ABSTRACT
Protein malnutrition causes anemia and leukopenia as it reduces hematopoietic precursors and impairs the production of mediators that regulate hematopoiesis. Hematopoiesis occurs in distinct bone marrow niches that modulate the processes of differentiation, proliferation and self-renewal of hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs). Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) contribute to the biochemical composition of bone marrow niches by the secretion of several growth factors and cytokines, and they play an important role in the regulation of HSCs and hematopoietic progenitors. In this study, we investigated the effect of protein malnutrition on the hematopoietic regulatory function of MSCs. C57BL/6NTaq mice were divided into control and protein malnutrition groups, which received, respectively, a normal protein diet (12% casein) and a low protein diet (2% casein). The results showed that protein malnutrition altered the synthesis of SCF, TFG-ß, Angpt-1, CXCL-12, and G-CSF by MSCs. Additionally, MSCs from the protein malnutrition group were not able to maintain the lymphoid, granulocytic and megakaryocytic-erythroid differentiation capacity compared to the MSCs of the control group. In this way, the comprehension of the role of MSCs on the regulation of the hematopoietic cells, in protein malnutrition states, is for the first time showed. Therefore, we infer that hematopoietic alterations caused by protein malnutrition are due to multifactorial alterations and, at least in part, the MSCs' contribution to hematological impairment.
Subject(s)
Bone Marrow Cells/drug effects , Dietary Proteins/administration & dosage , Hematopoiesis/drug effects , Mesenchymal Stem Cells/metabolism , Protein Deficiency/metabolism , Animals , Bone Marrow Cells/physiology , Coculture Techniques , Culture Media, Conditioned , Hematopoiesis/physiology , Leukocytes, Mononuclear/physiology , Mice , Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-kit/metabolism , RNA/drug effects , RNA/genetics , RNA/metabolismABSTRACT
Erythropoiesis is a complex process that starts in the course of embryo formation and it is maintained throughout the life of an organism. During the fetal development, erythropoiesis arises from different body sites and erythroblast maturation occurs in the fetal liver. After birth, erythropoiesis and erythroblast maturation take place exclusively in the bone marrow, generating a lifetime reservoir of red blood cells (RBCs), which are responsible for transporting oxygen through the bloodstream to tissues and organs. Several transcription factors and cytokines, such as GATA-1, GATA-2, FOG-1 and erythropoietin (EPO), constitute an elaborated molecular network that regulates erythropoiesis as they are involved in the differentiation and maturation of RBCs. The profound understanding of erythropoiesis is fundamental to avoid, treat or even soften the effects of erythropoietic clinical disorders and may be useful to improve patients' well-being.
Subject(s)
Erythropoiesis , Vertebrates/physiology , Age Factors , Animals , Erythropoietin/physiology , Fetus/physiology , Hemoglobins/physiology , Iron/metabolismABSTRACT
Most in vitro assays aim to distinguish sensitizers from non-sensitizers. Few aim to classify sensitizers according to potency. Here, we describe a potential method for classifying sensitizers according to their irritant potency with the aid of in house epidermal equivalents (EE). Sixteen sensitizers were applied topically in a dose response to EE for 24h. The EE-EC(50) value (effective chemical concentration required to reduce cell viability by 50%) and the EE-IL-1α(10)(×) value (chemical concentration which increases IL-1α secretion by 10-fold) were calculated. From 16 sensitizers, EE-EC(50) and/or EE-IL-1α(10×) values were obtained from 12 skin sensitizers. EE-EC(50) and IL-1α(10×) values decreased in proportion to increasing sensitizer potency. The in vitro assay correlated with existing in vivo mouse and human sensitization data (LLNA, HRIPT), and showed low intra- and inter-experimental variability. Additionally DNCB and resorcinol were correctly assessed as extreme and moderate sensitizers using commercial EE (EST1000™ and RHE™). In conclusion, our data supports the view that irritancy may in part be a factor determining sensitizer potency. Since this assay does not distinguish sensitizers from non-sensitizers, its potential application is in a tiered strategy, where Tier 1 identifies sensitizers which may then tested in Tier 2, this assay, which determines sensitizer potency.
