Preferences about Future Alzheimer's Disease Treatments Elicited through an Online Survey Using the Threshold Technique.

BACKGROUND: Treatments aiming at slowing down the progression of Alzheimer's disease (AD) may soon become available. However, information about the risks that people are willing to accept in order to delay the progression of the disease is limited. OBJECTIVE: To determine the trade-offs that individuals are willing to make between the benefits and risks of hypothetical treatments for AD, and the extent to which these trade-offs depend on individuals' characteristics and beliefs about medicines. DESIGN: Online, cross-sectional survey study. SETTING: Population in the UK. Public link to the survey available at the websites of Alzheimer's Research UK and Join Dementia Research. PARTICIPANTS: Everyone self-reported ≥18 years old was eligible to participate. A total of 4384 people entered the survey and 3658 completed it. MEASUREMENTS: The maximum acceptable risks (MARs) of participants for moderate and severe adverse events in exchange for a 2-year delay in disease progression. The risks were expressed on ordinal scales, from <10% to ≥50%, above a pre-existing risk of 30% for moderate adverse events and 10% for severe adverse events. We obtained the population median MARs using log-normal survival models and quantified the effects of individuals' characteristics and beliefs about medicines in terms of acceleration factors. RESULTS: For the moderate adverse events, 26% of the participants had a MAR ≥50%, followed by 25% of the participants with a MAR of 10 to <20%, giving an estimated median MAR of 25.4% (95% confidence interval [CI] 24.5 to 26.3). For the severe adverse events, 43% of the participants had a MAR <10%, followed by 25% of the participants with a MAR of 10 to <20%, resulting in an estimated median MAR of 12.1% (95%CI 11.6 to 12.5). Factors that were associated with the individuals' MARs for one or both adverse events were age, gender, educational level, living alone, and beliefs about medicines. Whether or not individuals were living with memory problems or had experience as a caregiver had no effect on the MARs for any of the adverse events. CONCLUSION: Trade-offs between benefits and risks of AD treatments are heterogeneous and influenced by individuals' characteristics and beliefs about medicines. This heterogeneity should be acknowledged during the medicinal product decision-making in order to fulfil the needs of the various subpopulations.

The Netherlands Sports Cardiology Map: a step towards sports cardiology network medicine for patient and athlete care.

Sports cardiology is a rapidly evolving subspecialty of cardiology, with a growing demand for expertise. To improve patient care, clinicians, patients, and athletes (recreational to elite) should be able to easily identify specialised care pathways, expertise centres and clinicians with sports cardiology expertise. To this purpose, several international societies and organisations recommend establishing a local and national sports cardiology infrastructure. We therefore aimed to establish The Netherlands Sports Cardiology Map. We conducted a web-based survey, which was published on the Netherlands Society of Cardiology home page (2019-2020) and in which each cardiology department or clinic was asked to provide information on sports cardiology expertise and the current infrastructure. Of the 46 respondent centres, 28 (61%) reported that they had expertise in sports cardiology, of which 22 (79%) had specific expertise in one or more specific types of sports. Integrated multidisciplinary meetings were reported by 43% of the centres (n = 12/28). Only two centres reported ongoing research projects that had been approved by an institutional review board. The Netherlands Sports Cardiology Map is an important step towards improving the existing infrastructure and developing network medicine for sports cardiology.

Return to sports after COVID-19: a position paper from the Dutch Sports Cardiology Section of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology.

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has led to preventive measures worldwide. With the decline of infection rates, less stringent restrictions for sports and exercise are being implemented. COVID-19 is associated with significant cardiovascular complications; however there are limited data on cardiovascular complications and long-term outcomes in both competitive (elite) athletes and highly active individuals. Based on different categories of disease severity (asymptomatic, regional/systemic symptoms, hospitalisation, myocardial damage, and/or myocarditis), in this point-of-view article we offer the (sports) cardiologist or sports physician in the Netherlands a practical guide to pre-participation screening, and diagnostic and management strategies in all athletes >16 years of age after COVID-19 infection.

Reversible cardiac valvular disease in catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome.

Catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome (CAPS) is a severe form of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). It frequently leads to multiorgan failure with an approximate mortality rate of 50%. The heart is involved in about 50% of the patients with CAPS. We report two cases with CAPS and severe heart manifestations, documented by echocardiography. Both women show regression of the valvular regurgitation under treatment. Valve replacement therapy was no longer necessary. In earlier studies and case reports, cardiac valve involvement had been characterised by valve thickening and vegetations. We suppose that (sometimes reversible) microvascular disturbances lead to valvular regurgitation via papillary muscle dysfunction and myocardial stunning.

Effects of altitude on exercise level and heart rate in patients with coronary artery disease and healthy controls.

Background. To evaluate the safety and effects of high altitude on exercise level and heart rate in patients with coronary artery disease compared with healthy controls.Methods. Eight patients with a history of an acute myocardial infarction (ejection fraction >5%) with a low-risk score were compared with seven healthy subjects during the Dutch Heart Expedition at the Aconcagua in Argentina in March 2007. All subjects underwent a maximum exercise test with a cycle ergometer at sea level and base camp, after ten days of acclimatisation, at an altitude of 4200 m. Exercise capacity and maximum heart rate were compared between groups and within subjects.Results. There was a significant decrease in maximum heart rate at high altitude compared with sea level in both the patient and the control group (166 vs. 139 beats/min, p<0.001 and 181 vs. 150 beats/min, p<0.001). There was no significant difference in the decrease of the exercise level and maximum heart rate between patients and healthy controls (-31 vs. -30%, p=0.673).Conclusion. Both patients and healthy controls showed a similar decrease in exercise capacity and maximum heart rate at 4200 m compared with sea level, suggesting that patients with a history of coronary artery disease may tolerate stay and exercise at high altitude similarly to healthy controls. (Neth Heart J 2010;18:118-21.).

Impact of high altitude on echocardiographically determined cardiac morphology and function in patients with coronary artery disease and healthy controls.

AIMS: To evaluate the impact of high altitude on cardiac morphology and function in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and healthy controls. METHODS AND RESULTS: Eight patients with a history of acute myocardial infarction [53 +/- 8 years, left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction 54 +/- 6%] and a low risk score were compared with seven healthy controls (41 +/- 16 years) during the Dutch Heart Expedition 2007 at the Aconcagua (6960 m) in Argentina. An exercise test and echocardiography were performed at sea level and at base camp (4200 m). In the apical four-chamber view, right ventricular (RV) diameter, tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE), early transmitral inflow peak velocity (E), atrial transmitral inflow peak velocity (A), and peak tissue velocity during early diastole (E') were obtained. Changes in global LV function and wall motion score index (WMSI) were used as markers of ischaemia. There were no significant differences in individual global LV function and WMSI at high altitude compared with sea level in both groups. A significant increase in RV diameter was observed in the patient group at 4200 m compared with sea level and a trend towards the same result in the control group. A decrease in TAPSE was observed. Measurements of the E' showed a significant decrease in the LV septum and lateral wall at high altitude compared with sea level in both groups. CONCLUSION: Symptoms and echocardiographic signs of myocardial ischaemia were absent in low-risk patients with a history of CAD during and after exercise up to an altitude of 4200 m. Patients and healthy controls showed comparable changes at high altitude compared with sea level with an increase in RV diameter, a decrease in TAPSE, and decreased E' as early signs of pulmonary hypertension and LV diastolic dysfunction. As these alterations are most likely physiological adaptation to high altitude, the results seem to affirm current guidelines. The safety of expanding previous recommendations to patients with low-risk CAD to an altitude ascent of 4200 m requires confirmation in a larger study with appropriately defined clinical endpoints.