Use of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors and risk of COVID-19 requiring admission to hospital: a case-population study.

BACKGROUND: Concerns have been raised about the possibility that inhibitors of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) could predispose individuals to severe COVID-19; however, epidemiological evidence is lacking. We report the results of a case-population study done in Madrid, Spain, since the outbreak of COVID-19. METHODS: In this case-population study, we consecutively selected patients aged 18 years or older with a PCR-confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 requiring admission to hospital from seven hospitals in Madrid, who had been admitted between March 1 and March 24, 2020. As a reference group, we randomly sampled ten patients per case, individually matched for age, sex, region (ie, Madrid), and date of admission to hospital (month and day; index date), from Base de datos para la Investigación Farmacoepidemiológica en Atención Primaria (BIFAP), a Spanish primary health-care database, in its last available year (2018). We extracted information on comorbidities and prescriptions up to the month before index date (ie, current use) from electronic clinical records of both cases and controls. The outcome of interest was admission to hospital of patients with COVID-19. To minimise confounding by indication, the main analysis focused on assessing the association between COVID-19 requiring admission to hospital and use of RAAS inhibitors compared with use of other antihypertensive drugs. We calculated odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs, adjusted for age, sex, and cardiovascular comorbidities and risk factors, using conditional logistic regression. The protocol of the study was registered in the EU electronic Register of Post-Authorisation Studies, EUPAS34437. FINDINGS: We collected data for 1139 cases and 11 390 population controls. Among cases, 444 (39·0%) were female and the mean age was 69·1 years (SD 15·4), and despite being matched on sex and age, a significantly higher proportion of cases had pre-existing cardiovascular disease (OR 1·98, 95% CI 1·62-2·41) and risk factors (1·46, 1·23-1·73) than did controls. Compared with users of other antihypertensive drugs, users of RAAS inhibitors had an adjusted OR for COVID-19 requiring admission to hospital of 0·94 (95% CI 0·77-1·15). No increased risk was observed with either angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (adjusted OR 0·80, 0·64-1·00) or angiotensin-receptor blockers (1·10, 0·88-1·37). Sex, age, and background cardiovascular risk did not modify the adjusted OR between use of RAAS inhibitors and COVID-19 requiring admission to hospital, whereas a decreased risk of COVID-19 requiring admission to hospital was found among patients with diabetes who were users of RAAS inhibitors (adjusted OR 0·53, 95% CI 0·34-0·80). The adjusted ORs were similar across severity degrees of COVID-19. INTERPRETATION: RAAS inhibitors do not increase the risk of COVID-19 requiring admission to hospital, including fatal cases and those admitted to intensive care units, and should not be discontinued to prevent a severe case of COVID-19. FUNDING: Instituto de Salud Carlos III.

Effect of Polymorphisms in CYP2C9 and CYP2C19 on the Disposition, Safety and Metabolism of Progesterone Administrated Orally or Vaginally.

INTRODUCTION: Exogenous progesterone is prescribed for a variety of conditions with endogenous progesterone deficiency, e.g. menstrual alterations, primary or secondary infertility or premenopause. To the best of our knowledge, no pharmacogenetic studies have been published in relation to exogenous progesterone pharmacokinetic safety or progesterone metabolites so far. METHODS: Candidate-gene study where we evaluated whether five single-nucleotide polymorphisms (CYP2C9*2, *3, CYP2C19*2, *3 and *17) were related to the pharmacokinetics, safety and metabolism of progesterone in 24 healthy volunteers who received a 200-mg progesterone formulation either orally or vaginally. RESULTS: The vaginal formulation had an average AUCt value approximately 18 times greater than the oral formulation. CYP2C19 intermediate metabolizers (IM) consistently showed higher adjusted AUCt and adjusted Cmax than extensive metabolizers (EM) (P < 0.05); CYP2C9 EM incongruently exhibited higher adjusted Cmax and longer half-life than IM (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: This is the first study that reports variability in progesterone disposition according to the CYP2C19 and CYP2C9 phenotype. We suggest that CYP2C19 may condition progesterone disposition and that it may be more relevant than CYP2C9. This study lays the foundations for further in-depth research to evaluate the pharmacogenetics of progesterone. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EudraCT numbers are 2012-005105-43 and 2012-005011-10.

Truncated AUC in the evaluation of fluconazole bioequivalence. A cross-over, randomised, open-label study in healthy volunteers.

The bioequivalence of two capsule formulations (test and reference) containing 200 mg fluconazole (CAS 86386-73-4) was assessed in 24 healthy volunteers in an open, randomised, crossover, 2 periods x 2 sequences single dose study with a minimum washout period of 14 days. Plasma samples were obtained over 168 h (at baseline, 1 h, 2 h, 2.5 h, 3 h, 3.5 h, 4 h, 5 h, 6 h, 8 h, 12 h, 24 h, 48 h, 72 h, 120 h and 168 h after administration) and fluconazole concentrations were determined by means of an HPLC-WV method (limit of quantification: 0.2 microg/mL). Pharmacokinetic parameters used for bioequivalence assessment (AUClast, AUCinf and Cmax) were determined from the fluconazole concentration data using non-compartmental analysis. The results showed that all 90% confidence intervals (obtained by ANOVA) were 100.89-110.24 for Cmax, 99.07-107.35 for AUClast and 95.42-105.17 for AUCinf, that is, all within the predefined ranges. Furthermore AUCs truncated at 24, 48, 72 and 120 h were also within the 80-125% range. It may be therefore concluded that the evaluated formulations are bioequivalent in terms of rate and extent of absorption.