Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Publication year range
1.
Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol (Engl Ed) ; 94(8): 367-376, 2019 Aug.
Article in English, Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31266666

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Fluctuating elevated intraocular pressure (IOP) is one of the complications of an implantable collamer lens (ICL), and its alteration is a predictive factor for the development of glaucoma. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective, cross-sectional analytic study was conducted on patients suitable for ICL implantation. Complete clinical and biometric work-ups were performed, as well as night-time IOP curve, in supine position, with 4 determinations, in order to assess fluctuation, considering abnormal with a value higher than 5 mmHg. Patients underwent surgery with conventional technique and three months after the work-ups were repeated, including a night-time IOP curve to assess any changes in IOP fluctuations. RESULTS: A total of 31 eyes of 16 patients were studied. Mean IOP fluctuation in the preoperative assessment was 3.35 ± 2 mmHg, whereas the postoperative mean was 3.0 ± 2.2 mmHg, with the difference not being statistically significant. Visual acuity and capacity, as well as spheric equivalent did show a statistically significant improvement. There were 6 cases of complications, which were related to a higher vault and a greater ICL size. There was no relationship between these findings and the angle grade, pigment, and the level of training of the surgeon. CONCLUSIONS: The effect of an ICL on IOP fluctuations, has been studied for the first time, which was found to be not statistically significant. As in previous publications, the procedure was safe and reproducible, adding the fact that the level of training of the surgeon is not a determining factor in these findings.


Subject(s)
Intraocular Pressure/physiology , Ocular Hypertension/physiopathology , Phakic Intraocular Lenses/adverse effects , Postoperative Complications/physiopathology , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Glaucoma/etiology , Humans , Lens Implantation, Intraocular/methods , Male , Mexico , Postoperative Period , Preoperative Period , Prospective Studies , Reproducibility of Results , Time Factors , Visual Acuity , Young Adult
2.
Int Ophthalmol ; 33(3): 221-5, 2013 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23154897

ABSTRACT

To compare intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements obtained with Goldmann applanation (GAT) and dynamic contour tonometry (DCT) in a Mexican population. 40 glaucoma patients were included in this cross-sectional observational cohort study. IOP measurements were performed in the following order: DCT, ultrasonic pachymetry and GAT, with a 5-minute difference between each measurement, between 8 am and 2 pm. Only DCT measurements of good quality (Q ≤ 3) were accepted. GAT measurements were made three times with the same Goldmann tonometer, previously checked for calibration errors, and the mean was used for statistical purposes. The IOP (mean [standard deviation], 95 % confidence interval [CI]) measured with the Goldmann tonometer (13.2 [2.4], 12.4-14.0 mmHg) was significantly lower than that obtained with the DCT (18.4 [3.3], 17.0-19.2 mmHg), p < 0.0001. Pearson's correlation coefficients between CCT and IOP measured with GAT and DCT were (r = 0.24, 95 % CI = 0.07-0.52, p = 0.133) and (r = 0.13, 95 % CI = -0.19 to 0.43, p = 0.412), respectively. The concordance correlation coefficient between GAT and DCT was r c = 0.3, 95 % CI = 0.17-0.41). DCT seems to overestimate the IOP as compared to GAT. Additionally, although there was a good correlation between the IOP measurements assessed with either GAT or DCT, the agreement was poor.


Subject(s)
Glaucoma, Open-Angle/physiopathology , Intraocular Pressure/physiology , Tonometry, Ocular/methods , Aged , Cohort Studies , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Mexico , Middle Aged
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL