ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Oxygenators, as used in cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) circuits, are components with good air removal properties. However, under some conditions the semipermeable characteristics of hollow fibers allow air to accidentally enter the blood side of the CPB circuit. This may occur when a fluid in motion is stopped suddenly by which the rapid change in momentum may cause a relative negative pressure drop, the so-called hammer effect. The hammer effect is not yet described in literature related to CPB. The aim of this in vitro study was to reproduce the hammer effect. METHODS: The in vitro setup consisted of a CPB circuit with a fully occluded roller pump and one of four test oxygenators. The hammer test was performed by a sudden pump stop. The pressure wave was measured and after the test the residual air present in the oxygenator was forced into the arterial line and measured with a bubble detector. RESULTS: We showed that a sudden pump stop could lead to the hammer effect, represented as a relative negative pressure drop in the arterial line. This hammer effect resulted in air release through the semipermeable fibers as we showed in two of the four tested brands of oxygenators. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the hammer effect may occur before connection of the CPB system to the patient, and this may result in air release into the arterial blood side of the oxygenator. The hammer effect can be caused by clamping of the tubing in combination with a centrifugal pump, or by suddenly stopping the roller pump. With this study we would like to raise awareness of the hammer effect.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: We describe successful aortic arch cannulation and perfusion of a heart donated after circulatory death using the Transmedics Organ Care System™. CASE REPORT: A 47-year old man developed advanced heart failure symptoms after prior mustard operation for transposition of the great arteries. He matched a DCD-donor and required an elongated aorta for implantation due to his altered anatomy. The donor heart was retrieved and successfully perfused via aortic arch cannulation for 4.5 h with satisfactory perfusion parameters. DISUSSION: Although Transmedics advises against aortic arch cannulation due to concerns regarding malperfusion, satisfactory and safe perfusion can be achieved by careful positioning of the heart. Awareness and attention to the occurrence of malperfusion is mandatory, especially during transport, to achieve satisfactory outcome. CONCLUSION: Aortic arch cannulation is feasible without compromising quality of perfusion. This is relevant for patient that require an elongated aorta after surgically corrected congenital heart disease.
