Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
Neurophysiol Clin ; 52(4): 333-338, 2022 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35945094

ABSTRACT

We compared the effects of one versus two daily sessions of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (a-tDCS) delivered to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) for 10 days in a cohort of 30 women (mean age 28.0±6.92) with chronic migraine (CM, disease duration: 37.8±48.41 month). Participants were randomly allocated to three groups: a-tDCS 1-s Group received one daily a-tDCS session; a-tDCS 2-s Group received two daily a-tDCS sessions; Group SHAM received one daily session with a simulated (placebo) current. All participants were assessed before, after and one month after treatment, using the Migraine Disability Assessment, Montreal Cognitive Assessment, d2 Test of Attention, Trail Making Test (part B), Sequence of Letters and Numbers of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale - III, and Nine Hole Peg Test. We found no difference between groups in the cognitive measures and motor dexterity. However, after treatment, a significant decrease in migraine-related disability was found for the a-tDCS 1-s Group. For all variables, no cumulative effects were observed in a-tDCS 2-s compared to the a-tDCS 1-s Group. The study findings provide preliminary results for future clinical trials designed to compare different intervals between tDCS sessions in CM.


Subject(s)
Migraine Disorders , Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation , Adult , Cognition/physiology , Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex , Female , Humans , Migraine Disorders/therapy , Pain , Prefrontal Cortex/physiology , Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation/methods , Young Adult
2.
Sci Rep ; 12(1): 1440, 2022 01 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35087138

ABSTRACT

Neuropathic pain after brachial plexus injury (NPBPI) is a highly disabling clinical condition and is increasingly prevalent due to increased motorcycle accidents. Currently, no randomized controlled trials have evaluated the effectiveness of non-invasive brain stimulation techniques such as repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and transcranial direct-current stimulation (tDCS) in patients suffering from NPBPI. In this study, we directly compare the efficacy of 10-Hz rTMS and anodal 2 mA tDCS techniques applied over the motor cortex (5 daily consecutive sessions) in 20 patients with NPBPI, allocated into 2 parallel groups (active or sham). The order of the sessions was randomised for each of these treatment groups according to a crossover design and separated by a 30-day interval. Scores for "continuous" and "paroxysmal" pain (primary outcome) were tabulated after the last stimulation day and 30 days after. Secondary outcomes included the improvement in multidimensional aspects of pain, anxiety state and quality of life from a qualitative and quantitative approach. Active rTMS and tDCS were both superior to sham in reducing continuous (p < 0.001) and paroxysmal (p = 0.002; p = 0.02) pain as well as in multidimensional aspects of pain (p = 0.001; p = 0.002) and anxiety state (p = < 0.001; p = 0.005). Our results suggest rTMS and tDCS are able to treat NPBPI with little distinction in pain and anxiety state, which may promote the use of tDCS in brachial plexus injury pain management, as it constitutes an easier and more available technique.Clinical Trial Registration: http://www.ensaiosclinicos.gov.br/, RBR-5xnjbc - Sep 3, 2018.


Subject(s)
Anxiety/therapy , Brachial Plexus/injuries , Neuralgia/therapy , Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation/methods , Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation/methods , Adult , Anxiety/etiology , Anxiety/psychology , Cross-Over Studies , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Male , Neuralgia/diagnosis , Neuralgia/etiology , Neuralgia/psychology , Pain Management/methods , Pain Measurement/statistics & numerical data , Pilot Projects , Placebos , Quality of Life , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
3.
Sci Rep ; 10(1): 18955, 2020 11 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33144646

ABSTRACT

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) has been used as an alternative treatment for pain reduction in fibromyalgia. In this study, in addition to behavioral measures, we analyzed oscillations in alpha 2 frequency band in the frontal, occipital, and parietal regions, in response to the application of two neuromodulation protocols in fibromyalgia. The study was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial with 31 women diagnosed with fibromyalgia. The participants were allocated to three groups with the anodic stimulation applied on the left motor cortex: Group 1, for five consecutive days; Group 2, for 10 consecutive days; and Group 3, sham stimulation for five consecutive days. Statistical analysis showed a reduction in pain intensity after treatment for groups in general [F (1.28) = 8.02; p = 0.008; η2 = 0.223], in addition to a reduction in alpha 2 in the frontal (p = 0.039; d = 0.384) and parietal (p = 0.021; d = 0.520) regions after the treatment on five consecutive days. We conclude that neuromodulation protocols produced similar effects on pain reduction, but differed with respect to the changes in the alpha 2 frequency band in the frontal and parietal regions.


Subject(s)
Fibromyalgia/therapy , Pain/prevention & control , Adult , Deep Brain Stimulation , Double-Blind Method , Electric Stimulation , Electric Stimulation Therapy/methods , Electroencephalography , Electrophysiology , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Neurosciences , Pain Management/methods
4.
Front Aging Neurosci ; 10: 334, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30450044

ABSTRACT

Despite advances in the treatment of Alzheimer's disease (AD), there is currently no prospect of a cure, and evidence shows that multifactorial interventions can benefit patients. A promising therapeutic alternative is the use of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) simultaneously with cognitive intervention. The combination of these non-pharmacological techniques is apparently a safe and accessible approach. This study protocol aims to compare the efficacy of tDCS and cognitive intervention in a double-blind, randomized and factorial clinical trial. One hundred participants diagnosed with mild-stage AD will be randomized to receive both tDCS and cognitive intervention, tDCS, cognitive intervention, or placebo. The treatment will last 8 weeks, with a 12-month follow-up. The primary outcome will be the improvement of global cognitive functions, evaluated by the AD Assessment Scale, cognitive subscale (ADAS-Cog). The secondary outcomes will include measures of functional, affective, and behavioral components, as well as a neurophysiological marker (Brain-derived neurotrophic factor, BDNF). This study will enable us to assess, both in the short and long term, whether tDCS is more effective than the placebo and to examine the effects of combined therapy (tDCS and cognitive intervention) and isolated treatments (tDCS vs. cognitive intervention) on patients with AD. Clinical Trial Registration: www.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT02772185-May 5, 2016.

5.
J Neurol Sci ; 378: 225-232, 2017 Jul 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28566169

ABSTRACT

Although transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) represents a therapeutic option for the prophylaxis of chronic migraine, the target area for application of the electrical current to the cortex has not yet been well established. Here we sought to determine whether a treatment protocol involving 12 sessions of 2mA, 20min anodal stimulation of the left primary motor (M1) or dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) could offer clinical benefits in the management of pain from migraine. Thirteen participants were assessed before and after treatment, using the Headache Impact Test-6, Visual Analogue Scale and Medical Outcomes Study 36 - Item Short - Form Health Survey. After treatment, group DLPFC exhibited a better performance compared with groups M1 and sham. On intragroup comparison, groups DLPFC and M1 exhibited a greater reduction in headache impact and pain intensity and a higher quality of life after treatment. No significant change was found in group sham. The participants in group M1 exhibited more adverse effects, especially headache, heartburn, and sleepiness, than did those in the other two groups. Transcranial direct current stimulation is a safe and efficacious technique for treating chronic migraine. However, it should be kept in mind that the site of cortical stimulation might modulate the patient's response to treatment.


Subject(s)
Migraine Disorders/therapy , Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation , Adult , Analgesics/therapeutic use , Chronic Disease , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , International Cooperation , Male , Migraine Disorders/physiopathology , Migraine Disorders/psychology , Motor Cortex , Pain Measurement , Pilot Projects , Prefrontal Cortex , Quality of Life , Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation/adverse effects , Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation/methods
6.
Trials ; 16: 435, 2015 Sep 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26420269

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Stroke patients may present severe cognitive impairments, primarily related to executive functions. Transcranial direct current stimulation has shown promising results, with neuromodulatory and neuroplastic effects. This study is a double-blind, sham-controlled clinical trial aiming to compare the long-term effects of stimulation in two different cognitive regions after a stroke. METHODS/DESIGN: Sixty patients who suffer from chronic strokes will be randomized into one of four groups: dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, cingulo-opercular network, motor primary cortex and sham stimulation. Each group will receive transcranial direct current stimulation at an intensity of 2 mA for 20 minutes daily for 10 consecutive days. Patients will be assessed with a Dysexecutive Questionnaire, Semantic Fluency Test, categorical verbal fluency and Go-no go tests, Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale, Rey Auditory-Verbal Learning Test, Letter Comparison and Pattern Comparison Tasks at baseline and after their tenth stimulation session. Those who achieve clinical improvement with neurostimulation will be invited to receive treatment for 12 months as part of a follow-up study. DISCUSSION: Long-term stimulation could be analyzed in regard to possible adaptive changes on plasticity after structural brain damage and if these changes are different in terms of clinical improvement when applied to two important cognitive centers. TRIALS REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02315807 . 9 December 2014.


Subject(s)
Cerebral Cortex/physiopathology , Cognition Disorders/rehabilitation , Cognition , Stroke Rehabilitation , Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Brazil , Clinical Protocols , Cognition Disorders/diagnosis , Cognition Disorders/physiopathology , Cognition Disorders/psychology , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neuropsychological Tests , Recovery of Function , Research Design , Stroke/diagnosis , Stroke/physiopathology , Stroke/psychology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Time Factors , Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...