Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/adverse effects , Conjunctiva/pathology , Conjunctivitis/chemically induced , Dermatitis, Atopic/drug therapy , Goblet Cells/drug effects , Adult , Biopsy , Conjunctiva/cytology , Conjunctiva/drug effects , Conjunctivitis/diagnosis , Conjunctivitis/pathology , Female , Goblet Cells/metabolism , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Mucus/metabolismABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical outcome and complications of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK), using Descemet-stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK) as a back-up procedure, in the management of Fuchs endothelial dystrophy. DESIGN: Non-randomised prospective clinical study. METHODS: The first fifty consecutive eyes that underwent DMEK, that is, transplantation of an isolated donor Descemet membrane carrying its endothelium, for Fuchs endothelial dystrophy were evaluated. In all eyes, the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) as well as the endothelial cell density (ECD) was measured before and at 6 months after surgery, as clinical outcome parameters. RESULTS: Ten patients required a secondary DSEK for failed DMEK. In the remaining 40 DMEK eyes, 95% had a BCVA of > or = 20/40 (> or = 0.5) and 75% > or = 20/25 (> or = 0.8) at 6 months after surgery. ECD averaged 2618 (+ or - 201) cells/mm(2) before, and 1876 (+ or - 522) cells/mm(2) at 6 months after surgery (n = 35). When the outcomes of DMEK and secondary DSEK procedures were combined, 94% reached a BCVA of > or = 20/40 (> or = 0.5) and 66% > or = 20/25 (> or = 0.8) (n = 47), and ECD averaged 2623 (+ or - 193) cells/mm(2) before, and 1815 (+ or - 578) cells/mm(2) at 6 months after surgery (n = 43). CONCLUSION: With DSEK as a back-up procedure, DMEK may provide relatively quick and complete visual rehabilitation in a majority of patients operated on for Fuchs endothelial dystrophy. Endothelial cell survival may be similar to earlier types of (lamellar) keratoplasty. Early graft detachment was the main complication in this first series of DMEK surgeries for Fuchs endothelial dystrophy.
Subject(s)
Descemet Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty , Fuchs' Endothelial Dystrophy/surgery , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cell Survival , Endothelial Cells/pathology , Endothelium, Corneal/pathology , Female , Fuchs' Endothelial Dystrophy/physiopathology , Graft Rejection , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Visual AcuityABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To compare a new Biopore membrane impression cytology method with the routinely used exfoliative cytology in patients with a melanocytic lesion of the conjunctiva. METHODS: Sixty-eight consecutive patients with a conjunctival melanocytic lesion underwent Biopore membrane impression cytology as well as exfoliative cytology. A histologic sample was also available in 26 cases. All Biopore samples were stained immediately with RAL 555. Both Biopore and exfoliative cytology samples were assessed by two cytopathologists and graded into four different categories of atypia. RESULTS: Twenty-three out of 26 Biopores and 20 out of 24 for the exfoliative smears correlated with the corresponding histologic sample. Biopore cytology resulted in higher numbers of cells with a greater density compared to exfoliative cytology. CONCLUSIONS: Biopore cytology can be used for cytologic sampling of conjunctival melanocytic lesions. Because of the larger amount and higher density of cells obtained with the Biopore membrane, interpretation by a pathologist is easier and faster. Sampling of the fornix, caruncula, and ocular material in children is difficult with the Biopore method, and exfoliative cytology seems to be the favorable test in those situations.
