ABSTRACT
Patients with the mesenchymal subtype colorectal cancer (CRC) have a poor prognosis, in particular patients with stroma-rich tumors and aberrant SMAD4 expression. We hypothesized that interactions between SMAD4-deficient CRC cells and cancer-associated fibroblasts provide a biological explanation. In transwell invasion assays, fibroblasts increased the invasive capacity of SMAD4-deficient HT29 CRC cells, but not isogenic SMAD4-proficient HT29 cells. A TGF-ß/BMP-specific array showed BMP2 upregulation by fibroblasts upon stimulation with conditioned medium from SMAD4-deficient CRC cells, while also stimulating their invasion. In a mouse model for experimental liver metastasis, the co-injection of fibroblasts increased metastasis formation of SMAD4-deficient CRC cells (p = 0.02) but not that of SMAD4-proficient CRC cells. Significantly less metastases were seen in mice co-injected with BMP2 knocked-down fibroblasts. Fibroblast BMP2 expression seemed to be regulated by TRAIL, a factor overexpressed in SMAD4-deficient CRC cells. In a cohort of 146 stage III CRC patients, we showed that patients with a combination of high stromal BMP2 expression and the loss of tumor SMAD4 expression had a significantly poorer overall survival (HR 2.88, p = 0.04). Our results suggest the existence of a reciprocal loop in which TRAIL from SMAD4-deficient CRC cells induces BMP2 in fibroblasts, which enhances CRC invasiveness and metastasis.
Subject(s)
Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts/metabolism , Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology , Neoplasm Metastasis , Smad4 Protein/metabolism , Animals , Bone Morphogenetic Protein 2/metabolism , Cell Line , Colorectal Neoplasms/metabolism , Culture Media, Conditioned , HT29 Cells , Humans , Liver Neoplasms/secondary , Male , Mice , Neoplasm Invasiveness , Stromal Cells/metabolism , Survival Rate , TNF-Related Apoptosis-Inducing Ligand/metabolismABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Hospital rooms play an important role in the transmission of several health care-associated pathogens. During the last few years, a number of innovative cleaning-disinfecting products have been brought to market. In this study, commercially available products combining cleaning and disinfection were compared, using 2 different application methods. The aim was to determine which product was most effective in simultaneous cleaning and disinfection of surfaces. METHODS: Seven cleaning-disinfecting wipes and sprays based on different active ingredients were tested for their efficacy in removal of microbial burden and proteins. Efficacy was tested with known Dutch outbreak strains: vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE), Klebsiella pneumoniae OXA-48, or Acinetobacter baumannii. RESULTS: For all bacteria, ready-to-use cleaning-disinfecting products reduced the microbial count with a log10 reduction >5 with a 5-minute exposure time, with the exception of a spray based on hydrogen peroxide. Omitting the aforementioned hydrogen peroxide spray, there were no significant differences between use of a wipe or spray in bacterial load reduction. Using adenosine triphosphate (ATP) measurements, a significant difference in log10 relative light units (RLU) reduction between various bacteria (P ≤ .001) was observed. CONCLUSIONS: In general, a >5 log10 reduction of colony forming units (CFU) for tested wipes and sprays was obtained for all tested bacteria strains, with exception of hydrogen peroxide spray and VRE. Although ATP may show a difference between pre- and postcleaning, RLU reduction does not correlate with actual CFU reductions.