteristics nor illness severity and degree of PaO2/FiO2 ratio improvement, nor did we find a relationship between degree of PaO2/FiO2 ratio improvement and survival.