Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
Perfusion ; 35(3): 202-208, 2020 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31402782

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Gaseous microemboli that originate from the cardiopulmonary bypass circuit may contribute to adverse outcome after cardiac surgery. We prospectively evaluated the influence of gaseous microemboli on the release of various biomarkers after use of a minimally invasive extracorporeal technology system. METHODS: In 70 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting with minimized cardiopulmonary bypass, gaseous microemboli were measured intraoperatively with a bubble counter. Intra- and postoperative biomarker levels for inflammatory response (interleukin-6, C5b-9), endothelial damage (von Willebrand factor, soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule-1), oxidative stress (malondialdehyde, 8-isoprostane, neuroketal), and neurological injury (neuron-specific enolase, brain-type fatty acid-binding protein) were analyzed using immune assay techniques. The relationship between gaseous microemboli number or volume and the incremental area under the curve (iAUC24h) or peak change for the biomarkers was calculated. RESULTS: All biomarkers except for malondialdehyde increased at least temporarily after coronary artery bypass grafting with a minimally invasive extracorporeal technology system. The median total gaseous microemboli number was 6,174 (interquartile range: 3,507-10,531) and the median total gaseous microemboli volume was 4.31 µL (interquartile range: 2.71-8.50). There were no significant correlations between total gaseous microemboli number or volume and iAUC24h or peak change for any of the biomarkers. After controlling for the variance of possible other predictor variables, multiple linear regression analysis showed no association between gaseous microemboli parameters and release of biomarkers. CONCLUSION: This study showed no evidence that gaseous microemboli contribute to increased biomarker levels after coronary artery bypass grafting with cardiopulmonary bypass. A reason for the absence of damage by gaseous microemboli may be the relative and considerably small amount of gaseous microemboli entering the patients in this study.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers/blood , Cardiopulmonary Bypass/methods , Gases/metabolism , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Prospective Studies
2.
Perfusion ; 33(1): 16-24, 2018 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28766987

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Gaseous microemboli (GME) introduced during cardiac surgery are considered as a potential source of morbidity, which has driven the development of the first bubble counters. Two new generation bubble counters, introduced in the early 2000s, claim correct sizing and counting of GME. This in-vitro study aims to validate the accuracy of two bubble counters using monodisperse bubbles in a highly controlled setting at low GME concentrations. METHODS: Monodisperse GME with a radius of 43 µm were produced in a microfluidic chip. Directly after their formation, they were injected one-by-one into the BCC200 and the EDAC sensors. GME size and count, measured with the bubble counters, were optically verified using high-speed imaging. RESULTS: During best-case scenarios or low GME concentrations of GME with a size of 43 µm in radius in an in-vitro setup, the BCC200 overestimates GME size by a factor of 2 to 3 while the EDAC underestimates the average GME size by at least a factor of two. The BCC200 overestimates the GME concentration by approximately 20% while the EDAC overestimates the concentration by nearly one order of magnitude. Nevertheless, the calculated total GME volume is only over-predicted by a factor 2 since the EDAC underestimates the actual GME size. For the BCC200, the total GME volume was over-predicted by 25 times due to the over-estimation of GME size. CONCLUSIONS: The measured errors in the absolute sizing/counting of GME do not imply that all results obtained using the bubble counters are insignificant or invalid. A relative change in bubble size or bubble concentration can accurately be measured. However, care must be taken in the interpretation of the results and their absolute values. Moreover, the devices cannot be used interchangeably when reporting GME activity. Nevertheless, both devices can be used to study the relative air removal characteristics of CPB components or for the quantitative monitoring of GME production during CPB interventions.


Subject(s)
Cardiac Surgical Procedures/methods , Cardiopulmonary Bypass/methods , Embolism, Air/etiology , Equipment Design/methods , Humans
3.
Artif Organs ; 41(11): 997-1003, 2017 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28741663

ABSTRACT

Recently, an oxygenator with an integrated centrifugal blood pump (IP) was designed to minimize priming volume and to reduce blood foreign surface contact even further. The use of this oxygenator with or without integrated arterial filter was compared with a conventional oxygenator and nonintegrated centrifugal pump. To compare the air removal characteristics 60 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting were alternately assigned into one of three groups to be perfused with a minimized extracorporeal circuit either with the conventional oxygenator, the oxygenator with IP, or the oxygenator with IP plus integrated arterial filter (IAF). Air entering and leaving the three devices was measured accurately with a bubble counter during cardiopulmonary bypass. No significant differences between all groups were detected, considering air entering the devices. Our major finding was that in both integrated devices groups incidental spontaneous release of air into the arterial line in approximately 40% of the patients was observed. Here, detectable bolus air (>500 µm) was shown in the arterial line, whereas in the minimal extracorporeal circulation circuit (MECC) group this phenomenon was not present. We decided to conduct an amendment of the initial design with METC-approval. Ten patients were assigned to be perfused with an oxygenator with IP and IAF. Importantly, the integrated perfusion systems used in these patients were flushed with carbon dioxide (CO2 ) prior to priming of the systems. In the group with CO2 flush no spontaneous air release was observed in all cases and this was significantly different from the initial study with the group with the integrated device and IAF. This suggests that air spilling may be caused by residual air in the integrated device. In conclusion, integration of a blood pump may cause spontaneous release of large air bubbles (>500 µm) into the arterial line, despite the presence of an integrated arterial filter. CO2 flushing of an integrated cardiopulmonary bypass system prior to priming may prevent spontaneous air release and is strongly recommended to secure patient safety.


Subject(s)
Carbon Dioxide , Cardiopulmonary Bypass/instrumentation , Catheters , Coronary Artery Bypass , Embolism, Air/prevention & control , Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation/instrumentation , Heart-Assist Devices , Oxygenators , Perfusion/instrumentation , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cardiopulmonary Bypass/adverse effects , Coronary Artery Bypass/adverse effects , Embolism, Air/diagnosis , Embolism, Air/etiology , Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Perfusion/adverse effects , Prosthesis Design , Treatment Outcome
4.
J Thromb Thrombolysis ; 44(1): 14-18, 2017 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28534102

ABSTRACT

Postoperative stroke and encephalopathy are potentially serious complications associated with coronary artery bypass grafting. In this case report a 78-year-old male patient receiving routine elective cardiac surgery presented with microaggregations in the sublingual microcirculation while on cardiopulmonary bypass that was undetected by routine intraoperative anticoagulation assessment. Microaggregates identified using video microscopy on his sublingual microcirculation during the procedure preceded a stroke postoperatively. Postoperative cerebral and carotid artery examination with computed tomography scanning revealed a left watershed cerebral infarct with carotid stenosis. This report presents intraoperative microcirculation-based evidence suggesting that observations of microaggregations, otherwise undetected by conventional anticoagulation assessment techniques, could serve as an early warning in elderly patients at high risk for postoperative cerebrovascular events.


Subject(s)
Carotid Stenosis , Cerebral Infarction , Coronary Artery Bypass/adverse effects , Microcirculation , Mouth Floor , Postoperative Complications/diagnostic imaging , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Aged , Carotid Stenosis/diagnostic imaging , Carotid Stenosis/etiology , Cerebral Infarction/diagnostic imaging , Cerebral Infarction/etiology , Humans , Male , Microscopy, Video , Mouth Floor/blood supply , Mouth Floor/diagnostic imaging
5.
Perfusion ; 32(2): 118-125, 2017 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27516417

ABSTRACT

Gaseous microemboli (GME) may originate from the extracorporeal circuit and enter the arterial circulation of the patient. GME are thought to contribute to cerebral deficit and to adverse outcome after cardiac surgery. The arterial filter is a specially designed component for removing both gaseous and solid microemboli. Integration of an arterial filter with an oxygenator is a contemporary concept, reducing both prime volume and foreign surface area. This study aims to determine the air-handling properties of four contemporary oxygenator devices with an integrated arterial filter. Two oxygenator devices, the Capiox FX25 and the Fusion, showed significant increased volume of GME reduction rates (95.03 ± 3.13% and 95.74 ± 2.69%, respectively) compared with both the Quadrox-IF (85.23 ± 5.84%) and the Inspire 6F M (84.41 ± 12.93%). Notably, both the Quadrox-IF and the Inspire 6F M as well as the Capiox FX 25 and the Fusion showed very similar characteristics in volume and number reduction rates and in detailed distribution properties. The Capiox FX25 and the Fusion devices showed significantly increased number and volume reduction rates compared with the Quadrox-IF and the Inspire 6F M devices. Despite the large differences in design of all four devices, our study results suggest that the oxygenator devices can be subdivided into two groups based on their fibre design, which results in screen filter (Quadrox-IF and Inspire 6F M) and depth filter (Capiox FX25 and Fusion) properties. Depth filter properties, as present in the Capiox FX25 and Fusion devices, reduced fractionation of air and may ameliorate GME removal.


Subject(s)
Cardiopulmonary Bypass/instrumentation , Embolic Protection Devices , Embolism, Air/prevention & control , Oxygenators , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Arteries/surgery , Cardiopulmonary Bypass/adverse effects , Embolism, Air/etiology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Oxygenators/adverse effects , Prospective Studies
6.
ASAIO J ; 62(4): 421-6, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26919180

ABSTRACT

During cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), gaseous microemboli (GME) are released into the patients' arterial bloodstream. Gaseous microemboli may contribute to the adverse outcome after cardiac surgery. Recently, two oxygenator models with or without integrated arterial filter (IAF) were designed and only differ in size, leading to a change of 20% in surface area of the hollow fibers and 25% in blood velocities. The aim of this study was to assess the air removal characteristics of the inspire oxygenators with or without IAF. Sixty-eight patients were randomly assigned to four different groups: optimized adult and full adult and an additional IAF. Gaseous microemboli reduction rates were measured with a bubble counter. The number of GME reduction rates showed no differences. However, both models reduced significantly less volume of GME (optimized adult: 40.6% and full adult: 50.3%) compared with both models with IAF (88.7% and 88.5%, respectively). No significant differences of reduction rates were found between both devices without IAF and also not between both models with IAF. In conclusion, the larger inspire oxygenator tends to remove more GME. No effect from size of oxygenator device with integrated screen filter on GME reduction was observed. The inspire oxygenators with IAF may be considered as an adequate GME filter.


Subject(s)
Cardiopulmonary Bypass/adverse effects , Embolism, Air/prevention & control , Oxygenators , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Arteries , Female , Filtration , Humans , Male , Middle Aged
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...