Impact of filgotinib on pain control in the phase 3 FINCH studies.

OBJECTIVE: This post hoc analysis of the FINCH 1-3 (NCT02889796, NCT02873936 and NCT02886728) studies assessed specific effects of filgotinib on pain control and their relationship with other aspects of efficacy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Assessments included: residual pain responses of ≤10 and ≤20 mm on a 100 mm visual analogue scale (VAS); the proportion of patients who achieved VAS pain responses in addition to remission or low disease activity by Disease Activity Score-28 with C-reactive protein (DAS28-CRP) or Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) criteria. RESULTS: Across studies, filgotinib reduced pain from week 2, with responses sustained throughout the studies. In FINCH 1, at week 24, 35.8%, 25.0%, 24.6% and 11.6% of patients in the filgotinib 200 mg, filgotinib 100 mg, adalimumab and placebo arms (each plus methotrexate) achieved VAS pain ≤20 mm in addition to DAS28-CRP remission; 26.3%, 17.9%, 17.2% and 7.6% achieved VAS pain ≤10 mm in addition to DAS28-CRP remission. A similar pattern was seen for CDAI remission. Time during which VAS pain was ≤10 or ≤20 mm was longest with filgotinib 200 mg and comparable between adalimumab and filgotinib 100 mg. Similar findings were reported for filgotinib in FINCH 2 and 3. CONCLUSION: In all RA populations studied, pain improvements occurred from week 2 and were sustained over time. In FINCH 1, filgotinib 100 mg provided similar pain amelioration to adalimumab, whereas filgotinib 200 mg resulted in greater pain improvement and higher proportion of patients with residual pain ≤10 or ≤20 mm and meeting DAS28-CRP remission criteria.

A 24-Week, Phase IIa, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of Ziritaxestat in Early Diffuse Cutaneous Systemic Sclerosis.

OBJECTIVE: We undertook this study to explore the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of ziritaxestat, a selective autotaxin inhibitor, in patients with early diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis (dcSSc). METHODS: NOVESA was a 24-week, multicenter, phase IIa, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Adults with dcSSc were randomized to oral ziritaxestat 600 mg once daily or matching placebo. The primary efficacy end point was change from baseline in modified Rodnan skin score (MRSS) at week 24. Secondary end points assessed safety and tolerability; other end points included assessment of skin and blood biomarkers. Patients in NOVESA could enter a 104-week open-label extension (OLE). RESULTS: Patients were randomized to ziritaxestat (n = 21) or placebo (n = 12). Reduction in MRSS was significantly greater in the ziritaxestat group versus the placebo group (-8.9 versus -6.0 units, respectively; P = 0.0411). Placebo patients switching to ziritaxestat in the OLE showed similar reductions in MRSS to those observed for ziritaxestat patients in the parent study. Ziritaxestat was well tolerated; the most frequent treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events were headache and diarrhea. Circulating lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) C18:2 was significantly reduced, demonstrating ziritaxestat target engagement, and levels of fibrosis biomarkers were reduced in the blood. No differentially expressed genes were identified in skin biopsies. Significant changes in 109 genes were identified in blood samples. CONCLUSION: Ziritaxestat resulted in significantly greater reduction in MRSS at week 24 than placebo; no new safety signals emerged. Biomarker analysis suggests ziritaxestat may reduce fibrosis. Modulation of the autotaxin/LPA pathway could improve skin involvement in patients with dcSSc. A plain language summary is provided in the Supplementary Material, available on the Arthritis & Rheumatology website at https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/art.42477.

MANTA and MANTA-RAy: Rationale and Design of Trials Evaluating Effects of Filgotinib on Semen Parameters in Patients with Inflammatory Diseases.

INTRODUCTION: The phase 2 MANTA and MANTA-RAy studies were developed in consultation with global regulatory authorities to investigate potential impacts of filgotinib, a Janus kinase 1 preferential inhibitor, on semen parameters in men with active inflammatory diseases. Here we describe the methods and rationale for these studies. METHODS AND RATIONALE: The MANTA and MANTA-RAy studies included men (aged 21-65 years) with active inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and rheumatic diseases, respectively. Participants had no history of reproductive health issues, and the following semen parameter values (≥ 5th percentile of World Health Organization reference values) at baseline: semen volume ≥ 1.5 mL, total sperm/ejaculate ≥ 39 million, sperm concentration ≥ 15 million/mL, sperm total motility ≥ 40% and normal sperm morphology ≥ 30%. Each trial included a 13-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled period (filgotinib 200 mg vs placebo, up to N = 125 per arm), for pooled analysis of the week-13 primary endpoint (proportion of participants with ≥ 50% decrease from baseline in sperm concentration). All semen assessments were based on two samples (≤ 14 days apart) to minimize effects of physiological variation; stringent standardization processes were applied across assessment sites. From week 13, MANTA and MANTA-RAy study designs deviated owing to disease-specific considerations. All subjects with a ≥ 50% decrease in sperm parameters continued the study in the monitoring phase until reversibility, or up to a maximum of 52 weeks, with standard of care as treatment. Overall conclusions from MANTA and MANTA-RAy will be based on the totality of the data, including secondary/exploratory measures (e.g. sperm motility/morphology, sex hormones, reversibility of any effects on semen parameters). CONCLUSIONS: Despite the complexities, the MANTA and MANTA-RAy studies form a robust trial programme that is the first large-scale, placebo-controlled evaluation of potential impacts of an advanced IBD and rheumatic disease therapy on semen parameters. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EudraCT numbers 2017-000402-38 and 2018-003933-14; ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers NCT03201445 and NCT03926195.

Filgotinib is a treatment for patients with ulcerative colitis and rheumatoid arthritis, and is being studied in other inflammatory diseases. Filgotinib works by blocking Janus kinase 1, an intracellular protein involved in inflammatory signalling processes. We designed the MANTA and MANTA-RAy trials with global health agencies to find out if filgotinib decreases the quality of semen in men with active inflammatory bowel disease (ulcerative colitis or Crohn's disease) (MANTA) or rheumatic disease (rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis or non-radiographic axial spondylitis) (MANTA-RAy). This paper describes the design of the two trials.Patients had normal sperm measurements and could not have had previous reproductive health issues. Nearly 250 patients were included in each trial. In both MANTA and MANTA-RAy, half of the patients were treated with 200 mg of filgotinib once a day for 13 weeks, and the other half with placebo. We determined if any patients had a decrease in number of sperm cells per millilitre (sperm concentration) by at least half after 13 weeks of treatment. We then monitored any patients who had such a decrease in sperm concentration for up to 52 weeks (while they received standard of care treatment) or until the decrease was reversed.The conclusions from the trials will be in a different paper and will be based on all the final data, including changes in sex hormones. This is the first large-scale clinical trial programme to measure the effect of a treatment on sperm in men with inflammatory bowel disease or rheumatic diseases.

Evaluation of disease-mediated therapeutic protein-drug interactions between an anti-interleukin-6 monoclonal antibody (sirukumab) and cytochrome P450 activities in a phase 1 study in patients with rheumatoid arthritis using a cocktail approach.

This therapeutic protein-drug interaction study evaluated the disease-mediated effect of sirukumab (anti-interleukin 6 [anti-IL-6] monoclonal antibody) on the pharmacokinetics of the cytochrome P450 (CYP) probe substrates midazolam (CYP3A), omeprazole (CYP2C19), warfarin (CYP2C9), and caffeine (CYP1A2) in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Twelve patients with C-reactive protein (CRP) ≥ 8.0 mg/L at screening received oral administration of a CYP probe cocktail consisting of 0.03 mg/kg midazolam, 10 mg warfarin + 10 mg vitamin K (equivalent to 5 mg S-warfarin), 20 mg omeprazole, and 100 mg caffeine 1 week before and 1, 3, and 6 weeks after a single subcutaneous dose of 300 mg sirukumab. The results showed that the pharmacokinetics of midazolam, omeprazole, and S-warfarin were nonequivalent before and after the administration of a single dose of 300 mg sirukumab. Area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC0- ∞ ) for midazolam, omeprazole, and S-warfarin was reduced by 30%-35%, 37%-45%, and 18%-19%, respectively, after sirukumab administration. Caffeine AUC0-∞ was increased by 20%-34% after sirukumab administration. The effect of sirukumab on CYP substrates was sustained for at least 6 weeks. No new adverse drug reactions related to the administration of sirukumab were observed in this study. These results suggest that sirukumab may reverse IL-6-mediated suppression of CYP3A, CYP2C9, and CYP2C19 activities in patients with active RA.

A phase 1, randomized study to assess the pharmacokinetic comparability of siltuximab derived from two different cell lines in healthy subjects.

Siltuximab, a monoclonal antibody (mAb) against interleukin (IL-6), is under development by Janssen Research & Development, LLC. During early clinical development, siltuximab was produced in a murine Sp2/0 myeloma cell line. The production cell line was switched to stably transfected Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cell line for subsequent clinical development. A two-part, parallel-group, phase 1 study was designed to evaluate the safety and pharmacokinetics (PK) of a single IV administration of Sp2/0- and CHO-derived siltuximab in healthy subjects. The results from this study demonstrated PK comparability of siltuximab produced from Sp2/0 and CHO cell lines. The 90% confidence interval of the ratios of geometric means of Cmax and AUC0-84day following 1.4 mg/kg doses was (99.4%, 111.3%) and (98.1%, 109.6%), respectively, both within the pre-specified comparability range of 80-125%. Siltuximab derived from either the Sp2/0 or CHO cell lines was in general well tolerated and was not found to be immunogenic in this study.

Phase I, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multiple intravenous, dose-ascending study of sirukumab in cutaneous or systemic lupus erythematosus.

OBJECTIVE: We undertook a 2-part, phase I, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the safety and pharmacokinetics of multiple intravenous infusions of sirukumab, a human anti-interleukin-6 monoclonal antibody, in patients with cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) or systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). METHODS: In part A, patients with histologically confirmed CLE were randomized to 4 infusions of placebo or 1, 4, or 10 mg/kg sirukumab every 2 weeks. In part B, SLE patients diagnosed according to American College of Rheumatology criteria with a score of 5-12 on the Safety of Estrogens in Lupus Erythematosus National Assessment version of the SLE Disease Activity Index were randomized to 4 infusions of placebo or 10 mg/kg sirukumab every 2 weeks. RESULTS: We treated 31 CLE patients (23 with sirukumab, 8 with placebo) and 15 SLE patients (10 with sirukumab, 5 with placebo). Adverse events (AEs) occurred more often with sirukumab than placebo in CLE patients (91% versus 63%) and in SLE patients (90% versus 80%). Sirukumab led to sustained, dose-independent decreases in white blood cell counts, absolute neutrophil counts (neutropenia), and platelet counts (thrombocytopenia) and to minor elevations in total cholesterol levels. The majority of infections were mild respiratory infections. which were reported similarly across CLE cohorts but more often in sirukumab-treated than in placebo-treated SLE patients. Two serious AEs of infection occurred (pneumonia in the 10 mg/kg-treated group and iatrogenic wound infection in the 4 mg/kg-treated group). Sirukumab showed linear pharmacokinetics in CLE patients. Systemic exposure and half-life were comparable between CLE and SLE patients. No patient developed antibodies to sirukumab through 22 weeks. C-reactive protein and serum amyloid A mean concentrations were suppressed with sirukumab from week 1 to week 14. CONCLUSION: Treatment with intravenous sirukumab infusions was generally well tolerated in both CLE and SLE patients with mild, stable, active disease. Sirukumab demonstrated linear pharmacokinetics over the dose range studied and comparable systemic exposure and half-life in CLE and SLE patients.

Effects of subcutaneous and intravenous golimumab on inflammatory biomarkers in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: results of a phase 1, randomized, open-label trial.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of the anti-TNF-α monoclonal antibody golimumab, administered by s.c. injection or i.v. infusion, on markers of inflammation in patients with RA. METHODS: In this phase 1, open-label study, patients with active RA were randomized to receive s.c. golimumab 100 mg at baseline and every 4 weeks through week 20 (n = 33; group 1) or i.v. golimumab 2 mg/kg at baseline and week 12 (n = 16; group 2). Serum levels of CRP, IL-6, serum amyloid A (SAA), TNF receptor II (TNFRII), MMP-3, hyaluronic acid, haptoglobin, ferritin and haemoglobin and serum/urine hepcidin were measured at various time points. Associations between the biomarkers were assessed with Spearman's correlations. RESULTS: In both groups 1 and 2, decreases in mean serum levels of CRP, IL-6, SAA, TNFRII, MMP-3, haptoglobin, ferritin and hepcidin, and mean urine levels of hepcidin occurred within 1 week and were sustained through week 8. Decreases in concentrations of serum CRP, IL-6, SAA, MMP-3, hepcidin, ferritin and haptoglobin and urine hepcidin were maintained through week 24 in group 1, but began to reverse after week 8 in group 2. Among all patients, decreases in serum hepcidin correlated significantly with decreases in serum CRP and ferritin. CONCLUSION: Decreases in serum and urine concentrations of markers of inflammation occurred as early as 24 h after treatment with golimumab, and most of these improvements were sustained through week 24 in group 1.

Pharmacokinetics and safety of sirukumab following a single subcutaneous administration to healthy Japanese and Caucasian subjects.

OBJECTIVE: Sirukumab (CNTO 136) is a human mAb with high affinity and specificity for binding to interleukin-6. This Phase 1 study evaluated the pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity, safety, and tolerability of sirukumab following a single subcutaneous (s.c.) administration in healthy male Japanese and Caucasian subjects. METHODS: Japanese and Caucasian subjects were randomized to placebo or 25, 50, or 100 mg sirukumab. Blood samples were collected to measure serum sirukumab concentration and antibodies to sirukumab. Noncompartmental analysis and population pharmacokinetic modeling were conducted to characterize sirukumab pharmacokinetics. Adverse events were monitored at each visit. RESULTS: 25 Japanese and 24 Caucasian subjects received sirukumab and were included in the pharmacokinetic evaluation. Mean Cmax and AUC0-∞of sirukumab increased in an approximately dose-proportional manner in both Japanese and Caucasian subjects. Median tmax was 3 -5 days after s.c. administration of sirukumab. Mean t1/2 was 15 -16 days in Japanese and 15 -18 days in Caucasian subjects. A one-compartment population pharmacokinetic model adequately described sirukumab pharmacokinetics following s.c. administration. The estimated population means for CL/F, V/F, and Ka were 0.54 ±0.03 l/day, 12.2 ±0.55 l, and 0.77 ±0.07 day-1, respectively. Race was not a significant covariate on CL/F or V/F. No subject was positive for antibodies to sirukumab. Adverse events were generally mild and did not appear to be dose-related or lead to study discontinuation. CONCLUSIONS: Sirukumab pharmacokinetics following subcutaneous administration was linear at doses ranging 25 -100 mg and was comparable between Japanese and Caucasian subjects. A single subcutaneous administration of 25, 50, or 100 mg sirukumab appeared to be well tolerated by both Japanese and Caucasian healthy male subjects.

Asenapine Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics After Single and Multiple Doses in Healthy Volunteers.

This double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study is the first in healthy volunteers to describe the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of sublingual asenapine at therapeutic dosages. After a 2-day placebo run-in phase, healthy male volunteers received placebo or asenapine escalated to dosages of 3, 5, 10, or 15 mg bid. Another group received single doses (2 and 5 mg) 1 week apart. Serial blood samples were obtained for pharmacokinetic analysis. The single asenapine doses and multiple bid doses up to 10 mg were well tolerated. The most frequent treatment-emergent adverse events were somnolence, oral paresthesia, fatigue, headache, dizziness, and dyspnea. Clinically relevant abnormalities or trends in laboratory and vital signs measures, physical examinations, or electrocardiograms were not observed. Asenapine was rapidly absorbed, with a tmax of ∼1 hour, and was biphasically eliminated with a terminal elimination half-life of 20 to 30 hours. In the range of 3 to 10 mg bid, increases in plasma concentrations were less than dose proportional. Asenapine appears to be well tolerated at single doses up to 5 mg and multiple doses up to 10 mg bid and can be administered to healthy volunteers in clinical pharmacology studies using the dosing regimens described.

Golimumab pharmacokinetics after repeated subcutaneous and intravenous administrations in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and the effect of concomitant methotrexate: an open-label, randomized study.

BACKGROUND: The pharmacokinetics of golimumab, a human monoclonal antibody that inhibits the activity of tumor necrosis factor α, after a single subcutaneous (SC) or intravenous (IV) administration have been previously studied. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to assess the pharmacokinetics of golimumab after multiple SC or IV administrations in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The effect of concomitant methotrexate (MTX) use on golimumab pharmacokinetics was evaluated. METHODS: In this open-label, randomized, Phase I study, 49 adult patients with RA received SC golimumab 100 mg (n = 33) every 4 weeks through week 20 or IV golimumab 2 mg/kg (n = 16) at weeks 0 and 12. Serial blood samples were collected, and serum golimumab concentration was measured with an electrochemiluminescent immunoassay. Golimumab pharmacokinetic parameters were derived with the use of a noncompartmental analysis. Adverse events were monitored at every visit. RESULTS: The population was predominantly Caucasian (84%) and female (76%), and the median age was 57 years. After SC golimumab administration, the serum golimumab concentration achieved steady state by ∼12 weeks with mean trough serum concentrations ranging from 1.15 to 1.24 µg/mL. After the final 30-minute IV infusion of golimumab 2 mg/kg, the mean (SD) clearance (CL) was 7.5 (2.6) mL/d/kg. The mean terminal half-life after SC and IV administrations was ∼13 days. The mean absolute bioavailability for SC golimumab was estimated to be 53%. The geometric mean of golimumab CL/F in patients with and without concomitant MTX use was 13.9 and 21.2 mL/d/kg, respectively, and the geometric mean ratio of CL/F was 65.5% (90% CI: 45.2%-94.9%, P = 0.06). Golimumab was generally well tolerated. No malignancies or deaths occurred during the study. CONCLUSIONS: Pharmacokinetics of golimumab were consistent after SC or IV administration in this population of patients with RA. Golimumab was well tolerated and no unexpected adverse events were observed in this trial.

Photoprovocation in cutaneous lupus erythematosus: a multicenter study evaluating a standardized protocol.

Photosensitivity is an important and distinguishing sign in various subtypes of cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE); however, it remains poorly defined. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether standardized photoprovocation is a reproducible method to assess photosensitivity in subjects with CLE. A total of 47 subjects with CLE (subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus (SCLE), n=14; discoid lupus erythematosus (DLE), n=20; lupus erythematosus tumidus (LET), n=13) and 13 healthy volunteers underwent photoprovocation at seven European sites. Of these, 22 (47%) subjects (57% SCLE, 35% DLE, and 54% LET) and none of the healthy volunteers developed photoprovoked lesions according to clinical analysis. Of these 22 subjects, 19 (86%) developed lesions that were histopathologically confirmed as specific for lupus erythematosus (LE). In CLE subjects who developed UV-induced lesions, 86% had Fitzpatrick's phototypes I or II, and the mean minimal erythema dose (MED) was significantly lower compared with subjects without UV-induced lesions (P=0.004). No significant differences in photoprovocation results were observed between study sites. Safety parameters showed no clinically meaningful differences between CLE subjects and healthy volunteers after photoprovocation. In conclusion, a standardized, safe, and reproducible protocol for photoprovocation using UVA and UVB radiation induced skin lesions in approximately half of all CLE subjects and showed comparable results across multiple sites. This method may therefore be used for future diagnostic testing and clinical trials.