Preferences in Clinical Care of Individuals With Differences of Sex Development.

OBJECTIVES: To identify the most important attributes related to the process of achieving, and outcomes associated with, successful care for differences of sex development (DSD). METHODS: We developed a best-worst scaling survey administered to 520 DSD stakeholders, including individuals or family members of those with DSD, health care specialists, and patient support and advocacy representatives. Fourteen process-related attributes and 16 outcome-related attributes were identified through qualitative research. We estimated relative importance scores and coefficients from regression analysis to understand the relative importance of attributes and conducted latent class analysis to explore heterogeneity in preferences. RESULTS: The 3 most important process attributes were (1) good communication between care team and patient/family, (2) care team educated patient/family about condition, and (3) care team incorporates the values of patient/family. The 3 most important outcome attributes were (1) patient satisfaction, (2) patient mental health, and (3) treatment maintains physical health. Latent class analyses showed that respondents had heterogeneous preferences. For process-related attributes, we identified 3 respondent groups: "Patient autonomy and support" (46% of respondents), "Education and care transitions" (18%), and "Shared decision-making" (36%). For outcome-related attributes, we identified 2 respondent groups: "Preserving function and appearance" (59% of respondents) and "Patient health and satisfaction" (41%). CONCLUSIONS: Outcomes such as patient satisfaction and health were the most important outcome attributes, and good communication and education from the care team were the most important process attributes. Respondents expressed heterogeneous preferences for selected DSD care attributes that providers should consider to improve satisfaction with and quality of DSD care.

Variation in Practice Surrounding Antegrade Colonic Enema Channel Placement.

PURPOSE: Antegrade colonic enemas (ACE) can be an effective management option for defecation disorders and improve quality of life. Best practice regarding channel placement is unclear and variation may exist around preferred initial type of channel, age at placement, and underlying diagnoses. We aimed to describe practice patterns and patient characteristics around ACE channel placement. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter retrospective study of children with an ACE channel cared for at sites participating in the Pediatric Colorectal and Pelvic Learning Consortium (PCPLC) from 2017 to 2022. Kruskal-Wallis test was utilized to test the age at surgery by site with significance level of 0.05. RESULTS: 500 patients with ACE channel were included. 293 (58.6%) patients had their ACE procedure at a PCPLC center. The median age at surgery was 7.6 [IQR 5.3-11.0] years for the overall cohort and 8.1 [IQR 5.3-11.5] years for placement at PCPLC centers. For PCPLC centers, median age at placement varied significantly across centers (p = 0.009). 371 (74.2%) patients received Malone appendicostomy, 116 (23.2%) received cecostomy, and 13 (2.6%) received Neo-Malone appendicostomy. Median age of patients by channel type was 7.7 [IQR 5.3-11.0], 7.5 [IQR 5.7-11.0], and 9.8 [IQR 4.2-11.6] years, respectively. The most common indication for cecostomy was idiopathic/refractory constipation (52.6%), whereas anorectal malformation was the most common indication for Malone (47.2%) and Neo-Malone (61.5%). Among ACE channels placed at PCPLC centers, there was variation across institutions in preferred initial channel type. The 4 highest volume centers favored Malone appendicostomy over cecostomy. CONCLUSION: There is variation in practice of ACE channel placement. At specialty pediatric colorectal centers, age at time of placement and type of channel placed varied across institutions. Further work is needed to better characterize diagnosis- and age-focused patient centered outcomes to clarify recommendations for our patients who benefit from these procedures. TYPE OF STUDY: Retrospective comparative study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Comparison of the PCPLC Database to NSQIP-P: A Patient Matched Comparison of Surgical Complications Following Repair of Anorectal Malformation.

BACKGROUND: Anorectal malformations (ARM) are rare and heterogenous which creates a challenge in conducting research and offering recommendations for best practice. The Pediatric Colorectal and Pelvic Learning Consortium (PCPLC) was formed in 2016 to address this challenge and created a shared national data registry to collect information about pediatric colorectal patients. There has been no external validation of the data collected. We sought to evaluate the database by performing a patient matched analysis comparing 30-day outcomes identified in the PCPLC registry with the NSQIP-P database for patients undergoing surgical repair of ARM. METHODS: Patients captured in the PCPLC database from 2016 to 2021 at institutions also participating in NSQIP-P who underwent ARM repair younger than 12 months old were reviewed for 30-day complications. These patients were matched to their NSQIP-P record using their hospital identification number, and records were compared for concordance in identified complications. RESULTS: A total of 591 patient records met inclusion criteria in the PCPLC database. Of these, 180 patients were also reviewed by NSQIP-P. One hundred and fifty-six patient records had no complications recorded. Twenty-four patient records had a complication listed in one or both databases. There was a 91 % concordance rate between databases. When excluding complications not tracked in the PCPLC registry, this agreement improved to 93 %. CONCLUSION: Including all patients evaluated for this subpopulation, a 91 % concordance rate was observed when comparing PCPLC collected complications to NSQIP-P. Future efforts can focus on further validating the data within the PCPLC for other patient populations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: V.

Rectal Prolapse Following Repair of Anorectal Malformation: Incidence, Risk Factors, and Management.

BACKGROUND: The incidence and optimal management of rectal prolapse following repair of an anorectal malformation (ARM) has not been well-defined. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed utilizing data from the Pediatric Colorectal and Pelvic Learning Consortium registry. All children with a history of ARM repair were included. Our primary outcome was rectal prolapse. Secondary outcomes included operative management of prolapse and anoplasty stricture following operative management of prolapse. Univariate analyses were performed to identify patient factors associated with our primary and secondary outcomes. A multivariable logistic regression was developed to assess the association between laparoscopic ARM repair and rectal prolapse. RESULTS: A total of 1140 patients met inclusion criteria; 163 (14.3%) developed rectal prolapse. On univariate analysis, prolapse was significantly associated with male sex, sacral abnormalities, ARM type, ARM complexity, and laparoscopic ARM repairs (p < 0.001). ARM types with the highest rates of prolapse included rectourethral-prostatic fistula (29.2%), rectovesical/bladder neck fistula (28.8%), and cloaca (25.0%). Of those who developed prolapse, 110 (67.5%) underwent operative management. Anoplasty strictures developed in 27 (24.5%) patients after prolapse repair. After controlling for ARM type and hospital, laparoscopic ARM repair was not significantly associated with prolapse (adjusted odds ratio (95% CI): 1.50 (0.84, 2.66), p = 0.17). CONCLUSION: Rectal prolapse develops in a significant subset of patients following ARM repair. Risk factors for prolapse include male sex, complex ARM type, and sacral abnormalities. Further research investigating the indications for operative management of prolapse and operative techniques for prolapse repair are needed to define optimal treatment. TYPE OF STUDY: Retrospective cohort study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Does presence of a VACTERL anomaly predict an associated gynecologic anomaly in females with anorectal malformations?: A Pediatric Colorectal and Pelvic Learning Consortium Study.

BACKGROUND: VACTERL association is defined by the presence of 3 or more anomalies in any of the following systems: vertebral, anorectal, cardiac, trachea-esophageal, renal, or limb. This study hypothesized that the presence of VACTERL association would correlate with an increased risk of gynecologic anomalies in patients with anorectal malformation (ARM). METHODS: This study is a cross-sectional, retrospective analysis from the prospectively collected, multicenter registry of the Pediatric Colorectal and Pelvic Learning Consortium (PCPLC). The 834 female patients with ARM who were enrolled in the registry by January 1, 2020 were included in this study. The relationship of VACTERL association with presence of a gynecologic anomaly was evaluated with Fisher's exact test. The relationship of each VACTERL system with presence of a gynecologic anomaly was assessed in patients with cloaca, rectovestibular fistulas and rectoperineal fistulas. P-values reported were based on a 2-sided alternative and considered significant when less than 0.05. RESULTS: 834 patients with ARM underwent VACTERL screening and gynecologic evaluation with the three most common subtypes being cloaca (n = 215, 25.8%), rectovestibular fistula (n = 191, 22.9%) and rectoperineal fistula (n = 194, 23.3%). A total of 223 (26.7%) patients with ARM had gynecologic anomalies. VACTERL association was seen in 380 (45.6%) of patients with ARM. Gynecologic anomalies were present in 149 (39.1%) vs. 74 (16.3%) of subjects with vs. without VACTERL association (p < 0.001). VACTERL association did not significantly increase the risk of gynecologic anomaly in patients with cloaca and VACTERL (n = 88, 61.5%) vs. cloaca without VACTERL (n = 39, 54.2% p = 0.308). VACTERL association increased the risk of gynecologic anomalies in patients with rectoperineal fistulas (n = 7, 14.9% vs n = 9, 6.1% p = 0.014) and rectovestibular fistulas (n = 19, 31.1% vs. n = 13, 10.0% p<0.001). In patients with ARM who had a VACTERL association, when one of the associated anomalies was renal, there was an even higher risk of having an associated gynecologic anomaly (n = 138, 44.2% vs. n = 85, 16.3% p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: VACTERL association in patients with rectoperineal and rectovestibular fistulas correlates with an increased risk of gynecologic anomalies. The presence of VACTERL associated findings, especially renal, should prompt a thorough evaluation of the gynecologic system. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III. Retrospective comparative study.

An Alternative Approach to Single-Stage Cloaca Repair: Image-Guided Anorectoplasty with Delayed Vaginoplasty.

BACKGROUND: Cloacal anomalies occur when a fetus's rectum, vagina, and urethra fail to separate and result in 1 common channel at birth. They are commonly managed by complex reconstruction in the first year of life. This manuscript presents an alternative approach to management in patients with absent or nondilated Mullerian structures. CASE: Image-guided, combined endoscopic and laparoscopic surgery (CELS) was used to perform an anorectal pull-through at 5 months of age on a patient with persistent cloaca and no definite vaginal or uterine structures seen on MRI and endoscopy. Urogenital reconstruction is delayed until adolescence. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION: We hypothesize that performing a minimally invasive anorectoplasty on patients with complicated anatomy and low risk for hydrocolpos could potentially result in improved urologic function and better psychosocial outcomes. Delaying vaginoplasty will enable determination of the function of remnant Mullerian structures and allow the patient to direct the augmentation approach.

Defining successful outcomes and preferences for clinical management in differences/disorders of sex development: Protocol overview and a qualitative phenomenological study of stakeholders' perspectives.

INTRODUCTION: Utilizing a qualitative phenomenological design, the Defining Successful Outcomes and Trade-offs study examined stakeholder perspectives regarding optimal healthcare delivery and outcomes for individuals with a difference/disorder of sex development (DSD). OBJECTIVE: We describe study methods and provide an overview of themes and subthemes. STUDY DESIGN: Interviews were conducted with individuals with a DSD (n = 24), parents of those with a DSD (n = 19), healthcare providers (n = 37), and others (n = 30). Primary questions regarding clinical management of patients with DSD were: "What is a successful outcome?" and "How do you achieve it?" RESULTS: Themes included: understanding of DSD diagnosis and self-efficacy in management is necessary but complex; patient and family psychological well-being; support from others versus being stigmatized; affected person experiences physical health and accepts the implications of their condition; complexities in DSD decision making, roles and expectations; and knowledgeable providers and multidisciplinary teams are essential, notwithstanding persisting barriers. Participants recognized competing values potentially forcing trade-offs in decision making. DISCUSSION: Recognition of diverse and sometimes conflicting perspectives regarding optimal pathways of care and outcomes - both within and among those with DSD and their providers -promises to enhance shared decision making. CONCLUSION: Diverse perspectives and perceptions of trade-offs associated with DSD healthcare emphasize the need to tailor care for patients and families.

Perioperative and long-term functional outcomes of neonatal versus delayed primary endorectal pull-through for children with Hirschsprung disease: A pediatric colorectal and pelvic learning consortium study.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: the timing of endorectal pull-through for Hirschsprung disease (HD) is controversial. Neonatal primary endorectal pull-through theoretically prevents preoperative enterocolitis. Delayed primary endorectal pull-through offers the surgeon the benefit of more robust perineal anatomy and allows primary caregivers the time to emotionally process the diagnosis and to gain experience with rectal irrigations. We hypothesized that delayed primary endorectal pull-through would be associated with equivalent perioperative morbidity compared to the neonatal repair and would lead to improved long-term functional outcomes. METHODS: we analyzed all patients in the Pediatric Colorectal and Pelvic Learning Consortium (PCPLC) registry who had a primary endorectal pull-through for HD and at least three-and-one-half years of follow up in a specialty colorectal clinic. We evaluated patient demographics, operative outcomes, perioperative episodes of enterocolitis, and long-term functional outcomes for the neonatal (<31 days) and delayed (≥31 days) pull-through cohorts. RESULTS: eighty-two patients were identified of whom 49 were operated upon in the neonatal period and 33 in a delayed fashion. The median age at operation was 11 days [IQR 7 - 19 days] for the neonatal cohort and 98 days [IQR 61 - 188 days] for the delayed cohort. Thirty-four (69.4%) of the neonatal and 22 (66.7%) of the delayed cohort patients had rectosigmoid transition zones. Four of 49 patients (8.1%) in the neonatal cohort were diagnosed with enterocolitis preoperatively compared to two of 33 (6.0%) in the delayed cohort (p = 0.89). Eighteen of 49 patients (36.7%) in the neonatal cohort and 16 of 33 (48.5%) in the delayed cohort had at least one postoperative episode of enterocolitis (p = 0.38). Fifteen of 49 patients (30.6%) in the neonatal cohort were receiving bowel management for fecal incontinence at most recent follow up compared to five of 33 (15.2%) in the delayed cohort (p = 0.13). CONCLUSION: delayed primary endorectal pull-through offers a safe alternative to operation in the neonatal period and appears to have, at least, equivalent functional outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative study.